心理资本训练对集训期新兵幸福感影响的比较研究

张巧; 王英男; 彭李; 许辰; 李敏

doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202201165

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

心理资本训练对集训期新兵幸福感影响的比较研究

军事心理学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 心理资本训练对集训期新兵幸福感影响的比较研究
- Effect of psychological capital interventions on well-being in new recruits during assembly training: a comparative study
- 陆军军医大学学报 2022年44卷第8期页码：847-854
- 作者机构：
  
  1.400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系军事心理学教研室
  2.071000 河北保定，中国人民解放军66109部队
- 作者简介：
  
  [李敏，E-mail: limin52267@tmmu.edu.cn LI Min, E-mail: limin52267@tmmu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  军队卫勤保障能力创新与生成专项技术(20WQ003)
- DOI：10.16016/j.2097-0927.202201165
  中图分类号： R395.6;R821.2
- 收稿：2022-01-19，
  
  修回：2022-03-11，
  
  纸质出版：2022-04-30
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张巧, 王英男, 彭李, 等. 心理资本训练对集训期新兵幸福感影响的比较研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2022,44(8):847-854.

Qiao ZHANG, Yingnan WANG, Li PENG, et al. Effect of psychological capital interventions on well-being in new recruits during assembly training: a comparative study[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(8): 847-854.
张巧, 王英男, 彭李, 等. 心理资本训练对集训期新兵幸福感影响的比较研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2022,44(8):847-854. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202201165.

Qiao ZHANG, Yingnan WANG, Li PENG, et al. Effect of psychological capital interventions on well-being in new recruits during assembly training: a comparative study[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(8): 847-854. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202201165.

摘要

目的

研究不同心理资本训练形式对集训期新兵幸福感的干预效果及差异。

方法

采取整群抽样法抽取某新兵训练基地2021年3月入伍新兵99人，分成3组(8次团体干预组、1次团体干预组和对照组)。8次团体干预组接受连续4周，每周2次，每次2 h的心理资本团体干预；1次团体干预组在第4周接受3 h的1次团体干预；对照组不接受干预。使用积极心理资本问卷(Positive Psychological capital Questionnaire

PPQ)、生活满意度量表(Satisfaction With Life Scale

SWLS)、正负性情绪量表(The Positive and Negative Affect Scale

PANAS)、中文版心理幸福感量表(Chinese version for Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-being

RPWB)在干预前(T1)、干预结束时(T2)、干预结束后1个月(T3)对3组成员进行评估。

结果

训练前3组人口统计学信息及各心理学指标差异均无统计学意义。①主观幸福感水平测量时间与训练分组的交互效应有统计学意义(

＜0.05)，8次团体干预组主观幸福感在T2、T3时均显著高于对照组(

＜0.01，

＜0.05)，1次干预组仅在T2时显著高于对照组(

＜0.05)；②心理幸福感水平测量时间与训练分组的交互效应有统计学意义(

＜0.05)，8次团体干预组心理幸福感水平在T2时显著高于对照组(

＜0.01)，1次组与对照组心理幸福感在T2、T3时差异均无统计学意义；③心理资本总分测量时间与训练分组的交互效应有统计学意义(

＜0.05)，8次团体干预组心理资

本水平在T2、T3时均显著高于对照组(

＜0.01，

＜0.05)，1次干预组仅在T2时显著高于对照组(

＜0.05)。

结论

集训期开展心理资本训练能显著增加新兵心理资本，提升其幸福感水平，且8次团体干预较1次团体干预效果更佳，维持时间更长。

Abstract

Objective

To compare the effects of 2 kinds of psychological capital intervention on well-being of new recruits during assembly training.

Methods

A total of 99 soldiers who were newly recruited in March 2021 were subjected by cluster sampling from an army unit. Then they were divided into 3 groups

that is

8-time intervention group

1-time intervention group and control group. The participants from the 8-time intervention group were given psychological capital group training for 8 times

twice a week

about 2 h per time

for 4 consecutive weeks. Those out of 1-time intervention group were given psychological capital group training in the 4th week for 3 h. While the control group was blank control. Positive Psychological capital Questionnaire (PPQ)

Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS)

Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) and Chinese version for Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-being (RPWB) were measured in all subjects before intervention (T1)

after intervention (T2) and 1 month after intervention (T3).

Results

There were no significant differences in demographic data and psychological indicators in the 3 groups before intervention. ① There were statistical significances in the interaction effect between measurement time for subjective well-being and different training groups (

0.05). The 8-time intervention group showed significantly higher subjective well-being at T1 and T2 than the control group (

0.01

0.05)

while the 1-time intervention group only showed at T2 (

0.05). ② Significant difference was seen in the interaction effect betw

een measurement time for psychological well-being and different training groups (

0.05). The 8-time intervention group had obviously higher psychological well-being at T2 than the control group (

0.05)

while the 1-time intervention group had no such difference from control group at T2 and T3 (

0.05). ③ Interaction effect was significant between measurement time for total score of psychological capital and different training groups (

0.05). The scores of psychological capital were significantly higher in the 8-time intervention group than the control group at T2 and T3 (

0.01

0.05)

and in the 1-time intervention group than the control group only at T2 (

0.05).

Conclusion

Psychological capital training could effectively increase recruits' positive psychological resources and improve well-being during assembly training. The 8-times group intervention has better effects than the 1-time group intervention

and can last longer.

关键词

Keywords

references

化振, 杨来启, 马文涛, 等. 新兵总体幸福感水平与相关因素的研究[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2020, 38(2): 105-107. DOI: 10.13704/j.cnki.jyyx.2020.02.036.

HUA Z, YANG L Q, MA W T, et al . Study on the overall well-being level and related factors of recruits[J ] . J Prev Med Chin PLA, 2020, 38(2): 105-107. DOI: 10.13704/j.cnki.jyyx.2020.02.036.

朱晓丽, 牛威, 孔令明, 等. 应激干预对新兵心理学指标及皮质醇水平影响的观察[J]. 人民军医, 2021, 64(2): 95-97, 117.

ZHU X L, NIU W, KONG L M, et al . Effect of stress intervention on psychological indexes and cortisol level of recruits[J ] . People Mil Surg, 2021, 64(2): 95-97, 117.

DIENER E, OISHI S, TAY L. Advances in subjective well-being research[J]. Nat Hum Behav, 2018, 2(4): 253-260. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6.

RYFF C D. Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia[J]. Psychother Psychosom, 2014, 83(1): 10-28. DOI: 10.1159/000353263.

邢占军, 黄立清. 西方哲学史上的两种主要幸福观与当代主观幸福感研究[J]. 理论探讨, 2004(1): 32-35. DOI: 10.16354/j.cnki.23-1013/d.2004.01.009.

XING Z J, HUANG L Q. Two main concepts of happiness in the history of western philosophy and contemporary subjective well-being[J]. Theor Investig, 2004(1): 32-35. DOI: 10.16354/j.cnki.23-1013/d.2004.01.009.

MARTELA F, SHELDON K. Clarifying the concept of well-being: psychological need satisfaction as the common core connecting eudaimonic and subjective well-being[J]. Rev Gen Psychol, 2019, 23(4): 108926801988088. DOI: 10.1177/1089268019880886.

YOUSSEF-MORGAN C M, LUTHANS F. Psychological capital and well-being[J]. Stress Health, 2015, 31(3): 180-188. DOI: 10.1002/smi.2623.

LUTHANS F, AVEY J B, AVOLIO B J, et al . Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention[J ] . J Organ Behav, 2006, 27(3): 387-393. DOI: 10.1002/job.373.

LUPŞA D, VÎRGA D, MARICUTOIU L P, et al . Increasing psychological capital: a pre-registered meta-analysis of controlled interventions[J ] . Appl Psychol, 2020, 69(4): 1506-1556. DOI: 10.1111/apps.12219.

LIANG L, XIAO Q G, YANG Y S. The psychological capital of left-behind university students: a description and intervention study from China[J]. Front Psychol, 2018, 9: 2438. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02438.

吴丹萍, 杨忠, 陈英葵, 等. 大学生积极心理资本干预的实验研究[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2016, 24(5): 677-681. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2016.05.010.

WU D P, YANG Z, CHEN Y K, et al . Experimental research on the effect of PPCI for college students[J ] . China J Heal Psychol, 2016, 24(5): 677-681. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2016.05.010.

樊富珉, 何瑾. 团体心理辅导[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2010.

FAN F M, HE J. Group counseling[M]. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2010.

张阔, 张赛, 董颖红. 积极心理资本: 测量及其与心理健康的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(1): 58-64.

ZHANG K, ZHANG S, DONG Y H. Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with mental health[J]. Stud Psychol Behav, 2010, 8(1): 58-64.

DIENER E, EMMONS R A, LARSEN R J, et al . The satisfaction with life scale[J ] . J Pers Assess, 1985, 49(1): 71-75. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

邱林, 郑雪, 王雁飞. 积极情感消极情感量表(PANAS)的修订[J]. 应用心理学, 2008, 14(3): 249-254, 268.

QIU L, ZHENG X, WANG Y F. Revision of the positive affect and negative affect scale[J]. Chin J Appl Psychol, 2008, 14(3): 249-254, 268.

LI R H. Reliability and validity of a shorter Chinese version for Ryff's psychological well-being scale[J]. Heal Educ J, 2014, 73(4): 446-452. DOI: 10.1177/0017896913485743.

王儒芳, 阴山燕, 李红. 军人自我和谐、总体幸福感及其关系的研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2005, 13(1): 64-65.

WANG R F, YIN S Y, LI H. Subjective self consistency and congruence and general well-being of soldiers[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2005, 13(1): 64-65.

谢颖, 陈雪蕾, 戴小红. 高职护生就业心理资本训练的干预研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(3): 63-68. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.03.063.

XIE Y, CHEN X L, DAI X H. Intervention study on employment psychological capital training of higher vocational nursing students[J]. J Nurs China, 2021, 28(3): 63-68. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.03.063.

黄梦丽. 基于PCI理论的心理资本团体辅导干预研究[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2016.

HUANG M L. Group counseling intervention study of psychological capital based on PCI theory[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2016.

AVEY J B, LUTHANS F, SMITH R M, et al . Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time[J ] . J Occup Health Psychol, 2010, 15(1): 17-28. DOI: 10.1037/a0016998.

DIERNER E, OISHI S, LUCAS R E. Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and life satisfaction[M]//LOPEZ S J, SNYDER C R. Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009: 186-194.

CULBERTSON S S, FULLAGAR C J, MILLS M J. Feeling good and doing great: the relationship between psychological capital and well-being[J]. J Occup Health Psychol, 2010, 15(4): 421-433. DOI: 10.1037/a0020720.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

最好自我训练对集训期新兵心理健康影响的干预研究

关节功能筛查与纠正训练降低新兵训练伤发生率：一项基于知信行路径的随机对照试验

运动功能障碍纠正对新兵新训期间军事训练伤预防效果的随机对照研究

正念减压训练对集训期火箭军新兵心理健康的促进作用

留守经历新兵状态-特质抑郁与情绪调节方式、儿童期创伤的关系