Zou Qing, Yuan Yefeng, Sun Weiming, et al. Efficacy and safety of agomelatine and SSRIs or SNRIs treating depression:a Meta-analysis. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 42(10):1288-1292(2017)
DOI:
Zou Qing, Yuan Yefeng, Sun Weiming, et al. Efficacy and safety of agomelatine and SSRIs or SNRIs treating depression:a Meta-analysis. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 42(10):1288-1292(2017) DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.000918.
Efficacy and safety of agomelatine and SSRIs or SNRIs treating depression:a Meta-analysis
Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of agomelatine in comparison with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors(SSRIs)and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor(SNRIs)used as anti-depressants in treatment of depressive disorder. Methods:Computer retrieval Cochrane library
Pubmed
Elsevier
CNKI
VIP
CBM
Wan Fang electronic database searches were performed to identify reports of head-to-head randomized controlled trials that have compared agomelatine with SSRIs or SNRIs in terms of efficacy/effectiveness in treating depressive disorder. The clinical trails meet the eligibility criteria for quality evaluation and information were extracted
and the Rev Man 5.2 statistic software was used for Meta analysis. Results:A total of 8 RCTs were enrolled including 2 632 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that agomelatine had higher response rates(RR=1.07
95%CI=1.01 to 1.12
P=0.010)compared with SSRIs and SNRIs. In the remission analysis
remission rates(RR=1.10
95%CI=1.01 to 1.20
P=0.030)were significantly different.Depression scale at the end of the scale and the baseline values was higher than in agomelatine group than in SSRI or SNRI drug groups(MD=0.46
95%CI=-0.13 to 1.05
P=0.130)without significant differences between the two groups. Agomelatine group was superior to SSRIs and SNRIs groups in side effects(RR=0.50
95%CI=0.37 to 0.68
P=0.000). Conclusion:Agomelatine has significantly higher efficacy and lower side effects compared with SSRIs and SNRIs when treating depression. However
this conclusion needs further validation by high quality and large sample RCTs.