Analysis of the effect of dynamic and static training on the balance function,walking ability, and quality of life of patients with post-stroke hemiplegia
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-04-14
|
Analysis of the effect of dynamic and static training on the balance function,walking ability, and quality of life of patients with post-stroke hemiplegia
Journal of Southwest Medical UniversityVol. 43, Issue 4, Pages: 407-410(2020)
LIU Xiaoyun. Analysis of the effect of dynamic and static training on the balance function,walking ability, and quality of life of patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. [J]. Journal of Southwest Medical University 43(4):407-410(2020)
LIU Xiaoyun. Analysis of the effect of dynamic and static training on the balance function,walking ability, and quality of life of patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. [J]. Journal of Southwest Medical University 43(4):407-410(2020)DOI:
Analysis of the effect of dynamic and static training on the balance function,walking ability, and quality of life of patients with post-stroke hemiplegia
P <0.05);观察组SF-36评分(163.35±11.21)分均高于对照组(146.65±10.01)分(t=8.1230
P=0.0000)。结论:动静态结合训练能够有效提升脑卒中偏瘫患者步行能力及平衡功能
改善生活质量。
Abstract
Objective: Post-stroke hemiplegia(PSH) has been the focus of clinical attention for a long time.There are various regimens for rehabilitation in PSH. With the rapid development of medical technologies
the number of rehabilitation regimens is increasing
which results in numerous controversies in the clinical application. The purpose of this study is to analyze the outcome of patients with PSH after intervention with dynamic and static training. Methods: A total of 107 patients with PSH who were admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to January2019 were divided control group and observation group. Fifty-three patients in the control group adopted conventional limb rehabilitation training
and 54 patients in the observation group adopted visual imagery training in addition to the training for the control group. The two groups were compared for changes in balance function
walking ability
and quality of life after intervention. Results: The Brunel score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(43.20 ± 3.62 vs 36.39 ± 2.98
t = 10.6132
P < 0.001); compared with the control group
the observation group had reduced walking ability in terms of grade 3 score(c2= 4.2410
P < 0.05)
but had improved walking ability in terms of grade 5 score(c2= 4.2322
P < 0.05); the observation group had significantly higher 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey scores than the control group(163.35±11.21 vs 146.65±10.01
t =8.1230
P = 0.0000). Conclusion: Dynamic and static training can effectively improve the walking ability