
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.新疆医科大学第一附属医院药学部/新疆 药物临床研究重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830054
2.新疆维吾尔自治区第六人民医院公共卫生与感染管理科, 乌鲁木齐 830013
3.新疆医科大学药学院,乌鲁木齐 830054
主管药师,硕士。研究方向:临床药学。E-mail:zhuqingmei111@126.com
主任药师,博士。研究方向:药物经济学、临床药学、天然药用资源的开发与利用。E-mail:yjh-yft@163.com
收稿:2025-10-11,
修回:2025-11-15,
录用:2026-01-28,
纸质出版:2026-02-28
移动端阅览
朱青梅,王菁,石莉莉,等.奥马环素治疗儿童大环内酯类药物无反应性肺炎支原体肺炎的疗效与安全性[J].中国药房,2026,37(04):480-485.
ZHU Qingmei,WANG Jing,SHI Lili,et al.Efficacy and safety of omadacycline in the treatment of macrolide-unresponsive Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2026,37(04):480-485.
朱青梅,王菁,石莉莉,等.奥马环素治疗儿童大环内酯类药物无反应性肺炎支原体肺炎的疗效与安全性[J].中国药房,2026,37(04):480-485. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.04.12.
ZHU Qingmei,WANG Jing,SHI Lili,et al.Efficacy and safety of omadacycline in the treatment of macrolide-unresponsive Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2026,37(04):480-485. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.04.12.
目的
2
探讨奥马环素治疗儿童大环内酯类药物无反应性肺炎支原体肺炎(MUMPP)的疗效与安全性。
方法
2
回顾性选取2022年1月至2025年6月于新疆医科大学第一附属医院儿内科住院的1~18岁MUMPP患儿作为研究对象,根据初始大环内酯类药物治疗72 h后二次抗生素的选择分为奥马环素组和多西环素组。在常规治疗基础上,奥马环素组患儿静脉输注注射用甲苯磺酸奥马环素2.4 mg/kg(每日1次),多西环素组患儿口服盐酸多西环素片2 mg/kg(每日2次)。比较两组患儿的疗效和安全性,对临床疗效进行单因素分析和多因素Logistic回归分析,并采用亚组分析与多重敏感性分析验证结论的稳健性。
结果
2
本研究共纳入284例MUMPP患儿,奥马环素组和多西环素组各142例。在疗效方面,虽然奥马环素组患儿住院时间长于多西环素组(
P
<0.05),但肺部病灶吸收率和临床疗效均显著高于或优于多西环素组(
P
<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,药物(OR=5.300,95%CI:2.526~11.123)、住院时间(OR=1.348,95%CI:1.167~1.556)、用药时间(OR=1.422,95%CI:1.169~1.729)是临床疗效的影响因素(
P
<0.05)。亚组分析结果显示,在各亚组中,奥马环素的临床疗效均显著优于多西环素(
P
<0.05);多重敏感性分析结果显示,逆概率加权法校正前后及4个模型(逐步调整变量)的回归系数
B
均显著大于1(
P
<0.05)。在安全性方面,两组患儿的不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(
χ
2
=0.447,
P
=0.504)。
结论
2
在住院及用药时间较长的情况下,奥马环素治疗儿童MUMPP的疗效优于多西环素,且安全性良好。
OBJECTIVE
2
To investigate the efficacy and safety of omadacycline in the treatment of macrolide-unresponsive
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
pneumonia (MUMPP) in children.
METHODS
2
A retrospective study was conducted on children aged 1-18 years old with MUMPP who were hospitalized in the Department of Pediatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2022 to June 2025. According to the selection of secondary antibiotics after 72 h of initial treatment with macrolides, they were divided into the omadacycline group and the doxycycline group. Based on conventional treatment, children in the omadacycline group were given intravenous infusion of 2.4 mg/kg (once daily) of omadacycline tosylate, while children in the doxycycline group were given oral doxycycline hydrochloride tablets at 2 mg/kg (twice daily). The efficacy and safety were compared between the two groups of pediatric patients. Univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were performed on clinical efficacy, and subgroup analysis along with multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of the conclusions.
RESULTS
2
A total of 284 children with MUMPP were included in this study, with 142 in the omadacycline group and 142 in the doxycycline group. In terms of efficacy, although the hospitalization time of children in the omadacycline group was longer than that in the doxycycline group (
P
<0.05), the lung lesion absorption rate and clinical efficacy were significantly higher or better than those in the doxycycline group (
P
<0.05). The results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that medication (OR=5.300, 95%CI: 2.526-11.123), length of hospital stay (OR=1.348, 95%CI: 1.167-1.556), and medication duration (OR=1.422, 95%CI: 1.169-1.729) were influencing factors of clinical efficacy (
P
<0.05). The subgroup analysis results showed that the clinical efficacy of omadacycline was significantly better than that of doxycycline in all subgroups (
P
<0.05). The results of multiple sensitivity analysis showed that the regression coefficients
B
of the four models (gradually adjust variables) before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting were significantly greater than 1 (
P
<0.05). In terms of safety, there was no statistically significant difference in the inci
dence of adverse drug reactions between the two groups of patients (
χ
2
=0.447,
P
=0.504).
CONCLUSIONS
2
In the case of hospitalization and prolonged medication, the efficacy of omadacycline in treating childhood MUMPP is superior to that of doxycycline, and its safety is good.
WAITES K B , XIAO L , LIU Y , et al . Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the respiratory tract and beyond [J ] . Clin Microbiol Rev , 2017 , 30 ( 3 ): 747 - 809 .
KUTTY P K , JAIN S , TAYLOR T H , et al . Mycoplasma pneumoniae among children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia [J ] . Clin Infect Dis , 2019 , 68 ( 1 ): 5 - 12 .
YANG S , LU S K , GUO Y H , et al . A comparative study of general and severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children [J ] . BMC Infect Dis , 2024 , 24 ( 1 ): 449 .
YANG S , LU S , GUO Y , et al . A comparative study of general and severe mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children [J ] . BMC Infect Dis , 2024 , 24 ( 1 ): 449 .
TSAI T A , TSAI C K , KUO K C , et al . Rational stepwise approach for Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children [J ] . J Microbiol Immunol Infect , 2021 , 54 ( 4 ): 557 - 565 .
赵顺英 , 刘瀚旻 , 陆权 , 等 . 儿童肺炎支原体肺炎诊治的专家释疑:2023年11月 [J ] . 中华儿科杂志 , 2024 , 62 ( 2 ): 108 - 113 .
XU L M , FANG C Q . Case report:omadacycline in the treatment of macrolide-unresponsive Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in an adolescent patient [J ] . Front Cell Infect Microbiol , 2023 , 13 : 1244398 .
赵顺英 , 钱素云 , 陈志敏 , 等 . 儿童肺炎支原体肺炎诊疗指南:2023年版 [J ] . 传染病信息 , 2023 , 36 ( 4 ): 291 - 297 .
国家卫生健康委员会 . 7岁以下儿童生长标准 : WS/T 423-2022 [S ] . 北京 : 人民卫生出版社 , 2023 : 7 - 19 .
国家卫生和计划生育委员会 . 学龄儿童青少年超重与肥胖筛查 : WS/T 586-2018 [S ] . 北京 : 中国标准出版社 , 2018 : 1 - 2 .
《抗菌药物临床试验技术指导原则》写作组 . 抗菌药物临床试验技术指导原则 [J ] . 中国临床药理学杂志 , 2014 , 30 ( 9 ): 844 - 856 .
马依晨 , 周熙惠 , 赵晓丹 , 等 . 儿童大环内酯类无反应性肺炎支原体肺炎延长阿奇霉素与换用多西环素的疗效研究 [J ] . 中国当代儿科杂志 , 2024 , 26 ( 12 ): 1294 - 1300 .
卫生部 . 药品不良反应报告和监测管理办法 [EB/OL ] . ( 2011-05-04 )[ 2025-09-13 ] . https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/yaopin/ypfgwj/ypfgbmgzh/201105 04162501325.html https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/yaopin/ypfgwj/ypfgbmgzh/20110504162501325.html .
刘力铭 . 儿童重症肺炎支原体肺炎的临床特征及危险因素分析 [D ] . 大理 : 大理大学 , 2024 .
中国药学会儿童药物专业委员会 , 中华医学会儿科学分会呼吸学组合理用药协作组 , 中国妇幼保健协会儿童变态反应专业委员会呼吸学组 , 等 . 四环素类抗菌药物儿科临床应用专家共识:2024年版 [J ] . 中国实用儿科杂志 , 2024 , 39 ( 9 ): 641 - 651 .
临床常用四环素类药物合理应用多学科专家共识编写组 , 中华预防医学会医院感染控制分会 , 中国药理学会临床药理分会 , 等 . 临床常用四环素类药物合理应用多学科专家共识 [J ] . 中华医学杂志 , 2023 , 103 ( 30 ): 2281 - 2296 .
中华医学会儿科学分会呼吸学组 , 《中华实用儿科临床杂志》编辑委员会 . 儿童肺炎支原体肺炎诊治专家共识:2015年版 [J ] . 中华实用儿科临床杂志 , 2015 , 30 ( 17 ): 1304 - 1308 .
XU G Q , LIU X , WANG J Q , et al . Evaluation of omadacycline regimens for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia patients infected with Staphylococcus aureus by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis [J ] . J Chemother , 2024 , 36 ( 8 ): 709 - 716 .
董璐瑶 , 李国庆 , 游雪甫 , 等 . 奥马环素研究进展 [J ] . 中国医药生物技术 , 2020 , 15 ( 1 ): 48 - 56 .
李小娟 , 张科 . 血清乳酸脱氢酶和D-二聚体及C反应蛋白与重症肺炎支原体肺炎患儿预后的关系 [J ] . 医药论坛杂志 , 2025 , 46 ( 6 ): 625 - 630 .
STETS R , POPESCU M , GONONG J R , et al . Omadacyc-line for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia [J ] . N Engl J Med , 2019 , 380 ( 6 ): 517 - 527 .
BAKER D E . Omadacycline [J ] . Hosp Pharm , 2019 , 54 ( 2 ): 80 - 87 .
曾娜 , 王小洁 , 孙华君 . 米诺环素治疗儿童难治性肺炎支原体肺炎的用药安全性分析 [J ] . 药学服务与研究 , 2020 , 20 ( 2 ): 137 - 139 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621