
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.内蒙古医科大学附属医院药学部,呼和浩特 010110
2.内蒙古医科大学新药筛选工程研究中心,呼和浩特 010110
3.内蒙古医科大学药学院,呼和浩特 010110
4.内蒙古医科大学计算机学院,呼和浩特 010110
主管药师,硕士。研究方向:药事管理及中蒙药质量评价。E-mail:nmlrj1987@163.com
副研究员,硕士。研究方向:中蒙药药效物质研究。E-mail:nmg15547126231@sina.com
收稿:2025-03-18,
修回:2025-07-01,
录用:2025-07-01,
纸质出版:2025-08-15
移动端阅览
李荣杰,张谦,张微,等.多成分定量分析结合化学模式识别与熵权-TOPSIS法的三子散质量评价[J].中国药房,2025,36(15):1846-1851.
LI Rongjie,ZHANG Qian,ZHANG Wei,et al.Quality evaluation of Sanzi powder based on quantitative analysis of multi-component combined with chemical pattern recognition and entropy weight-TOPSIS method[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(15):1846-1851.
李荣杰,张谦,张微,等.多成分定量分析结合化学模式识别与熵权-TOPSIS法的三子散质量评价[J].中国药房,2025,36(15):1846-1851. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.15.05.
LI Rongjie,ZHANG Qian,ZHANG Wei,et al.Quality evaluation of Sanzi powder based on quantitative analysis of multi-component combined with chemical pattern recognition and entropy weight-TOPSIS method[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(15):1846-1851. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.15.05.
目的
2
基于12种成分定量分析结合化学模式识别与熵权-逼近理想解排序(TOPSIS)法,对不同批次三子散的质量进行综合评价。
方法
2
采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱(HPLC-MS/MS)法测定15批(编号S1~S15)三子散中12种成分(没食子酸乙酯、没食子酸、阿魏酸、柯里拉京、京尼平-1-
O
-
β
-D-龙胆双糖苷、川楝素、栀子苷、咖啡酸、去乙酰车叶草苷酸甲酯、鞣花酸、芦丁、槲皮素)的含量,然后对含量测定结果进行聚类分析(CA)、主成分分析(PCA)和正交偏最小二乘-判别分析(OPLS-DA),并筛选三子散质量差异标志性成分。采用熵权法计算各指标成分的权重值,并利用TOPSIS法对15批三子散的质量进行优劣排序。
结果
2
12种成分的含量分别为13.494~24.292、2 069.608~3 188.100、1.410~3.616、1 065.030~2 630.584、1 404.704~1 838.078、101.640~354.268、9 193.720~14 777.854、1.240~5.060、1 480.028~5 541.990、4 261.422~5 607.438、107.560~195.512、2.226~4.192 μg/g。CA、PCA、OPLS-DA结果显示,15批三子散可聚为2类,S3、S7、S10、S15聚为一类,其余批次聚为一类;栀子苷、槲皮素、咖啡酸和去乙酰车叶草苷酸甲酯的变量重要性投影值>1且
P
<0.05,是各批次三子散质量差异标志性成分。熵权-TOPSIS分析结果显示,去乙酰车叶草苷酸甲酯的信息熵最小、权重最大;S3、S7、S10、S15样品的相对贴近程度在0.789~0.973之间,而其余样品的相对贴近程度在0.054~0.172之间。
结论
2
所建立的HPLC-MS/MS法可准确测定三子散中12种成分的含量;去乙酰车叶草苷酸甲酯、栀子苷、槲皮素及咖啡酸是其质量差异标志性成分;S3、S7、S10、S15样品的整体质量优于其他批次样品,栀子饮片的质量是保证该制剂质量一致性的关键。
OBJECTIVE
2
To comprehensively evaluate the quality of Sanzi powder from different batches based on 12 components quantitative analysis combined with chemical pattern recognition and entropy weight-TOPSIS method.
METHODS
2
The contents of 12 components in 15 batches of Sanzi powder (No. S1-S15) were determined by HPLC-MS/MS, such as ethyl gallate, gallic acid, ferulic acid, corilagin, genipin-1-
O
-
β
-D-gentiobioside, toosendanin, geniposide, caffeic acid, methyl deacetylated coumarinate, tannic acid, rutin, quercetin. Cluster analysis (CA), principal component analysis (PCA), and orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were conducted on the assay results. Using variable importance projection (VIP) value>1 and
P
<0.05 as the evaluation criteria, the quality differential markers in Sanzi powder were screened. The entropy weight method was used to calculate the weight value, and TOPSIS method was used to rank th
e quality of 15 batches of Sanzi powder from superior to inferior.
RESULTS
2
The contents of the 12 components were 13.494-24.292, 2 069.608-3 188.100, 1.410-3.616, 1 065.030-2 630.584, 1 404.704-1 838.078, 101.640-354.268, 9 193.720-14 777.854, 1.240-5.060, 148.028-5 541.990, 4 261.422-5 607.438, 107.560-195.512, 2.226-4.192 μg/g, respectively. The results of CA, PCA and OPLS-DA indicated that 15 batches of Sanzi powder could be clustered into two groups. Specifically, batches S3, S7, S10 and S15 were grouped into one category, and remaining batches were grouped into one category. VIP values of geniposide, quercetin, caffeic acid, and methyl deacetylated coumarinate were all greater than 1, with corresponding
P
-values less than 0.05. The results of the entropy weight-TOPSIS analysis revealed that methyl deacetylate exhibited the smallest information entropy and the highest weight. The relative closeness degrees of samples S3, S7, S10 and S15 ranged from 0.789 to 0.973, while the remaining samples ranged from 0.054 to 0.172.
CONCLUSIONS
2
The contents of 12 components in Sanzi powder could be determined accurately by using HPLC-MS/MS technology. Methyl deacetylated coumarinate, geniposide, quercetin and caffeic acid were identified as the quality differential markers. It was found that the overall quality of samples S3, S7, S10 and S15 were superior to that of other batches. Notably, the quality of Gardeniae Fructus decoction pieces emerges as a critical factor in ensuring the consistency of the preparation’s quality.
卫生部药典委员会 . 中华人民共和国卫生部药品标准:蒙药分册 [M ] . 呼和浩特 : 内蒙古科学技术出版社 , 1998 : 58 .
国家药典委员会 . 中华人民共和国药典:一部 [M ] . 2020年版 . 北京 : 中国医药科技出版社 , 2020 : 512 .
李君 , 李荣杰 , 周枫叶 , 等 . 蒙药三子散质量评价研究:指纹图谱、化学模式识别和多成分分析 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2025 , 36 ( 4 ): 414 - 420 .
周枫叶 , 李君 , 张谦 , 等 . 基于定性、定量及化学模式识别分析的蒙药森登-4质量评价 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2025 , 36 ( 9 ): 1040 - 1045 .
李君 , 胡玉霞 , 张梦迪 , 等 . 蒙药三子散醇提物化学成分的HPLC-Q-Exactive-MS快速分析与鉴定 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2022 , 33 ( 11 ): 1348 - 1354 .
崔小敏 , 董明芝 , 张红 , 等 . 基于UHPLC-Q-exactive orbitrap MS和化学计量学分析的芪龙壮儿口服液质量评价研究 [J ] . 药学学报 , 2023 , 58 ( 6 ): 1655 - 1662 .
李君 , 周枫叶 , 张曼玲 , 等 . 基于指纹图谱和化学模式识别分析的蒙药森登-4质量评价研究 [J ] . 中国医院药学杂志 , 2024 , 44 ( 21 ): 2447 - 2453,2491 .
李君 , 张谦 , 王跃武 , 等 . 基于HPLC-MS/MS和化学模式识别分析的蒙药那如-3味丸质量评价 [J ] . 中国医院药学杂志 , 2024 , 44 ( 11 ): 1277 - 1284 .
何小芳 , 王欣 , 李及 , 等 . 基于15种成分定量结合化学模式识别及TOPSIS分析的三黄片质量评价 [J ] . 中草药 , 2024 , 55 ( 24 ): 8379 - 8391 .
赵伟 , 陈树和 , 闫斌 , 等 . 基于指纹图谱结合化学模式识别的精天颗粒质量评价 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2025 , 36 ( 3 ): 300 - 305 .
田芳 , 张英 , 吴孟华 , 等 . HPLC特征图谱结合多模式识别及熵权TOPSIS法的不同基原蒲黄药材质量评价 [J ] . 中草药 , 2025 , 56 ( 4 ): 1377 - 1384 .
雷蓉 , 杨建玲 , 周亚楠 , 等 . 基于麦冬多指标成分定量结合偏最小二乘法-判别分析、熵权-TOPSIS法评价参麦颗粒质量 [J ] . 中草药 , 2025 , 56 ( 2 ): 467 - 475 .
张煜炯 , 罗益远 , 孙崇鲁 , 等 . 基于UPLC-QTRAP-MS/MS和多元统计分析评价不同干燥方式对乌药叶成分的影响 [J ] . 中国现代应用药学 , 2025 , 42 ( 3 ): 377 - 384 .
李雅静 , 王胜超 , 朱建光 , 等 . 基于熵权TOPSIS法和灰色关联度分析的曼地亚红豆杉质量评价 [J ] . 中药材 , 2024 , 47 ( 11 ): 2783 - 2791 .
刘方舟 , 杨阳 , 张一颖 , 等 . 栀子药材道地性系统评价与分析 [J ] . 中国现代中药 , 2018 , 20 ( 11 ): 1330 - 1339 .
李明利 , 赵佳琛 , 金艳 , 等 . 经典名方中栀子的本草考证 [J ] . 中国现代中药 , 2020 , 22 ( 8 ): 1287 - 1302 .
0
浏览量
22
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621