
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
710032 西安,空军军医大学军事医学心理学系航空航天心理学教研室
[ 肖玮,E-mail:xiaowei7304@outlook.com XIAO Wei, E-mail: xiaowei7304@outlook.com
收稿:2023-05-19,
修回:2023-09-25,
纸质出版:2023-12-15
移动端阅览
朱妍, 吴迪, 孙科伟, 等. 某军校男性学员爱荷华赌博任务的神经活动过程:一项ERP研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(23):2434-2440.
Yan ZHU, Di WU, Kewei SUN, et al. Neural activity processes in Iowa gambling task among male cadets from a military university——an event-related potential study[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(23): 2434-2440.
朱妍, 吴迪, 孙科伟, 等. 某军校男性学员爱荷华赌博任务的神经活动过程:一项ERP研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(23):2434-2440. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202305061.
Yan ZHU, Di WU, Kewei SUN, et al. Neural activity processes in Iowa gambling task among male cadets from a military university——an event-related potential study[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(23): 2434-2440. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202305061.
目的
2
探索不同风险决策能力个体的任务态脑电特征,了解风险决策的神经活动过程,并为决策能力训练的指导提供神经生理学的评估指标。
方法
2
招募某军校男性学员20名,采用爱荷华赌博任务(Iowa gambling task,IGT)对其风险决策能力进行评估并测量其事件相关电位(event-related potential,ERP)作为神经生理学指标。以行为学指标(净分数)将被试分为高决策能力组和低决策能力组,并分析两组被试在ERP成分上的不同。
结果
2
随着选择次数的增加,IGT任务行为学绩效不断提升;Oz通道上,高决策能力组的被试在“输”“赢”两种情况下产生的ENW、P200和FRN振幅均高于低决策能力组(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
大脑对于结果反馈的早期处理是区分高、低决策能力的重要因素,可以用于评估决策能力训练的有效性。
Objective
2
To explore the characteristics of task-state electroencephalogram (EEG) in individuals with different risky decision-making abilities in order to better understand the neural activity process and provide neurophysiological assessment metrics for the guidance of ability training.
Methods
2
Twenty male cadets from a military university were recruited to assess their risky decision-making ability and measure their event-related potential (ERP) as a neurophysiological indicator using the Iowa gambling task (IGT) with a 32-channel EEG system. The subjects were divided into high- and low-decision-making ability groups by behavioral indicators (net scores)
and then their differences in ERP components were analyzed between the 2 groups.
Results
2
The behavioral performance of the IGT was increased as the number of choices increased. On the Oz channel
the participants in the high-decision-ability group produced higher amplitudes of early negative wave (ENW)
P200
and feedback related negativity (FRN) in both "lose" and "win" situations than those in the low-decision-ability group (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
The brain's early processing of feedback on outcomes is an important factor in distinguishing high and low decision-making abilities
and can be used to assess the effectiveness of decision-making ability training.
BECHARA A, DAMASIO A R, DAMASIO H, et al . Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex[J ] . Cognition, 1994, 50(1/2/3): 7-15. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3.
TOPLAK M E, SORGE G B, BENOIT A, et al . Decision-making and cognitive abilities: a review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence[J ] . Clin Psychol Rev, 2010, 30(5): 562-581. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.002.
WALTEROS C, SÁNCHEZ-NAVARRO J P, MUÑOZ M A, et al . Altered associative learning and emotional decision making in fibromyalgia[J ] . J Psychosom Res, 2011, 70(3): 294-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.07.013.
PORTH E, MATTES A, STAHL J. The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task[J]. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 2022, 22(6): 1231-1249. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-022-01028-6.
BIANCHIN M, ANGRILLI A. Decision preceding negativity in the Iowa gambling task: an ERP study[J]. Brain Cogn, 2011, 75(3): 273-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.005.
CUI J F, CHEN Y H, WANG Y, et al . Neural correlates of uncertain decision making: ERP evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task[J ] . Front Hum Neurosci, 2013, 7: 776. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00776.
ARBEL Y, DONCHIN E. How large the sin? A study of the event related potentials elicited by errors of varying magnitude[J]. Psychophysiology, 2011, 48(12): 1611-1620. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01264.x.
MARTIN E A, MCCLEERY A, MOORE M M, et al . ERP indices of performance monitoring and feedback processing in psychosis: a meta-analysis[J ] . Int J Psychophysiol, 2018, 132(Pt B): 365-378. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.08.004.
DE BRUIJN E R A, JANSEN M, OVERGAAUW S. Enhanced error-related brain activations for mistakes that harm others: ERP evidence from a novel social performance-monitoring paradigm[J]. NeuroImage, 2020, 204: 116238. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116238.
SAILER U, FISCHMEISTER F P S, BAUER H. Effects of learning on feedback-related brain potentials in a decision-making task[J]. Brain Res, 2010, 1342: 85-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.051.
PFABIGAN D M, ALEXOPOULOS J, BAUER H, et al . Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials[J ] . Psychophysiology, 2011, 48(5): 656-664. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01136.x.
SCHUERMANN B, ENDRASS T, KATHMANN N. Neural correlates of feedback processing in decision-making under risk[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2012, 6: 204. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00204.
SAN MARTÍN R, MANES F, HURTADO E, et al . Size and probability of rewards modulate the feedbackerror-related negativity associated with wins but not losses in a monetarily rewarded gambling task[J ] . NeuroImage, 2010, 51(3): 1194-1204. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.031.
POLEZZI D, LOTTO L, DAUM I, et al . Predicting outcomes of decisions in the brain[J ] . Behav Brain Res, 2008, 187(1): 116-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.09.001.
POLEZZI D, SARTORI G, RUMIATI R, et al . Brain correlates of risky decision-making[J ] . NeuroImage, 2010, 49(2): 1886-1894. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.068.
GOYER J P, WOLDORFF M G, HUETTEL S A. Rapid electrophysiological brain responses are influenced by both valence and magnitude of monetary rewards[J]. J Cogn Neurosci, 2008, 20(11): 2058-2069. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20134.
BECHARA A, DAMASIO H, TRANEL D, et al . The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers[J ] . Trends Cogn Sci, 2005, 9(4): 159-162;discussion 162-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.002.
冯田, 霍倩倩, 肖玮. 最优化与满意型决策风格对爱荷华赌博任务的影响[J]. 职业与健康, 2015, 31(15): 2068-2072.
FENG T, HUO Q Q, XIAO W.Effect of optimal and satisfied decision-making styles on Iowa gambling task[J]. Occup Health, 2015, 31(15): 2068-2072.
NAKAO, YAMANOUCHI J, TAKENAKA K, et al . The Iowa gambling task on HIV-infected subjects[J ] . J Infect Chemother, 2020, 26(3): 240-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.09.008.
GLICKSOHN J, ZILBERMAN N. Gambling on individual differences in decision making[J]. Pers Individ Differ, 2010, 48(5): 557-562. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.006.
ROGER C, BÉNAR C G, VIDAL F, et al . Rostral Cingulate Zone and correct response monitoring: ICA and source localization evidences for the unicity of correct- and error-negativities[J ] . Neuroimage, 2010, 51(1): 391-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.005.
FRANK M J, WOROCH B S, CURRAN T. Error-related negativity predicts reinforcement learning and conflict biases[J]. Neuron, 2005, 47(4): 495-501. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.020.
MARTÍNEZ-SELVA J M, MUÑOZ M A, SÁNCHEZ-NAVARRO J P, et al . Time course of the neural activity related to behavioral decision-making as revealed by event-related potentials[J ] . Front Behav Neurosci, 2019, 13: 191. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00191.
陈璟, 姜金栋, 汪为, 等. 决策中情绪作用机制的理论研究述评[J]. 心理科学, 2014, 37(6): 1346-1353. . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.00050
CHEN J, JIANG J D, WANG W, et al . The mechanism of emotion in decision making: a critical review of theoretical researches[J ] . J Psychol Sci, 2014, 37 (6): 1346-1353. . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.00050
FERRY R A, NELSON B D. Tactile P300 to unpredictable electric shocks: association with anxietysymptoms, intolerance of uncertainty, and neuroticism[J]. Biol Psychol, 2021, 162: 108094. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108094..
雷黎慧, 王萍. 成就动机与框架效应双重影响下大学生创业风险决策研究[J]. 经营与管理, 2017(4): 152-154. DOI: 10.7666/d.y1944298.
LEI L H, WANG P. Research on college students' venture decision-making under the dual influence of achievement motivation and frame effect[J]. Manag Adm, 2017(4): 152-154. DOI: 10.7666/d.y1944298.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621