Cluster analysis on epidemic status of COVID-19 among different provinces
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-12-22
|
Cluster analysis on epidemic status of COVID-19 among different provinces
Journal of Chongqing Medical UniversityVol. 45, Issue 7, Pages: 858(2020)
作者机构:
1. 陆军军医大学1. 学报编辑部
2. 卫生统计学教研室,重庆,400038
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2020,
扫 描 看 全 文
Yi Dali, Li Gaoming, Leng Huaiming. Cluster analysis on epidemic status of COVID-19 among different provinces. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 45(7):858(2020)
DOI:
Yi Dali, Li Gaoming, Leng Huaiming. Cluster analysis on epidemic status of COVID-19 among different provinces. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 45(7):858(2020)DOI:
Cluster analysis on epidemic status of COVID-19 among different provinces
Objective:To give the comprehensive evaluation on epidemic status of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) among dif-ferent provinces and classify all provinces into reasonable classes in accordance with the severity. Methods:Systematic clustering method was used to classify the development trend of cumulative confirmed cases,cumulative death cases and cumulative cured cases. Clustering heat maps were used for visual display and analysis. Results:The first class included Hubei. A total of 56 249 con-firmed cases in Hubei were much more than the total of 12 335 cases in other regions. The second class included Henan. Confirmed cases of 1 321 in Henan ranked to the third in the country and the death number was the largest(13 cases) except Hubei. The third class included Jiangxi,Zhejiang,Jiangsu,Shanghai,Sichuan,Anhui,Hunan,and Guangdong. These provinces had a higher confirmed cases but lower mortality compared with the following classes. The fourth class included Shandong,Chongqing,Beijing,Guangxi,Gansu,Tianjin,Heilongjiang,Hainan and Hebei. These provinces had a median confirmed patients,cure rate and mortality. The fifth class included Shanxi,Yunnan,Fujian,Shaanxi,Liaoning,Guizhou and Jilin. These provinces had the a lower confirmed patients and very few death cases(only 3 cases in this class). The sixth class included Tibet,Taiwan,Qinghai,Ningxia,Macau,Inner Mongolia,Hong Kong and Xinjiang. These provinces had few confirmed cases(less than 71 cases) and only 2 death cases. Conclusion:In summary,areas that need to be closely controlled are Hubei and Henan,where can be regarded as extremely high-endemic areas. Areas that need to be closely monitored are Jiangxi,Zhejiang,Jiangsu,Shanghai,Sichuan,Anhui,Hunan and Guangdong,where can be regarded as high-endemic areas. Tibet,Taiwan,Qinghai,Ningxia,Macau,Inner Mongolia,Hong Kong and Xinjiang are relatively safe and can be regarded as low-endemic areas,while other areas are moderately endemic areas.
Characteristics and progress of clinical diagnosis and treatment on 2019 novel coronavirus
Clinical diagnosis and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 and progress of epidemic prevention and control
Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and establishment of risk-prediction model in Chongqing
Relation graph of COVID-19 based on VOSviewer software
Comparative study on assessment methods of epidemic risk of COVID-19 in Chongqing
Related Author
Zhang Xiangmin
Lü Liang
Chen Jianfu
Song Wei
Liu Xingli
Yang Jingsong
Huo Shanqi
Long Fangmin
Related Institution
Department of Ultrasonography,The Second People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province
Department of Radiology,The First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province/The Affiliated Hospital Kunming University of Science and Technology
Department of Infectious Medicine,Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Department of Critical Care Medicine,Three Gorges Hospital of Chongqing University
Department of Critical Care Medicine,Chongqing Public Health Medical Center