LIU Sheng-kai,CUI Li-na,LI Jun-peng,et al.Clinical study on anti-reflux of conical gastric stump embedding in radical resection of esophageal cancer[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(12):1093-1096.
LIU Sheng-kai,CUI Li-na,LI Jun-peng,et al.Clinical study on anti-reflux of conical gastric stump embedding in radical resection of esophageal cancer[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(12):1093-1096. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.10E023073.
Clinical study on anti-reflux of conical gastric stump embedding in radical resection of esophageal cancer
选取2020年6月至2022年6月于我院拟行食管癌根结术的60例患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将患者分为观察组和对照组,各30例。2组患者均行腔镜食管癌根治术并行食管-胃端侧机械吻合,观察组行食管-胃端侧机械吻合后,采用圆锥形胃残端套叠包埋技术。比较2组患者围术期相关指标、术后并发症及胃食管反流情况。采用反流性疾病问卷(RDQ)评分和食管内24 h pH监测评估术后抗反流效果。
To study the anti-reflux effect of conical gastric stump embedding in radical resection of esophageal cancer.
Methods
2
A total of 60 patients who planned to undergo radical resection of esophageal cancer in our hospital from June 2020 to June 2022 were selected as the study objects,and the patients were divided into the observation group and the control group by random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. Patients in both groups underwent laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer and esophagogastric end-to-side mechanical anastomosis. The observation group adopted the conical gastric stump embedding technique after esophagogastric end-to-side mechanical anastomosis. The perioperative related indexes, postoperative complications and gastroesophageal reflux of patients in the two groups were compared. The postoperative anti-reflux effect was evaluated by reflux disease questionnaire (RDQ) score and 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring.
Results
2
The operation time and digestive tract reconstruction time of patients in the observation group were longer than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the number of lymph node dissection, the first exhaust time, or the postoperative hospital stay of patients between the two groups (
P
>
0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (
P
>
0.05). The severity of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux of patients in the observation group was lighter than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (
P
<
0.05). The RDQ score, 24-hour reflux frequency,
>
5 minutes reflux frequency, pH
<
4 time, and longest reflux time of patients in the observation group was significantly lower/less/shorter than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
The conical gastric stump embedding technique is safe and feasible in the radical resection of esophageal cancer. Although the operation time and digestive tract reconstruction time are slightly prolonged,it does not increase the perioperative risks,which can significantly reduce the occurrence and severity of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux of patients,and achieve a good anti-reflux effect.
Siegel RL,Miller KD,Fuchs HE,et al.Cancer Statistics,2021[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2021,71(1):7-33.doi:10.3322/caac.21654http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654.
Cao W,Chen HD,Yu YW,et al.Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China:a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020[J].Chin Med J (Engl),2021,134(7):783-791.doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474.
Yip HC,Shirakawa Y,Cheng CY,et al.Recent advances in minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous esophageal cancer[J].Ann N Y Acad Sci,2020,1482(1):113-120.doi:10.1111/nyas.14461http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14461.
Watanabe M,Otake R,Kozuki R,et al.Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer[J].Surg Today,2020,50(1):12-20.doi:10.1007/s00595-019-01878-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01878-7.
Sun S,Wang Z,Huang C,et al.Different gastric tubes in esophageal reconstruction during esophagectomy[J].Esophagus,2023,20(4):595-604.doi:10.1007/s10388-023-01021-zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-01021-z.
Zheng Z,Shang Y,Wang N,et al.Current advancement on the dynamic mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].Int J Biol Sci,2021,17(15):4154-4164.doi:10.7150/ijbs.65066http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.65066.
Uhlenhopp DJ,Then EO,Sunkara T,et al.Epidemiology of esophageal cancer:update in global trends,etiology and risk factors[J].Clin J Gastroenterol,2020,13(6):1010-1021.doi:10.1007/s12328-020-01237-xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12328-020-01237-x.
Jung MK,Schmidt T,Chon SH,et al.Current surgical treatment standards for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer[J].Ann N Y Acad Sci,2020,1482(1):77-84.doi:10.1111/nyas. 14454http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14454.
Engineering JOH.Retracted:a study on risk factors associated with reflux esophagitis in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery[J].J Healthc Eng,2023,2023:9843745.doi:10.1155/2023/9843745http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/9843745.