Zhao Zhi, Chen Hong, Tan Jixiang, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous and intra-articular sequential application of tranexamic acid during total knee arthroplasty. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 41(2):142-146(2016)
Zhao Zhi, Chen Hong, Tan Jixiang, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous and intra-articular sequential application of tranexamic acid during total knee arthroplasty. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 41(2):142-146(2016) DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.000732.
Efficacy and safety of intravenous and intra-articular sequential application of tranexamic acid during total knee arthroplasty
Objective:To assess the impact of different administration methods of tranexamic acid on total blood loss volume following primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Methods:Totally 70 patients receiving unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomly divided into 3 groups. Tranexamic acid was given intra-articularly at the end of the operation in group A(24 patients)and intravenously as well as intra-articularly in group B(23 patients). Meanwhile
intra-articular injection of saline solution was performed in group C(23 patients). Total blood loss volume
transfusion rate
drainage volume
lower limb diameter(thigh and calf girth)
D-dimer as well as thrombelastogram of 3 groups were measured and compared. Results:Total blood loss volumes were(541±210)
(456±216)ml and(731 ±179) ml for three groups
respectively. Drainage volumes were(104 ±44)
(98 ±48) ml and(160 ±60) ml for each group. Both total blood loss volume and drainage volume were significantly higher in group C than the other two groups(P<0.05)
while no significant difference was demonstrated between group A and group B(P >0.05). For other parameters like transfusion rate
lower limb diameter and deep venous thrombosis rate
no difference was detected among those 3 groups(P >0.05). Conclusion:Sequential application of intra-articular and intravenous tranexamic acid could reduce
though not significantly
blood loss volume and drainage volume than intra-articular injection alone. No significant difference has been found in terms of transfusion rate
lower limb diameter
and deep venous thrombosis rate following two different application methods.