
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
400037 重庆,陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第二附属医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科
[ 邓安春,E-mail:260019300@qq.com DENG Anchun, E-mail: 260019300@qq.com
收稿:2022-07-16,
修回:2022-10-13,
纸质出版:2023-02-28
移动端阅览
陈思霖, 李谦, 王刘倩, 等. 头颈鳞状细胞癌自噬相关基因预后风险评分模型构建及验证[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(4):326-334.
Silin CHEN, Qian LI, Liuqian WANG, et al. Construction and validation of prognostic risk score model based on autophagy-related genes for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(4): 326-334.
陈思霖, 李谦, 王刘倩, 等. 头颈鳞状细胞癌自噬相关基因预后风险评分模型构建及验证[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023,45(4):326-334. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202207110.
Silin CHEN, Qian LI, Liuqian WANG, et al. Construction and validation of prognostic risk score model based on autophagy-related genes for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(4): 326-334. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202207110.
目的
2
构建并验证一种头颈鳞状细胞癌(head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,HNSCC)自噬相关基因预后风险评分模型。
方法
2
从癌症基因组图谱(The Cancer Genome Atlas,TCGA)数据库下载全部HNSCC转录组表达数据(RNA sequencing,RNA-seq)及临床信息,筛选出差异表达基因,与GeneCards数据库检索的自噬相关基因(autophagy related genes,ARGs)取交集,得到差异表达的ARGs,整合临床信息后经预后分析获得预后相关的ARGs,再对其富集分析。应用套索(the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator,LASSO)回归和Cox回归模型构建一种用于预测HNSCC预后及生存情况的风险评分模型;绘制受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic
ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(area under the curve
AUC)及最佳截断(cut-off)值,并以最佳cut-off值将患者分为高、低风险评分组;绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线评价该模型的预测性能;将临床信息与风险评分对应整合,再次利用Cox回归分析评价风险评分的独立预后价值。
结果
2
通过对差异表达的ARGs进行预后分析初筛出20个与预后相关的ARGs,再应用LASSO回归和Cox回归分析获得9个与预后显著相关的ARGs,以此构建HNSCC的预后风险评分模型。ROC曲线及Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析显示,低风险评分组生存时间优于高风险评分组,两组生存时间差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.001),且该模型在训练集(AUC最大值为0.69)与外部验证集(AUC最大值为0.822)中均展现出良好的预测性能。纳入临床信息后,对风险评分进行Cox回归分析,提示其与HNSCC患者预后显著相关(
P
<
0.001),表明风险评分对HNSCC具有独立预后价值。
结论
2
由9个ARGs组成的HNSCC风险评分模型,可有效预测HNSCC患者的预后情况。
Objective
2
To construct and validate a prognostic risk-scoring model based on autophagy-related genes for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
Methods
2
All HNSCC transcriptome expression data (RNA sequencing
RNA-seq) and clinical information downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database
and differentially expressed genes were screened. These differentially expressed genes of HNSCC were intersected with autophagy related genes (ARGs) retrieved from the GeneCards database to obtain differentially expressed ARGs. After integrating clinical information
prognostic ARGs were obtained by prognostic analysis
and then enrichment analysis was performed. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and Cox regression model were used to construct a risk scoring model for predicting the prognosis and survival of HNSCC. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn
the area under the curve (AUC) and the best cut-off value were calculated
and the patients were divided into the high- and low-risk score groups with the best cut-off value. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was drawn to assess the predictive performance of the model. The clinical information was integrated with the risk score
and the independent prognostic value of the risk score was evaluated by Cox regression analysis.
Results
2
The prognostic risk score model of HNSCC was constructed based on the 9 ARGs significantly related to prognosis were obtained by LASSO regression and Cox regression analysis through the prognostic analysis for differentially expressed ARGs which screened 20 ARGs related to prognosis. The survival time of the low-risk score group was better than that of the high risk score group
and the survival time of the two groups was significantly different (
P
<
0.001)
according to ROC curve and Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The model showed good prediction performance in both the training set (the maximum AUC
0.69) and the external validation set (the maximum AUC
0.822). Cox regression analysis showed that the risk score was significantly correlated with the prognosis of HNSCC patients (
P
<
0.001)
indicating that the risk score had independent prognostic value for HNSCC.
Conclusion
2
The HNSCC risk scoring model composed of 9 ARGs can effectively predict the prognosis of patients with HNSCC.
DJUREINOVIC D, WANG M N, KLUGER H M. Agonistic CD40 antibodies in cancer treatment[J]. Cancers, 2021, 13(6): 1302. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061302.
ADELSTEIN D, GILLISON M L, PFISTER D G, et al . NCCN guidelines(R) insights: head and neck cancers, version 2.2017[J ] . J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2017, 15(6): 761-770. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0101.
AMARAVADI R K, KIMMELMAN A C, DEBNATH J. Targeting autophagy in cancer: recent advances and future directions[J]. Cancer Discov, 2019, 9(9): 1167-1181. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0292.
SINHA D, VALAPALA M, SHANG P, et al . Lysosomes: regulators of autophagy in the retinal pigmented epithelium[J ] . Exp Eye Res, 2016, 144: 46-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.08.018.
TAI S, HU X Q, PENG D Q, et al . The roles of autophagy in vascular smooth muscle cells[J ] . Int J Cardiol, 2016, 211: 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.128.
KOBAYASHI S, LIANG Q R. Autophagy and mitophagy in diabetic cardiomyopathy[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2015, 1852(2): 252-261. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.05.020.
PARIKH N D, SINGAL A G, HUTTON D W. Cost effectiveness of regorafenib as second-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 2017, 123(19): 3725-3731. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30863.
COSWAY B, LOVAT P. The role of autophagy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck[J]. Oral Oncol, 2016, 54: 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.12.007.
CHEN Z T, ZHAO W, QU S, et al . PARP-1 promotes autophagy via the AMPK/mTOR pathway in CNE-2 human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells following ionizing radiation, while inhibition of autophagy contributes to the radiation sensitization of CNE-2 cells[J ] . Mol Med Rep, 2015, 12(2): 1868-1876. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3604..
LIU Z Y, LIU J, LI L, et al . Inhibition of autophagy potentiated the antitumor effect of nedaplatin in cisplatin-resistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells[J ] . PLoS One, 2015, 10(8): e0135236. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135236.
GU JJ, YIN L, WU J, et al . Cetuximab and cisplatin show different combination effect in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells lines via inactivation of EGFR/AKT signaling pathway[J ] . Biochem Res Int, 2016, 2016: 7016907. DOI: 10.1155/2016/7016907..
CHEN W B, OU M L, TANG D E, et al . Identification and validation of immune-related gene prognostic signature for hepatocellular carcinoma[J ] . J Immunol Res, 2020, 2020: 5494858. DOI: 10.1155/2020/5494858.
DE BRUIN E C, MEDEMA J P. Apoptosis and non-apoptotic deaths in cancer development and treatment response[J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2008, 34(8): 737-749. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.07.001.
屈倩倩, 张世文, 李晓江. 溶酶体-自噬与头颈鳞状细胞癌凋亡的关系[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 30(24): 1975-1979. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2016.24.022.
QU Q Q, ZHANG S W, LI X J. The relationship between lysosome-autophagy and the head and neck squamous cancer cell apoptosis[J]. J Chin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg(China), 2016, 30(24): 1975-1979. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2016.24.022.
JUTTEN B, KEULERS T G, SCHAAF M B, et al . EGFR overexpressing cells and tumors are dependent on autophagy for growth and survival[J ] . Radiother Oncol, 2013, 108(3): 479-483. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.033.
LU T, LI Y S, PANM, et al . TBC1D14 inhibits autophagy to suppress lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by downregulating macrophage erythroblast attacher[J ] . Int J Biol Sci, 2022, 18(5): 1795-1812. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.68992.
CHEN Y, ZHAO H, LIANG W L, et al . Autophagy regulates the cancer stem cell phenotype of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma through the noncanonical FOXO3/SOX2 axis[J ] . Oncogene, 2022, 41(5): 634-646. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-021-02115-7.
ONDREJ M, CECHAKOVA L, DURISOVA K, et al . To live or let die: unclear task of autophagy in the radiosensitization battle[J ] . Radiother Oncol, 2016, 119(2): 265-275. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.02.028.
HUANG C Q, LIU J Y, XIONG B, et al . Expression and prognosis analyses of forkhead box A (FOXA) family in human lung cancer[J ] . Gene, 2019, 685: 202-2 10. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.11.022.
GAO B, XIE W, WU X J, et al . Functionally analyzing the important roles of hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 (FoxA) in tumorigenesis[J ] . Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2020, 1873(2): 188365. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188365.
SHENG S R, GUO B, WANG Z T, et al . Aberrant methylation and immune microenvironment are associated with overexpressed fibronectin 1: a diagnostic and prognostic target in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J ] . Front Mol Biosci, 2021, 8: 753563. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.753563.
JIANG Y Y, CAO W, WU K, et al . LncRNA LINC00460 promotes EMT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by facilitating peroxiredoxin-1 into the nucleus[J ] . J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2019, 38(1): 365. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-019-1364-z.
HAYASHI F, KASAMATSU A, ENDO-SAKAMOTO Y, et al . Increased expression of tripartite motif (TRIM) like 2 promotes tumoral growth in human oral cancer[J ] . Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2019, 508(4): 1133-1138. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.12.060.
SHIIBA M, NOMURA H, SHINOZUKA K, et al . Down -regulated expression of SERPIN genes located on chromosome 18q21 in oral squamous cell carcinomas[J ] . Oncol Rep, 2010, 24(1): 241-249. DOI:10.3892/or_00000852.
RANZUGLIA V, LORENZON I, PELLARIN I, et al . Serum- and glucocorticoid- inducible kinase 2, SGK2, is a novel autophagy regulator and modulates platinum drugs response in cancer cells[J ] . Oncogene, 2020, 39(40): 6370-6386. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-020-01433-6.
ZHAO X P, LI L, YUAN S Y, et al . SPIB acts as a tumor suppressor by activating the NFkB and JNK signaling pathways through MAP4K1 in colorectal cancer cells[J ] . Cell Signal, 2021, 88: 110148. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.110148.
LIU C, WU W L, XU M, et al . Development and validation of an autophagy-related signature for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J ] . Biomed Res Int, 2021, 2021: 1028158. DOI: 10.1155/2021/1028158.
ZHU L B, YAN D L, CHEN Y, et al . The identification of autophagy-related genes in the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma[J ] . Oral Dis, 2020, 26(8): 1659-1667. DOI: 10.1111/odi.13492.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621