
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.重庆大学附属江津医院急诊科,重庆 402260
2.重庆大学附属江津医院脊柱外科,重庆 402260
3.重庆大学附属江津医院手术室,重庆 402260
邓佳林,Email:50282919@qq.com
纸质出版日期:2024-12-20,
收稿日期:2023-12-29,
移动端阅览
郭贇卿, 夏晓静, 刁瑞, 等. 织网式单元教学在护生手术室临床实习中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(12): 1702-1706.
GUO YUNQING, XIA XIAOJING, DIAO RUI, et al. Research on the application of woven mesh unit method in teaching nursing students in clinical internship in operating room. [J]. Chinese journal of medical education research, 2024, 23(12): 1702-1706.
郭贇卿, 夏晓静, 刁瑞, 等. 织网式单元教学在护生手术室临床实习中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(12): 1702-1706. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231229-01913.
GUO YUNQING, XIA XIAOJING, DIAO RUI, et al. Research on the application of woven mesh unit method in teaching nursing students in clinical internship in operating room. [J]. Chinese journal of medical education research, 2024, 23(12): 1702-1706. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231229-01913.
目的
2
探讨织网式单元教学在护生临床实习教学中的应用效果。
方法
2
将重庆大学附属江津医院2022年实习的300名护理实习生纳入传统组,将2023年实习的300名护理实习生纳入改革组。传统组给予传统教学,改革组给予织网式单元教学,比较两组护生考核成绩(理论考核成绩、实践操作成绩)、应急处理能力(预警能力、应急响应能力、恢复与总结能力)差异,比较两组临床教学质量评价差异。采用SPSS 26.0进行
t
检验、卡方检验和秩和检验。
结果
2
改革组护生理论考核成绩、实践操作成绩得分明显高于传统组[(79.15±9.27) vs. (74.58±9.16)、(81.25±8.35) vs. (76.04±8.25)];改革组护生预警能力、应急响应能力、恢复与总结能力评分与总分明显高于传统组[(15.28±2.36) vs.(12.91±2.42)、(38.76±7.37) vs.(34.15±7.29)、(21.25±5.14) vs.(18.73±5.07)、(75.29±9.86) vs.(65.79±9.76)];改革组带教教师临床教学质量评级明显高于传统组[质量高(88.67% vs. 79.00%)/质量中等(11.33% vs. 16.67%)/质量低(0.00% vs. 4.33%)]。
结论
2
将织网式单元教学应用于护生临床实习教学中,可有效提高护生理论考核成绩、实践操作水平、应急处理能力,也可提高临床教学质量。
Objective
2
To explore the application effect of woven mesh unit method in teaching nursing students in clinical internship.
Methods
2
The 300 nursing interns in Chongqing University Jiangjin Hospital who interned in 2022 were included in the traditional group
and the 300 nursing interns who interned in 2023 were included in the reform group. The traditional group received traditional teaching
while the refor
m group received woven mesh unit teaching. The two groups of nursing students were compared for the assessment scores (theoretical assessment scores and practical operation scores)
emergency response abilities (warning ability
emergency response ability
and recovery and summary ability)
and evaluation of clinical teaching quality. The
t
-tests
chi-square test
and rank-sum test were conducted using SPSS 26.0.
Results
2
The theoretical assessment scores and practical operation scores of the reform group were significantly higher than those of the traditional group [(79.15±9.27) vs. (74.58±9.16)
(81.25±8.35) vs. (76.04±8.25)]. The scores and total scores of the early warning ability
emergency response ability
and recovery and summary ability of the reform group were significantly higher than those of the traditional group [(15.28±2.36) vs. (12.91±2.42)
(38.76±7.37) vs. (34.15±7.29)
(21.25±5.14) vs. (18.73±5.07)
(75.29±9.86) vs. (65.79±9.76)]. The clinical teaching quality grade of teachers in the reform group was significantly higher than that of the traditional group [high quality (88.67% vs. 79.00%)/medium quality (11.33% vs. 16.67%)/low quality (0.00% vs. 4.33%)].
Conclusions
2
The application of woven mesh unit method in teaching nursing students in clinical internship can effectively improve their theoretical assessment scores
practical operation level
and emergency response ability
as well as the quality of clinical teaching.
织网式单元教学临床教学护生
Woven mesh unit teachingClinical teachingNursing student
谢郁芳, 张先翠. 基于反馈机制的案例导入式竞赛活动在临床护理本科生带教中的应用效果[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2023, 20(1): 128-131. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2023.01.026http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2023.01.026.
柳娟娟, 张学华. 织网式教学对手术室新入职护士培训质量的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2021, 40(10): 1737-1740. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190628-00505http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190628-00505.
苏捷. 模仿史书体例, 探索整本书阅读“织网式”教学: 以《红楼梦》为例[J]. 语文建设, 2022(15): 67-69.
李慧, 沈曲. 欧盟护理学研究生教育能力培养标准及启示[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(1): 89-92. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.01.089http://dx.doi.org/10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.01.089.
云天奇, 聂文博, 王立生. 护士突发公共卫生事件应急能力现状及干预策略的研究进展[J]. 现代临床护理, 2020, 19(11): 68-74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2020.11.012http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2020.11.012.
龙春花, 易代碧. 单元周教学法对提高护生自主学习能力的效果研究[J]. 护理学报, 2015, 22(5): 13-15. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn.1008-9969.2015.05.013http://dx.doi.org/10.16460/j.issn.1008-9969.2015.05.013.
邓姣, 周群香, 唐莉, 等. 基于护理教育程序的中医医院规范化培训的践行与效果评价[J]. 中医药导报, 2021, 27(9): 224-228.
彭宇, 沙丽艳, 张宇涵, 等. 学习环模式在护理教育中的研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2022, 22(3): 420-424. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.03.019http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.03.019.
丁学坤, 刘琼. 高职高专护理教育人才培养模式改革与医学教育实践平台建设的研究[J]. 中国医院管理, 2021, 41(11): 前插3.
鹿笑寒, 宋洁, 王晋芳, 等. 置信职业行为在护理教育中的研究现状[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 35-39. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.03.035http://dx.doi.org/10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.03.035.
许琦, 陈春丽, 马利娜, 等. Miller金字塔教学法联合CBL教学法在手术室实习护生带教中的应用[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(22): 80-84. DOI: 10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2023.22.18http://dx.doi.org/10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2023.22.18.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621