1.中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区普外科,安徽 合肥 230031
2.安徽医科大学第一附属医院普外科,安徽 合肥 230022
Published:25 December 2023,
Received:06 February 2023,
扫 描 看 全 文
陆明,胡孔旺,涂从银.不同术前营养评分系统在肝细胞癌切除术预后评估中的意义[J].局解手术学杂志,2023,32(12):1054-1058.
LU Ming,HU Kong-wang,TU Cong-yin.Significance of different preoperative nutritional scoring systems in prognosis evaluation of radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2023,32(12):1054-1058.
陆明,胡孔旺,涂从银.不同术前营养评分系统在肝细胞癌切除术预后评估中的意义[J].局解手术学杂志,2023,32(12):1054-1058. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.02E023029.
LU Ming,HU Kong-wang,TU Cong-yin.Significance of different preoperative nutritional scoring systems in prognosis evaluation of radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2023,32(12):1054-1058. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.02E023029.
目的
2
评估术前预后营养指数(PNI)、控制营养状态评分(CONUT)、那不勒斯预后评分(NPS)3种营养评分系统与肝细胞癌切除术患者临床病理特征及预后的关系。
方法
2
回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年12月在中国科学技术大学附属第一医院行肝细胞癌根治性切除术的122例原发性肝细胞癌患者的临床病理资料,分析术前PNI、CONUT和NPS与临床病理特征及预后之间的关系。采用
Kaplan-Meier
法绘制生存曲线;
Cox
比例风险模型进行单因素及多因素分析肝细胞癌患者总生存期的影响因素。受试者工作特征(
ROC
)曲线下面积(
AUC
)比较各评分系统的预测价值。
结果
2
术前PNI与肿瘤分化程度、微血管侵犯(MVI)、肝硬化、术前血红蛋白水平有关(
P
<
0.05);术前CONUT与肿瘤分化程度、肝硬化、术前血红蛋白水平有关(
P
<
0.05);术前NPS与肝硬化、术前血红蛋白水平有关(
P
<
0.05)。低PNI组、高CONUT组、高NPS组分别相较于高PNI组、低CONUT组、低NPS组的术后住院时间更长、术后并发症发生率更高,差异均具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。
Cox
比例风险模型得出术前PNI、CONUT、NPS与肝细胞癌患者的预后相关(
P
<
0.05);但只有术前NPS是影响肝细胞癌患者预后的独立危险因素(
P
<
0.05)。
ROC
曲线结果显示,NPS的
AUC
高于PNI、CONUT。
结论
2
术前PNI、CONUT和NPS 3种营养评分系统均与行肝细胞癌切除术患者的预后有关,其中术前NPS的预测价值高于术前PNI和CONUT。
Objective
2
To evaluate the relationship between preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI), controlling nutritional status (CONUT) and Naples prognostic score (NPS) and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Methods
2
The clinicopathological data of 122 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent radical resection in the first affiliated hospital of university of science and technology of China from January 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, and the relationship between preoperative PNI, CONUT and NPS and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis was analyzed. The survival curve was drawn by
Kaplan
-
Meier
method.
Cox
proportional-hazards regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of the overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. The
area under the
receiver operating characteristic
(
ROC
) curve (
AUC
) was used to compare the predictive value of each scoring system.
Results
2
Preoperative PNI was related to the tumor differentiation, microvascular invasion(MVI), cirrhosis and preoperative hemoglobin level(
P
<
0.05).The preoperative CONUT was related to the tumor differentiation, cirrhosis and preoperative hemoglobin level (
P
<
0.05). The preoperative NPS was related to the cirrhosis and preoperative hemoglobin level (
P
<
0.05). The low PNI group, high CONUT group and high NPS group had longer postoperative hospital stay and higher postoperative complications rate compared with the high PNI group, low CONUT group and low NPS group, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (
P
<
0.05).
Cox
proportional-hazards regression model showed that preoperative PNI,CONUT and NPS were associated with the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(
P
<
0.05); However, only preoperative NPS was the independent risk factor for prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(
P
<
0.05). The
ROC
curve results showed that the
AUC
of NPS was higher than those of PNI and CONUT.
Conclusion
2
preoperative PNI, CONUT and NPS are all related to the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing radical resection, and the predictive value of preoperative NPS is higher than preoperative PNI and CONUT.
肝细胞癌预后营养指数控制营养状态那不勒斯预后评分预后
hepatocellular carcinomaprognostic nutritional indexcontrolling nutritional statusNaples prognostic scoreprognosis
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2021,71(3):209-249.doi: 10.3322/caac.21660http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.
Konyn P,Ahmed A,Kim D.Current epidemiology in hepatocel-lular carcinoma[J].Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol,2021,15(11):1295-1307.doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0316-1http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0316-1.
Omata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, et al. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcino-ma:a 2017 update[J].Hepatol Int,2017,11(4):317-370.doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9.
Fan X,Chen G,Li Y,et al.The preoperative prognostic nutritional index in hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy:a retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis[J].J Invest Surg, 2021, 34(8):826-833.doi: 10.1080/08941939.2019.1698679http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1698679.
Wang Y,Peng C,Cheng Z,et al.The prognostic significance of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving hepatectomy:a systematic review andmeta-analysis[J].Int J Surg,2018,55(7):73-80.doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018. 05.022http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.022.
Murata M.Inflammation and cancer[J]. Environ Health Prev Med,2018,23(1):50.doi: 10.1186/s12199-018-0740-1http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12199-018-0740-1.
Borre M,Dam G,Knudsen A,et al. Nutritional status and nutritional risk in patients with neuroendocrine tumors[J].Scand J Gastroenterol,2018,53(3):284-292.doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1430848http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2018.1430848.
Fujiya K,Kawamura T,Omae K,et al. Impact of malnutrition after gastrectomy for gastric cancer on long-term survival[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2018, 25(4):974-983.doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6342-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6342-8.
谢 炎,张炜琪,黄亚北,等.术前炎症指标在肝细胞癌肝移植后肿瘤复发中的预测价值[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2023,22(2):236-243. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20230117-00024http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20230117-00024.
陈雪岩,乔建梁,李 军,等.小野寺预后营养指数对消化系统恶性肿瘤预后预测价值的研究进展[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2022,21(10):1390-1394. doi:010.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20220816-00460http://dx.doi.org/010.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20220816-00460.
Fruchtenicht A, Poziomyck A, Reis A, et al. Inflammatory and nutritional statuses of patients submitted to resection of gastrointestinal tumors[J]. Rev Col Bras Cir,2018,45(2):e1614.doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20181614http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20181614.
Kang R, Li P, Wang T, et al. Apolipoprotein E epsilon 2 allele and low serum cholesterol as risk factors for gastric cancer in a Chinese Han population[J].Sci Rep, 2016,28(6):19930.doi: 10.1038/srep19930http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep19930.
Wang C, Li P, Xuan J, et al. Cholesterol enhances colorectal cancer progression via ros elevation and mapk signaling pathway activation[J]. Cell Physiol Biochem,2017,42(2): 729-742.doi: 10.1159/000477890http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000477890.
Saito Y, Imura S, Morine Y, et al. Preoperative prognostic nutritional index predicts short- and long-term outcomes after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Oncol Lett,2021,21(2):153-160.doi:10.3892/ol.2020.12414http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12414.
Feng J,Zhao J,Chen S, et al. Naples prognostic score: a novel prognostic score in predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Front Oncol,2021,28(11):652537.doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.652537http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.652537.
Wang H,Fang T,Yin X,et al.Prognostic importance of the preoperative New-Naples prognostic score for patients with gastric cancer[J]. Cancer Med,2023,12(2):1358-1375.doi: 10.1002/cam4.5017http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5017.
Miyamoto Y,Hiyoshi Y,Daitoku N,et al.Naples prognostic score is a useful prognostic marker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2019,62(12):1485-1493.doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000001484http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001484.
Nakagawa N,Yamada S,Sonohara F,et al. Clinical implications of naples prognostic score in patients with resected pancreatic cancer[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2020,27(3):887-895.doi:10.1245/s10434-019-08047-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08047-7.
Huang H,Zhang L,Chen D,et al.Validation of prognosis value of cumulative prognostic scores based on serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and albumin levels in patients with colorectal cancer[J].J Cancer,2019,10(1):35-42.doi:10.7150/jca.26637http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.26637.
Yang Z,Zheng Y,Wu Z,et al. Association between pre-diagnostic serum albumin and cancer risk: Results from a prospective population-based study[J]. Cancer Med,2021,10(12):4054-4065.doi:10.1002/cam4.3937http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3937.
Galizia G,Lieto E,Auricchio A,et al.Naples prognostic score, based on nutritional and inflammatory status, is an independent predictor of long-term outcome in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2017,60(12):1273-1284. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000961http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000961.
Zhang G,Zhang D,Wu J,et al.Low serum levels of pre-surgical total cholesterol are associated with unfavorable overall survival in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer[J].Clin Lab,2018,64(3):321-327.doi:10.7754/Clinhttp://dx.doi.org/10.7754/Clin.
Liang W,Ferrara N.The complex role of neutrophils in tumor angiogenesis and metastasis[J].Cancer Immunol Res,2016,4(2):83-91.doi:10.1158/2326-6066http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.
Hendry S,Salgado R,Gevaert T,et al.Assessing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in solid tumors: a practical review for pathologists and proposal for a standardized method from the international immuno-oncology biomarkers working group[J].Adv Anat Pathol,2017,24(6): 311-335.doi:10.1097/PAP.0000000000000161http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0000000000000161.
Mantovani A,Marchesi F,Malesci A,et al.Tumour-associated macrophages as treatment targets in oncology[J].Nat Rev Clin Oncol,2017,14(7):399-416.doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.217http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.217.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
