急性椎基底动脉串联闭塞血管内治疗的预后研究

高攀; 李凤利; 资文杰; 杨清武

doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202307016

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

急性椎基底动脉串联闭塞血管内治疗的预后研究

临床医学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 急性椎基底动脉串联闭塞血管内治疗的预后研究
- Prognosis of acute tandem vertebrobasilar artery occlusion after endovascular revascularization: report of 647 cases
- 陆军军医大学学报 2023年45卷第18期页码：1965-1973
- 作者机构：
  
  400037 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第二附属医院神经内科
- 作者简介：
  
  [ 杨清武, E-mail: yangqwmlys@hotmail.com YANG Qingwu, E-mail: yangqwmlys@hotmail.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家杰出青年科学基金(81525008)
- DOI：10.16016/j.2097-0927.202307016
  中图分类号： R195.1;R741.05;R743.9
- 收稿：2023-07-03，
  
  修回：2023-07-19，
  
  纸质出版：2023-09-30
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
高攀, 李凤利, 资文杰, 等. 急性椎基底动脉串联闭塞血管内治疗的预后研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(18):1965-1973.

Pan GAO, Fengli LI, Wenjie ZI, et al. Prognosis of acute tandem vertebrobasilar artery occlusion after endovascular revascularization: report of 647 cases[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(18): 1965-1973.
高攀, 李凤利, 资文杰, 等. 急性椎基底动脉串联闭塞血管内治疗的预后研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(18):1965-1973. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202307016.

Pan GAO, Fengli LI, Wenjie ZI, et al. Prognosis of acute tandem vertebrobasilar artery occlusion after endovascular revascularization: report of 647 cases[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(18): 1965-1973. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202307016.

摘要

目的

分析急性椎基底动脉串联闭塞(acute tandem vertebrobasilar artery occlusion

VBO)的患者接受血管内治疗术(endovascular treatment

EVT)后的预后及其危险因素。

方法

采用2014年1月至2019年5月急性基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗的全国多中心临床登记研究(the EVT for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study

BASILAR)的患者数据。所有患者接受了血管内治疗，并进行了为期90 d的随访。依据是否存在椎动脉及基底动脉串联病变将患者分为两组：椎基底动脉串联闭塞组(acute tandem vertebrobasilar artery occlusion

VBO)、单纯基底动脉闭塞组(acute basilar artery occlusion

BAO)。分析患者基线指标，并探讨两组患者的预后差异及其相关影响因素。

结果

共纳入647例符合条件的患者，中位年龄为64(56，74)岁，男性483例(74.7%)。有560例患者为单纯基底动脉闭塞；87例患者为基底动脉闭塞合并有椎动脉重度狭窄或闭塞。VBO组与BAO组的90 d良好预后率(定义为mRS评分0~3)(

=0.090)及死亡率(

=0.890)无明显差异。对于VBO组患者

更低的NIHSS评分[

(95%

)：0.898 (0.845~0.954)，

0.001

]

、更高的pc-ASPECTS评分[

(95%

)：1.690 (1.117~2.557)，

=0.010

]

、更短的穿刺至再通时间[

(95%

)：0.990 (0.980~1.000)，

=0.047

]

是影响患者90 d良好预后率的独立危险因素。同样的

更高的NIHSS评分[

(95%

)：1.094 (1.033~1.159)

=0.002

]

、更低的pc-ASPECTS评分[

(95%

)：0.622 (0.438~0.882)

=0.008

]

、更长的穿刺至再通时间[

(95%

)：1.010 (1.001~1.019)

=0.040

]

也是患者90 d死亡率预测因素。

结论

血管内治疗对于急性椎基底动脉串联闭塞安全有效，短期预后良好。NIHSS评分、pc-ASPECTS评分及穿刺至再通时间是VBO患者90 d良好预后的独立预测因素，也是其90 d死亡率预测因素。

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the prognosis and risk factors of acute tandem vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBO) after endovascular therapy (EVT).

Methods

This study used the patient data from the EVT for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study (BASILAR)

a national multicenter clinical registry study for endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion from January 2014 to May 2019. All patients received intravascular treatment and underwent a 90 d follow-up. According to the presence of vertebral artery and basilar artery occlusion

they were divided into vertebral basilar artery occlusion (VBO) group and acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) group. Their baseline indicators were analyzed to explore the differences in prognosis and influencing factors between the 2 groups.

Results

A total of 647 eligible patients were included in this study

with a median age of 64 (56

74) years

and 74.7% of them (483) were males. Among them

560 patients had simple basilar artery occlusion and the other 87 had basilar artery occlusion combined with severe stenosis or occlusion of the vertebral artery. There were no significant differences in the 90-day good prognosis rate (defined as mRS score of 0~3) (

=0.090) and mortality rate (

=0.890) between the VBO group and the BAO group. For the patients in the VBO group

lower NIHSS score (

OR=

0.898

95%

: 0.845~0.954

0.001)

higher pc-ASPECTS score (

OR=

1.690

95%

: 1.117~2.557

=0.010)

and shorter puncture to recanalization time (

OR=

0.990

95%

: 0.980~1.000

=0.047) were independent risk factors for 90-day good prognosis. Similarly

higher NIHSS score (

=1.094

95%

: 1.033~1.159

=0.002)

lower pc-ASPECTS score (

=0.622

95%

: 0.438~0.882

=0.008) and longer puncture to recanalization time (

=1.010

95%

: 1.001~1.019

=0.040) were also predictive factors for 90-day mortality in these patients.

Conclusion

EVT is safe and effective for acute VBO

with a good short-term prognosis. NIHSS score

pc-ASPECTS score

and puncture to recanalization time are independent predictors for 90-day good prognosis in VBO patients

and are also predictors of 90-day mortality rate.

关键词

Keywords

references

SCHONEWILLE W J, WIJMAN C A, MICHEL P, et al . Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): a prospective registry study[J ] . Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8(8): 724-730. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70173-5.

SCHONEWILLE W J, ALGRA A, SERENA J, et al . Outcome in patients with basilar artery occlusion treated conventionally[J ] . J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2005, 76(9): 1238-1241. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.049924.

SAVITZ S I, CAPLAN L R. Vertebrobasilar disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352(25): 2618-2626. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra041544.

ECKER R D, TSUJIURA C A, BAKER C B, et al . Endo-vascular reconstruction of vertebral artery occlusion prior to basilar thrombectomy in a series of six patients presenting with acute symptomatic basilar thrombosis[J ] . J Neurointerv Surg, 2014, 6(5): 379-383. DOI : 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010719.

QURESHI A I, ZIAI W C, YAHIA A M, et al . Stroke-free survival and its determinants in patients with symptomatic vertebrobasilar stenosis: a multicenter study[J ] . Neurosurgery, 2003, 52(5): 1033-1039;discussion 1039-1040.

BERKHEMER O A, FRANSEN P S S, BEUMER D, et al . A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke[J ] . N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(1): 11-20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411587.

CAMPBELL B C V, MITCHELL P J, KLEINIG T J, et al . Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection[J ] . N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(11): 1009-1018. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414792.

GOYAL M, DEMCHUK A M, MENON B K, et al . Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke[J ] . N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(11): 1019-1030. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414905.

JOVIN T G, CHAMORRO A, COBO E, et al . Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke[J ] . N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(24): 2296-2306.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503780.

ALBERS G W, MARKS M P, KEMP S, et al . Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging[J ] . N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(8): 708-718. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713973.

BAIK S H, KIM J Y, JUNG C. A review of endovascular treatment forposterior circulation strokes[J]. Neurointervention, 2023, 18(2): 90-106. DOI: 10.5469/neuroint.2023.00213.

COHEN J E, LEKER R R, GOMORI J M, et al . Emergent revascularization of acute tandem vertebrobasilar occlusions: Endovascular approaches and technical considerations—confirming the role of vertebral artery ostium stenosis as a cause of vertebrobasilar stroke[J ] . J Clin Neurosci, 2016, 34: 70-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.05.005.

YANG H H, MA N, ZHANG S Y, et al . Endovascular revascularisation of acute tandem vertebrobasilar artery occlusion: seven case series with literature reviews[J ] . Stroke Vasc Neurol, 2018, 3: 17-21. DOI: 10.1136/svn-2017-000125.

HACKE W, ZEUMER H, FERBERT A, et al . Intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy improves outcome in patients with acute vertebrobasilar occlusive disease[J ] . Stroke, 1988, 19(10): 1216-1222. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.19.1 0.1216.

BRANDT T, VON KUMMER R, MVLLER-KVPPERS M, et al . Thrombolytic therapy of acute basilar artery occlusion. Variables affecting recanalization and outcome[J ] . Stroke, 1996, 27: 875-881. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.27.5.875.

Writing Group for the BASILAR Group, Zi W, Qiu Z, et al . Assessment of endovascular treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion via a Nationwide Prospective Registry[J ] . JAMA Neurol, 2020, 77(5): 561-573. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0156.

ZAIDAT O O, YOO A J, KHATRI P, et al . Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement[J ] . Stroke, 2013, 44(9): 2650-2663. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972.

MARKS M P, LANSBERG M G, MLYNASH M, et al . Correlation of AOL recanalization, TIMI reperfusion and TICI reperfusion with infarct growth and clinical outcome[J ] . J Neurointerv Surg, 2014, 6(10): 724-728. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010973.

YOO A, SIMONSEN C, PRABHAKARAN S, et al . Refin-ing angiographic biomarkers of revascularization: improving outcome pred iction after intra-arterial therapy[J ] . Stroke, 2013, 44: 2509-2512. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001990.

VON KUMMER R, BRODERICK J P, CAMPBELL B C V, et al . The Heidelberg bleeding classification: classification of bleeding events after ischemic stroke and reperfusion therapy[J ] . Stroke, 2015, 46(10): 2981-2986. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010049.

BAIK S H, PARK H J, KIM J H, et al . Mechanical thrombectomy in subtypes of basilar artery occlusion: relationship to recanalization rate and clinical outcome[J ] . Radiology, 2019, 291(3): 730-737. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019181924.

PIECHOWIAK E, KAESMACHER J, ZIb F, et al . Endovascular treatment of tandem occlusions in vertebro-basilar stroke: technical aspects and outcome compared with isolated basilar artery occlusion[J ] . J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 12(1): 25-29. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014825.

SINGER O C, BERKEFELD J, NOLTE C H, et al . Mechanical recanalization in basilar artery occlusion : the ENDOSTROKE study[J ] . Ann Neurol, 2015, 77(3): 415-424. DOI: 10.1002/ana.24336.

LIU X F, DAI Q L, YE R D, et al . Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (BEST): an open-label, randomised controlled trial[J ] . Lancet Neurol, 2020, 19(2): 115-122. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30395-3.

孙瑄, 高峰, 佟旭, 等. 串联病变是急性基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗预后不良的危险因素: 单中心队列研究[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2020, 20(5): 392-398. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2020.05.005.

SUN X, GAO F, TONG X, et al . Tandem lesion was risk factor for endovascular treatment in acute basilar artery occlusion: a single center retrospective observational study[J ] . Chin J Contemp Neurol Neurosurg, 2020, 20(5): 392-398. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2020.05.005.

SAVER J L, GOYAL M, VAN DER LUGT A, et al . Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis[J ] . JAMA, 2016, 316(12): 1279-1288. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647.

ABECASSIS I J, ALMALLOUHI E, CHALHOUB R, et al . Outcomes after endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for low compared to high National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS): a multicenter study[J ] . Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2023, 225: 107592. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107592.

PUETZ V, SYLAJA P N, COUTTS S B, et al . Extent of hypoattenuation on CT angiography source images predicts functional outcome in patients with basilar artery occlusion[J ] . Stroke, 2008, 39(9): 2485-2490. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.511162.

MUNDIYANAPURATH S, MÖHLENBRUCH M, RINGLEB P A, et al . Posterior circulation acute stroke prognosis early computed tomography score using hypointense vessels on susceptibility weighted imaging independently predicts outcome in patients with basilar artery occlusion[J ] . PLoS One, 2015, 10(7): e0132587. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132587.

PUETZ V, KHOMENKO A, HILL M, et al . Extent of hypo-attenuation on CT angiography source images in basilar artery occlusion: prognostic value in the basilar artery international cooperation study[J ] . Stroke, 2011, 42: 3454-3459. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.622175.

LIU J C, GAO B L, LI H W, et al . Effects of and prognostic factors affecting endovascular mechanical thrombectomy of acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion[J ] . J Clin Neurosci, 2021, 93: 221-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.09.028.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

中国高空腹血糖相关缺血性脑卒中疾病负担评估、趋势预测与重点人群防控策略：基于GBD 2021的公共卫生预警

急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗后实质性出血2型颅内出血的影响因素分析

急性基底动脉闭塞患者早期血管内治疗联用丁苯酞的多中心、前瞻性队列研究

支架结合弹簧圈治疗8例颈内动脉前壁动脉瘤——“铆钉”技术的运用

重庆市2006－2015年5岁以下儿童死亡率及死因构成的变化趋势