Complications of applying Angioseal arterial closure device versus and manual compression homeostasis after common femoral artery puncture in coronary intervention

FANG Zhimin; ZHONG Xiaolan

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Complications of applying Angioseal arterial closure device versus and manual compression homeostasis after common femoral artery puncture in coronary intervention

更新时间：2023-12-18

- Complications of applying Angioseal arterial closure device versus and manual compression homeostasis after common femoral artery puncture in coronary intervention
- Journal of Chongqing Medical University Vol. 37, Issue 9, Pages: 836-837(2012)
- 作者机构：
  
  新疆医科大学第二附属医院心内科,乌鲁木齐,830063
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC：
- Published：2012，
扫描看全文
FANG Zhimin, ZHONG Xiaolan. Complications of applying Angioseal arterial closure device versus and manual compression homeostasis after common femoral artery puncture in coronary intervention. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 37(9):836-837(2012)
DOI：

FANG Zhimin, ZHONG Xiaolan. Complications of applying Angioseal arterial closure device versus and manual compression homeostasis after common femoral artery puncture in coronary intervention. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 37(9):836-837(2012) DOI：

摘要

目的：比较经股动脉穿刺行冠状动脉介入诊治术后Angioseal血管闭合器和人工压迫止血的安全性。方法：采用随机双盲对照研究，从2008年1月至2011年11月经股动脉穿刺行冠状动脉介入诊治的病例611人次，分为Angioseal血管闭合器组和人工压迫组，比较2组并发症的发生率。结果：２组总的并发症发生率差异无统计学意义（P >0.05），但在24 h后Angioseal血管闭合器组的并发症发生率有增加的趋势（P<0.05）。结论：使用Angioseal血管闭合器不能减少股动脉穿刺并发症的发生率，尤其在24 h后并发症有增加的趋势，不推荐股动脉穿刺后常规使用Angioseal血管闭合器。

Abstract

Objective：To compare the safety between Angioseal closure device and manual compression homeostasis after performing coronary intervention through femoral artery puncture. Methods：Randomized double blind controlled trial was used. Totally 611 pa－tients treated with coronary intervention through femoral artery puncture from January 2008 to November 2011 were enrolled and di－vided into Angioseal closure device group and manual compression homeostasis group. Complications were compared between the two groups. Results：There was no difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups（P >0.05）. However，the compli－cation rate of Angioseal closure device group tended to increase at 24 h after the treatment（P<0.05）. Conclusions：Angioseal clo－sure device can not decrease complications because delayed complications may occur significantly after 24 h. Angioseal closure de－vice is not recommended to use after performing coronary intervention through femoral artery puncture.

关键词

冠状动脉造影冠状动脉介入血管闭合器人工压迫

Keywords

coronary angiographycoronary interventionarterial closure devicesmanual compression

references

Views

844

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

A study on heart rate variability of patients with different coronary artery disease

A study on the relationship among serum uric acid, serum C-reactive protein and the coronary lesions

A study on the relationship between brachial ankle pulse wave velocity and coronary artery disease

A study on the characteristics of baPWV in patients with essential hypertension associated with coronary artery disease

The risk factors and clinical significance of non-invasive examinations of female chest pain

Related Author

罗开良

刘地川

黄晶

邓昌明

罗开良

朱悫

江永红

刘地川

Related Institution

重庆医科大学附属第二医院心血管内科

Department of Cardiology,the Second Affiliated Hospital,Chongqing Medical University

Department of Rehabilitation Center,Hainan Provincial People Hospital

Department of Radiology,the First Affiliated Hospital,Chongqing Medical University

河南省人民医院放射科

⁰