反刍思维量表在军人群体中的信效度检验及应用

廖兴亚; 姜辉; 赵梦雪; 张小玲; 李媛媛; 熊珂; 孙淑娟; 冯正直

doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202202092

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

反刍思维量表在军人群体中的信效度检验及应用

专题报道：军人心理效能提升 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 反刍思维量表在军人群体中的信效度检验及应用
- Reliability and validity test of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese military personnel and its application
- 陆军军医大学学报 2022年44卷第19期页码：1954-1960
- 作者机构：
  
  1.400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系
  2.510000 广州，31626部队
  3.266000 山东青岛，91951部队卫生队
- 作者简介：
  
  [冯正直，E-mail：fzz@tmmu.edu.cnFENG Zhengzhi, E-mail: fzz@tmmu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16016/j.2097-0927.202202092
  中图分类号： B841.7;R395.1;R821.2
- 收稿：2022-02-18，
  
  修回：2022-04-21，
  
  纸质出版：2022-10-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
廖兴亚, 姜辉, 赵梦雪, 等. 反刍思维量表在军人群体中的信效度检验及应用[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2022,44(19):1954-1960.

Xingya LIAO, Hui JIANG, Mengxue ZHAO, et al. Reliability and validity test of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese military personnel and its application[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(19): 1954-1960.
廖兴亚, 姜辉, 赵梦雪, 等. 反刍思维量表在军人群体中的信效度检验及应用[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2022,44(19):1954-1960. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202202092.

Xingya LIAO, Hui JIANG, Mengxue ZHAO, et al. Reliability and validity test of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese military personnel and its application[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(19): 1954-1960. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202202092.

摘要

目的

检验反刍思维量表在中国军人群体中的信效度。

方法

采用反刍思维量表、患者健康问卷抑郁量表、负性认知加工偏向量表对2个旅级单位4 443名军人进行施测，用SPSS 22.0与AMOS 26.0软件进行信效度分析。

结果

① 验证性因素分析显示一阶三因子模型的结构方程拟合度良好(RMSEA=0.074

GFI=0.887

RMR=0.018

CFI=0.922

IFI=0.922)；②反刍思维量表各条目与各因子、量表总分之间呈显著正相关(

=0.372~0.977，

0.01)，内容效度良好；③量表总分及各因子与抑郁症筛查量表的相关系数在0.604~0.730，与负性认知加工偏向量表的相关系数在0.615~0.741，效标关联效度良好；④反刍思维量表及其因子的克伦巴赫α系数在0.821~0.956，分半系数在0.845~0.918，重测系数在0.671~0.894，信度良好。

结论

反刍思维量表在中国军人群体中具有良好的信效度。

Abstract

Objective

To test the reliability and validity of the Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) in Chinese military personnel.

Methods

A total of 4 443 military personnel from 2 brigades in the Northern Theater Command were tested using Ruminative Responses scale(RRS)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

and Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire (NCPBQ). SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 26.0 were used for reliability and validity analysis.

Results

① The 3-dimension model fitting indexes of RRS were within the standard range (RMSEA=0.074

GFI=0.887

RMR=0.018

CFI=0.922

IFI=0.922). ② All the scores for each item and factor of RRS showed significant positive correlations with the total score of the questionnaire (

=0.372~0.977

0.01). ③ The correlation coefficients between each factor of RRS and PHQ-9 were 0.604~0.730

and those between each factor of RRS and NCPBQ were 0.615~0.741. ④ It was found that the Cronbach'α coefficients of the RRS were between 0.821 and 0.956

the split-half coefficients were between 0.845 and 0.918

the test-retest coefficients were between 0.671 and 0.894.

Conclusion

RRS is of high reliability and validity for measurement among military personnel.

关键词

Keywords

references

NOLEN-HOEKSEMA S. Sex differences in unipolar depression: evidence and theory[J]. Psychol Bull, 1987, 101(2): 259-282.

WHISMAN M A, MIRANDA R, FRESCO D M, et al . Measurement invariance of the ruminative res ponses scale across gender[J ] . Assessment, 2020, 27(3): 508-517. DOI: 10.1177/1073191118774131.

LUCENA-SANTOS P, PINTO-GOUVEIA J, CARVALHO S A, et al . Is the widely used two-factor structure of the Ruminative Responses Scale invariant across different samples of women?[J ] . Psychol Psychother, 2018, 91(3): 398-416. DOI: 10.1111/papt.12168.

LEE S, KIM W. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the revised Korean version of ruminative response scale[J]. Psychiatry Investig, 2014, 11(1): 59-64. DOI: 10.4306/pi.2014.11.1.59.

HASEGAWA A, KODA M, HATTORI Y, et al . Longitudinal predictions of the Brooding and Reflection subscales of the Japanese Ruminative Responses Scale for depression[J ] . Psychol Rep, 2013, 113(2): 566-585. DOI: 10.2466/02.15.PR0.113x24z5.

NOLEN-HOEKSEMA S, MORROW J. A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1991, 61(1): 115-121. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.1.115.

HVENEGAARD M, WATKINS E R, POULSEN S, et al . Rumination-focused cognitive behav iour therapy vs. cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: study protocol for a randomised controlled superiority trial[J ] . Trials, 2015, 16: 344. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0875-y.

FIGUEROA C A, DEJONG H, MOCKING RJ T, et al . Attentional control, rumination and recurrence of depression[J ] . J Affect Disord, 2019, 256: 364-372. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.072.

游志麒, 徐钰, 张陆, 等. 自我控制对睡眠质量的影响: 反刍思维与就寝拖延的中介作用[J]. 应用心理学, 2020, 26(1): 74-82. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2020.01.008.

YOU Z Q, XU Y, ZHANG L, et al . The predictive effect of self-control on sleep quality: the mediating role of rumination and bedtime procrastination[J ] . Chin J Appl Psychol, 2020, 26(1): 74-82. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2020.01.008.

刘慧瀛, 王婉. 大学生负性生活事件与状态焦虑的关系: 反刍思维的中介效应和自我肯定的调节效应[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2017, 31(9): 728-733. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2017.09.012.

LIU H Y, WANG W. Relationship between negative life events and state-anxiety: Mediating role of rumination and moderating role of self-affirmation[J]. Chin Ment Heal J, 2017, 31(9): 728-733. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2017.09.012.

MATHES B M, KENNEDY G A, MORABITO D M, et al . A longitudinal investigation of the association between rumination, hostility, and PTSD symptoms among trauma-exposed individuals[J ] . J Affect Disord, 2020, 277: 322-328. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.029.

侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞, 等. 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响: 基于综合认知模型的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(12): 1548-1558. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01548.

HOU L L, JIANG Q, WANG H Z, et al . The relationship between trait anger and aggressive behavior: based on the perspective of the integrative cognitive model[J ] . Acta Psychol Sin, 2017, 49(12): 1548-1558. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01548.

ROBERTS J E, GILBOA E, GOTLIB I. Ruminative response style and vulnerability to episodes of Dysphoria: gender, neuroticism, and episode duration[J]. Cogn Ther Res, 1998, 22: 401-423. DOI: 10.1023/A%3A1018713313894.

WENDY T, RICHARD G, SUSAN N. Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis[J]. Cogn Ther Res, 2003, 27(3): 247-259. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023910315561.

韩秀, 杨宏飞. Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表在中国的试用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(5): 550-551, 549.

HAN X, YANG H F. Chinese version of Nolen-Hoeksema ruminative responses scale(RRS) used in 912 college students: reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2009, 17(5): 550-551, 549.

杨娟, 凌宇, 肖晶, 等. 沉思反应量表中文版在高中生中初步运用结果分析[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(1): 27-28, 31.

YANG J, LING Y, XIAO J, et al . The Chinese version of ruminative responses scale in high school students: its reliability and validity[J ] . Chin J Clin Psychol, 2009, 17(1): 27-28, 31.

戴琴, 冯正直, 许爽, 等. 沉思反应问卷中文版在大学生中的信效度检验[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2015, 23(5): 753-758. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2015.05.031.

DAI Q, FENG Z Z, XU S, et al . The reliability and validity of the Chinese version ruminative response scale(RRS) in undergraduates[J ] . China J Heal Psychol, 2015, 23(5): 753-758. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2015.05.031.

QIU W F, MA J P, XIE Z Y, et al . Online risky behavior and sleep quality among Chinese college students: the chain mediating role of rumination and anxiety[J ] . Curr Psychol, 2022: 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-02641-3.

DU PONT A, RHEE S H, CORLEY R P, et al . Rumination and executive functions: understanding cognitive vulnerability for psychopathology[J ] . J Affect Disord, 2019, 256: 550-559. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.026.

SATYSHUR M D, LAYDEN E A, GOWINS J R, et al . Functional connectivity of reflective and brooding rumination in depressed and healthy women[J ] . Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 2018, 18(5): 884-901. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-0611-7.

SHIN K M, CHO S M, KIM K H. A validation study of the Korean-ruminative response scale in Korean adolescents[J]. Psychiatry Investig, 2015, 12(4): 508-515. DOI: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.4.508.

KROENKE K, SPITZER R L, WILLIAMS J B. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2001, 16(9): 606-613. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

孙晓艳, 李怡雪, 余灿清, 等. 中文版抑郁量表信效度研究的系统综述[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2017, 38(1): 110-116. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.01.021.

SUN X Y, LI Y X, YU C Q, et al . Reliability and validity of depression scales of Chinese version: a systematic review[J ] . Chin J Epidemiol, 2017, 38(1): 110-116. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.01.021.

张睿. 负性认知加工偏向问卷的编制与应用[D]. 重庆: 第三军医大学, 2015.

ZHANG R. The compilation and application of negative cognitive processing bias questionnaire[D]. Chongqing: Third Military Medical University, 2015.

闫晓钒, 张睿, 冯正直. 负性认知加工偏向问卷的研制[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2017, 39(23): 2329-2334. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201707160.

YAN X F, ZHANG R, FENG Z Z. Development of negative cognitive processing bias questionnaire[J]. J Third Mil Med Univ, 2017, 39(23): 2329-2334. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201707160.

闫晓钒, 冯正直. 负性认知加工偏向问卷在军人群体中的信效度评价[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018, 40(18): 1619-1623. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201805075.

YAN X F, FENG Z Z. Assessment of reliability and validity of Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire in military personnel[J]. J Third Mil Med Univ, 2018, 40(18): 1619-1623. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201805075.

PADILLA PAREDES P, CALVETE ZUMALDE E. A test of the vulnerability-stress model with brooding and reflection to explain depressive symptoms in adolescence[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2015, 44(4): 860-869. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-014-0148-1.

JOSE P E, BROWN I. When does the gender difference in rumination begin? gender and age differences in the use of rumination by adolescents[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2008, 37(2): 180-192. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-006-9166-y.

刘旺, 田丽丽, 陆红. 反刍思维反应量表在中国职业女性群体的初步运用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(1): 42-44. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2013.01.009.

LIU W, TIAN L L, LU H. Preliminary application of the rumination response scale(RRS) to Chinese working women[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2013, 21(1): 42-44. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2013.01.009.

JOHNSON D P, WHISMAN M A, CORLEY R P, et al . Genetic and environmental influences on rumination and its covariation with depression[J ] . Cogn Emot, 2014, 28(7): 1270-1286. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2014.881325.

KOVÁCS L N, KOCSEL N, GALAMBOS A, et al . Validating the bifactor structure of the Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire-A psychometric study[J ] . PLoS One, 2021, 16(7): e0254986. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254986.

冯正直, 胡丰, 刘云波, 等. 我国军人症状自评量表2016版常模的建立[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2016, 38(20): 2210-2214. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201607007.

FENG Z Z, HU F, LIU Y B, et al . Establishment of norm of Symptom Check List 90(2016 Edition) for Chinese military personnel[J ] . J Third Mil Med Univ, 2016, 38(20): 2210-2214. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201607007.

张理义, 梅贵森, 任忠文, 等. 不同文化程度军人心身健康水平及其影响因素调查与分析[J]. 人民军医, 2012, 55(11): 1034-1035, 1042.

ZHANG L Y, MEI G S, REN Z W, et al . Investigation and analysis of mental and physical health level and its influencing factors of soldiers with different education levels[J ] . People Mil Surg, 2012, 55(11): 1034-1035, 1042.

张婕, 段芸杉, 杨解玲. 军人心理健康现状调查与干预对策[J]. 教育现代化, 2020, 7(14): 161-164. DOI: 10.16541/j.cnki.2095-8420.2020.14.052.

ZHANG J, DUAN Y S, YANG J L. Investigation on the status of mental health of soldiers personnel and the intervention strategies[J]. Educ Mod, 2020, 7(14): 161-164. DOI: 10.16541/j.cnki.2095-8420.2020.14.052.

罗显荣, 王真真, 张红梅, 等. 南战区军人心理状况的多维度多因素分析[J]. 空军医学杂志, 2013, 29(1): 25-29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2811.2013.01.008.

LUO X R, WANG Z Z, ZHANG H M, et al . Multi-dimensional and multiple factors analysis of psychological status of military personnel in south war-zone[J ] . Med J Air Force, 2013, 29(1): 25-29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2811.2013.01.008.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于网络分析的军人心理健康综合评估和性别差异比较

亲子疏离问卷在军人群体中的修订、信效度检验和常模初步构建

反渗透技术冲击下军队给水卫生工作的思考

军人心理健康能力量表的因素分析与信效度分析