
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
400037 重庆,陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第二附属医院骨科
[张玉梅, E-mail: zhangyumei19693@sina.comZHANG Yumei, E-mail: zhangyumei19693@sina.com
收稿:2023-01-17,
修回:2023-03-04,
纸质出版:2023-09-15
移动端阅览
何永琴, 赵荣荣, 刘鑫, 等. 初次髋关节置换患者术后尿潴留风险评估量表的构建与分析[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(17):1854-1859.
Yongqin HE, Rongrong ZHAO, Xin LIU, et al. Development and analysis of a urinary retention risk assessment scale for patients after primary hip arthroplasty[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(17): 1854-1859.
何永琴, 赵荣荣, 刘鑫, 等. 初次髋关节置换患者术后尿潴留风险评估量表的构建与分析[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(17):1854-1859. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202301088.
Yongqin HE, Rongrong ZHAO, Xin LIU, et al. Development and analysis of a urinary retention risk assessment scale for patients after primary hip arthroplasty[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(17): 1854-1859. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202301088.
目的
2
构建初次髋关节置换患者术后尿潴留风险评估量表,并检验其信效度。
方法
2
采用文献回顾法、半结构式访谈法、德尔菲专家函询法和预调查,形成量表条目池。采取便利抽样法,选取重庆市某三级甲等专科医院2021年7-8月住院的27名行初次髋关节置换的患者,进行预调查;2021年8月至2022年6月,选取114名行初次髋关节置换的患者进行条目分析和信效度检验,进一步验证量表结构的稳定性。
结果
2
形成包含3个维度,12个条目的初次髋关节置换患者术后尿潴留风险评估量表。该量表Cronbach’s α系数为0.758,内容效度指数为0.800,重测信度为0.935。ROC曲线结果显示:初次髋关节置换患者术后尿潴留风险评估量表的诊断阈值为17分,AUC为0.704(95%
CI
0.578~ 0.830),敏感度为63.6%,特异度为71.8%。量表分级结果为,17~
<
22分Ⅰ级;22~
<
27分Ⅱ级;≥27分Ⅲ级。
结论
2
构建的初次髋关节置换患者术后尿潴留风险评估量表具有良好的信效度,可作为评价髋关节置换术后尿潴留风险的工具。
Objective
2
To construct a urinary retention risk assessment scale for patients after primary hip replacement and test its reliability and validity.
Methods
2
The item pool of the scale was formed by combining literature review
semi-structured interview
Delphi expert letter consultation and pre-survey. A total of 27 patients who underwent primary hip replacement in a Class A tertiary specialized hospital in Chongqing from July to August 2021 were subjected with convenience sampling for pre-investigation. Then 114 patients who underwent primary hip replacement from August 2021 to June 2022 were selected for item analysis and reliability and validity test to further verify the stability of the scale structure.
Results
2
A risk assessment scale for urinary retention after primary hip replacement was constructed
which included 3 dimensions and 12 items. The content validity index of the scale was 0.800
Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.758
and test-retest reliability was 0.935. The results of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the diagnostic threshold of urinary retention risk assessment scale for patients with primary hip replacement was 17
the AUC was 0.704 (95%
CI
0.578~0.830)
the sensitivity was 63.6%
and the specificity was 71.8%. The scale grading results were as follows: 17≤ total score
<
22 indicated that the risk grade of Ⅰ; 22≤ total score
<
27 indicates that the risk grade of Ⅱ; A score of 27 or more indicates the grade of Ⅲ.
Conclusion
2
Our established urinary retention risk assessment scale for patients with primary hip replacement has good reliability and validity
and can be used as a tool to evaluate the risk of urinary retention after hip replacement.
周宗科, 翁习生, 曲铁兵, 等. 中国髋、膝关节置换术加速康复: 围术期管理策略专家共识[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2016, 9(1): 1-9.
ZHOU Z K, WENG X S, QU T B, et al . Expert consensus in enhanced recovery after total hip and knee arthroplasty in China: perioperative management[J ] . Chin J Bone Jt Surg, 2016, 9(1): 1-9.
何永琴, 姚爽, 张其梦, 等. 单侧髋膝关节置换患者围术期不留置尿管的可行性研究[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(7): 50-52. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.07.050.
HE Y Q, YAO S, ZHANG Q M, et al . Feasibility of not placing urinary catheter during perioperative stage in patients receiving unilateral hip or knee arthroplasty[J ] . J Nurs Sci, 2019, 34(7): 50-52. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.07.050.
裴福兴. 加速康复外科是现代骨外科发展的趋势[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2017, 6(12): 881-882. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2017.12.001.
PEI F X. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): the trend of modern orthopedic surgery[J]. Chin J Bone Jt, 2017, 6(12): 881-882. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2017.12.001.
SCHOLTEN R, KREMERS K, VAN DE GROES S A W, et al . Incidence and risk factors of postoperative urinary retention and bladder catheterization in patients undergoing fast-track total joint arthroplasty: a prospective observational study on 371 patients[J ] . J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(5): 1546-1551. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.001.
MILLER A G, MCKENZIE J, GREENKY M, et al . Spinal anesthesia: should everyone receive a urinary catheter?: a randomized, prospective study of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty[J ] . J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(16): 1498-1503. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01671.
宋阳阳, 颜美琼, 赵俭, 等. 术后患者尿潴留风险评估研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2018, 18(2): 241-244. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2018.02.021.
SONG Y Y, YAN M Q, ZHAO J, et al . The research progress of risk assessment of Postoperative Urinary Retention[J ] . Chin Nurs Manag, 2018, 18(2): 241-244. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2018.02.021.
霍冰清. 医院PICC护理质量评价指标体系的构建及应用[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2020, 11(23): 144-146. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2020.23.054.
HUO B Q. Construction and application of nursing quality evaluation index system of hospital PICC[J]. China Health Stand Manag, 2020, 11(23): 144-146. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2020.23.054.
KWONG E W Y, LAI C K Y, LIU F. Quality of life in nursing home settings: perspectives from elderly residents with frailty[J]. Clin Nurs Stud, 2014, 2(1): 100. DOI: 10.5430/cns.v2n1p100.
刘建辉, 陈飞虎. 临床医学科研方法学[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2002.
LIU J H, CHEN F H. Clinical medical research methods[M]. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 2002.
罗家洪, 郭秀花. 医学统计学[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.
LUO J H, GUO X H. Medical Statistics[M]. Second Edition. Beijing: Science Press, 2011.
吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.
WU M L. Questionnaire statistical analysis practice[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2010.
鄢建军, 杨建国, 江燕, 等. 临床护理人员创新能力评价量表的构建及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2018, 53(10): 1213-1217. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.10.011.
YAN J J, YANG J G, JIANG Y, et al . Development of Nurse Innovation Ability Scale and its reliability and validity testing[J ] . Chin J Nurs, 2018, 53(10): 1213-1217. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.10.011.
付艳芬, 郑显兰, 李平, 等. 护理非专业技术技能测评量表的构建研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2010, 45(9): 845-847. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2010.09.030.
FU Y F, ZHENG X L, LI P, et al . The development of an evaluation tool for nursing soft skills[J ] . Chin J Nurs, 2010, 45(9): 845-847. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2010.09.030.
郑晓菲, 张新平, 赖晓全, 等. 基于德尔菲法的医院感染公开指标研究[J]. 中国医院管理, 2016, 36(5): 59-61.
ZHENG X F, ZHANG X P, LAI X Q, et al . Reseavch on the health-care associated infection indicators for public reporting based on the Delphi method[J ] . Chin Hosp Manag, 2016, 36(5): 59-61.
吴莹玉, 黄霞, 贾培培, 等. 护士工作场所暴力防范培训体系的构建[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(4): 584-589. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2020.04.020.
WU Y Y, HUANG X, JIA P P, et al . Development of a nurse training indicator system against workplace violence based on behavioral objectives theory[J ] . Chin J Nurs, 2020, 55(4): 584-589. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2020.04.020.
孙琳, 黄迎春, 沈子琳, 等. 肠内营养护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 中国护理管理, 2017, 17(3): 341-345. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2017.03.014.
SUN L, HUANG Y C, SHEN Z L, et al . Construction of clinical enteral nutrition nursing quality evaluation system[J ] . Chin Nurs Manag, 2017, 17(3): 341-345. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2017.03.014.
陈有荣, 万伏银, 郭万首, 等. 下肢初次关节置换术中不留置导尿管的意义及研究现状[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2016, 9(5): 446-450. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2016.05-20.
CHEN Y R, WAN F Y, GUO W S, et al . Research status of primary lower limb arthroplasty without indwelling urinary catheter[J ] . Chin J Bone Jt Surg, 2016, 9(5): 446-450. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2016.05-20.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621