
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中山大学附属第五医院脊柱外科,珠海 519000
2.中山大学附属第五医院继续教育处,珠海 519000
张奎渤,Email:zhangkb@mail.sysu.edu.cn
收稿:2026-04-09,
网络首发:2026-06-15,
移动端阅览
张大卫, 陈军权, 谢丽丽, 等. 形成性评价嵌入同伴辅助学习对住院医师培训效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2026,1-7.
Zhang Dawei, Chen Junquan, Xie Lili, et al. Effects of embedding formative assessment into peer-assisted learning on residency training outcomes[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2026, 1-7.
张大卫, 陈军权, 谢丽丽, 等. 形成性评价嵌入同伴辅助学习对住院医师培训效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2026,1-7. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20260409-02300.
Zhang Dawei, Chen Junquan, Xie Lili, et al. Effects of embedding formative assessment into peer-assisted learning on residency training outcomes[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2026, 1-7. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20260409-02300.
目的
2
探讨形成性评价嵌入同伴辅助学习(peer-assisted learning,PAL)对住院医师规范化培训中同伴导师教学表现及学员学习效果的影响。
方法
2
2024至2025学年在中山大学附属第五医院住培基地开展平行对照研究。纳入高年资住院医师同伴导师54名,按随机数字表法分为干预组(
n
=27)和对照组(
n
=27);低年资住院医师学员108名,按导师分组进入两组,每组54名。对照组实施常规PAL教学,干预组在此基础上嵌入迷你临床评估演练(mini-clinical evaluation exercise,Mini-CEX)、直接观察操作技能评估(direct observation of procedural skills,DOPS)、反思性教学日志及反馈机制,干预12周,每名导师完成6次教学,每次60~90 min。比较两组学员知识考核成绩及同伴导师教学表现。学员成绩采用线性混合效应模型分析,导师教学表现采用基于团队学习的同伴评价量表(peer evaluation scale for team-based learning,PES-TBL)、Mini-CEX和DOPS评价。采用
SPSS 26.0统计软件进行数据分析。
结果
2
两组基线差异均无统计学意义(均
P
>
0.05)。组别与时间交互作用有统计学意义(
Z
=11.62,
P
<
0.001)。干预后,干预组学员知识考核成绩(6.85±0.68)高于对照组(5.07±0.64),差异有统计学意义(
Z
=15.31,
P
<
0.001)。干预组同伴导师PES-TBL(67.54±1.88 vs. 54.06±3.66)、Mini-CEX(7.15±0.73 vs. 5.72±0.71)及DOPS(4.20±0.47 vs. 3.19±0.34)评分均高于对照组(
t
=17.03、7.26、9.15,均
P
<0.001)。
结论
2
形成性评价嵌入同伴辅助学习过程可提升同伴导师教学表现并改善学员学习效果。
Objective
2
To investigate the effects of embedding formative assessment into peer-assisted learning (PAL) on the teaching performance of peer tutors and the learning outcomes of trainees in standardized residency training.
Methods
2
A parallel controlled study was conducted at the standardized residency training base of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University during the 2024-2025 academic year. A total of 54 senior residents serving as peer tutors were enrolled and randomly assigned to an intervention group and a control group (
n
=27 in each group) using a random number table. A total of 108 junior resident trainees were assigned to the two groups according to their corresponding tutors (
n
=54 in each group). The control group received conventional PAL
while the intervention group received PAL embedded with mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX)
direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS)
reflective teaching logs
and a feedback mechanism. The intervention lasted 12 weeks
with each tutor conducting six teaching sessions
each lasting 60-90 min. Knowledge test scores and peer tutor teaching performance were compared between the two groups. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze knowledge test scores
and teaching performance was assessed using Peer Evaluation Scale for Team-Based Learning
Mini-CEX
and DOPS
. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 statistical software.
Results
2
There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (all
P
>
0.05). A significant group-by-time interaction was observed (
Z
=11.62
P
<
0.001). After the intervention
the knowledge test score of trainees in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (6.85±0.68 vs. 5.07±0.64
Z
=15.31
P
<
0.001). Peer tutors in the intervention group achieved significantly higher scores in peer evaluation scale for team-based learning (67.54±1.88 vs. 54.06±3.66)
Mini-CEX (7.15±0.73 vs. 5.72±0.71)
and DOPS (4.20±0.47 vs. 3.19±0.34) than those in the control group (
t
=17.03
7.26
9.15
respectively; all
P
<
0.001).
Conclusions
2
Embedding formative assessment into PAL can improve the teaching performance of peer tutors and enhance the learning outcomes of trainees.
Ten Cate O , Durning S . Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice [J ] . Med Teach , 2007 , 29 ( 6 ): 591 - 599 . DOI: 10.1080/01421590701606799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590701606799 .
Brierley C , Ellis L , Reid ER . Peer-assisted learning in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J ] . Med Educ , 2022 , 56 ( 4 ): 365 - 373 . DOI: 10.1111/medu.14672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14672 .
Norcini J , Burch V . Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE guide No. 31 [J ] . Med Teach , 2007 , 29 ( 9 ): 855 - 871 . DOI: 10.1080/01421590701775453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590701775453 .
Norcini JJ , Blank LL , Duffy FD , et al . The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills [J ] . Ann Intern Med , 2003 , 138 ( 6 ): 476 - 481 . DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-6-200303180-00012 http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-6-200303180-00012 .
徐广文 , 徐世斌 , 徐美清 , 等 . 形成性评价在住院医师规范化培训胸外科规培中的应用 [J ] . 中华全科医学 , 2020 , 18 ( 2 ): 307 - 310 . DOI: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001232 http://dx.doi.org/10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001232 .
佘君 , 洪群英 , 郑玉英 , 等 . 基于MiniCEX-DOPS的形成性评价在呼吸与危重症医学科住院医师规范化培训中的探索 [J ] . 中华医学教育探索杂志 , 2021 , 20 ( 7 ): 826 - 829 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200325-00556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200325-00556 .
Zhang D , Zhang K , Chen J , et al . Enhancing peer teaching and psychological outcomes in medical education through structured formative assessment: a quasi-experimental study [J ] . Front Psychol , 2025 , 16 : 1710203 . DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1710203 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1710203 .
Zhang H , Liao AWX , Goh SH , et al . Effectiveness of peer teaching in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J ] . Nurse Educ Today , 2022 , 118 : 105499 . DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105499 .
Friel O , Kell D , Higgins M . The evidence base for peer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education: a scoping study [J ] . MedEdPublish , 2018 , 7 : 44 . DOI: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000044.1 http://dx.doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.0000044.1 .
Slabbert R . Effects of same-year/level peer-assisted learning on academic performance of students in health sciences extended curriculum programmes at a University of Technology in South Africa [J ] . Pie , 2024 , 42 ( 2 ): 46 - 59 . DOI: 10.38140/pie.v42i2.7311 http://dx.doi.org/10.38140/pie.v42i2.7311 .
Irons A , Elkington S . Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback [M ] . London : Routledge , 2021 .
Morris R , Perry T , Wardle L . Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: a systematic review [J ] . Rev Educ , 2021 , 9 ( 3 ): e3292 . DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621