虚拟病人联合CBL教学在内科教学中的实践与探索

陆耀红; 潘静薇; 韩蓓蓓; 谢芳艺; 李萍

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230912-01902

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

虚拟病人联合CBL教学在内科教学中的实践与探索

教学改革 | 更新时间：2024-12-26

- 虚拟病人联合CBL教学在内科教学中的实践与探索
- Practice and exploration of the teaching mode of virtual patients combined with case-based learning in teaching internal medicine
- 中华医学教育探索杂志 2024年23卷第12期页码：1670-1675
- 作者机构：
  
  1.上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院教学办公室，上海　200233
  2.上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院心内科，上海　200233
- 作者简介：
  
  李萍，Email：lipingxu365@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  上海交通大学教育教学研究项目(JYJX20 0011);上海交通大学本科教学管理项目(JYGL22 025);上海市高等教育学会规划研究课题(1QYB24071)
- DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230912-01902
  中图分类号： R44
- 纸质出版日期：2024-12-20，
  
  收稿日期：2023-09-12，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陆耀红, 潘静薇, 韩蓓蓓, 等. 虚拟病人联合CBL教学在内科教学中的实践与探索[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(12): 1670-1675.

LU YAOHONG, PAN JINGWEI, HAN BEIBEI, et al. Practice and exploration of the teaching mode of virtual patients combined with case-based learning in teaching internal medicine. [J]. Chinese journal of medical education research, 2024, 23(12): 1670-1675.
陆耀红, 潘静薇, 韩蓓蓓, 等. 虚拟病人联合CBL教学在内科教学中的实践与探索[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(12): 1670-1675. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230912-01902.

LU YAOHONG, PAN JINGWEI, HAN BEIBEI, et al. Practice and exploration of the teaching mode of virtual patients combined with case-based learning in teaching internal medicine. [J]. Chinese journal of medical education research, 2024, 23(12): 1670-1675. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230912-01902.

摘要

目的

探讨虚拟病人联合案例教学法（case-based learning，CBL）的教学效果，并研究其对提升学生临床思维能力的作用。

方法

将2021年7月至2022年12月在上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院内科实习的71名学生随机分为3组：虚拟病人教学组（24人），予以虚拟病人教学；CBL教学组（23人），予以CBL教学；混合教学组（24人），予以虚拟病人教学+CBL教学。教学结束后，对所有学生进行技能考试，并进行了教学效果满意度调查。数据分析采用SPSS 24.0软件进行，多组均数的比较采用方差分析（analysis of variance，ANOVA），而3组之间的两两比较则采用最小显著差异法（least-significant difference，LSD）进行。

结果

在3组学生技能考试成绩的比较中，“问诊思路”项目上，3组学生成绩[（82.04±3.76） vs. （79.00±4.93） vs. （78.61±4.56）

]

差异有统计学意义（

=0.018），混合教学组成绩优于虚拟病人教学组和CBL教学组。3组学生的“总分”成绩差异也有统计学意义[（81.33±5.02） vs. （80.65±5.67） vs. （79.76±5.15）

]

（

=0.046）。两两比较发现，混合教学组在总分上明显优于CBL教学组（

=0.013）。教学效果满意度调查显示，在“提高学习积极性和主动性”方面，混合教学组和虚拟病人教学组均优于CBL教学组；在“提升分析问题的能力”方面，混合教学组和CBL教学组优于虚拟病人教学组；在“加深对知识的理解”方面，混合教学组优于虚拟病人教学组；而在“提高创新的能力”方面，混合教学组则优于CBL教学组。总体而言，混合教学组学生的满意度最高。

结论

虚拟病人与CBL相结合的教学方法能够更有效地提升学生的临床思维能力，促进学生自主学习，并提升教学满意度，为临床思维教学提供了一种全新的教学模式。

Abstract

Objective

To explore the teaching effect of virtual patient combined with case-based learning (CBL) and investigate its impact on improving students' clinical thinking ability.

Methods

From July 2021 to December 2022

71 students practicing in the Department of Internal Medicine at the Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine were randomly divided into three groups: virtual patient teaching group (24 students)

CBL teaching group (23 students)

and mixed teaching group (24 students

virtual patient + CBL). After the teaching

a skill test and a teaching satisfaction survey were conducted. The data analysis was conducted using SPSS 24.0 software. The comparison of means among multiple groups was performed using analysis of variance. The pairwise comparisons between the three groups were performed using the least significant difference method.

Results

In comparison of the scores of the three groups of students in skill test

there was a statistically significant difference in "consultation ideas" among the three groups of students [(82.04±3.76) vs. (79.00±4.93) vs. (78.61±4.56)

=0.018)

]

and the mixed teaching group performed better than the virtual patient teaching group and CBL teaching group. There was a significant difference in "total score" among the three groups of students [(81.33±5.02) vs. (80.65±5.67) vs. (79.76±5.15)

=0.046

]

. Pairwise comparisons showed that the mixed teaching group was significantly better than the CBL teaching group in "total score" (

=0.013). The survey on teaching satisfaction showed that the scores of "improving learning motivation and initiative" were higher in the mixed teaching group and the virtual patient teaching group than in the CBL teaching group. The scores of "enhancing the ability to analyze problems" were higher in the mixed teaching group and CBL teaching group than in the virtual patient teaching group. The score of "deepening understanding of knowledge" was higher in the mixed teaching group than in the virtual patient teaching group. The score of "improving innovation ability" was higher in the mixed teaching group than in the CBL teaching group. Overall

students in the mixed teaching group showed the highest satisfaction.

Conclusions

The teaching method combining virtual patient and CBL can more effectively enhance students' clinical thinking ability

promote self-learning

and improve teaching satisfaction

providing a new mode for teaching clinical thinking.

关键词

临床思维虚拟病人案例教学法教学方法混合学习

Keywords

Clinical thinkingVirtual patientCase-based learningTeaching methodMixed learning

references

殷晓丽，王德炳. 医学生临床思维能力培养探析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志， 2014， 34（1）： 10-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2014.01.003http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2014.01.003.

孙成城，贠英伟，张广峻. 基于CBL教学法的以学生为中心的课堂教学转型[J]. 邢台职业技术学院学报， 2020， 37（1）： 1-4. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-6129.2020.01.001http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-6129.2020.01.001.

徐静，潘晓霞，靳远萌，等. 应用手机程序“虚拟病人”进行教学查房可提高肾脏内科实习带教效果[J]. 诊断学理论与实践， 2019， 18（5）： 602-604. DOI: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2019.05.024http://dx.doi.org/10.16150/j.1671-2870.2019.05.024.

陆耀红，张锋，李萍，等. 临床思维训练软件用于内科实习的实践与探索[J]. 中国高等医学教育， 2015（8）： 75-76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2015.08.040http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2015.08.040.

周磊，曹薇薇，郝晓燕，等. CBL联合翻转课堂在整合课程《诊疗基础》实验诊断学教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志， 2023， 22（8）： 1179-1182. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220711-01380http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220711-01380.

蒋娟，蒲丹岚，邹辣，等. PBL-CBL整合教学在内分泌科轮转临床医学专业学位研究生培养中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志， 2023， 22（11）： 1626-1629. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220917-01479http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220917-01479.

Dankbaar MEW, Alsma J, Jansen EEH, et al. An experimental study on the effects of a simulation game on students' clinical cognitive skills and motivation [J]. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2016, 21(3): 505-521. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-015-9641-xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9641-x.

Foster A, Chaudhary N, Murphy J, et al. The use of simulation to teach suicide risk assessment to health profession trainees-rationale, methodology, and a proof of concept demonstration with a virtual patient [J]. Acad Psychiatry, 2015, 39(6): 620-629. DOI: 10.1007/s40596-014-0185-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0185-9.

Botezatu M, Hult H, Tessma MK, et al. Virtual patient simulation for learning and assessment: superior results in comparison with regular course exams [J]. Med Teach, 2010, 32(10): 845-850. DOI: 10.3109/01421591003695287http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01421591003695287.

Botezatu M, Hult H, Tessma MK, et al. Virtual patient simulation: knowledge gain or knowledge loss? [J]. Med Teach, 2010, 32(7): 562-568. DOI: 10.3109/01421590903514630http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01421590903514630.

Li J, Li QL, Li J, et al. Comparison of three problem-based learning conditions (real patients, digital and paper) with lecture-based learning in a dermatology course: a prospective randomized study from China [J]. Med Teach, 2013, 35(2): e963-e970. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.719651http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.719651.

Williams C, Aubin S, Harkin P, et al. A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial of teaching provided by a computer-based multimedia package versus lecture [J]. Med Educ, 2001, 35(9): 847-854. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00960.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00960.x.

Bonnetain E, Boucheix JM, Hamet M, et al. Benefits of computer screen-based simulation in learning cardiac arrest procedures [J]. Med Educ, 2010, 44(7): 716-722. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03708.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03708.x.

Qayumi AK, Kurihara Y, Imai M, et al. Comparison of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional textbook methods for training in abdominal examination (Japanese experience) [J]. Med Educ, 2004, 38(10): 1080-1088. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01957.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01957.x.

Schwid HA, Rooke GA, Michalowski P, et al. Screen-based anesthesia simulation with debriefing improves performance in a mannequin-based anesthesia simulator [J]. Teach Learn Med, 2001, 13(2): 92-96. DOI: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1302_4http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1302_4.

Tao H. Computer-based simulative training system: a new approach to teaching pre-hospital trauma care [J]. J Med Coll PLA, 2011, 26(6): 335-344. DOI: 10.1016/S1000-1948(12)60029-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1000-1948(12)60029-X.

Subramanian A, Timberlake M, Mittakanti H, et al. Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format [J]. J Surg Educ, 2012, 69(4): 449-452. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.05.013http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.05.013.

Kononowicz AA, Krawczyk P, Cebula G, et al. Effects of introducing a voluntary virtual patient module to a basic life support with an automated external defibrillator course: a randomised trial [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2012, 12: 41. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-41http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-41.

Gu Y, Zou Z, Chen X. The effects of vSIM for nursing™ as a teaching strategy on fundamentals of nursing education in undergraduates [J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2017, 13(4): 194-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2017.01.005http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.01.005.

Lehmann R, Thiessen C, Frick B, et al. Improving pediatric basic life support performance through blended learning with web-based virtual patients: randomized controlled trial [J]. J Med Internet Res, 2015, 17(7): e162. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4141http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4141.

Gentry SV, Gauthier A, L'Estrade Ehrstrom B, et al. Serious gaming and gamification education in health professions: systematic review [J]. J Med Internet Res, 2019, 21(3): e12994. DOI: 10.2196/12994http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12994.

Kononowicz AA, Woodham L, Georg C, et al. Virtual patient simulations for health professional education [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016: 19(5): CD012194. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012194http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd012194.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

多学科协作模式在肿瘤学教学中的实践与思考

虚拟仿真教考联动在住院医师规范化培训麻醉危机资源管理教学中的应用

“BOPPPS模型+思维导图”在医学免疫学课程教学中的应用研究

E-learning+思维导图在神经内科护理实习教学中的应用研究

医学辩证法结合以教材为基础的问题导向教学在血液病实习教学中的应用