
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.400038 重庆, 陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系军事心理学教研室
2.266000 山东 青岛, 山东省军区青岛第六离职干部休养所
[许辰,E-mail: xuchen51@sina.com XU Chen, E-mail: xuchen51@sina.com
[李敏,E-mail: limin52267@tmmu.edu.cn LI Min, E-mail: limin52267@tmmu.edu.cn
收稿:2022-05-16,
修回:2022-07-06,
纸质出版:2022-11-30
移动端阅览
刘笑彤, 刘玉, 杨烨, 等. 叙事团体心理训练对集训期新兵心理适应的干预研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2022,44(22):2340-2345.
Xiaotong LIU, Yu LIU, Ye YANG, et al. Intervention of narrative group psychological training on psychological adaptation of recruits during the training period[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(22): 2340-2345.
刘笑彤, 刘玉, 杨烨, 等. 叙事团体心理训练对集训期新兵心理适应的干预研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2022,44(22):2340-2345. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202204217.
Xiaotong LIU, Yu LIU, Ye YANG, et al. Intervention of narrative group psychological training on psychological adaptation of recruits during the training period[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(22): 2340-2345. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202204217.
目的
2
探讨叙事团体心理训练对集训期新兵生活满意度、自我效能感和心理弹性的干预效果。
方法
2
采取整群抽样法抽取某训练基地于2020年9月入伍新兵154人,采取以连为单位整建制分组法分成干预组(73人)和对照组(81人)。干预组接受9次叙事团体心理训练,每周1~2次,每次2~2.5 h;对照组不接受干预。使用生活满意度量表(satisfaction with life scale
SWLS)、一般自我效能感量表(general self-efficacy scale
GSES)和心理弹性量表简版(10-item Connor-Davidson resilience scale,CD-RISC-10)在干预前(T
1
)、干预结束即刻(T
2
)、干预结束后1个月(T
3
)对两组成员进行评估。
结果
2
训练前两组成员人口统计学信息及各心理学指标均无显著统计差异(
P
>0.05)。①生活满意度测量时间与分组的交互效应有统计学意义(
P
<0.01),干预组的生活满意度在T
2
显著高于对照组(
P
<0.01);②自我效能感测量时间与分组的交互效应有统计学意义(
P
<0.05),干预组自我效能感在T
2
和T
3
均显著高于对照组(
P
<0.01,
P
<0.05);③心理弹性测量时间与分组的交互效应有统计学意义(
P
<0.01),干预组的心理弹性在T
2
显著高于对照组(
P
<0.01)。
结论
2
集训期开展叙事团体心理训练能显著提升新兵生活满意度、自我效能感、心理弹性水平,增强新兵心理适应能力。
Objective
2
To explore the intervention effect of narrative group psychological training on life satisfaction
self-efficacy and psychological resilience of recruits during the training period.
Methods
2
A total of 154 recruits from a training base in September 2020 were selected by cluster sampling. Two companies were randomly selected as the intervention group (
n
=73) and the control group (
n
=81). The intervention group received 9 times of narrative group psychological training (1~2 times a week
2~2.5 h each time)
while the control group received no intervention. The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS)
general self-efficacy scale (GSES) and psychological resilience scale (CD-RISC) were used to evaluate the life satisfaction
self-efficacy and psychological resilience level of the two groups in 3 different time points: before intervention (T
1
)
at the end of intervention (T
2
) and 1 month after intervention (T
3
).
Results
2
① The interaction effect of grouping and the measurement time of life satisfaction was statistically significant (
P
<
0.01). The life satisfaction of the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group in T
2
(
P
<
0.01). ②The interaction effect of grouping and the measurement time of
self-efficacy was statistically significant (
P
<
0.05). The self-efficacy of the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group both in T
2
and T
3
(
P
<
0.01
P
<
0.05). ③The interaction effect of grouping and the measurement time of psychological resilience was statistically significant (
P
<
0.01). The psychological resilience of the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group in T
2
(
P
<
0.01).
Conclusion
2
The narrative group psychological training during the training period can significantly improve the level of life satisfaction
self-efficacy and psychological resilience and enhance the psychological adaptability of recruits.
辛阔林. 陆军新兵心理健康发展特点及教育策略研究[D]. 重庆: 第三军医大学, 2015.
XIN K L. The research on army recruits' characteristics of psychological healthy development and education strategy[D]. Chongqing: Third Military Medical University, 2015.
ÇAǦLAYAN MÜLAZ 1 M Ö, ELDELEKLIO ǦLU J. What is the role of self-compassion on subjective happiness and life satisfaction?[J ] . Human Sci, 2016, 13(3): 3895. DOI: 10.14687/jhs.v13i3.4001.
樊富珉. 我国青少年自杀研究及预防对策[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 2005, 15(4): 241-242.
FAN F M. Study on adolescent suicide and its prevention in China[J]. J Clin Psychol Med, 2005, 15(4): 241-242.
柳迎新, 黄文倩, 朱婉儿. 大学新生的自杀意念及与生活满意度、幸福感的关系[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2012, 26(3): 235-238.
LIU Y X, HUANG W Q, ZHU W E. Suicidal ideationto satis faction with life and happiness in college freshmen[J]. Chin Ment Heal J, 2012, 26(3): 235-238.
张鼎昆, 方俐洛, 凌文辁. 自我效能感的理论及研究现状[J]. 心理学动态, 1999, 7(1): 6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.1999.01.009.
ZHANG D K, FANG L L, LING W Q. The theory and research status of self-efficacy[J]. J Dev Psychol, 1999, 7(1): 6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.1999.01.009.
王青, 王菡红. 新兵自我效能感与焦虑和抑郁的相关分析[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2010, 28(1): 46-47. DOI: 10.13704/j.cnki.jyyx.2010.01.024.
WANG Q, WANG H H. Correlation analysis of recruits' self-efficacy with anxiety and depression[J]. J Prev Med Chin PLA, 2010, 28(1): 46-47. DOI: 10.13704/j.cnki.jyyx.2010.01.024.
席居哲, 桑标, 左志宏. 心理弹性(Resilience)研究的回顾与展望[J]. 心理科学, 2008, 31(4): 995-998, 977. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2008.04.044.
XI J Z, SANG B, ZUO Z H. The research on resilience: its evolution and direction[J]. Psychol Sci, 2008, 31(4): 995-998, 977. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2008.04.044.
宁连才, 贾梦楠, 王晓丽, 等. 心理弹性在武警新兵应付方式与适应不良间的中介效应[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2014, 22(8): 1208-1210. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2014.08.036.
NING L C, JIA M N, WANG X L, et al . Psychological resilience as a mediator of the association between coping styles and mental maladjustment of armed police recruits[J ] . China J Heal Psychol, 2014, 22(8): 1208-1210. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2014.08.036.
石磊, 刘波涛, 李敏, 等. 某部新兵新训期间的心理健康和适应与其家庭教养方式、心理弹性和应对方式的关系[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2014, 22(10): 1524-1526. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2014.10.035.
SHI L, LIU B T, LI M, et al . The relations among mental health and adaptation, parental rearing patterns, resilience and coping styles in recruits during military training[J ] . China J Heal Psychol, 2014, 22(10): 1524-1526. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2014.10.035.
HANSSON L, YANOS P T. Narrative enhancement and cogni- tive therapy: a pilot study of outcomes of a self-stigma intervention in a Swedish clinical context[J]. Stigma Heal, 2016, 1(4): 280-286. DOI: 10.1037/sah0000035.
PERI T, HASSON-OHAYON I, GARBER S, et al . Narrative reconstruction therapy for prolonged grief disorder-rationale and case study[J ] . Eur J Psychotraumatol, 2016, 7: 30687. DOI: 10.3402/ejpt.v7.30687.
赵晓妍. 大学生主观幸福感、生活事件、认知情绪调节的关系及叙事团体辅导干预研究[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2016.
ZHAO X Y. The correlations among undergraduates' subjective well-being, negative lifeevents and cognitive emotion regulation and narrative oriented group counseling intervention[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University, 2016.
李丹, 李文静, 程琳博. 叙事疗法对肺癌患者疼痛应激、心理弹性和生活质量的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2021, 19(23): 2471-2475. DOI: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2021.19.23.26.
LI D, LI W J, CHENG L B. Effect of narrative therapy on pain stress, mental resilience and quality of life in patients with lung cancer[J]. Oncol Prog, 2021, 19(23): 2471-2475. DOI: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2021.19.23.26.
周雁荣, 张严丽, 罗亮春, 等. 叙事护理干预对心脏瓣膜置换术患者心理状态的影响[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(21): 81-84. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.21.081.
ZHOU Y R, ZHANG YL, LUO L C, et al . Effect of narrative intervention on mental state of patients undergoing heart valve replacement[J ] . J Nurs Sci, 2020, 35(21): 81-84. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.21.081.
RODRÍGUEZ VEGA B, BAYÓN PÉREZ C, PALAOTARRERO A, et al . Mindfulness-based narrative therapy for depression in cancer patients[J ] . Clin Psychol Psychother, 2014, 21(5): 411-419. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.1847.
YOOSEFI LOOYEH M, KAMALI K, GHASEMI A, et al . Treating social phobia in children through group narrative therapy[J ] . Arts Psychother, 2014, 41(1): 16-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.aip.2013.11.005.
熊承清, 许远理. 生活满意度量表中文版在民众中使用的信度和效度[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2009, 17(8): 948-949. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2009.08.026.
XIONG C Q, XU Y L. Reliability and validity of the stisfaction with life scale for Chinese demos[J]. China J Heal Psychol, 2009, 17(8): 948-949. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2009.08.026.
王才康, 刘勇. 一般自我效能感与特质焦虑、状态焦虑和考试焦虑的相关研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2000, 8(4): 229-230. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2000.04.011.
WANG C K, LIU Y. Correlation among general self-efficacy, trait anxiety, state anxiety and test anxiety[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2000, 8(4): 229-230. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2000.04.011.
CAMPBELL-SILLS L, STEIN M B. Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC): validation of a 10-item measure of resilience[J]. J Trauma Stress, 2007, 20(6): 1019-1028. DOI: 10.1002/jts.20271.
张丹梅, 熊梅, 李彦章. 心理弹性量表简版在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2018, 27(10): 942-946. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2018.10.016.
ZHANG D M, XIONG M, LI Y Z. The reliability and validity of 10-item Connor-Davidson resilience scale in the community-dwelling older adults[J]. Chin J Behav Med Brain Sci, 2018, 27(10): 942-946. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2018.10.016.
费俊峰, 赵兆. 叙事治疗视角下的心理健康教育[J]. 医学与哲学, 2017, 38(5): 52-55. DOI: 10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2017.03a.12.
FEI J F, ZHAO Z. The psycho-education in the perspective of narrative therapy[J]. Med Philos A, 2017, 38(5): 52-55. DOI: 10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2017.03a.12.
梁舜薇. 外显问题大学生的心理健康状况调查及叙事团体心理干预[D]. 广州: 南方医科大学, 2018. DOI: 10.7666/d.Y3474357.
LIANG S W. An investigation of explicit-troubled college students' mental health and narrative group intervention[D]. Guangzhou: Southern Medical University, 2018. DOI: 10.7666/d.Y3474357.
缪毅, 李敏, 兰勇, 等. 集训期野战部队新兵心理弹性、心理健康与心理应激关系的交叉滞后分析[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2012(1): 59-62.
MIAO Y, LI M, LAN Y, et al . A cross-lagged regression analysis between resilience, mental health and psychological stress of recruits during training[J ] . Chin J Behav Med Sci, 2012(1): 59-62.
杨倩, 左昕, 彭李, 等. 某部新兵集训期心理弹性与应激水平和情绪体验的关系[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2016, 24(6): 833-836. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2016.06.011.
YANG Q, ZUO X, PENG L, et al . Relationships of resilience with psychological stress and positive and negative affect in new recruits[J ] . China J Heal Psychol, 2016, 24(6): 833-836. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2016.06.011.
ZIMMERMAN J L, DICKERSON V C. Using a narrative metaphor: implications for theory and clinical practice[J]. Fam Process, 1994, 33(3): 233-245. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1994.00233.x.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621