
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.河北医科大学第三医院药学部,石家庄 050051
2.河北医科大学研究生学院,石家庄 050017
3.河北省药物与卫生技术综合评估学会,石家庄 050051
硕士研究生。研究方向:药物经济学。E-mail:2449898635@qq.com
主任药师,硕士生导师,硕士。研究方向:药物经济学、卫生技术评估、合理用药。E-mail:36700774@hebmu.edu.cn
收稿:2026-01-07,
修回:2026-04-09,
录用:2026-04-10,
纸质出版:2026-04-30
移动端阅览
刘冉,高胜男,李从欣,等.库莫西利联合氟维司群二线治疗HR+/HER2-局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者的药物经济学评价 [J].中国药房,2026,37(08):1033-1038.
LIU Ran,GAO Shengnan,LI Congxin,et al.Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of culmerciclib combined with fulvestrant in the second-line treatment of HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2026,37(08):1033-1038.
刘冉,高胜男,李从欣,等.库莫西利联合氟维司群二线治疗HR+/HER2-局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者的药物经济学评价 [J].中国药房,2026,37(08):1033-1038. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.08.11.
LIU Ran,GAO Shengnan,LI Congxin,et al.Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of culmerciclib combined with fulvestrant in the second-line treatment of HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2026,37(08):1033-1038. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.08.11.
目的
2
从我国卫生体系角度出发,评价库莫西利联合氟维司群二线治疗激素受体阳性(HR+)/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者的经济性。
方法
2
根据CULMATE-1研究结果构建分区生存模型,模拟时限设置为15年,循环周期为28 d,计算库莫西利联合氟维司群相较于氟维司群单药二线治疗HR+/HER2-乳腺癌的增量成本-效果比(ICER);采用单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析评估模型的稳健性,同时开展库莫西利降价的情境分析并测算达到本研究意愿支付(WTP)阈值所需的降价幅度和价格。
结果
2
基础分析结果显示,与氟维司群单药方案相比,库莫西利联合氟维司群方案可使患者多获得0.823质量调整生命年(QALY),对应的ICER为371 696.26元/QALY,高于WTP阈值(199 330元/QALY)。单因素敏感性分析结果显示,库莫西利成本、折现率、疾病进展和无进展生存期状态效用值对ICER有较大的影响;单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析都验证了模型结果的稳健性。情境分析结果表明,当库莫西利分别降价30%、55%、85%时,对应的ICER 值分别低于我国3、2、1倍2025年人均GDP,具有经济性的概率分别为3.00%、94.90%、100%;当库莫西利(60 mg)成本下降52.6%至50.96元时,ICER方可低于本研究的WTP阈值。
结论
2
当WTP阈值为2倍2025年我国人均GDP时,相比于氟维司群单药方案,库莫西利联合氟维司群二线治疗HR+/HER2-局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌不具有经济性优势,需进行合理降价,才能减轻患者的经济负担。
OBJECTIVE
2
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of culmerciclib combined with fulvestrant as second-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive(HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, within the context of the Chinese healthcare system.
METHODS
2
A partitioned survival model was established based on the CULMATE-1 study, with a simulation time horizon set at 15 years and a cycle length of 28 days. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of culmerciclib combined with fulvestrant versus fulvestrant monotherapy as second-line treatment for HR+/HER2– breast cancer was calculated. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to assess the robustness of the model. Meanwhile, scenario analysis of culmerciclib price reduction was conducted; the required price reduction and price to reach the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold in this study were calculated.
RESULTS
2
The results of the base-case analysis indicated that, compared with the fulvestrant monotherapy regimen, culmerciclib combined with fulvestrant yielded an additional 0.823 quality-adjusted life year (QALY), with a corresponding ICER of 371 696.26 yuan/QALY, which exceeded the WTP threshold (199 330 yuan/QALY). The results of the univariate sensitivity analysis indicated that the cost of culmerciclib, the discount rate, the utility values for progression disease and progression free survival status were significant factors influencing the ICER; both the univariate sensitivity analysis and the probabilistic sensitivity analysis validated the robustness of the model results. Scenario analysis indicated that when the price of culmerciclib was reduced by 30%, 55% and 85% respectively, the corresponding ICER values fell below 3, 2, and 1 times China’s per capita GDP in 2025, with the probability of cost-effectiveness being 3.00%, 94.90%, 100%. When the cost of culmerciclib (60 mg) was reduced by 52.6% to 50.96 yuan, the ICER value met the WTP threshold established in this study.
CONCLUSIONS
2
When the WTP threshold is set at twice China’s per capita GDP in 2025, second-line treatment with culmerciclib combined with fulvestrant for HR+/HER2– locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer does not exhibit cost-effectiveness advantage over fulvestrant monotherapy. Therefore, a reasonable price reduction is required to alleviate the financial burden on patients.
ZENG H M , ZHENG R S , SUN K X , et al . Cancer survival statistics in China 2019-2021:a multicenter,population-based study [J ] . J Natl Cancer Cent , 2024 , 4 ( 3 ): 203 - 213 .
GIAQUINTO A N , SUNG H , NEWMAN L A , et al . Breast cancer statistics 2024 [J ] . CA Cancer J Clin , 2024 , 74 ( 6 ): 477 - 495 .
National Comprehensive Cancer Network . NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology:cancer breast version 4 [EB/OL ] .( 2025-04-17 )[ 2025-12-15 ] . https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/nccn-guidelines https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/nccn-guidelines .
中国临床肿瘤学会指南工作委员会 . 中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)乳腺癌诊疗指南:2025 [M ] . 北京 : 人民卫生出版社 , 2025 : 111 - 119 .
SPRING L M , WANDER S A , ANDRE F , et al . Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer:past,present,and future [J ] . Lancet , 2020 , 395 ( 10226 ): 817 - 827 .
GENNARI A , ANDRÉ F , BARRIOS C H , et al . ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis,staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer [J ] . Ann Oncol , 2021 , 32 ( 12 ): 1475 - 1495 .
PU D Q , WU Y , XU D B , et al . The adverse events of CDK4/6 inhibitors for HR+/HER2- breast cancer:an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials [J ] . Front Pharmacol , 2024 , 15 : 1269922 .
XU Z B , LIU Y C , SONG B H , et al . Discovery and preclinical evaluations of TQB3616,a novel CDK4-biased inhibitor [J ] . Bioorg Med Chem Lett , 2024 , 107 : 129769 .
BOÉR K . Fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer:evidence to date and place in therapy [J ] . Ther Adv Med Oncol , 2017 , 9 ( 7 ): 465 - 479 .
YIN Y M , ZHANG Q Y , SUN T , et al . Novel CDK2/4/6 inhibitor culmerciclib(TQB3616) plus fulvestrant in previously treated,HR-positive,HER2-negative advanced breast cancer:a randomized,double-blind,phase 3 trial [J ] . Signal Transduct Target Ther , 2025 , 10 ( 1 ): 414 .
WU X Y , JIN N , GAO H F , et al . Effectiveness and safety of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer:a multi-center study in China [J ] . Cancers , 2023 , 15 ( 17 ): 4360 .
ZHU W T , ZHENG M M , XIA P P , et al . Cost-effectiveness of palbociclib plus fulvestrant as second-line therapy of women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a Chinese healthcare system perspective [J ] . Front Oncol , 2023 , 13 : 1068463 .
吴晶 , 刘国恩 . 中国药物经济学评价指南2025中英双语版 [M ] . 北京 : 中国市场出版社 , 2025 : 53 - 55 .
WAN X M , PENG L B , LI Y J . A review and comparison of methods for recreating individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves for economic evaluations:a simulation study [J ] . PLoS One , 2015 , 10 ( 3 ): e0121353 .
LIU N , ZHOU Y H , LEE J J . IPDfromKM:reconstruct individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves [J ] . BMC Med Res Methodol , 2021 , 21 ( 1 ): 111 .
何银梅 , 李晓 , 刘晓丽 , 等 . 戈沙妥珠单抗对比单药化疗后线治疗HR+/HER2-晚期转移性乳腺癌的成本-效用分析 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2024 , 35 ( 20 ): 2493 - 2498 .
JIANG W , HE Z C , ZHANG T T , et al . Cost-effectiveness analysis of ribociclib plus fulvestrant for hormone receptor-positive/human EGF receptor 2-negative breast cancer [J ] . Immunotherapy , 2021 , 13 ( 8 ): 661 - 668 .
SHANG F J , ZHANG B Y , KANG S . Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China [J ] . Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res , 2023 , 23 ( 3 ): 337 - 343 .
梁淼 , 刘洋 , 王宪英 . 埃万妥单抗联合化疗用于EGFR突变的晚期NSCLC的成本-效果分析 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2025 , 36 ( 6 ): 715 - 720 .
张冉冉 , 张羽曦 , 高胜男 , 等 . 芦康沙妥珠单抗对比单药化疗用于转移性三阴性乳腺癌二线及后线治疗的成本-效果分析 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2025 , 36 ( 16 ): 2024 - 2029 .
WANG K X , LIU S X , WANG R X , et al . Cost-effectiveness analysis of cadonilimab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy for persistent,recurrent,or metastatic cervical cancer [J ] . Front Immunol , 2025 , 16 : 1594786 .
张森 , 贾才凤 , 王洁 , 等 . 瑞波西利联合来曲唑一线治疗HR+/HER2-晚期或转移性乳腺癌的成本-效用分析 [J ] . 中国现代应用药学 , 2025 , 42 ( 19 ): 3432 - 3439 .
LLOYD A , NAFEES B , NAREWSKA J , et al . Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer [J ] . Br J Cancer , 2006 , 95 ( 6 ): 683 - 690 .
SONG E , YIN Y , ZHAO J , et al . LBA25 Culmerciclib plus fulvestrant as first-line treatment for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer:a phase Ⅲ trial(CULMINATE-2) [J ] . Ann Oncol , 2025 , 36 : S1569 - S1570 .
ZHANG Y J , ZENG X H , DENG H J , et al . Cost-effectiveness analysis of adding palbociclib as a second-line endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer from the US and Chinese perspectives [J ] . Clin Ther , 2019 , 41 ( 6 ): 1175 - 1185 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621