
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.南方医科大学南方医院药学部,广州;510515
2.首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院药学部,北京 100035
3.中国医院协会药事专业委员会,北京 100035
4.华东师范大学教育学部,上海 200062
5.天津市第一中心医院药学部,天津 300192
6.四川大学华西第二医院药学部/循证药学中心,成都 610041
7.北京大学第一医院药剂科,北京 100034
8.复旦大学附属中山医院药剂科,上海 200032
9.中国医学科学院肿瘤医院药学部,北京 100020
10.山东第一医科大学第一附属医院(山东省千佛山医院)临床药学科, 济南 250014
主任药师。研究方向:临床药学、临床药代动力学、药物基因组学。E-mail:zpm321@126.com
主任药师。研究方向:临床药学、药事管理、药学教育。E-mail:zhenjiancun@163.com
收稿:2026-04-22,
修回:2026-07-13,
录用:2026-07-14,
网络首发:2026-07-24,
纸质出版:2026-07-30
移动端阅览
郑萍,甄健存,游蠡,等.我国临床药师培训基地质量管理现状研究 [J].中国药房,2026,37(14):1826-1831.
ZHENG Ping,ZHEN Jiancun,YOU Li,et al.Study on the current status of quality management of clinical pharmacist training bases in China[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2026,37(14):1826-1831.
郑萍,甄健存,游蠡,等.我国临床药师培训基地质量管理现状研究 [J].中国药房,2026,37(14):1826-1831. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.14.05.
ZHENG Ping,ZHEN Jiancun,YOU Li,et al.Study on the current status of quality management of clinical pharmacist training bases in China[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2026,37(14):1826-1831. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.14.05.
目的
2
了解我国临床药师培训基地的质量管理现状,为基地的规范化建设和发展提供参考。
方法
2
以我国31个省份的卫生健康紧缺人才(临床药师)培训基地及中国医院协会临床药师培训基地为调研对象,采用问卷调研和现场调研相结合的方式,构建包含25项三级指标的培训质量管理评估指标体系,从培训结构质量与培训环节质量管理两方面对其展开调研,并对数据进行描述性统计分析。
结果
2
本研究共完成了对31个省份所有临床药师培训基地297家的现场调研,其中中国医院协会临床药师培训基地284家,卫生健康紧缺人才(临床药师)培训基地271家。结构质量方面,院级培训制度核心指标达标率超过80%,经费专款专用率达80.13%,软硬件设施整体达标率超过88%;培训基地中带教师资共有1 348名,其中高级职称及专职专科临床药师主带教分别占62.91%和94.36%。环节质量方面,“临床科室轮转建立符合规定的临床实践带教组”达标率为85.19%,分别有79.80%和76.09%的基地能做到理论考核严格保密和考核案例规模符合要求。但仅57.91%的基地制定了相应的培训管理制度正式文件,培训手册填写完整规范率仅47.47%。此外,各省份质量管理水平仍存在较大差异,其中培训环节质量问题尤为突出。
结论
2
我国临床药师培训基地管理体系、硬件设施及师资人员配置相对完备,但各省份培训基地质量管理存在较大差异。
OBJECTIVE
2
To investigate the current status of quality management in clinical pharmacist training bases in China, and to provide references for the standardized development and improvement of these bases.
METHODS
2
A combined approach of questionnaire survey and on-site investigation was adopted, targeting the healthcare highly sought-after talent (clinical pharmacist) training bases in 31 provinces of China as well as the clinical pharmacist training bases affiliated with the Chinese Hospital Association. A training quality management evaluation index system consisting of 25 tertiary indicators was established. Investigations were conducted from two dimensions: structural quality of training and quality management of training processes. Data were statistically analyzed using descriptive statistical methods.
RESULTS
2
On-site investigations were completed for 297 clinical pharmacist training bases across the 31 provinces, among which 284 were affiliated with the Chinese Hospital Association and 271 were healthcare highly sought-after talent (clinical pharmacist) training bases. In terms of structural quality, the core indicator compliance rate for hospital-level training systems exceeded 80%, the rate of special fund utilization for designated purposes reached 80.13%, and the overall compliance rate for software and hardware facilities surpassed 88%. A total of 1 348 preceptors were employed across the training bases, among whom those with senior professional titles and full-time specialist clinical pharmacists as lead preceptors accounted for 62.91% and 94.36%, respectively. Regarding process quality, the compliance rate for “establishment of clinical practice teaching groups in accordance with regulations during clinical department rotations” was 85.19%, and 79.80% and 76.09% of the bases were found to implement strict confidentiality in theoretical examinations and meet the required scale of assessment cases, respectively. However, formal documents of corresponding training management regulations were formulated in only 57.91% of the bases, and the completeness and standardization rate of training manual completion was merely 47.47%. In addition, considerable disparities in quality management levels were observed among provinces, with issues in training process quality being particularly prominent.
CONCLUSIONS
2
The management system, hardware facilities, and preceptor staffing of clinical pharmacist training bases in China are relatively well-established, yet notable variations in quality management exist among training bases across different provinces.
黄珊珊 . 我国临床药师培训模式现状的探讨 [J ] . 卫生职业教育 , 2018 , 36 ( 12 ): 138 - 139 .
刘高峰 , 陈孝 , 张毕奎 , 等 . 中国医院药学学科的建设与发展 [J ] . 中国药学杂志 , 2023 , 58 ( 22 ): 1993 - 2015 .
吴永佩 . 中国临床药师制体系的建设与实践 [M ] . 北京 : 科学技术文献出版社 , 2023 : 5 .
郑婷婷 , 张宇晴 , 刘思彤 , 等 . 我国医疗机构药学监护开展现状调查 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2025 , 36 ( 9 ): 1117 - 1122 .
蒋君好 , 郑航 , 严波 . 临床药师队伍的现状、问题与建设措施 [J ] . 中国高等医学教育 , 2024 ( 3 ): 32 - 33,36 .
甄健存 . 我国自主培养临床药师的阶段性成果回顾 [J ] . 中国药物与临床 , 2025 , 25 ( 23 ): 1497 - 1500 .
张觅 , 杨雨飞 , 胡汉昆 . 临床药师培训和住院医师规范化培训的比较及启示 [J ] . 中南药学 , 2020 , 18 ( 9 ): 1595 - 1598 .
甄健存 , 吴永佩 , 颜青 , 等 . 加强医院药学人才建设 建设适应医改需求的临床药师培训体系 [J ] . 中国医院 , 2020 , 24 ( 5 ): 65 - 67 .
王静林 , 胡琪 , 曾芳 , 等 . 湖北省494家医疗机构临床药学发展及临床药师培训现状调研 [J ] . 中国医院药学杂志 , 2021 , 41 ( 24 ): 2582 - 2585 .
阮晓 , 闫雪莲 , 张波 . 中国医院协会药事专业委员会临床药师培训进展研究 [J ] . 协和医学杂志 , 2025 , 16 ( 3 ): 797 - 804 .
杨蕊 , 车虹昱 , 王梓凝 , 等 . 我国临床药师培训基地住院药学监护服务现状及影响因素 [J ] . 中国药物与临床 , 2025 , 25 ( 23 ): 1506 - 1513 .
卜一珊 , 游蠡 , 卞婧 , 等 . 我国临床药师培训基地创新现状调研 [J ] . 中国药物与临床 , 2025 , 25 ( 23 ): 1501 - 1505 .
Donabedian A . Evaluating the quality of medical care [J ] . Milbank Mem Fund Q , 1966 , 44 ( 3 ): 166 - 206 .
Ayanian J Z , Markel H . Donabedian’s lasting framework for health care quality [J ] . N Engl J Med , 2016 , 375 ( 3 ): 205 - 207 .
T/ CHAS 20-4-7—2024 医疗机构药事管理与药学服务第4-7部分:药事管理教育与教学 [S ] .
T/ CHAS 20-4-8-1—2023 医疗机构药事管理与药学服务第4-8-1部分:药事管理药学培训管理临床药师培训 [S ] .
0
浏览量
1
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621