LI Guo,PENG Ya-yong,DAI Zhi-bo.Proximal humeral locking plate combined with allogeneic femoral head structure bone grafting for the treatment of proximal humeral fracture[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2023,32(08):701-703.
LI Guo,PENG Ya-yong,DAI Zhi-bo.Proximal humeral locking plate combined with allogeneic femoral head structure bone grafting for the treatment of proximal humeral fracture[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2023,32(08):701-703. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.11E022172.
Proximal humeral locking plate combined with allogeneic femoral head structure bone grafting for the treatment of proximal humeral fracture
To investigate the clinical effect of proximal humeral locking plate combined with allogeneic femoral head structure bone grafting in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture (PHF).
Methods
2
The clinical data of 80 PHF patients admitted to our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were treated with proximal humeral locking plate combined with allogeneic femoral head structure bone grafting.The shoulder joint function score standard was used for postoperative evaluation, and the fracture healing status of patients were evaluated with follow-up.
Results
2
The patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months after surgery, with an average of 16 months. There were no complications such as infection, humeral head necrosis, loose internal fixation or nonunion after operation. The clinical healing time of fracture was 8 to 24 weeks, with an average of 15 weeks. According to the shoulder joint function score standard, 60 cases were excellent, 15 cases were good and 5 cases were poor. The scores of postoperative pain, shoulder joint range of motion, muscle strength and activity of daily living in 80 patients were higher than those before operation (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Proximal humeral locking plate combined with allogeneic femoral head structure bone grafting is effective in the treatment of PHF without related complications.
Sobel AD,Shah KN,Paxton ES.Fixation of a proximal humerus fracture with an intramedullary nail[J].J Orthop Trauma,2017,31(3):S47-S49.doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000909http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000909.
Schumaier A,Grawe B.Proximal humerus fractures:evaluation and management in the elderly patient[J].Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil,2018,9(1):2151458517750516.doi:10.1177/2151458517750516http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458517750516.
Wang Q,Sheng N,Rui B,et al.The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the positioning of calcar screw when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate[J].Bone Joint J,2020,102-B(12):1629-1635.doi:10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0070http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0070.
Walsh JS,Vilaca T.Obesity,type 2 diabetes and bone in adults[J].Calcif Tissue Int,2017,100(5):528-535.doi:10.1007/s00223-016-0229-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-016-0229-0.
Smith GCS,Bateman E,Cass B,et al.Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the Elderly (ReShAPE trial) :study protocol for a multicentre combined randomised controlled and observational trial[J].Trials,2017,18(1):91.doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1826-6http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1826-6.
Goodnough LH,Campbell ST,Githens TC,et al.Intramedullary cage fixation for proximal humerus fractures has low reoperation rates at 1 year:results of a multicenter study[J].J Orthop Trauma,2020,34(4):193-198.doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001712http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001712.
Zhang X,Zhu CX,He JQ,et al.Correlation of CT values and bone mineral density in elderly Chinese patients with proximal humeral fractures[J].Orthop Surg,2021,13(8):2271-2279.doi:10.1111/os.13145http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13145.
Sun Q,Wu X,Wang L,et al.The plate fixation strategy of complex proximal humeral fractures[J].Int Orthop,2020,44(9):1785-1795.doi:10.1007/s00264-020-04544-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04544-7.
Taskesen A,Göçer A,Uzel K,et al.Effect of osteoporosis on proximal humerus fractures[J].Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil,2020,11(1):2151459320985399.doi:10.1177/2151459320985399http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459320985399.