
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.402160 重庆,重庆医科大学附属永川医院: 眼科
2.402160 重庆,重庆医科大学附属永川医院: 中心实验室
[ 李华,E-mail: lihua80@yeah.net LI Hua, E-mail: lihua80@yeah.net
收稿:2021-04-06,
修回:2021-05-13,
纸质出版:2021-07-30
移动端阅览
范玉洁, 宋胜仿, 刘世纯, 等. 应用智能眼镜监测学龄儿童用眼行为的效果分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021,43(14):1396-1401.
Yujie FAN, Shengfang SONG, Shichun LIU, et al. Monitoring effect of smart glasses on visual behavior in school-age children: analysis of 46 cases[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(14): 1396-1401.
范玉洁, 宋胜仿, 刘世纯, 等. 应用智能眼镜监测学龄儿童用眼行为的效果分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021,43(14):1396-1401. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202104034.
Yujie FAN, Shengfang SONG, Shichun LIU, et al. Monitoring effect of smart glasses on visual behavior in school-age children: analysis of 46 cases[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(14): 1396-1401. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202104034.
目的
2
探讨智能眼镜在学龄儿童用眼行为监测中的价值。
方法
2
纳入46名在重庆医科大学附属永川医院就诊的9~11岁近视儿童,采用问卷记录参与者基线时期日常的户外活动时间、近距离用眼时间,询问父母监督用眼情况;采用Akeso智能眼镜客观记录所有参与者2019年9-12月每天的戴镜时间、户外活动时间、近距离用眼时间。比较两种方法记录的用眼行为差异,比较智能眼镜客观记录的学习日和周末用眼行为差异,分析父母监督对佩戴眼镜时间的影响。
结果
2
调查问卷记录的户外活动时间各阶段人数分布情况: ≤30 min(
n
=5)、
>
30~60 min(
n
=6)、
>
60~120 min(
n
=23)、
>
120 min(
n
=12),智能眼镜记录的户外活动时间各阶段的人数分布情况: ≤30 min(
n
=16)、
>
30~60 min(
n
=26)、
>
60~120 min(
n
=4)、
>
120 min(
n
=0),两种方式记录的户外活动时间分布差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.001);智能眼镜客观记录的学习日和周末的户外活动时间分别为24(4,56) min/d和15(3,43) min/d,差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.001);学习日和周末的近距离用眼时间分别为(363.36±98.55)min/d和(329.08±105.90)min/d,差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.001)。父母参与监督用眼行为者每天的戴镜时间是(711.80±101.63)min,父母未参与监督用眼行为者每天的戴镜时间是(641.64±84.79)min,两组差异具有统计学意义(
P
=0.026)。
结论
2
智能眼镜能客观记录儿童用眼行为,在近视防控研究中可用于补充或代替调查问卷;父母参与监督的儿童戴镜依从性更好。
Objective
2
To explore the value of smart glasses in monitoring the visual behavior of school-age children.
Methods
2
A total of 46 myopic children aged 9 to 11 years who visited our hospital during April to August 2019 were included in this study. Questionnaires were used to record the participants' daily outdoor time
near-work time
and parental supervision to obtain the baseline value of children's visual behavior. Besides
Akeso smart glasses were used to objectively record the daily wearing time
outdoor time
and near-work time of all participants from September 2019 to December 2019. Subsequently
we compared the differences in the children's visual behavior recorded by the questionnaire and Akeso smart glasses. In addition
we also compared the differences in the children's visual behavior on school days and weekends recorded by Akeso smart glasses
and analyzed the impact of parental supervision on the length of time the child wears glasses.
Results
2
The number of children corresponding to the different outdoor time recorded by the questionnaire was as follows: ≤30 min (
n
=5)
>
30 to 60 min (
n
=6)
>
60 to 120 min (
n
=23)
>
120 min (
n
=12)
and this children's visual behavior parameter recorded by Akeso smart glasses was ≤30 min (
n
=16)
>
30 to 60 min (
n
=26)
>
60 to 120 min (
n
=4)
>
120 min (
n
=0). There were statistical differences between the results recorded by the above methods (
P
<
0.001). The results of Akeso smart glasses also showed significant differences were in the outdoor time spent on school days and weekends [24 (4
56)
vs
15 (3
43) min/d
P
<
0.001
]
and in the near-work time spent on school days and weekends (363.36±98.55
vs
329.08±105.90 min/d
P
<
0.001). The children with parental supervision wore glasses for 711.80±101.63 min every day
while the wearing time for those without was 641.64±84.79 min
and there were statistical
differences between these 2 groups (
P
=0.026).
Conclusion
2
Akeso smart glasses is able to objectively record children's visual behavior and can be used to supplement or replace questionnaires in the prevention and control myopia research.
DOLGIN E. The myopia boom[J]. Nature, 2015, 519(7543): 276-278.
WANG S K, GUO Y F, LIAO C M, et al . Incidence of and factors associated with myopia and high myopia in Chinese children, based on refraction without cycloplegia[J ] . JAMA Ophthalmol, 2018, 136(9): 1017-1024. DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.2658.
BRENNAN N A, TOUBOUTI Y M, CHENG X, et al . Efficacy in myopia control[J ] . Prog Retin Eye Res, 2020: 100923. DOI:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100923.
GUO L, YANG J, MAI J, et al . Prevalence and associated factors of myopia among primary and middle school-aged students: a school-based study in Guangzhou[J ] . Eye (Lond), 2016, 30(6): 796-804. DOI:10.1038/eye.2016.39.
MORGAN I G, FRENCH A N, ASHBY R S, et al . The epidemics of myopia: Aetiology and prevention[J ] . Prog Retin Eye Res, 2018, 62: 134-149. DOI:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004.
姜珺. 近视管理白皮书(2019)[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2019, 21(3): 161-165. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.03.001.
JIANG J. Expert consensus on myopia management white paper(2019)[J]. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2019, 21(3): 161-165. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.03.001.
JIN J X, HUA W J, JIANG X, et al . Effect of outdoor activity on myopia onset and progression in school-aged children in northeast China: the Sujiatun Eye Care Study[J ] . BMC Ophthalmol, 2015, 15: 73. DOI:10.1186/s12886-015-0052-9.
HE M, XIANG F, ZENG Y, et al . Effect of time spent outdoors at school on the development of myopia among children in China: a randomized clinical trial[J ] . JAMA, 2015, 314(11): 1142-1148. DOI:10.1001/jama.2015.10803.
WU P C, CHEN C T, LIN K K, et al . Myopia prevention and outdoor light intensity in a school-based cluster randomized trial[J ] . Ophthalmology, 2018, 125(8): 1239-1250. DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.011.
BEZ D, MEGRELI J, BEZ M, et al . Association between type of educational system and prevalence and severity of myopia among male adolescents in Israel[J ] . JAMA Ophthalmol, 2019, 137(8): 887-893. DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1415.
RAMESSUR R, WILLIAMS K M, HAMMOND C J. Risk factors for myopia in a discordant monozygotic twin study[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2015, 35(6): 643-651. DOI:10.1111/opo.12246.
KU P W, STEPTOE A, LAI Y J, et al . The associations between near visual activity and incident myopia in children: a nationwide 4-year follow-up study[J ] . Ophthalmology, 2019, 126(2): 214-220. DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.010.
ALVAREZ A A, WILDSOET C F. Quantifying light exposure patterns in young adult students[J]. J Mod Opt, 2013, 60(14): 1200-1208. DOI:10.1080/09500340.2013.845700.
OSTRIN L A. Objectively measured light exposure in emmetropic and myopic adults[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2017, 94(2): 229-238. DOI:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001013.
WILLIAMS R, BAKSHI S, OSTRIN E J, et al . Continuous objective assessment of near work[J ] . Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 6901. DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-43408-y.
DIRANI M, CROWSTON J G, WONG T Y. From reading books to increased smart device screen time[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2019, 103(1): 1-2. DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313295.
WEN L B, CHENG Q, LAN W Z, et al . An objective comparison of light intensity and near-visual tasks between rural and urban school children in China by a wearable device clouclip[J ] . Transl Vis Sci Technol, 2019, 8(6): 15. DOI:10.1167/tvst.8.6.15.
READ S A, VINCENT S J, TAN C S, et al . Patterns of daily outdoor light exposure in Australian and Singaporean children[J ] . Transl Vis Sci Technol, 2018, 7(3): 8. DOI:10.1167/tvst.7.3.8.
VERKICHARLA P K, RAMAMURTHY D, NGUYEN Q D, et al . Development of the FitSight fitness tracker to increase time outdoors to prevent myopia[J ] . Transl Vis Sci Technol, 2017, 6(3): 20. DOI:10.1167/tvst.6.3.20.
LI S M, LI H, LI S Y, et al . Time outdoors and myopia progression over 2 years in Chinese children: the Anyang childhood eye study[J ] . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2015, 56(8): 4734-4740. DOI:10.1167/iovs.14-15474.
WANG J, HE X G, XU X. The measurement of time spent outdoors in child myopia research: a systematic review[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2018, 11(6): 1045-1052. DOI:10.18240/ijo.2018.06.24.
RAMAMURTHY D, LIN CHUA S Y, SAW S M. A review of environmental risk factors for myopia during early life, childhood and adolescence[J]. Clin Exp Optom, 2015, 98(6): 497-506. DOI:10.1111/cxo.12346.
WEN L B, CHENG Q, CAO Y P, et al . The Clouclip, a wearable device for measuring near-work and outdoor time: validation and comparison of objective measures with questionnaire estimates[J ] . Acta Ophthalmol, 2021. DOI:10.1111/aos.14785.
徐捷, 徐亮. 近视防控的六维度评估及防控模式[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2018, 20(3): 129-132. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2018.03.001.
XU J, XU L. Six dimensional evaluation for myopia prevention and control[J]. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2018, 20(3): 129-132. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2018.03.001.
DHARANI R, LEE C F, THENG Z X, et al . Comparison of measurements of time outdoors and light levels as risk factors for myopia in young Singapore children[J ] . Eye (Lond), 2012, 26(7): 911-918. DOI:10.1038/eye.2012.49.
董佩芳. 戴镜习惯对学龄期儿童近视进展影响的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2014.
DONG P F. A study of wearing glasses habits'impacts on progression of myopia among children of school age[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2014.
GOGATE P, MUKHOPADHYAYA D, MAHADIK A, et al . Spectacle compliance amongst rural secondary school children in Pune district, India[J ] . Indian J Ophthalmol, 2013, 61(1): 8-12. DOI:10.4103/0301-4738.99996.
MESSER D H, MITCHELL G L, TWELKER J D, et al . Spectacle wear in children given spectacles through a school-based program[J ] . Optom Vis Sci, 2012, 89(1): 19-26. DOI:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182357f8c.
MACONACHIE G D, FAROOQ S, BUSH G, et al . Association between adherence to glasses wearing during amblyopia treatment and improvement in visual acuity[J ] . JAMA Ophthalmol, 2016, 134(12): 1347-1353. DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3793.
WEN L B, CAO Y P, CHENG Q, et al . Objectively measured near work, outdoor exposure and myopia in children[J ] . Br J Ophthalmol, 2020, 104(11): 1542-1547. DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315258.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621