Compilation of questionnaire for quality evaluation on problem-based learning of Neurology and analysis of its reliability and validity

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Compilation of questionnaire for quality evaluation on problem-based learning of Neurology and analysis of its reliability and validity

更新时间：2024-09-19

- Compilation of questionnaire for quality evaluation on problem-based learning of Neurology and analysis of its reliability and validity
- Vol. 19, Issue 9, Pages: 1112-1116(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院神经科,武汉
  2. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院第二临床学院,武汉
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC：
- Published：2020，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Compilation of questionnaire for quality evaluation on problem-based learning of Neurology and analysis of its reliability and validity. [J]. 19(9):1112-1116(2020)
DOI：

Compilation of questionnaire for quality evaluation on problem-based learning of Neurology and analysis of its reliability and validity. [J]. 19(9):1112-1116(2020) DOI：

摘要

目的　编制神经病学课程PBL教学质量评估问卷，并进行信度、效度检验。方法　参考文献报道的评价体系框架，针对神经病学课程特点，设计PBL教学质量评估问卷。以参与神经病学课程PBL的临床医学生为对象，实施问卷调查；检验问卷重测信度与内部一致性信度；使用相关分析和探索性因子分析来评估问卷效度。结果　编制的神经病学课程PBL教学质量评估问卷包含“教案质量评估”“教学方式评估”“教学质量评估”3个一级指标，共包含6个二级指标、25个三级指标。问卷相关系数ρ=0.990（P<0.01），表明重测信度良好；克龙巴赫?琢系数为0.901，达到内部一致性信度要求；内容效度相关系数为0.307~0.7（P<0.05），表明每个三级指标均与总分项有显著相关性，问卷项设计良好；使用3个一级指标做公因子进行探索性因子分析，评估结构效度且提示问卷优化方向。结论　该问卷具有良好的信度和效度，可作为科学评价神经病学PBL教学效果的工具，也为未来进一步研究提供了优化方向

Abstract

Objective　To design and compile quality evaluation questionnaire on problem-based learning (PBL) of Neurology and to test its reliability and validity. Methods　Referring to the framework of the evaluation system and according to the characteristics of the discipline

we designed the questionnaire on PBL of Neurology. The clinical medical students who participated in neurologic PBL course were taken as the objects of investigation. The reliability of the questionnaire and the reliability of internal consistency were tested. Correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used to evaluate the validity of the questionnaire. Results The questionnaire on PBL of Neurology included three first-level indicators: teaching plan quality evaluation

teaching method evaluation and teaching quality evaluation

containing 6 second-level indicators and 25 third-level indicators. The correlation coefficient ρ=0.990 (P<0.01) showed that the retest reliability was good. The cronbach's ?琢 coefficient is 0.901

meeting the internal consistency reliability requirement. And the content validity correlation coefficient was 0.307-0.7 (P<0.05)

indicating that each third-level index had a significant correlation with the total score

and the questionnaire item design was good. The three first-level indicators were used as common factors to evaluate the structural validity by exploratory factor analysis and identify the direction of optimization. Conclusion The questionnaire has good reliability and validity

which can be used as a tool for scientific evaluation on PBL of neurology

and also provide an optimization direction for further research in the future.

关键词

以问题为基础的学习　医学教育　神经病学　问卷调查

Keywords

Problem-based learning (PBL)　Medical education　Neurology　Questionnaire survey

references

Views

246

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Survey and analysis of foreign medical students in Chongqing Medical University

Problem-based learning based on constructivism in medical education

Investigation on the current situation of microsurgery education and discussion on microsurgery teaching method

Practice and thinking of assessment scale design for simulated clinical skills examination

Application of problem-based learning combined with formative evaluation in pediatrics teach-ing

Related Author

赵林

沈扬　张焱焱　尹婉宜　王嘉

林俊卿　李星玮　郑宪友

易雪

李谧　邓红梅　冉素娟　于洁　罗征秀　曾燕　王家蓉　何莹

徐昕　杨华

孙宝清　罗文婷　王文熙　罗嘉莹

王湘君　郝元涛　周慧明　赵劭娟　吴忠道

Related Institution

重庆医科大学附属第一医院急诊科

上海交通大学附属第六人民医院骨科

第三军医大学第一附属医院全军医学模拟训练中心

佳木斯大学高教研究与评估中心

上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院院长办公室

⁰