Effect of ureteral wall thickness at the site of ureteral stones on the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy

PU Wei; JI Jian; WU Zhi-da; WANG Ya-fei; YANG Tian-can; CHEN Lyu-yang; CUI Qing-peng; XU Xu; SUN Xiao-lei; ZHU Yuan-quan; FAN Shi-cheng

doi:10.11659/jjssx.04E024122

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effect of ureteral wall thickness at the site of ureteral stones on the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy

Clinical Research | 更新时间：2024-12-10

- Effect of ureteral wall thickness at the site of ureteral stones on the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy
- JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY Vol. 33, Issue 12, Pages: 1077-1080(2024)
- 作者机构：
  
  云南省第三人民医院/大理大学第二附属医院泌尿外科，云南昆明 650011
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.11659/jjssx.04E024122
  CLC： R693+4
- Published：25 December 2024，
  
  Received：24 April 2024，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
蒲伟,季健,吴知达等.输尿管结石处管壁厚度对输尿管镜碎石取石术临床效果的影响[J].局解手术学杂志,2024,33(12):1077-1080.

PU Wei,JI Jian,WU Zhi-da,et al.Effect of ureteral wall thickness at the site of ureteral stones on the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(12):1077-1080.
蒲伟,季健,吴知达等.输尿管结石处管壁厚度对输尿管镜碎石取石术临床效果的影响[J].局解手术学杂志,2024,33(12):1077-1080. DOI： 10.11659/jjssx.04E024122.

PU Wei,JI Jian,WU Zhi-da,et al.Effect of ureteral wall thickness at the site of ureteral stones on the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(12):1077-1080. DOI： 10.11659/jjssx.04E024122.

摘要

目的

探讨输尿管结石处不同的输尿管壁厚度(UWT)对输尿管镜碎石取石术(URL)疗效的影响。

方法

回顾性分析我院164例输尿管结石患者的临床资料。根据不同UWT，将患者分为轻度增厚组84例（UWT<3.16 mm）、中度增厚组31例（UWT为3.16~3.49 mm）和重度增厚组49例(UWT>3.49 mm)，比较3组患者临床相关指标的差异。

结果

轻度增厚组、中度增厚组术后肾绞痛及术后白细胞异常发生率均低于重度增厚组，差异有统计学意义(

0.05)。轻度增厚组、中度增厚组患者术后置管时间均短于重度增厚组，二次碎石、结石残留及结石返肾发生率均低于重度增厚组，差异有统计学意义(

0.05)。轻度增厚组、中度增厚组患者住院时间及住院费用均短/少于重度增厚组，差异有统计学意义(

0.05)。

结论

随着UWT的增加（特别是UWT>3.49 mm时），URL的术后并发症发生率、住院费用均有不同程度的增加，且手术疗效降低。临床工作中UWT在预测URL的手术疗效及并发症等方面具有潜在价值。

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effect of varying ureteral wall thickness （UWT） at the site of ureteral stones on the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy （URL）.

Methods

The clinical data of 164 patients with ureteral stones in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed.According to different UWT，the patients were divided into the mild thickening group （84 cases，UWT<3.16 mm）， the moderate thickening group （31 cases， UWT 3.16 to 3.49 mm），and the severe thickening group （49 cases，UWT>3.49 mm）， and the differences of clinical related indicators among the three groups were compared.

Results

The incidence of postoperative renal colic and leukocyte disorder in the mild thickening group and the moderate thickening group were lower than those in the severe thickening group， and

the differences were statistically significant （

0.05）.The postoperative catheterization time in the mild thickening group and the moderate thickening group were shorter than that in the severe thickening group， and the incidences of secondary lithotripsy， residual stones and stone return to kidney in the mild thickening group and the moderate thickening group were lower than those in the severe thickening group， with statistically significant differences （

0.05）.The length of hospital stay and hospitalization cost in the mild thickening group and the moderate thickening group were shorter/less than those in the severe thickening group， with statistically significant differences （

0.05）.

Conclusion

With the increase of UWT （especially when UWT >3.49 mm）， the incidence of postoperative complications and hospitalization cost of URL increase to varying degrees， and the surgical efficacy decreases. In clinical work， UWT measurement holds potential value in predicting the surgical efficacy and complications of URL.

关键词

输尿管结石输尿管壁厚度输尿管镜碎石取石术预测

Keywords

ureteral stonesureteral wall thicknessureteroscopic lithotripsyprediction

references

Koyuncu HH，Yencilek F，Eryildirim B，et al.Family history in stone disease：how important is it for the onset of the disease and the incidence of recurrence？［J］.Urol Res，2010，38（2）：105-109.doi：10.1007/s00240-009-0249-6http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-009-0249-6.

米华，邓耀良.中国尿石症的流行病学特征［J］.中华泌尿外科杂志，2003，24（10）：715-716.doi：10.3760/j：issn：1000-6702.2003. 10.021http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/j：issn：1000-6702.2003.10.021.

宁勇.输尿管镜下钬激光碎石手术治疗输尿管结石的效果及对患者不良反应的影响［J］.检验医学与临床，2020，17（2）：251-253.doi：10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2020.02.034http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2020.02.034.

赵伟，肖云新，陈光耀.输尿管镜碎石取石术提高碎石成功率的研究进展［J］.国际医药卫生导报，2022，28（12）：1764-1767.doi：10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.12.031http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.12.031.

Li DX，Shi X，Wei WR，et al.Single-stage noninvasive antegrade endoscopic treatment of large bladder and urethral stones［J］.Asian J Surg，2023，46（4）：1886-1887.doi：10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.10.083http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.10.083.

Yoshida T，Inoue T，Omura N，et al.Ureteral wall thickness as a preoperative indicator of impacted stones in patients with ureteral stones undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy［J］.Urology，2017，106：45-49.doi：10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.047http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.047.

Perez Castro E，Osther PJ，Jinga V，et al.Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal，mid-，proximal，or multiple ureteral locations：the clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study［J］.Eur Urol，2014，66（1）：102-109.doi：10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.011http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.011.

吴浩然，王旭刚，张亮，等.输尿管软镜碎石术后清石率的影响因素［J］.江苏医药，2020，46（12）：1271-1273.doi：10.19460/j.cnki.0253-3685.2020.12.021http://dx.doi.org/10.19460/j.cnki.0253-3685.2020.12.021.

杨彤威，李原学，张鑫，等.术前CT测量输尿管壁最大厚度预测输尿管嵌顿性结石及镜下钬激光碎石疗效的价值［J］.中国医师杂志，2022，24（5）：780-783.doi：10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-2021 0804-00844http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20210804-00844.

Millán-Rodríguez F.Editorial comment on：impact of stone size，location， composition，impaction，and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium：YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy［J］.Eur Urol，2007，52（6）：1757-1758.doi：10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.030http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.030.

Dretler SP，Young RH.Stone granuloma：a cause of ureteral stricture［J］.J Urol，1993，150（6）：1800-1802.doi：10.1016/s0022-5347（17）35899-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347（17）35899-8.

Demir M，Dündar İ，Eryılmaz R，et al.Average， and maximum ureteral wall thickness are predictor factor for ureteroscopy outcomes？［J］.OTJHS，2022，7（2）：215-220.doi：10.26453/otjhs.1059414http://dx.doi.org/10.26453/otjhs.1059414.

王成路，金露，薛波新.术前预测输尿管嵌顿性结石的临床因素分析［J］.中华泌尿外科杂志，2019，40（1）：42-46.doi：10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2019.01.008http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2019.01.008.

于靳，郑亮，潘奇，等.输尿管壁厚度作为预测输尿管镜下治疗输尿管下段梗阻性结石的应用研究［J］.国际泌尿系统杂志，2020，40（2）：200-203.doi：10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4416.2020. 02.003http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4416.2020.02.003.

Beilan J，Strakosha R，Palacios DA，et al.The postoperative morbidity index：a quantitative weighing of postoperative complications applied to urological procedures［J］.BMC Urol，2014，14：1.doi：10.1186/1471-2490-14-1http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-1.

王静，李凡.输尿管结石患者术后发生泌尿道感染的logistic分析［J］.中国卫生统计，2020，37（5）：740-741.doi：10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2020.05.026http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2020.05.026.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Clinical analysis of flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for patients with stones moving into renal pelvis during rigid ureterosope

Study on the correlation between cerebral oxygen saturation during radical resection of elderly lung cancer and postoperative neuro-cognitive dysfunction

Related Author

DONG Chuanjiang

XIE Zonglan

ZHANG Lusheng

HU Jingzu

PENG Qing

CHEN Xiaobo

DONG Ziqiang

ZHAO De-cai

Related Institution

Department of Urology,the First College of Clinical Medical Science,China Three Gorges University,Yichang Central People’s Hospital

Department of Anesthesiology，Bozhou People’s Hospital

⁰