Comparison of clinical efficacy between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and improved circular hemorrhoidectomy for circular mixed hemorrhoids

Gao Min; Zhu Peng; Tang Yunhao

doi:10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.000935

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparison of clinical efficacy between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and improved circular hemorrhoidectomy for circular mixed hemorrhoids

更新时间：2024-01-17

- Comparison of clinical efficacy between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and improved circular hemorrhoidectomy for circular mixed hemorrhoids
- Journal of Chongqing Medical University Vol. 41, Issue 12, Pages: 1294-1297(2016)
- 作者机构：
  
  重庆医科大学附属第二医院胃肠外科
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.000935
  CLC： R657.18
- Published：2016，
扫描看全文
[1]高敏,朱鹏,唐云昊.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与改良痔环切术治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效比较[J].重庆医科大学学报,2016,41(12):1294-1297.

Gao Min, Zhu Peng, Tang Yunhao. Comparison of clinical efficacy between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and improved circular hemorrhoidectomy for circular mixed hemorrhoids. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 41(12):1294-1297(2016)
[1]高敏,朱鹏,唐云昊.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与改良痔环切术治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效比较[J].重庆医科大学学报,2016,41(12):1294-1297. DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.000935.

Gao Min, Zhu Peng, Tang Yunhao. Comparison of clinical efficacy between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and improved circular hemorrhoidectomy for circular mixed hemorrhoids. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 41(12):1294-1297(2016) DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.000935.

摘要

目的:比较吻合器痔上黏膜环切术（procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids

PPH）与改良痔环切术（improved circular hemorrhoidectomy

ICH）对于环状混合痔的临床疗效。方法:将80例环状混合痔（Ⅲ

Ⅳ

度）患者随机分为实验组（PPH组

40例）和对照组（ICH组

40例）

对手术近、远期疗效

并发症及住院费用等方面进行比较分析。结果:实验组在术中出血量、手术时间、术后住院时间及恢复工作时间、术后疼痛评分、肛门坠胀、尿储留、控便失调方面均少于对照组

治疗费用高于对照组

差异有统计学意义（P

0.05）。2组在术后出血、肛门狭窄、总体有效率、患者满意度方面差异无统计学意义（P

0.05）。随访12个月

实验组4例复发、对照组1例复发

差异无统计学意义（P=0.356）。结论:PPH治疗环状混合痔较改良痔环切术更为简单、安全

是一种微创手术

在控制费用的前提下

PPH值得临床推广应用。

Abstract

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)and improved circular hemorrhoidectomy(ICH)in circular mixed hemorrhoids treatment. Methods:Totally 80 patients with circular mixed hemorrhoids(Ⅲ-Ⅳ)were divided into two groups randomly with 40 patients in each group. The immediate and long-term outcomes

complications and cost were compared. Results:PPH group showed a reduction in blood loss

operating time

postoperative hospital stay

recovery time

the pain score

anus bulge

retention of urine and fecal incontinence

but an increase in cost compared with ICH group;the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative hemorrhage

anorectal stricture

overall efficiency rate and patient satisfaction(P >0.05). After 12 months of follow-up

four cases of recurrence in PPH group and one case in ICH group were observed

with no statistical difference between the two groups(P=0.356). Conclusion:PPH is a simple and safe way for the treatment of circular mixed hemorrhoids

with less trauma and complications and no higher recurrence rate

compared with improved circular hemorrhoidectomy. On the premise of cost control

PPH is worth clinical application.

关键词

吻合器痔上黏膜环切术改良痔环切术环状混合痔临床疗效

Keywords

procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoidsimproved circular hemorrhoidectomycircular mixed hemorrhoidsclinical efficacy

references

Views

116

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Comparison of efficacy and complications of endoscopic surgery through three different approaches in the treatment of thyroid microcarcinoma

Efficacy of systemic anticoagulation combined with endovascular treatment for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis

A randomized comparative study on the effect of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin therapy in urinary tract and genital bacterial infections

A randomized comparative study on the effect of gatifloxacin andciprofloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial infections

Clinical observation of gefitinib combined with Endostar in the first-line treatment of EGFR mutation positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma

Related Author

Ren Junling

Wang Yabing

Liu Sanbao

Xiaoying Bi

Qiang Li

Yongwei Zhang

Xiaobei Liu

Cunxiu Fan

Related Institution

Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery，Yijishan Hospital，The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College

Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery，The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College

Department of Neurology, Changhai Hospital,The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University

Center of Cerebrovascular Disease, Changhai Hospital,The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University

重庆医科大学临床学院感染科

⁰