
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.400016 重庆,重庆医科大学: 口腔医学院,口腔疾病与生物医学重庆市重点实验室,重庆市高校市级口腔生物医学工程重点实验室
2.400016 重庆,重庆医科大学: 附属第一医院妇产科
[季平,E-mail: jiping@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn JI Ping, E-mail: jiping@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn
收稿:2021-08-27,
修回:2021-09-14,
纸质出版:2022-02-28
移动端阅览
何云影, 张华, 季平. 间充质干细胞与血管内皮细胞间经隧道纳米管线粒体交流对成血管的影响[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2022,44(4):310-319.
Yunying HE, Hua ZHANG, Ping JI. Effect of TNTs-mediated mitochondrial transfer between mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells on vascularization
何云影, 张华, 季平. 间充质干细胞与血管内皮细胞间经隧道纳米管线粒体交流对成血管的影响[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2022,44(4):310-319. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202108167.
Yunying HE, Hua ZHANG, Ping JI. Effect of TNTs-mediated mitochondrial transfer between mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells on vascularization
目的
2
探讨间充质干细胞(mesenchymal stem cells,MSC)/脐静脉内皮细胞(human umbilical vein endothelial cells,HUVEC)共培养细胞球内的隧道纳米管(tunneling nanotubes,TNTs)对内皮细胞成血管的影响。
方法
2
采用小管形成实验比较MSC/HUVEC成球共培养组、贴壁共培养组、HUVEC三维培养组和MSC三维培养组的血管生成能力,Western blot和免疫荧光染色检测β-catenin蛋白表达量。以微丝解聚试剂(CytoD)处理MSC/HUVEC共培养细胞球,再次检测CytoD处理组和未处理组的上述指标,并采用荧光标记和场发射扫描电镜验证TNTs结构,采用腺病毒感染的方法观察线粒体交流,采用线粒体膜电位检测评估线粒体状态。
结果
2
与MSC/HUVEC成球共培养组比较,贴壁共培养组、HUVEC三维培养组和MSC三维培养组的管腔连接交叉点数和小孔数均显著下降(
P
<0.05)。β-catenin蛋白免疫荧光染色提示,MSC/HUVEC成球共培养组荧光强度强于贴壁共培养组;Western blot检测结果显示MSC/HUVEC成球共培养组细胞内β-catenin表达显著高于贴壁共培养组(
P
<0.05)。鬼笔环肽染色结果显示,共培养球内MSC和HUVEC间存在TNTs(F-actin)。当成球共培养时,MSC胞内观察到来源于HUVEC的线粒体;HUVEC胞内也观察到来源于MSC的线粒体;而上述线粒体交流在CytoD处理组中均减弱;与未处理组比较,CytoD处理组细胞球的线粒体膜电位显著降低(
P
<0.05),HUVEC的增殖速度减慢、迁移范围缩小,细胞球的管腔连接交叉点数和小孔数显著下降(
P
<0.05)。CytoD处理组细胞β-catenin蛋白免疫荧光强度弱于未处理组,β-catenin蛋白表达显著低于未处理组(
P
<0.05)。
结论
2
共培养细胞球内,MSC和HUVEC间存在TNTs及其介导的双向线粒体交流,并可能通过β-catenin相关通路影响细胞球成血管能力。
Objective
2
To explore the effect of tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) within mesenchymal stem cells (MSC)/human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) co-culture cell spheroids on endothelial cell angiogenesis.
Methods
2
Pre-vascular network formation assay was used to compare the angiogenic ability among the MSC/HUVEC cell spheroid co-culture group
adherent co-culture group
HUVEC 3D culture group and MSC 3D culture group. The expression of β-catenin protein was detected by Western blotting and immunofluorescence staining. The cell spheroids were treated with microfilament depolymerization reagent (CytoD) as a control group
and the above parameters were tested again in the untreated and treated groups. The structure of TNTs was verified by fluorescent labeling and field emission scanning electron microscopy
mitochondrial communication was observed by adenovirus infection
and the mitochondrial status was assessed by mitochondrial membrane potential assay.
Results
2
Compared with the MSC/HUVEC cell spheroid co-culture group
the numbers of junctions and meshes were significantly lower in the adherent co-culture group
HUVEC 3D culture group and MSC 3D culture group (
P
<
0.05). Immunofluorescence staining for β-catenin protein suggested that the spheroid co-culture group had stronger expression than the adherent co-culture group. The results of Western blotting also showed that the intracellular β-catenin expression in the spheroid co-culture group was significantly higher than that in the adherent co-culture group (
P
<
0.05). The presence of TNT (F-actin) between MSC and HUVEC in the co-culture cellular spheroids was shown by phalloidine staining. When the cells were co-cultured as spheroids
the mitochondria derived from HUVEC were observed intracellularly in MSC
and the mitochondria derived from MSC were also observed intracellularly in HUVEC
and the above mitochondrial exchange was diminished in the CytoD-treated group. The mitochondrial membrane potential of the CytoD-treated spheroids was significantly lower than that of the untreated spheroids (
P
<
0.05)
and the proliferation rate and migration range of HUVEC were lower and smaller than those of the untreated spheroids. Compared with the untreated cell spheroid group
the numbers of junctions and meshes were significantly lower in the CytoD-treated cell spheroid group (
P
<
0.05). The total amount of β-catenin protein was significantly higher in the untreated cell spheroid group compared to the CytoD-treated group (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Within the co-culture cell spheroids
there are TNTs and their mediated bidirectional mitochondrial transfer between MSC and HUVEC
and they affect the angiogenic ability of HUVEC within these cellular spheroids probably through β-catenin related pathways.
CASTRECHINI N M, MURTHI P, GUDE N M, et al . Mesenchymal stem cells in human placental chorionic villi reside in a vascular Niche[J ] . Placenta, 2010, 31(3): 203-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.12.006.
GRELLIER M, BORDENAVE L, AMÉDÉE J. Cell-to-cell communication between osteogenic and endothelial lineages: implications for tissue engineering[J]. Trends Biotechnol, 2009, 27(10): 562-571. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.07.001.
GRANT P K, SZEP G, PATANGE O, et al . Interpretation of morphogen gradients by a synthetic bistable circuit[J ] . Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 5545. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19098-w.
LJUBOJEVIC N, HENDERSON J M, ZURZOLO C. The ways of actin: why tunneling nanotubes are unique cell protrusions[J]. Trends Cell Biol, 2021, 31(2): 130-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.11.008.
TALBOT J, BRION R, LAMORA A, et al . Connexin43 intercellular communication drives the early differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells into osteoblasts[J ] . J Cell Physiol, 2018, 233(2): 946-957. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.25938.
JIANG D, CHEN F X, ZHOU H, et al . Bioenergetic crosstalk between mesenchymal stem cells and various ocular cells through the intercellular trafficking of mitochondria[J ] . Theranostics, 2020, 10(16): 7260-7272. DOI: 10.7150/thno.46332.
SISAKHTNEZHAD S, KHOSRAVI L. Emerging physiological and pathological implications of tunneling nanotubes formation between cells[J]. Eur J Cell Biol, 2015, 94(10): 429-443. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2015.06.010.
MITTAL R, KARHU E, WANG J S, et al . Cell communication by tunneling nanotubes: Implications in disease and thera-peutic applications[J ] . J Cell Physiol, 2019, 234(2): 1130-1146. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27072.
MURPHY K C, HOCH A I, HARVESTINE J N, et al . Mesenchymal stem cell spheroids retain osteogenic phenotype through α2β1 signaling[J ] . Stem Cells Transl Med, 2016, 5(9): 1229-1237. DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0412.
SEO B J, YOON S H, DO J T. Mitochondrial dynamics in stem cells and differentiation[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19(12): E3893. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19123893.
WANG J C, LIU X, QIU Y, et al . Cell adhesio n-mediated mitochondria transfer contributes to mesenchymal stem cell-induced chemoresistance on T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells[J ] . J Hematol Oncol, 2018, 11(1): 11. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-018-0554-z.
BURT R, DEY A, AREF S, et al . Activated stromal cells transfer mitochondria to rescue acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells from oxidative stress[J ] . Blood, 2019, 134(17): 1415-1429. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019001398.
SINCLAIR K A, YERKOVICH S T, HOPKINS P M, et al . Characterization of intercellular communication and mitochondrial donation by mesenchymal stromal cells derived from the human lung[J ] . Stem Cell Res Ther, 2016, 7(1): 91. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-016-0354-8.
JIANG L, YIN M, XU J, et al . The transcription factor Bach1 suppresses the developmental angiogenesis of zebrafish[J ] . Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2017, 2017: 2143875. DOI: 10.1155/2017/2143875.
FOURNIER P, VIALLARD C, DEJDA A, et al . The protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPRJ/DEP-1 contributes to the regulation of the Notch-signaling pathway and sprouting angiogenesis[J ] . Angiogenesis, 2020, 23(2): 145-157. DOI: 10.1007/s10456-019-09683-z.
YI C, WU W, ZHENG D, et al . Targeted inhibition of endo thelial calpain delays wound healing by reducing inflammation and angiogenesis[J ] . Cell Death Dis, 2020, 11(7): 533. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-020-02737-x.
ZHANG J L, WHITEHEAD J, LIU Y, et al . Direct observation of tunneling nanotubes within human mesenchymal stem cell spheroids[J ] . J Phys Chem B, 2018, 122(43): 9920-9926. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07305.
NAJDANOVIĆ J G, CVETKOVIĆ V J, STOJANOVIĆ S T, et al . Vascularization and osteogenesis in ectopically implanted bone tissue-engineered constructs with endothelial and osteogenic differentiated adipose-derived stem cells[J ] . World J Stem Cells, 2021, 13(1): 91-114. DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v13.i1.91.
WANG L, ZHU L X, WANG Z, et al . Development of a centrally vascularized tissue engineering bone graft with the unique core-shell composite structure for large femoral bone defect treatment[J ] . Biomaterials, 2018, 175: 44-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.017.
HEO D N, HOSPODIUK M, OZBOLAT I T. Synergistic interplay between human MSCs and HUVECs in 3D spheroids laden in collagen/fibrin hydrogels for bone tissue engineering[J]. Acta Biomater, 2019, 95: 348-356. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.046.
ZHANG J, NEOH K G, KANG E T. Electrical stimulation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells co-cultured in a conductive scaffold for potential orthopaedic applications[J]. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2018, 12(4): 878-889. DOI: 10.1002/term.2441.
MAHON O R, BROWE D C, GONZALEZ-FERNANDEZ T, et al . Nano-particle mediated M2 macrophage polarization enhances bone formation and MSC osteogenesis in an IL-10 dependent manner[J ] . Biomaterials, 2020, 239: 119833. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119833.
TODA S, FRANKEL N W, LIM W A. Engineering cell-cell communication networks: programming multicellular behaviors[J]. Curr Opin Chem Biol, 2019, 52: 31-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.04.020.
SONG Z Y, WANG F, CUI S X, et al . Knockdown of CXCR4 inhibits CXCL12-induced angiogenesis in HUVECs through downregulation of the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT and the wnt/β-catenin pathways[J ] . Cancer Invest, 2018, 36(1): 10-18. DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2017.1422512.
SHEN M, BAI D, LIU B, et al . Dysregulated Txnip-ROS-Wnt axis contributes to the impaired ischemic heart repair in diabetic mice[J ] . Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis, 2018, 1864(12): 3735-3745. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.09.029.
QIU J J, SUN S G, TANG X Y, et al . Extracellular vesicular Wnt7b mediates HPV E6-induced cervical cancer angiogenesis by activating the β-catenin signaling pathway[J ] . J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2020, 39(1): 260. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-020-01745-1.
RATUSHNYY A, EZDAKOVA M, BURAVKOVA L. Secretome of senescent adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells negatively regulates angiogenesis[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(5): 1802. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21051802.
YU M Y, LIU W, LI J X, et al . Exosomes derived from atorvastatin-pretreated MSC accelerate diabetic wound repair by enhancing angiogenesis via AKT/ENOS pathway[J ] . Stem Cell Res Ther, 2020, 11(1): 350. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-020-01824-2..
FENG Y H, ZHU R J, SHEN J, et al . Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells rescue endothelial cells experiencing chemotherapy stress by mitochondrial transfer via tunneling nanotubes[J ] . Stem Cells Dev, 2019, 28(10): 674-682. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2018.0248..
ISLAM M N, DAS S R, EMIN M T, et al . Mitochondrial transfer from bone-marrow-derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury[J ] . Nat Med, 2012, 18(5): 759-765. DOI: 10.1038/nm.2736.
ACQUISTAPACE A, BRU T, LESAULT P F, et al . Human mesenchymal stem cells reprogram adult cardiomyocytes toward a progenitor-like state through partial cell fusion and mitochondria transfer[J ] . Stem Cells, 2011, 29(5): 812-824. DOI: 10.1002/stem.632.
GUO Y S, CHI X P, WANG Y F, et al . Mitochondria transfer enhances proliferation, migration, and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell and promotes bone defect healing[J ] . Stem Cell Res Ther, 2020, 11(1): 245. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-020-01704-9.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621