
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.重庆医科大学莱斯特大学联合学院,重庆 400016
2.重庆医药高等专科学校科技产业发展中心,重庆 401331
3.重庆医科大学教务处,重庆 400016
4.重庆医科大学附属第一医院心血管内科,重庆 400016
李响,Email:lzd9288@163.com
收稿:2025-11-01,
网络首发:2026-04-27,
移动端阅览
王文涛, 潘俊颐, 朱文彦, 等. 基于学生视角的混合式教学在中外合作办学临床医学专业中的实施效果及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2026,1-9.
Wang Wentao, Pan Junyi, Zhu Wenyan, et al. DOI Implementation effectiveness and influencing factors of blended learning in a Sino-foreign cooperative clinical medicine program: a student-perspective questionnaire study[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2026, 1-9.
王文涛, 潘俊颐, 朱文彦, 等. 基于学生视角的混合式教学在中外合作办学临床医学专业中的实施效果及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2026,1-9. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20251101-02274.
Wang Wentao, Pan Junyi, Zhu Wenyan, et al. DOI Implementation effectiveness and influencing factors of blended learning in a Sino-foreign cooperative clinical medicine program: a student-perspective questionnaire study[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2026, 1-9. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20251101-02274.
目的
2
基于学生问卷调查,评价混合式教学——“大班讲授(lecture)+小组讨论(group work,GW)”在中外合作办学临床医学专业中的实施效果,并分析影响学生满意度/偏好的相关因素及主要问题反馈。
方法
2
以重庆医科大学临床医学(中外合作办学)专业2020至2023级本科生为对象,通过匿名问卷收集数据,问卷内容涵盖混合式教学模式偏好、课堂教学体验、学习效果感知、课程负荷与改进建议,并设置开放性问题用于文本分析。采用Python 3.9.6进行描述性统计、Spearman相关分析及Logistic回归分析,并结合BERTopic主题建模进行语义分析。
结果
2
共获得有效问卷155份。75.48
%
(117/155)的学生偏好“大班授课 + 小组讨论”模式,他们认为该模式较传统教学更能促进知识理解与临床思维的发展。“教师讲解清晰、结构合理”(
OR
=2.12,
P
=0.047)、“课堂互动机会充足”(
OR
=2.58,
P
=0.026)及“提供实践中解决问题的机会”(
OR
=2.86,
P=
0.009)是主要正向因素。文本分析显示,正向反馈集中于合作学习、理论联系实践及自主学习能力的提升,负向反馈主要涉及讨论效率和课程负荷。
结论
2
在中外合作办学临床医学专业中,混合式教学(lecture+group work)与学生学习主动性、临床思维能力及课堂参与度呈正向关联,并整体获得较高认可。不同年级学生在教学主导方式偏好方面存在差异,课程负荷与课堂组织效率仍是影响学习体验的重要因素。混合式教学的实施有必要结合学生学习阶段与课程特点,进一步优化教学结构与学习支持体系。
Objective
2
To evaluate the implementation effectiveness of blended learning (lecture + group work) in a Sino-foreign cooperative clinical medicine program based on a student questionnaire survey
and analyze the factors associated with student satisfaction/preferences as well as the major issues reported.
Methods
2
Undergraduate students enrolled between 2020 and 2023 in the Clinical Medicine (Sino-foreign Cooperative Program) at Chongqing Medical University were surveyed using anonymous questionnaires. The questionnaire covered preferences for blended learning modes
classroom teaching experiences
perceived learning outcomes
course workload
and suggestions for improvement
and included open-ended items for text analysis. Data were analyzed using Python 3.9.6 for descriptive statistics
Spearman correlation analysis
and logistic regression analysis. Open-ended responses were examined through semantic analysis with BERTopic modeling.
Results
2
A total of 155 valid questionnaires were collected. Among the students
75.48% (117/15
5) preferred the blended model combining large-class lectures + group discussions
considering it more effective than traditional teaching in promoting knowledge comprehension and clinical thinking. Clear and well-structured instruction [odds ratio (
OR
)=2.12
P
=0.047
]
sufficient opportunities for classroom interaction (
OR
=2.58
P
=0.026)
and opportunities to solve practical problems (
OR
=2.86
P
=0.009) were identified as major positive factors. Text analysis indicated that positive feedback focused on collaborative learning
integration of theory and practice
and improvement in self-directed learning ability
while negative feedback concerned discussion efficiency and workload.
Conclusions
2
In a Sino-foreign cooperative clinical medicine program
blended learning (lecture + group work) was positively associated with student learning initiative
clinical thinking ability
and classroom engagement
and was generally well accepted. Preferences for instructional leadership differed across academic years
while course workload and classroom organization efficiency remained key factors influencing learning experience. Future implementation should be tailored to student learning stages and course characteristics
with further optimization of instructional structure and learning support systems.
刘芳 , 余诗倩 , 牛萍 , 等 . 基于CiteSpace的国内外医学教育混合式教学研究对比分析 [J ] . 中国医学教育技术 , 2024 , 38 ( 5 ): 606 - 613, 621 . DOI: 10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202405010 http://dx.doi.org/10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202405010 .
教育部等六部门 . 教育部等六部门关于医教协同深化临床医学人才培养改革的意见 [EB/OL ] . ( 2014-06-30 )[ 2025-10-31 ] . http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/s7065/201407/t20140714_178832.html http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/s7065/201407/t20140714_178832.html .
国务院办公厅 . 国务院办公厅关于深化医教协同进一步推进医学教育改革与发展的意见 [EB/OL ] . ( 2017-07-03 )[ 2025-10-31 ] . http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/201707/t20170711_309175.html http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/201707/t20170711_309175.html .
闵静婷 , 杜帮 , 张艳君 , 等 . 中西结合创新型小班教学模式在《系统解剖学》教学中的实践研究 [J ] . 中国医药科学 , 2024 , 14 ( 14 ): 50 - 54 . DOI: 10.20116/j.issn2095-0616.2024.14.12 http://dx.doi.org/10.20116/j.issn2095-0616.2024.14.12 .
汪瓒 , 邓世雄 , 朱丹 , 等 . 新医科背景下临床医学中外合作办学课程体系的构建 [J ] . 医学教育研究与实践 , 2023 , 31 ( 4 ): 406 - 409 . DOI: 10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2023.04.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2023.04.003 .
龚清歌 , 王岩 , 蒋宁 , 等 . 临床医学专业中外合作办学: 学生视角下的问卷调查研究及启示 [J ] . 中华医学教育探索杂志 , 2024 , 23 ( 8 ): 1042 - 1045 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231212-01824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231212-01824 .
覃湃惟 , 黄彦纾 , 张海英 . 探讨“在地国际化”在地方医学院校的实施路径 [J ] . 中国高等医学教育 , 2021 ( 2 ): 9 - 10 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2021.02.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2021.02.005 .
刘东庭 , 王立新 , 赵宇 , 等 . LBL与CBL为基础结合 “翻转课堂教学” 的混合教学模式在基层医院心电图教学中研究应用 [J ] . 首都食品与医药 , 2025 , 32 ( 7 ): 117 - 119 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8257.2025.07.039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8257.2025.07.039 .
教育部 . 教育部关于加快建设高水平本科教育全面提高人才培养能力的意见 [J ] . 中华人民共和国国务院公报 , 2019 ( 3 ): 34 - 41 .
郭蕾 , 刘昊 , 徐佳 , 等 . 医学生对线上线下混合教学模式的评价和需求的调查分析:以宁波大学医学部为例 [J ] . 创新教育研究 , 2024 ( 12 ): 515 - 522 .
Young JQ , Van Merrienboer J , Durning S , et al . Cognitive Load Theory: implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86 [J ] . Med Teach , 2014 , 36 ( 5 ): 371 - 384 . DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.889290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.889290 .
van Diggele C , Burgess A , Mellis C . Planning, preparing and structuring a small group teaching session [J ] . BMC Med Educ , 2020 , 20 ( 2 ): 462 . DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02281-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02281-4 .
黄晓芳 , 桑田 , 孙燕 , 等 . 翻转课堂与传统大课在儿科学见习的教学效果反馈及优化策略分析 [J ] . 中华医学教育探索杂志 , 2025 , 24 ( 4 ): 446 - 452 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20250105-02014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20250105-02014 .
李春歌 , 乔春梅 , 王博冉 , 等 . 翻转课堂与实时评价系统在超声医学科教学中的应用研究 [J/OL ] . 中华临床医师杂志 (电子版), 2025 , 19 ( 2 ): 150 - 154 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2025.02.008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2025.02.008 .
路惠捷 , 李逢战 , 闫晓飞 , 等 . O-PIRTAS翻转课堂在《发展心理学》教学中的应用与评价 [J ] . 中华医学教育探索杂志 , 2025 , 24 ( 10 ): 1322 - 1326 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20240321-02134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20240321-02134 .
沈梦雯 , 丁纯蕾 , 赵雷 , 等 . “小组化”助教指导模式在临床技能同质化培训体系建设中的应用 [J ] . 中华医学教育探索杂志 , 2023 , 22 ( 6 ): 908 - 911 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210111-01321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210111-01321 .
0
浏览量
1
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621