
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
400038 重庆,陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)军事预防医学系防化医学教研室,创伤与化学中毒全国重点实验室
[邹仲敏,E-mail: zmzou@tmmu.edu.cn ZOU Zhongmin, E-mail: zmzou@tmmu.edu.cn
收稿:2022-12-12,
修回:2023-06-07,
纸质出版:2023-11-15
移动端阅览
程晋, 余文珮, 叶枫, 等. DVC1在氮芥致人支气管上皮细胞DNA-蛋白交联损伤修复中的作用[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(21):2214-2221.
Jin CHENG, Wenpei YU, Feng YE, et al. Role of DVC1 in repair of nitrogen mustard-induced DNA protein crosslink in human bronchial epithelial cells[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(21): 2214-2221.
程晋, 余文珮, 叶枫, 等. DVC1在氮芥致人支气管上皮细胞DNA-蛋白交联损伤修复中的作用[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(21):2214-2221. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202212085.
Jin CHENG, Wenpei YU, Feng YE, et al. Role of DVC1 in repair of nitrogen mustard-induced DNA protein crosslink in human bronchial epithelial cells[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(21): 2214-2221. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202212085.
目的
2
探讨蛋白水解酶DVC1在氮芥诱导人支气管上皮细胞DNA-蛋白交联损伤修复中的作用。
方法
2
利用siRNA干预DVC1表达,50 μmol/L氮芥染毒细胞后,采用Western blot检测DNA损伤修复蛋白的表达;荧光酶标仪测定1~24 h DNA-蛋白交联总量;Slot blot检测DNA与O
6
-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA甲基转移酶
(O
6
-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase,MGMT)的共价交联;免疫沉淀检测MGMT泛素化水平。构建GST-DVC1融合蛋白,GST下拉实验检测DVC1与MGMT、泛素的结合。
结果
2
si-DVC1干预后,DNA-蛋白交联总量升高。氮芥降低交联蛋白MGMT原型的水平,但增强其泛素化水平;DVC1可结合泛素,si-DVC1可进一步增强MGMT的泛素化及DNA-MGMT的交联量,与泛素结合酶抑制剂NSC697923和蛋白酶体抑制剂MG132引起的交联结果类似。si-DVC1引起DNA损伤修复蛋白Rad51表达降低、Ku70表达升高。
结论
2
DNA-蛋白交联的清除依赖于交联蛋白的泛素化;DVC1通过与泛素相互作用,促进氮芥诱导的DNA-蛋白交联的清除,并维持DNA以同源重组方式修复损伤的能力。
Objective
2
To investigate the effect of DNA damage protein targeting VCP (DVC1) in DNA protein crosslink repair induced by nitrogen mustard in human bronchial epithelial cells (16HBE).
Methods
2
DVC1 siRNA was used to interfere its expression in 16HBE. Then the cells were exposed to 50 μmol/L nitrogen mustard
and the expression levels of DNA damage repair proteins were detected by Western blotting. The total content of DNA-protein crosslink was determined by fluorescence microplate analyzer from 1 to 24 h. The crosslink content of DNA with O
6
-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)
a methyltransferase
was detected by Slot blotting. The level of ubiquitinated MGMT was detected by immunoprecipitation. After GST-DVC1 fusion protein was constructed
GST pull-down was used to detect the binding of DVC1 with MGMT and ubquitin.
Results
2
After si-DVC1 intervention
the total content of DNA-protein crosslink was increased
and exposure to nitrogen mustard decreased the level of prototype of MGMT
but increased the level of ubiquitinated MGMT. DVC1 could bind to ubquitin
and si-DVC1 intervention further enhanced the ubiquitination of MGMT
as well as the crosslink between MGMT and DNA
which was similar with NSC697923 (an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating inhibitor) and MG132 (a proteasome inhibitor) treatment. The expression of Rad51 and Ku70
2 DNA repair proteins
were increased and decreased respectively by si-DVC1 interference.
Conclusion
2
Clearance of DNA-protein crossslink is depend on ubiquitination of MGMT. DVC1 promotes the clearance of nitrogen mustard induced DNA-protein crossslink by interacting with ubiquitin
and maintain the ability of homologous recombination repair.
YUE L J, WEI Y X, CHEN J, et al . Abundance of four sulfur mustard-DNA adducts ex vivo and in vivo revealed by simultaneous quantification in stable isotope dilution-ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J ] . Chem Res Toxicol, 2014, 27(4): 490-500. DOI: 10.1021/tx4003403..
ZHANG Y J, YUE L J, NIE Z Y, et al . Simultaneous determination of four sulfur mustard-DNA adducts in rabbit urine after dermal exposure by isotope -dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J ] . J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2014, 961: 29-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.04.050.
LIN Y, DONG Y, CHEN J, et al . Gas chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric analysis of β-lyase metabolites of sulfur mustard adducts with glutathione in urine and its use in a rabbit cutaneous exposure model[J ] . J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2014, 945/946: 233-239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.11.058.
NIE Z Y, ZHANG Y J, CHEN J, et al . Monitoring urinary metabolites resulting from sulfur mustard exposure in rabbits, using highly sensitive isotope-dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J ] . Anal Bioanal Chem, 2014, 406(21): 5203-5212. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-7916-3.
DARCHINI-MARAGHEH E, BALALI-MOOD M. Delayed complications and long-term management of sulfur mustard poisoning: recent advances by Iranian researchers (part Ⅰ of Ⅱ)[J]. Iran J Med Sci, 2018, 43(2): 103-124.
STEINRITZ D, LÜLING R, SIEGERT M, et al . Alkylated epidermal creatine kinase as a biomarker for sulfur mustard exposure: comparison to adducts of albumin and DNA in an in vivo rat study[J ] . Arch Toxicol, 2021, 95(4): 1323-1333. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-021-03005-3..
IQUBAL A, IQUBAL M K, SHARMA S, et al . Molecular mechanism involved in cyclophosphamide-induced cardiotoxicity: old drug with a new vision[J ] . Life Sci, 2019, 218: 112-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.12.018.
GROEHLER A 4th, VILLALTA P W, CAMPBELL C, et al . Covalent DNA-protein cross-linking by phosphoramide mustard and nornitrogen mustard in human cells[J ] . Chem Res Toxicol, 2016, 29(2): 190-202. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00430.
CHENG J, YE F, DAN G R, et al . Bifunctional alkylating agent-mediated MGMT-DNA cross-linking and its proteolytic cleavage in 16HBE cells[J ] . Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2016, 305: 267-273. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2016.06.022.
STINGELE J, BELLELLI R, ALTE F, et al . Mechanism and regulation of DNA-protein crosslink repair by the DNA-dependent metalloprotease SPRTN[J ] . Mol Cell, 2016, 64(4): 688-703. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.09.031.
REINKING H K, KANG H S, GOTZ M J, et al . DNA structure-specific cleavage of DNA-protein crosslinks by the SPRTN protease[J ] . Mol Cell, 2020, 80(1): 102-113. e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.08.003.
KⅡANITSA K, MAIZELS N. A rapid and sensitive assay for DNA-protein covalent complexes in living cells[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013, 41(9): e104. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt171.
BRAYBOY L M, CLARK H, KNAPIK L O, et al . Nitrogen mustard exposure perturbs oocyte mitochondrial physiology and alters reproductive outcomes[J ] . Reproductive Toxicol, 2018, 82: 80-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.10.002.
PUYO S, MONTAUDON D, POURQUIER P. From old alkylating agents to new minor groove binders[J]. Crit Rev Oncol, 2014, 89(1): 43-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.07.006.
JAN Y H, HECK D E, LASKIN D L, et al . DNA damage signaling in the cellular responses to mustard vesicants[J ] . Toxicol Lett, 2020, 326: 78-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.03.008.
SOSIC A, ZURAVKA I, SCHMITT N K, et al . Direct and topoisomerase Ⅱ mediated DNA damage by bis-3-chloropiperidines: the importance of being an earnest G[J ] . ChemMedChem, 2017, 12(17): 1471-1479. DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201700368.
GOSWAMI D G, KANT R, AMMAR D A, et al . Acute corneal injury in rabbits following nitrogen mustard ocular exposure[J ] . Exp Mol Pathol, 2019, 110: 104275. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2019.104275.
NAKAMURA J, NAKAMURA M. DNA-protein crosslink formation by endogenous aldehydes and AP sites[J]. DNA Repair, 2020, 88: 102806. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102806.
BALAKIREV M Y, MULLALLY J E, FAVIER A, et al . Wss1 metalloprotease partners with Cdc48/Doa1 in processing genotoxic SUMO conjugates[J ] . eLife, 2015, 4: e06763. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.06763.
VAZ B, POPOVIC M, RAMADAN K. DNA-protein crosslink proteolysis repair[J]. Trends Biochem Sci, 2017, 42(6): 483-495. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.03.005.
STINGELE J, BELLELLI R, BOULTON S J. Mechanisms of DNA-protein crosslink repair[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2017, 18(9): 563-573. DOI: 10.1038/nrm.2017.56.
STINGELE J, HABERMANN B, JENTSCH S. DNA-protein crosslink repair: proteases as DNA repair enzymes[J]. Trends Biochem Sci, 2015, 40(2): 67-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.012.
MÓROCZ M, ZSIGMOND E, TÓTH R, et al . DNA-dependent protease activity of human Spartan facilitates replication of DNA-protein crosslink-containing DNA[J ] . Nucleic Acids Res, 2017, 45(6): 3172-3188. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1315.
CARLA B, MARCO T. Identification and characterization of physiological pairing of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and E3 ubiquitin ligases[J]. Methods Mol Biol Clifton N J, 2023, 2581: 13-29.
CHENG J, YE F, DAN G R, et al . Formation and degradation of nitrogen mustard-induced MGMT-DNA crosslinking in 16HBE cells[J ] . Toxicology, 2017, 389: 67-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.07.007.
BARD J A M, GOODALL E A, GREENE E R, et al . Structure and function of the 26S proteasome[J ] . Annu Rev Biochem, 2018, 87: 697-724. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-011931.
YASUDA S, TSUCHIYA H, KAIHO A, et al . Stress- and ubiquitylation-dependent phase separation of the proteasome[J ] . Nature, 2020, 578(7794): 296-300. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-1982-9.
LEE N S, KIM S, JUNG Y W, et al . Eukaryotic DNA damage responses: Homologous recombination factors and ubiquitin modification[J ] . Mutat Res Mol Mech Mutagen, 2018, 809: 88-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.04.003.
FARIDOUNNIA M, FOLKERS G, BOELENS R. Function and interactions of ERCC1-XPF in DNA damage response[J]. Molecules, 2018, 23(12): 3205. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23123205.
SABATELLA M, PINES A, SLYSKOVA J, et al . ERCC1-XPF targeting to psoralen-DNA crosslinks depends on XPA and FANCD2[J ] . Cell Mol Life Sci, 2020, 77(10): 2005-2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-019-03264-5.
GAO C, JIN G X, FORBES E, et al . Inactivating mutations of the IK gene weaken Ku80/Ku70-mediated DNA repair and sensitize endometrial cancer to chemotherapy[J ] . Cancers, 2021, 13(10): 2487. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102487.
BONILLA B, HENGEL S R, GRUNDY M K, et al . RAD51 gene family structure and function[J ] . Annu Rev Genet, 2020, 54: 25-46. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-021920-092410.
MURMANN-KONDA T, SONI A, STUSCH KE M, et al . Analysis of chromatid-break-repair detects a homologous recombination to non-homologous end-joining switch with increasing load of DNA double-strand breaks[J ] . Mutat Res Toxicol Environ Mutagen, 2021, 867: 503372. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503372.
SCULLY R, PANDAY A, ELANGO R, et al . DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells[J ] . Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2019, 20(11): 698-714. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-019-0152-0.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621