
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
天津市第一中心医院药学部,天津 300192
副主任药师,硕士。研究方向:临床药学。E-mail:yyguoxj@163.com
主任药师,硕士。研究方向:临床药学。E-mail:buyishan@sina.com
收稿:2025-03-20,
修回:2025-07-09,
录用:2025-07-09,
纸质出版:2025-08-15
移动端阅览
郭媛媛,王超,秦寅鹏,等.基于循证方法学和德尔菲法构建地佐辛注射液的药物利用评价标准[J].中国药房,2025,36(15):1841-1845.
GUO Yuanyuan,WANG Chao,QIN Yinpeng,et al.Construction of drug utilization evaluation criteria for Dezocine injection based on evidence-based methodology and Delphi method[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(15):1841-1845.
郭媛媛,王超,秦寅鹏,等.基于循证方法学和德尔菲法构建地佐辛注射液的药物利用评价标准[J].中国药房,2025,36(15):1841-1845. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.15.04.
GUO Yuanyuan,WANG Chao,QIN Yinpeng,et al.Construction of drug utilization evaluation criteria for Dezocine injection based on evidence-based methodology and Delphi method[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(15):1841-1845. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.15.04.
目的
2
构建地佐辛注射液的药物利用评价标准,为医疗机构合理用药提供参考。
方法
2
以循证方法学为基础,查阅相关指南/专家共识、系统评价/Meta分析,筛选证据后,初步建立地佐辛注射液的评价标准框架。采用德尔菲法,选择28位来自天津、北京、山东等8个省份的二级及以上级别医疗机构的临床医师和临床药师,进行2轮问卷调查,根据专家积极系数、权威系数及协调程度等确定最终指标。
结果
2
2轮问卷有效回收率分别为100%和92.86%;2轮专家权威系数分别为0.82、0.81,专家协调程度分别为0.29、0.31(
P
<0.001)。最终形成包含用药指征、用药过程和用药结果三大维度,涵盖11个一级指标(如适应证、用法用量等)和33个二级指标(如分娩镇痛、中大手术后重度疼痛镇痛应与其他镇痛药联合应用等)的地佐辛注射液药物利用评价标准体系,各指标的重要性评分均值为4.08~5.00分,总体评分均值为4.61分,变异系数为0~0.19。
结论
2
基于循证方法学和德尔菲法建立的地佐辛注射液药物利用评价标准具有较好的权威性和科学性,为后续临床用药合理性评价提供了参考依据。
OBJECTIVE
2
To construct the drug utilization evaluation criteria for Dezocine injection, so as to provide reference for the rational drug use in medical institutions.
METHODS
2
On the basis of evidence methodology, relevant guidelines/expert consensus, systematic reviews/meta-analysis were consulted; the evaluation criteria framework for Dezocine injection was established after screening evidence. Delphi method was employed, whereby 28 clinicians and clinical pharmacists from secondary and above-level medical institutions across eight provinces, including Tianjin, Beijing and Shandong, were selected to participate in two rounds of questionnaire surveys. The final indicators were determined based on the experts’ enthusiasm coefficient, authority coefficient, and degree of coordination.
RESULTS
2
The effective recovery rate of questionnaire was 100% in the first round and 92.86% in the second round; expert authority coefficient was 0.82 in the first round and 0.81 in the second round; the coordination degree of experts in the first round was 0.29, and in the second round was 0.31 (
P
<0.001). Drug utilization evaluation standard system for Dezocine injection was formed finally, including three dimensions of medication indications, medication process and medication results, with a total of 11 first-level indicators (such as indications, usage and dosage) and 33 second-level indicators (such as labor analgesia and the management of severe pain following major or moderate surgeries combined with other analgesic drugs). The average importance scores for each indicator ranged from 4.08 to 5.00 points, with an overall average score of 4.61 points and coefficient of variation ranging from 0 to 0.19.
CONCLUSIONS
2
The drug utilization evaluation criteria for Dezocine injection established based on evidence-based methodology and Delphi method is authoritative and scientific, which provides a reference for subsequent evaluation of the rationality of clinical medication.
安胜男 , 刘亚非 , 朱旭 , 等 . 基于真实世界地佐辛注射液临床使用研究及合理性评价 [J ] . 中国医科大学学报 , 2022 , 51 ( 11 ): 1031 - 1034 .
赵紫楠 , 李婷 , 李超 , 等 . 地佐辛注射液的快速卫生技术评估 [J ] . 中国合理用药探索 , 2020 , 17 ( 7 ): 14 - 18 .
夏亚丹 , 王晓骏 , 张旭升 , 等 . 1 000例住院患者地佐辛注射液临床应用分析与合理性评价 [J ] . 中国医院用药评价与分析 , 2025 , 25 ( 4 ): 479 - 483 .
ASMA AL T , LISA S , IMTI C . et al . Review of drug utilization studies in neonatal units:a global perspective [J ] . Int J Environ Res Public Health , 2020 , 17 ( 16 ): 5669 .
苏开燕 , 赵赟 , 张东梅 , 等 . 我国药物利用评价文献可视化分析 [J ] . 中国药业 , 2025 , 34 ( 6 ): 11 - 17 .
陈彤丹 , 高奇隆 , 任晋文 , 等 . 基于德尔菲法构建慢性病药物可及性评价指标体系 [J ] . 中国现代应用药学 , 2022 , 39 ( 20 ): 2652 - 2657 .
吴玥 , 沈秉正 , 张帆 , 等 . 直接口服抗凝药用于肿瘤相关静脉血栓预防的临床综合评价体系研究 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2025 , 36 ( 11 ): 1384 - 1388 .
张明雄 , 秦婉莹 , 黄健 , 等 . 重点监控药品合理用药管理指标体系的构建 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2025 , 36 ( 7 ): 784 - 788 .
刘楠 , 李纳 , 时程程 , 等 . 基于Delphi法的磺达肝癸钠药物利用评价标准的构建及单中心研究 [J ] . 中国药学杂志 , 2023 , 58 ( 8 ): 737 - 741 .
LIANG S B , CAI F X . Off-label drug use in China after the physician law:2021:legal challenges and solutions [J ] . Front Pharmacol , 2025 , 16 : 1547418 .
胡正波 , 卢海波 , 陈路佳 , 等 . 地佐辛注射液治疗癌性疼痛的系统评价 [J ] . 中国药业 , 2015 , 24 ( 17 ): 9 - 11 .
董维森 , 李洁 , 陈赫军 , 等 . 地佐辛注射液治疗肿瘤患者持续疼痛的系统评价 [J ] . 中国疼痛医学杂志 , 2016 , 22 ( 2 ): 123 - 127 .
HUANG R Z , JIANG L H , CAO Y , et al . Comparative efficacy of therapeutics for chronic cancer pain:a Bayesian network meta-analysis [J ] . J Clin Oncol , 2019 , 37 ( 20 ): 1742 - 1752 .
WANG L , LIU X D , WANG J F , et al . Comparison of the efficacy and safety between dezocine injection and morphine injection for persistence of pain in Chinese cancer patients:a meta-analysis [J ] . Biosci Rep , 2017 , 37 ( 3 ): BSR20170243 .
中国医师协会疼痛科医师分会癌痛与安宁疗护专家组 , 中华医学会疼痛学分会癌痛学组 , 樊碧发 , 等 . 癌痛患者静脉自控镇痛中国专家共识 [J ] . 中华医学杂志 , 2023 , 103 ( 11 ): 793 - 802 .
龙霞 , 吴斌 , 徐珽 . 预注地佐辛预防依托咪酯所致肌阵挛疗效和安全性的系统评价 [J ] . 中国循证医学杂志 , 2015 , 15 ( 6 ): 693 - 698 .
ZHU Y , YANG Y T , ZHOU C M , et al . Using dezocine to prevent etomidate-induced myoclonus:a meta-analysis of randomized trials [J ] . Drug Des Devel Ther , 2017 , 11 : 2163 - 2170 .
ZHOU C M , YANG Y T , ZHU Y , et al . Effects of dezocine on prevention of propofol injection pain:a meta-analysis [J ] . J Pain Res , 2017 , 10 : 1369 - 1375 .
NI X F , LIN M , LI J L , et al . Development of an eva- luation indicator system for the rational use of proton pump inhibitors in pediatric intensive care units:an application of Delphi method [J ] . Medicine (Baltimore) , 2021 , 100 ( 24 ): e26327 .
PERL T , VANHATALO J , CHRYSAFI A . Calibrating expert assessments using hierarchical Gaussian process models [J ] . Bayesian Anal , 2020 , 15 ( 4 ): 1251 - 1280 .
0
浏览量
59
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621