
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.北京大学第三医院药学部,北京 100191
2.北京大学药学院药事管理与临床药学系,北京 100191
主管药师,硕士研究生。研究方向:静脉用药调配。E-mail:wgc748@163.com
主任药师,博士生导师。研究方向:循证药学、临床药物治疗评价、个体化治疗。E-mail:zhaorongsheng@bjmu.edu.cn
收稿:2025-12-02,
修回:2026-02-11,
录用:2026-02-11,
纸质出版:2026-03-15
移动端阅览
王干城,杜雅薇,程吟楚,等.静脉用药调配质量控制指标体系的构建 Δ[J].中国药房,2026,37(05):559-564.
WANG Gancheng,DU Yawei,CHENG Yinchu,et al.Construction of a quality control index system for intravenous medication admixture[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2026,37(05):559-564.
王干城,杜雅薇,程吟楚,等.静脉用药调配质量控制指标体系的构建 Δ[J].中国药房,2026,37(05):559-564. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.05.02.
WANG Gancheng,DU Yawei,CHENG Yinchu,et al.Construction of a quality control index system for intravenous medication admixture[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2026,37(05):559-564. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.05.02.
目的
2
构建科学、系统的静脉用药调配质量控制指标体系,以保障患者用药安全与提升医疗服务质量。
方法
2
在文献分析和横断面调查研究基础上,初步拟定指标框架,并通过两轮德尔菲专家咨询收集意见,计算专家权威系数与肯德尔协调系数评估一致性;最终采用层次分析法确定各指标权重并检验一致性,以构建科学、系统的静脉用药调配质量控制指标体系。
结果
2
两轮函询专家积极系数均值为95.92%,权威系数均值为0.983。第二轮函询中,一、二、三级指标的肯德尔协调系数分别为0.306、0.440、0.394,均显著高于第一轮函询的0.211、0.274、0.379。最终构建的静脉用药调配质量控制指标体系包含6个一级指标(人员、药品耗材、设施设备、流程管理、环境卫生、成效)、17个二级指标(如教育培训、结构与梯队、工作强度、药品管理、耗材管理、设施设备管理等)、44个三级指标(如人均日工作量、药学专业技术人员占比、工作能力考核合格率、工作制度考核合格率、继续教育频次与考核合格率、药品账物相符率等)。
结论
2
本研究构建的静脉用药调配质量控制指标体系具有良好权威性与科学性,可为医院静脉用药调配质量的规范化管理提供理论依据与实践工具。
OBJECTIVE
2
To construct a scientific and systematic quality control index system for intravenous medication admixture, so as to ensure the safety of drug use and improve the quality of medical service.
METHODS
2
Based on literature analysis and cross-sectional survey, an initial indicator framework was formulated. Opinions were then gathered through two rounds of Delphi expert consultations, and the expert authority coefficient and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance were calculated to evaluate the consistency. Ultimately, the analytic hierarchy process was employed to determine the weights of each indicator and test for consistency in order to establish a scientific and systematic quality control indicator system for intravenous medication admixture.
RESULTS
2
The study conducted two rounds of expert consultation with an average positive coefficient of 95.92% and an average authority coefficient of 0.983. In the second round of the Delphi consultation, the Kendall’s coefficients of concordance for the first-, second-, and third-level indicators were 0.306, 0.440, and 0.394, respectively, all significantly higher than those in the first round (0.211, 0.274, 0.379). The final quality control system for intravenous medication admixture consisted of 6 first-level indicators (personnel, medicines and consumables, facilities and equipment, process management, environmental hygiene, and outcomes), 17 second-level indicators (e.g., education and training, staffing structure, workload, medication management, consumables management, and equipment maintenance), and 44 third-level indicators (e.g., average daily workload per person, proportion of pharmacy professionals, competency assessment pass rate, work system assessment pass rate, continuing education frequency and pass rate, and medication inventory accuracy).
CONCLUSIONS
2
The quality control system for intravenous medication admixture developed in this study demonstrates strong authority and scientific rigor, providing a theoretical basis and practical tool for the standardized management of intravenous medication admixture quality in hospitals.
吕红梅 , 吴永佩 . 我国静脉用药集中调配模式的创建与现状 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2021 , 32 ( 6 ): 641 - 646 .
国家卫生健康委 . 静脉用药调配中心建设与管理指南:试行 [EB/OL ] .( 2021-12-10 )[ 2025-03-20 ] . https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-12/21/content_5663666.htm https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-12/21/content_5663666.htm .
方宝霞 , 吴松潮 , 刘菁 , 等 . 静脉用药集中调配中心全面质量管理体系的构建与应用 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2023 , 34 ( 15 ): 1798 - 1803 .
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists . ASHP guidelines on compounding sterile preparations [J ] . Am J Health Syst Pharm , 2014 , 71 ( 2 ): 145 - 166 .
European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & Healthcare . Guide to good practices for the preparation of medicinal products in healthcare establishments [EB/OL ] . ( 2014-03-01 )[ 2025-03-20 ] . https://picscheme.org/docview/3443 https://picscheme.org/docview/3443 .
HUNG J C . USP general chapter <797> pharmaceutical compounding-sterile preparations [J ] . J Nucl Med , 2004 , 45 ( 6 ): 20 N, 28 N.
Institute for Safe Medication Practices . ISMP guidelines for safe preparation of compounded sterile preparations [EB/OL ] . ( 2022-05-04 ) [ 2025-03-20 ] . https://www.ismp.org/guidelines/sterile-compounding https://www.ismp.org/guidelines/sterile-compounding .
DONABEDIAN A . Quality assurance. Structure,process and outcome [J ] . Nurs Stand , 1992 , 7 ( 11 ): 4 - 5 .
National Quality Forum . National voluntary consensus standards for nursing sensitive care:an initial performance measure set [EB/OL ] . ( 2004-10-01 ) [ 2025-03-20 ] . http://www.qualityforum.org/WorkArea/linkit.aspx LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=22094 http://www.qualityforum.org/WorkArea/linkit.aspxLinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=22094 .
张若彬 , 吴秋惠 , 曹馨瑞 , 等 . 基于德尔菲法构建药师视角下慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者分级管理标准 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2024 , 35 ( 7 ): 860 - 865 .
DOURADO G B , VOLPATO G H , DE ALMEIDA-PEDRIN R R , et al . Likert scale vs visual analog scale for assessing facial pleasantness [J ] . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop , 2021 , 160 ( 6 ): 844 - 852 .
何珮莹 , 崇梓乔 , 陶静 , 等 . 上海市二级公立医院经济运营评价指标体系构建 [J ] . 中国卫生资源 , 2022 , 25 ( 6 ): 807 - 812 .
周亚霖 , 张艺馨 , 田新宇 , 等 . 基于德尔菲法中国县(区)突发公共卫生事件应急能力评估指标体系构建 [J ] . 中国公共卫生 , 2023 , 39 ( 9 ): 1180 - 1184 .
鞠晓宇 , 赵靓 , 赵越 , 等 . 医疗机构中药制剂立项评价体系的构建及应用 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2024 , 35 ( 10 ): 1168 - 1173 .
王彦芳 , 陈娟娟 , 关克磊 , 等 . 医院药师科研能力评价指标体系的构建及其信效度评价 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2023 , 34 ( 2 ): 242 - 245 .
徐驰 , 贾秀玲 , 范静 , 等 . 静脉用药调配中心静脉输液安全质量敏感指标构建 [J ] . 护理学杂志 , 2019 , 34 ( 16 ): 62 - 64 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621