A clinical efficacy comparison between Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens and 1-CU accommodating intraocular lens
返回论文页
|更新时间:2024-01-17
|
A clinical efficacy comparison between Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens and 1-CU accommodating intraocular lens
Journal of Chongqing Medical UniversityVol. 36, Issue 11, Pages: 1375-1378(2011)
作者机构:
中山大学中山眼科中心白内障科
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:R779.66
Published:2011,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]Luay Radi Hasan Tayeh,陈伟蓉,林振德.2种调节性晶体术后效果比较的临床分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2011,36(11):1375-1378.
Luay Radi Hasan Tayeh, CHEN Wei-rong, LIN Zhen-de. A clinical efficacy comparison between Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens and 1-CU accommodating intraocular lens. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 36(11):1375-1378(2011)
[1]Luay Radi Hasan Tayeh,陈伟蓉,林振德.2种调节性晶体术后效果比较的临床分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2011,36(11):1375-1378.DOI:
Luay Radi Hasan Tayeh, CHEN Wei-rong, LIN Zhen-de. A clinical efficacy comparison between Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens and 1-CU accommodating intraocular lens. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 36(11):1375-1378(2011)DOI:
A clinical efficacy comparison between Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens and 1-CU accommodating intraocular lens
Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy after implantation of the 1-CU accommodating intraocular lens and Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens in cataract patients.Methods:77 age-related cataract patients(80 eyes) were divided into two groups:1-CU group included 38 patients(40 eyes)
and Tetraflex group included 39 patients(40 eyes).All the patients accepted phacoemulsification and IOL implantation.Patients were examined for the uncorrected and corrected distant visual acuity
uncorrected near visual acuity
and the distance corrected near visual acuity at 1 week
1 month
and 3 months after the surgery
and the amplitude of accommodation by 2 different methods(the dynamic retinoscopy method and near point method)at 1 week
1 month
and 3 months after the surgery.Results:There were no significant differences of the corrected near visual acuity at 1 week
1 month
and 3 months after the surgery between two groups(P>0.05)
but the corrected near visual acuity became better as time went on.The uncorrected near visual acuity and the distance corrected near visual acuity became worse at 3 months after surgery(P<0.05).Both groups had good distance corrected near visual acuity
and there were no significant differences of the distance corrected near visual acuity between the two groups(P>0.05).The uncorrected distant visual acuity at 1 week
1 month
and 3 months after the surgery of 1-CU group was significantly better than that of Tetraflex group(P<0.05).The uncorrected neat visual acuity at 1 week
1 month
and 3 months after the surgery of Tetraflex group were significantly better than that of 1-CU group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences of amplitude of accommodation between the two groups(P>0.05)
but both the amplitude of accommodation became worse at 3 months after surgery.Conclusion:Both two IOL can provide good distance corrected near visual acuity.1-CU group have better uncorrected distant visual acuity
and Tetraflex group have better uncorrected neat visual acuity.Both two IOL can offer good amplitude of accommodation and improve the visual performance.But its long-term effect remains to be observed.