
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.400016 重庆,重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经外科
2.401220 重庆,重庆市长寿区人民医院神经外科
3.408499 重庆,重庆市南川区人民医院神经外科
4.400014 重庆,重庆市急救中心神经外科
[何朝晖,E-mail: geno_he@163.comHE Zhaohui, E-mail: geno_he@163.com
收稿:2023-06-24,
修回:2023-09-01,
纸质出版:2024-02-28
移动端阅览
文唐敏, 苏俊, 谭嘉禾, 等. 腰池持续引流改善动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后急性脑积水患者的预后[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2024,46(4):384-390.
Tangmin WEN, Jun SU, Jiahe TAN, et al. Continuous lumbar drainage improves prognosis in patients with acute hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(4): 384-390.
文唐敏, 苏俊, 谭嘉禾, 等. 腰池持续引流改善动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后急性脑积水患者的预后[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2024,46(4):384-390. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202306089.
Tangmin WEN, Jun SU, Jiahe TAN, et al. Continuous lumbar drainage improves prognosis in patients with acute hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(4): 384-390. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202306089.
目的
2
分析腰池引流量对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
aSAH)后急性脑积水(acute hydrocephalus
AHC)预后的影响。
方法
2
纳入2017年1月至2022年1月就诊于重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经外科因动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血发生AHC的患者82例。以出院半年后改良Rankin评分量表(modified Rankin scale
mRS)评分为预后结局
对人口学因素、入院时蛛网膜下腔出血(subarachnoid hemorrhage
SAH)严重程度、既往史、血管痉挛、腰池引流等数据进行单因素和多因素Logistic逐步回归分析
并构建列线图预测模型。
结果
2
单因素分析发现WFNS、Hunt-Hess、mFisher、腰池引流时间、分流依赖、脑血管痉挛、腰池引流量可影响患者预后
进一步采用Logistic逐步回归分析
发现高评分WFNS (
OR
: 3.25
95%
CI
: 1.11~9.48)、mFisher高分级(
OR
: 3.66
95%
CI
: 1.08~12.35)、发生分流依赖(
OR
: 15.56
95%
CI
: 1.22~198.57)与脑血管痉挛(
OR
: 22.24
95%
CI
: 3.08~160.68)是影响mRS的独立危险因素
腰池引流量(
OR
: 0.57
95%
CI
: 0.40~0.82)是独立保护因素。ROC曲线面积显示模型具有良好的预测效果[AUC: 0.898(95%
CI
: 0.935~0.861)
]
; 通过Bootstrap方法进行内部验证
结果显示模型具很好的区分能力[C-index: 0.950(95%
CI
: 0.904~0.996);校正C-index: 0.934
]
。
结论
2
增加腰池引流量是aSAH术后发生AHC预后不良的独立保护因素
并可以改善SAH患者的预后。
Objective
2
To analyze the influence of drainage volume on prognosis of acute hydrocephalus (AHC) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) by continuous lumbar drainage.
Methods
2
A retrospective trial was conducted on 82 AHC patients after aSAH admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between January 2017 and January 2022.In 6 months after discharge
modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was used to evaluate the prognostic outcomes.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on demographic factors
severity of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) at admission
medical history
cerebral vasospasm
and lumbar drainage data.Then a nomogram prediction model was constructed.
Results
2
Univariate analysis found that World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) score
Hunt-Hess grade
modified Fisher grade
time for continuous lumbar drainage
shunt dependence
cerebral vasospasm
and drainage volume were factors affecting the prognosis of the patients.Then logistic regression analysis revealed that high WFNS score (
OR
: 3.25
95%
CI
: 1.11~9.48)
high modified Fisher grade (
OR
: 3.66
95%
CI
: 1.08~12.35)
shunt dependence (
OR
: 15.56
95%
CI
: 1.22~198.57)
and cerebral vasospasm (
OR
: 22.24
95%
CI
: 3.08~160.68) were independent predictors for mRS score
while volume of continuous lumbar draina
ge (
OR
: 0.57
95%
CI
: 0.40~0.82) was an independent protective factor.ROC curve analysis indicated a good predictive performance of the model (AUC=0.898
95%
CI
: 0.935~0.861).Internal validation through Bootstrap method demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability of the model (C-index=0.950
95%
CI
: 0.904~0.996;adjusted C-index: 0.934).
Conclusion
2
Increased volume of lumbar drainage is an independent protective factor for poor prognosis following aSAH and can improve the prognosis of SAH patients.
STEINER T, JUVELA S, UNTERBERG A, et al . European Stroke Organization guidelines for the management of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid haemorrhage[J ] . Cerebrovasc Dis, 2013, 35(2): 93-112. DOI: 10.1159/000346087.
ASPIDE R, PEGOLI M, FUSTINI M F, et al . Correlation between hypo-pituitarism and poor cognitive function using neuropsychological tests after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a pilot study[J ] . Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2022, 214: 107167. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro. 2022.107167.
GERAGHTY J R, LARA-ANGULO M N, SPEGAR M, et al . Severe cognitive impairment in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Predictors and relationship to functional outcome[J ] . J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2020, 29(9): 105027. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105027.
LUCKE-WOLD B, DODD W, MOTWANI K, et al . Investigation and modulation of interleukin-6 following subarachnoid hemorrhage: targeting inflammatory activation for cerebral vasospasm[J ] . J Neuroinflamm, 2022, 19(1): 228. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-022-02592-x.
ERIKSEN N, ROSTRUP E, FABRICIUS M, et al. Early focal brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage correlates with spreading depolarizations[J ] . Neurology, 2019, 92 (4): e326-e341. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006814.
GARCÍA-ARMENGOL R, PUYALTO P, MISIS M, et al . Cerebrospinal fluid output as a risk factor of chronic hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J ] . World Neurosurg, 2021, 154: e572-e579. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.084.
HOEKEMA D, SCHMIDT R H, ROSS I. Lumbar drainage for subarachnoid hemorrhage: technical considerations and safety analysis[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2007, 7(1): 3-9. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-007-0047-3.
LEE C Y, JANG K M, WUI S H, et al . The benefits and feasibility of external lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage for cerebral vasospasm in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis[J ] . World Neurosurg, 2022, 167: e549-e560. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.044.
SORRENTINO Z A, LAURENT D, HERNANDEZ J, et al . Headache persisting after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a narrative review of pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies[J ] . Headache, 2022, 62(9): 1120-1132. DOI: 10.1111/head.14394.
KAWAKITA F, KANAMARU H, ASADA R, et al . Roles of glutamate in brain injuries after subarachnoid hemorrhage[J ] . Histol Histopathol, 2022, 37(11): 1041-1051. DOI: 10.14670/hh-18-509.
KANAT A, TURKMENOGLU O, AYDIN M D, et al . Toward changing of the pathophysiologic basis of acute hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a preliminary experimental study[J ] . World Neurosurg, 2013, 80(3/4): 390-395. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.12.020.
YANG C, LI Y H. Review of the prevention and treatment of hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. World Neurosurg, 2022, 168: 134-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.089.
YOKOYA S, HINO A, GOTO Y, et al . Pros and cons of tentative clipping in intracranial aneurysm surgery: review of 867 direct clippings in single institution[J ] . World Neurosurg, 2018, 118: e185-e187. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.151.
SUN C, DU H, YIN L. Choice for the removal of bloody cerebrospinal fluid in postcoiling aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage: external ventricular drainage or lumbar drainage?[J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2014, 24(5): 737-744. DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.9837-13.2.
HUSSEIN M, ABDELLATIF M. Continuous lumbar drainage for the prevention and management of perioperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage[J]. Asian J Neurosurg, 2019, 14(2): 473-478. DOI: 10.4103/ajns.ajns_265_18.
DUAN F, WANG G F, MA X H, et al . A controlled study of continuous lumbar drainage of fluid and lumbar puncture drainage for aneurysmal SAH after intracranial aneurysm clipping[J ] . J Healthc Eng, 2021, 2021: 1-8. DOI: 10.1155/2021/2827493.
LU X C, JI C Y, WU J, et al . Intrathecal fibrinolysis for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies[J ] . Front Neurol, 2019, 10: 885. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00885.
DEMIRGIL B T, TUGCU B, POSTALCI L, et al . Factors leading to hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J ] . Minim Invas Neurosurg, 2003, 46(6): 344-348. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-812500.
LIANG H S, ZHANG L Y, GAO A L, et al . Risk factors for infections related to lumbar drainage in spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage[J ] . Neurocrit Care, 2016, 25(2): 243-249. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-015-0239-1.
WU X Y, JI D F, WANG Z F, et al . Elevated serum NOX2 levels contribute to delayed cerebral ischemia and a poor prognosis after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study[J ] . Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 2023, 19: 1027-1042. DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s407907.
ZHAO B, YANG H, ZHENG K, et al . Preoperative and postoperative predictors of long-term outcome after endovascular treatment of poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J ] . J Neurosurg, 2017, 126(6): 1764-1771. DOI: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS152587.
ASADA R, NAKATSUKA Y, KANAMARU H, et al . Higher plasma osteopontin concentrations associated with subsequent development of chronic shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J ] . Transl Stroke Res, 2021, 12(5): 808-816. DOI: 10.1007/s12975-020-00886-x.
EAGLES M E, JAJA B N R, MACDONALD R L. Incorporating a modified Graeb score to the modified fisher scale for improved risk prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Neurosurgery, 2017, 82(3): 299-305. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx165.
FANG Y J, SHAO Y J, LU J N, et al . The effectiveness of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with different bleeding amounts[J ] . Neurosurg Rev, 2020, 43(2): 739-747. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-019-01116-1.
吴恒浩, 张万宏, 郑光明. 自发性颅内出血患者开颅术后腰大池置管引流过度的临床研究[J]. 国际神经病学神经外科学杂志, 2015, 42(6): 519-522.
WU H H, ZHANG W H, ZHENG G M. Clinical study of excessive lumbar drainage after craniotomy in patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage[J]. J Int Neurol Neurosurg, 2015, 42(6): 519-522.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621