小香猪DCD边缘供体模型的构建及其供肾病理学观察

刘祥凤; 陈倩; 秦志刚; 杨子恒; 李翼容; 黎洁钰; 薛正威; 高仁君; 陈星同; 许月明; 肖亚; 顾健腾

doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202211138

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

小香猪DCD边缘供体模型的构建及其供肾病理学观察

基础医学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 小香猪DCD边缘供体模型的构建及其供肾病理学观察
- Construction of porcine DCD marginal donor model and pathological observation of donor kidney
- 陆军军医大学学报 2023年45卷第5期页码：426-432
- 作者机构：
  
  1.400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第一附属医院麻醉科
  2.400020 重庆，陆军第958医院麻醉科
  3.400037 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第二附属医院泌尿外科
- 作者简介：
  
  [顾健腾，E-mail: gjt1976@163.com GU Jianteng, E-mail: gjt1976@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(81801900);重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(cstc2018jcyjAX0007);陆军军医大学人才基金(XZ-2019-505-028)
- DOI：10.16016/j.2097-0927.202211138
  中图分类号： R-332;R322.61;R361
- 收稿：2022-11-18，
  
  修回：2022-12-19，
  
  纸质出版：2023-03-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘祥凤, 陈倩, 秦志刚, 等. 小香猪DCD边缘供体模型的构建及其供肾病理学观察[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(5):426-432.

Xiangfeng LIU, Qian CHEN, Zhigang QIN, et al. Construction of porcine DCD marginal donor model and pathological observation of donor kidney[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(5): 426-432.
刘祥凤, 陈倩, 秦志刚, 等. 小香猪DCD边缘供体模型的构建及其供肾病理学观察[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(5):426-432. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202211138.

Xiangfeng LIU, Qian CHEN, Zhigang QIN, et al. Construction of porcine DCD marginal donor model and pathological observation of donor kidney[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(5): 426-432. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202211138.

摘要

目的

建立一种小香猪心脏死亡后器官捐献(donation after cardiac death，DCD) 供体模型，并对DCD供肾进行病理学评价。

方法

7只4~6月龄的雄性小香猪(13~17 kg)分为标准供体对照组(C组，

=3)和DCD组(

=4)，两组肌注苯巴比妥钠麻醉诱导后，建立耳缘静脉通道，行血压、心电图和氧饱和度(SaO

)监测，同时注射丙泊酚、舒芬太尼强化麻醉诱导效果。C组气管插管后机械通气，丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼和顺阿曲库铵维持麻醉，行开腹术摘取肾脏；DCD组静脉推注肝素(300 IU/kg)抗凝，后注射丙泊酚600 mg和顺阿曲库铵10 mg使猪心跳呼吸停止，待心停跳30 min时摘取肾脏。2组肾脏均切成小块组织，4%多聚甲醛固定，行石蜡包埋，采用HE染色，光镜下观察正常肾脏和DCD边缘供体肾脏的病理结果变化并进行组织损伤评分。

结果

DCD组共成功建模4只猪在注射过量麻醉药后SaO

下降至80%的平均时间为(3.25±1.89)min，心脏骤停平均时间为(7.75±3.10)min；热缺血30 min后获取的DCD边缘供肾与C组供肾相比，肾小管损伤评分增高(

0.05)，肾小球损伤评分均值增高，但差异无统计学意义。

结论

采用静脉注射过量丙泊酚和顺阿曲库铵的方法可有效建立猪DCD边缘供体模型。

Abstract

Objective

To construct a marginal donor model of porcine donation after cardiac death (DCD)

and evaluate the pathological alteration of DCD donor kidneys.

Methods

Seven male mini pigs (4~6 months old

13~17 kg) were divided into standard donor control group (C group

=3) and DCD group (

=4). After intramuscular injection with phenobarbital sodium

their auricular vein channels were established

then propofol and sufentanil were injected to enhance the anesthetic induction while blood pressure

electrocardiogram and oxygen saturation (SaO

) were monitored at the same time. Group C received mechanical ventilation after endotracheal intubation

and maintained anesthesia with propofol

remifentanil and cisatracurium

and the kidneys were harvested under laparotomy. In the DCD group

300 IU/kg heparin was injected intravenously for anticoagulation

followed by single bolus venous injection with 600 mg propofol and 10 mg cisatricurium to induce cardiac and respiratory arrest

and finally

the kidneys were harvested i

n 30 min after cardiac arrest. The kidneys in both groups were cut into small tissues

which were further fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde

embedded in paraffin wax and stained with HE for the pathological assessment and tissue damage scores under a optical microscope.

Results

The mean time for SaO

to decline to 80% was 3.25±1.89 min and the mean time for cardiac arrest was 7.75±3.10 min in the 4 pigs of DCD group after injection with overdose of anesthetics. Compared with the C group

the renal tubular injury score of DCD marginal donor kidney after suffering from warm ischemia for 30 min

was higher (

0.05)

and the mean score of glomerular injury was increased through no statistical difference.

Conclusion

Intravenous injection of excessive propofol and cisatracurium can effectively establish a porcine DCD marginal donor model.

关键词

Keywords

references

BAUER A C, FRANCO R F, MANFRO R C. Immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: state of the art and current protocols[J]. Curr Pharm Des, 2020, 26(28): 3440-3450. DOI: 10.2174/1381612826666200521142448.

陈栋, 张伟杰. 边缘供肝的评估和应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 893-895. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2018.12.001.

CHEN D, ZHANG W J. Evaluation and application of marginal donor liver[J]. J Clin Surg, 2018, 26(12): 893-895. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2018.12.001.

SMITH M, DOMINGUEZ-GIL B, GREER D M, et al . Organ donation after circulatory death: current status and future potential[J ] . Intensive Care Med, 2019, 45(3): 310-321. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05533-0.

SUMMERS D M, WATSON C J E, PETTIGREW G J, et al . Kidney donation after circulatory death (DCD): state of the art[J ] . Kidney Int, 2015, 88(2): 241-249. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2015.88.

REEB J, KESHAVJEE S, CYPEL M. Expanding the lung donor pool: advancements and emergingpathways[J]. Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2015, 20(5): 498-505. DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000233.

中华医学会器官移植学分会. 中国心脏死亡器官捐献工作指南(第2版)[J]. 中华器官移植杂志, 2011, 32(12): 756-758. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2011.12.014

Organ Transplantation Branch of the Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for organ donation of dead heart in China (2nd edition)[J]. Chin J Organ Transplant, 2011, 32(12): 756-758. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2011.12.014

ROUFOSSE C, SIMMONDS N, CLAHSEN-VAN GRONINGEN M, et al . A 2018 reference guide to the Banff classification of renal allograft pathology[J ] . Transplantation, 2018, 102(11): 1795-1814. DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002366.

ZHAO H L, NING J L, SAVAGE S, et al . A novel strategy for preserving renal grafts in an ex vivo setting: potential for enhancing the marginal donor pool[J ] . FASEB J, 2013, 27(12): 4822-4833. DOI: 10.1096/fj.13-236810..

ATTIA M, SILVA M A, MIRZA D F. The marginal liver donor: an update[J]. Transpl Int, 2008, 21(8): 713-724. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2008.00696.x.

ALBANO L, BANAS B, LEHNER F, et al . Outcomes with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression after kidney transplantation from standard- and extended-criteria donors—A post hoc analysis of the prospective OSAKA study[J ] . Ann Transplant, 2020, 25: e920041. DOI: 10.12659/AOT.920041.

ISRANI A K, ZAUN D, HADLEY N, et al . OPTN/S RTR 2018 annual data report: deceased organ donation[J ] . Am J Transplant, 2020, 20(Suppl s1): 509-541. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15678.

王鹏, 马婕, 左志超, 等. MRI体素内不相干运动在小型猪颌下腺放疗损伤中的应用价值初步研究[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2017, 36(11): 1716-1720. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2017.11.044.

WANG P, MA J, ZUO Z C, et al . MRI-IVIM in mini-pig submandibular gland radiation injury: a preliminary study on the application of value[J ] . J Clin Radiol, 2017, 36(11): 1716-1720. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2017.11.044.

陈伟民, 李峰, 黄达德, 等. 法舒地尔提高猪缺血诱导心脏死亡供者心保存效果的实验研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2014, 43(36): 4864-4868. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2014.36.006.

CHEN W M, LI F, HUANG D D, et al . Experimental study on fasudil for increasing preserving effect on porcine DCD heart induced by ischemia[J ] . Chongqing Med, 2014, 43(36): 4864-4868. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2014.36.006.

余明. 胸外按压过程中伪迹抑制与心电节律辨识算法研究[D]. 北京: 中国人民解放军军事医学科学院, 2017.

YU M. Research on the algorithm used for artifacts suppression and ECG rhythm recognition during chest compression[D]. Beijing: Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 2017.

SANCHEZ P G, BITTLE G J, WILLIAMS K, et al . Ex vivo lung evaluation of prearrest heparinization in donation after cardiac death[J ] . Ann Surg, 2013, 257(3): 534-541. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318273bef1.

GABISONIA K, PROSDOCIMO G, AQUARO G D, et al . MicroRNA therapy stimulates uncontrolled cardiac repair after myocardial infarction in pigs[J ] . Nature, 2019, 569(7756): 418-422. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1191-6.

刘蕾, 刘懿禾, 马宁, 等. 应用体外膜肺氧合对猪心脏死亡后肝脏的保护作用[J]. 中华器官移植杂志, 2015, 36(1): 44-47. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2015.01.011

LIU L, LIU Y H, MA N, et al . Protective effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on liver graft after cardiac death in pigs[J ] . Chin J Organ Transplant, 2015, 36(1): 44-47. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2015.01.011

马宁, 刘蕾, 刘懿禾, 等. 体外膜氧合再灌注猪心脏死亡供体后肠黏膜屏障功能的改变[J]. 天津医科大学学报, 2020, 26(3): 209-212, 217.

MA N, LIU L, LIU Y H, et al . Intestinal mucosal barrier function changes during reperfusion of donation after pig cardiac death by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation[J ] . J Tianjin Med Univ, 2020, 26(3): 209-212, 217.

范晓礼, 胡龙, 陈治泉, 等. 在体体外膜肺氧合辅助再循环对猪心脏死亡后肝脏的保护作用[J]. 中华器官移植杂志, 2014, 35(7): 426-430. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2014.07.011.

FAN X L, HU L, CHEN Z Q, et al . Repair function of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation recirculation in vivo for swine liver after cardiac death[J ] . Chin J Organ Transplant, 2014, 35(7): 426-430. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2014.07.011..

申颖, 刘唐威, 陈蒙华, 等. 猪窒息性心跳骤停动物模型的建立[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2008, 25(3): 344-346. DOI: 10.16190/j.cnki.45-1211/r.2008.03.010.

SHEN Y, LIU T W, CHEN M H, et al . A swine model of acute asphyxial cardiac arrest by endotracheal tube clamping[J ] . J Guangxi Med Univ, 2008, 25(3): 344-346. DOI: 10.16190/j.cnki.45-1211/r.2008.03.010.

IYER A, CHEW H C, GAO L, et al . Pathophysiological trends during withdrawal of life support: implications for organ donation after circulatory death[J ] . Transplantation, 2016, 100(12): 2621-2629. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001396.

毕见龙, 蔡明, 袁清, 等. 建立小型猪可控型心脏死亡模型[J]. 中华器官移植杂志, 2015, 36(12): 705-708. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2015.12.001.

BI J L, CAI M, YUAN Q, et al . Establishment of a miniature porcine model for controlled cardiac deceased donor[J ] . Chin J Organ Transplant, 2015, 36(12): 705-708. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2015.12.001.

WANG S Y, ZHANG C Y, CAI G Y, et al . Method used to establish a large animal model of drug-induced acute kidney injury[J ] . Exp Biol Med (Maywood), 2021, 246(8): 986-995. DOI: 10.1177/1535370220981756.

SAFAEE FAKHR B, DONDOSSOLA D, CAVENAGO M, et al . Deterioration of lung function in a pig model of uncontrolled cardiac death[J ] . Transplant Proc, 2016, 48(2): 431-434. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.046.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

高原、高寒、高热环境下致死性休克大鼠模型的建立与标准化造模方式筛选

经腹膜后入路构建大鼠肾下腹主动脉瘤模型

HBx通过COX-2及其下游因子诱导小鼠发生肝癌的机制研究

鼠Fscb/Cabyr双基因靶向敲除动物模型的建立和鉴定

HBx基因通过ERK1/2信号通路促肝细胞增殖及炎性因子表达