彩色光瞳孔测量法评估视网膜色素变性盲人视功能的临床意义

赵赫; 王浩; 翁传煌; 刘勇; 阴正勤

doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202305103

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

彩色光瞳孔测量法评估视网膜色素变性盲人视功能的临床意义

临床医学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 彩色光瞳孔测量法评估视网膜色素变性盲人视功能的临床意义
- Clinical significance of chromatic pupillometry in evaluating visual function in blind patients with retinitis pigmentosa
- 陆军军医大学学报 2023年45卷第21期页码：2284-2292
- 作者机构：
  
  400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第一附属医院眼科
- 作者简介：
  
  [阴正勤，E-mail: qinzyin@aliyun.comYIN Zhengqin, E-mail: qinzyin@aliyun.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金面上项目(81770972);国家自然科学基金面上项目(81970843)
- DOI：10.16016/j.2097-0927.202305103
  中图分类号： R181.32;R770.425;R774.13
- 收稿：2023-05-29，
  
  修回：2023-06-04，
  
  纸质出版：2023-11-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
赵赫, 王浩, 翁传煌, 等. 彩色光瞳孔测量法评估视网膜色素变性盲人视功能的临床意义[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(21):2284-2292.

He ZHAO, Hao WANG, Chuanhuang WENG, et al. Clinical significance of chromatic pupillometry in evaluating visual function in blind patients with retinitis pigmentosa[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(21): 2284-2292.
赵赫, 王浩, 翁传煌, 等. 彩色光瞳孔测量法评估视网膜色素变性盲人视功能的临床意义[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(21):2284-2292. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202305103.

He ZHAO, Hao WANG, Chuanhuang WENG, et al. Clinical significance of chromatic pupillometry in evaluating visual function in blind patients with retinitis pigmentosa[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(21): 2284-2292. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202305103.

摘要

目的

研究彩色光瞳孔测量法量化评估视网膜色素变性(retinitis pigmentosa

RP)盲人视网膜功能的可行性和有效性。

方法

纳入2022年1-12月在本院眼科就诊并达到法律盲标准的RP盲人46例(81眼)

并根据最佳矫正视力分为无形觉组(no form perception

NFP)、微弱形觉组(faint form perception

FFP)、形觉组(form perception

FP)。另招募18名健康志愿者(18只眼)作为对照。入组病例接受彩色眼底照相、光学相干断层扫描、眼底自发荧光和闪光视觉诱发电位(flash visual evoked potential

FVEP)等眼科常规检查

并收集OCT外核层厚度、FAF高荧光区垂径长度、FVEP P2波幅值。而后行彩色光瞳孔测量检查

光刺激模式为可激活视杆细胞的低强度蓝光、激活视锥细胞的高强度红光

评价指标为瞳孔瞬时收缩幅值(transient pupil construction amplitude

TPCA)、收缩潜时、最大收缩速度(maximal contraction velocity

MCV)和收缩时间。

结果

在低强度蓝光刺激下

超过半数RP盲人视杆细胞瞳孔对光反应消失。在高强度红光刺激下

RP盲人视锥细胞瞳孔对光反应大部分保留且明显降低。各RP盲人组视锥细胞瞳孔反应的TPCA、MCV均较对照组有显著降低(

0.05)

收缩潜时较对照组显著升高(

0.05)。NFP组瞳孔TPCA、MCV较FP组显著降低(

0.05)

收缩潜时较FP组显著升高(

0.05)。视锥细胞瞳孔反应的TPCA、MCV分别与视网膜外核层厚度、自发荧光垂径和FVEP P2波幅值呈显著正相关(

0.05)

收缩潜时与视网膜外核层厚度、FVEP P2波幅值呈显著负相关(

0.05)。

结论

彩色瞳孔测量法能够定量区分有形觉视力和无形觉视力的RP盲人视网膜功能差异; 彩色光瞳孔测量结果改变与病变视网膜形态学和功能学的变化一致。

Abstract

Objective

To study the feasibility and effectiveness of quantitative evaluation of retinal function in blind patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) by chromatic pupillometry.

Methods

A total of 46 blind RP patients (81 eyes) who met the legal blindness standard admitted in our department from January 2022 to December 2022 were recruited in this study.According to their best-corrected visual acuity

they were divided into the no form perception (NFP) group

faint form perception (FFP) group

and form perception (FP) group.Another 18 healthy volunteers (18 eyes) were enrolled as controls.The subjects received routine ophthalmic examinations such as color fundus photography

optical coherence tomography (OCT)

fundus autofluorescence (FAF)

and flash visual evoked potential (FVEP).The thickness of the outer nuclear layer of OCT

vertical diameter of the FAF high fluorescence area

and amplitude of FVEP P2 were collected.Then chromatic pupillometry was performed.The light stimulation mode of low-intensity blue light was conducted to activate rods

and of high-intensity red light to activate cones.The evaluation indexes included transient pupil construction amplitude (TPCA)

latency

maximal contraction velocity (MCV)

and contraction duration.

Results

Under the mode of low-intensity blue light stimulation

more than half of the blind RP patients had rods pupil light reaction disappeared.Under the mode of high-intensity red light stimulation

the blind RP patients though retained pupil response of cone cells to light mostly but the response was significantly weakened.Compared with the control group

the TPCA and MCV of the cones'pupillary responses were significantly lower (

0.05)

and the contraction latency was obviously higher (

0.05) in all RP blind groups.The NFP

group had significantly lower TPCA and MCV and higher contraction latency when compared with the FP group (both

0.05).Positively correlations were observed in the TPCA and MCV of the cones'pupillary responses with the thickness of the outer nuclear layer of the retina

the vertical diameter of autofluorescence

and the amplitude of the FVEP P2 wave

respectively (

0.05).The latency of contraction was significantly negatively correlated with the thickness of the outer nuclear layer of the retina and the amplitude of FVEP P2 wave (

0.05).

Conclusion

Chromatic pupillometry can quantitatively distinguish the difference in retinal function between blind RP patients with and without formal perceptual vision.The changes in chromatic pupillometric results are consistent with the changes in retinal morphology and function.

关键词

Keywords

references

AHMED I, JOHNSTON R J Jr, SINGH M S. Pluripotent stem cell therapy for retinal diseases[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(15): 1279. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4747.

SHARMA A, JAGANATHAN B G. Stem cell therapy for retinal degeneration: the evidence to date[J]. Biologics, 2021, 15: 299-306. DOI: 10.2147/BTT.S290331.

LINDNER M, GILHOOLEY M J, HUGHES S, et al . Optogenetics for visual restoration: from proof of principle to translational challenges[J ] . Prog Retin Eye Res, 2022, 91: 101089. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101089.

SCHMETTERER L, SCHOLL H, GARHÖFER G, et al . Endpoints for clinical trials in ophthalmology[J ] . Prog Retin Eye Res, 2023: 101160. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101160.

JOLLY J K, BRIDGE H, MACLAREN R E. Outcome measures used in ocular gene therapy trials: a scoping review of current practice[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2019, 10: 1076. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01076.

BELLIVEAU A P, SOMANI A N, DOSSANI R H. Pupillary light reflex[M]. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing, 2023.

PAPAGEORGIOU E, TICINI L F, HARDIESS G, et al . The pupillarylight reflex pathway: cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps in hemianopic patients[J ] . Neurology, 2008, 70(12): 956-963. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000305962.93520.ed.

HOFMANN K P, LAMB T D. Rhodopsin, light-sensor of vision[J]. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2023, 93: 101116. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101116.

KATAYAMA K, GULATI S, ORTEGA J T, et al . Specificity of the chromophore-binding site in human cone opsins[J ] . J Biol Chem, 2019, 294(15): 6082-6093. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007587.

HE Y, TANG H Y, WANG G, et al . Correlation between transient pupillary light reflex and retinal function impairment in patients with retinitis pigmentosa[J ] . J Ophthalmol, 2018, 2018: 2519375. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2519375.

LIU Y, CHEN S J, LI S Y, et al . Long-term safety of human retinal progenitor cell transplantation in retinitis pigmentosa patients[J ] . Stem Cell Res Ther, 2017, 8(1): 209. DOI:10.1186/s13287-017-0661-8.

LEE J Y, CHOI J H, PARK K A, et al . Ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer as predictors of vision recovery in ethambutol-induced optic neuropathy: a longitudinal OCT analysis[J ] . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2018, 59(5): 2104-2109. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-22988.

MURAKAMI T, AKIMOTO M, OOTO S, et al . Association between abnormal autofluorescence and photoreceptor disorganization in retinitis pigmentosa[J ] . Am J Ophthalmol, 2008, 145(4): 687-694. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.11.018.

CREEL D J. Visually evoked potentials[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2019, 160: 501-522. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00034-5.

ZHANG M F, OUYANG W B, WANG H, et al . Quantitative assessment of visual pathway function in blind retinitis pigmentosa patients[J ] . Clin Neurophysiol, 2021, 132(2): 392-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.11.023.

PARK J C, MOURA A L, RAZA A S, et al . Toward a clinical protocol for assessing rod, cone, and melanopsin contributions to the human pupil response[J ] . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011, 52(9): 6624-6635. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7586.

KELBSCH C, STRASSER T, CHEN Y J, et al . Standards in pupillography[J ] . Front Neurol, 2019, 10:129. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00129.

HALL C A, CHILCOTT R P. Eyeing up the future of the pupillary light reflex in neurodiagnostics[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2018, 8(1): 19. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics8010019.

OLSON D M, STUTZMAN S, SAJU C J, et al . Interrater reliability of pupillary assessments[J ] . Neurocrit Care, 2016, 24(2): 251-257. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-015-0182-1.

LOBATO-RINCÓN L L, CABANILLAS CAMPOS M C, NAVARRO-VALLS J J, et al . Utility of dynamic pupillometry in alcohol testing on drivers[J ] . Adicciones, 2013, 25(2): 137-145.

BARRIONUEVO P A, NICANDRO N, MCANANY J J, et al . Assessing rod, cone, and melanopsin contributions to human pupil flicker responses[J ] . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(2): 719-727. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-13252.

KARDON R, ANDERSON S C, DAMARJIAN T G, et al . Chromatic pupillometry in patients with retinitis pigmentosa[J ] . Ophthalmology, 2011, 118(2): 376-381. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.033.

COLLISON F T, PARK J C, FISHMAN G A, et al . Full-field pupillary light responses, luminance thresholds, and light discomfort thresholds in CEP290 leber congenital amaurosis patients[J ] . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2015, 56(12): 7130-7136. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-17467.

CHARNG J, JACOBSON S G, HEON E, et al . Pupillary light reflexes in severe photoreceptor blindness isolate the melanopic component of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells[J ] . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2017, 58(7): 3215-3224. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-21909.

PFEIFFER R L, MARC R E, JONES B W. Persistent remodeling and neurodegeneration in late-stage retinal degeneration[J]. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2020, 74: 100771. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.07.004.

LAZOW M A, HOOD D C, RAMACHANDRAN R, et al . Transition zones between healthy and diseased retina in choroideremia (CHM) and Stargardt disease (STGD) as compared to retinitis pigmentosa (RP)[J ] . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011, 52(13): 9581-9590. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8554.

YAMAMOTO M, MATSUYAMA T, MAEDA T, et al . Detailed evaluation of chromatic pupillometry and full-field stimulus testing to assess ultralow vision in retinitis pigmentosa[J ] . Ophthalmol Sci, 2023, 3(4): 100328. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100328.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据