
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
230036 合肥,中国科学技术大学附属第一医院(安徽省立医院)心血管内科
[马礼坤,E-mail:Lkma119@163.comMA Likun, E-mail: Lkma119@163.com
收稿:2021-03-22,
修回:2021-05-07,
纸质出版:2021-09-30
移动端阅览
曹教育, 张理想, 詹玲, 等. 基于残余炎症风险构建的列线图模型对急性心肌梗死患者介入术后院内MACE的预测价值[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021,43(18):1821-1830.
Jiaoyu CAO, Lixiang ZHANG, Ling ZHAN, et al. Predictive value of residual inflammation risk-based nomogram model for major adverse cardiovascular events in acute myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(18): 1821-1830.
曹教育, 张理想, 詹玲, 等. 基于残余炎症风险构建的列线图模型对急性心肌梗死患者介入术后院内MACE的预测价值[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021,43(18):1821-1830. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202103184.
Jiaoyu CAO, Lixiang ZHANG, Ling ZHAN, et al. Predictive value of residual inflammation risk-based nomogram model for major adverse cardiovascular events in acute myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(18): 1821-1830. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202103184.
目的
2
构建基于残余炎症风险(residual inflammatory risk,RIR)的列线图预测模型,并评估其预测急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入术(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)后院内主要心血管不良事件(major adverse cardiovascular events,MACE)发生风险的价值。
方法
2
回顾性分析2017年6月至2019年3月本院心血管内科收入且行PCI治疗的297例AMI患者的临床资料,依据患者术前超敏C反应蛋白(hypersensitive-CRP,hs-CRP)和血浆低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(low-density lipoprotein cholesterol,LDL-C)指标将患者分为残余炎症风险(residual inflammation risk,RIR)组(
n
=28)和非RIR组(
n
=269)。通过患者住院期间的MACE发生情况将患者分为院内MACE(
n
=102)和非院内MACE组(
n
=195),采用最小绝对收缩与选择算子(least absolute shrinkage and selection operator,LASSO)回归法和多因素Logistic回归分析评估残余炎症风险与MACE发生之间的关联性,同时筛选出MACE发生的其他独立风险预测因素,应用R语言软件构建基于残余炎症指标的列线图模型并对其进行验证。
结果
2
残余炎症风险组患者院内泵衰竭、心源性休克、恶性心律失常、死亡及总体MACE的发生率均高于非残余炎症风险组(
P
<
0.05);LASSO回归及多因素回归分析显示,左室射血分数(left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF)、血红蛋白浓度与院内MACE发生风险呈负相关(
P
<
0.05),RIR、糖化血红蛋白(hemoglobinA1c,Hb1Ac)、白细胞计数、氨基末端脑钠肽前体(N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide,NT-proBNP)与院内MACE发生风险呈正相关(
P
<
0.05)。受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operator characteristic curve,ROC曲线) 提示RIR预测院内MACE发生的能力欠佳(AUC=0.592,95%
CI
:0.551~ 0.634),构建的列线图的Harrel’s C-index为0.872(95%
CI
:0.827~0.917),内部验证后列线图的ROC曲线下面积为0.866(95%
CI
:0.818~0.907),Hosmer-Lemeshow偏差性检验提示列线图的预测概率与现况值之间具有较好的一致性(χ
2
=8.420,
P
=0.393)。临床决策曲线发现,当患者院内MACE发生的阈值概率处于0.08~0.88之间时,应用列线图模型所获得的净收益最高,提示列线图模型的临床适用性较好。
结论
2
基于残余炎症风险和其他5个因素构建的预测模型在急性心肌梗死患者术后MACE的发生风险方面具有较好的预测效率和临床适用性。
Objective
2
To develop a nomogram prediction model based on residual inflammation risk (RIR) and evaluate its value in the prediction for the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods
2
Clinical data of 297 AMI patients who underwent PCI in our department from June 2017 to March 2019 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. According to their levels of preoperative hypersensitive-CRP (hs-CRP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)
they were divided into RIR group (
n
=28) and non RIR group (
n
=269). They also were assigned into the MACE group (
n
=102) and non-MACE group (
n
=195) according to whether MACEs occurred during hospitalization. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the correlation between the risk of RIR and the occurrence of MACE
and other independent risk predictors of MACE were screened out. The nomogram model based on the indicators of RIR was constructed and verified by the R language software.
Results
2
The incidences of pump failure
cardiogenic shock
malignant arrhythmia and death
and overall MACE were significantly higher in the RIR group than the non-RIR group (
P
<
0.05). The Results of LASSO regression and multivariate regression analyses showed that left ventricular ejection
fraction (LVEF) and hemoglobin concentration were negatively correlated with the risk of MACE in hospital (
P
<
0.05)
while residual inflammation risk
hemoglobinA1c (Hb1Ac)
leukocyte count and N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level were positively correlated with the risk of MACE (
P
<
0.05). The ROC curve indicated that RIR was not good in prediction of MACE (AUC=0.592
95%
CI
: 0.551~0.634). Based on the above 6 indicators
the nomogram model was constructed. The Harrel's C-index of the nomogram was 0.872 (95%
CI
: 0.827~0.917)
the AUC of the nomogram after re-sampling 1 000 times was 0.866 (95%
CI:
0.818~0.907)
and the Hosmer lemeshow deviation test showed that the prediction probability of nomogram was consistent with the actual frequency (
Chi
-square=8.420
P
=0.393). The clinical decision curve showed that when the threshold probability of MACE occurrence is between 0.08 and 0.88
and the nomogram model could obtain the highest net benefit
which indicated that the model had good clinical applicability.
Conclusion
2
The RIR-based nomogram model and other 5 factors have good prediction efficiency and clinical applicability in the prediction of the risk of MACE in AMI patients.
刘峰. 替罗非班对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者心血管内皮功能与血小板活化的影响[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2020, 33(20): 3366-3367. DOI: 10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2020.20.012.
LIU F. Effects of tirofiban on cardiovascular endothelial function and platelet activation in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome[J]. J Med Theory Pract, 2020, 33(20): 3366-3367. DOI: 10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2020.20.012.
张杰, 马礼坤, 张理想, 等. 急性心肌梗死患者院内死亡风险列线图预测模型的构建[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2020, 36(4): 311-317. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2020.04.004.
ZHANG J, MA L K, ZHANG L X, et al . Construction of predictive model of in-hospital death risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J ] . J Clin Cardiol, 2020, 36(4): 311-317. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2020.04.004.
杨国慧, 李树仁. 心肌梗死PCI术后运动康复的现状及进展[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2018, 34(7): 640-642. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2018.07.003.
YANG G H, LI S R. The status and progress of exercise rehabilitation after PCI in myocardial infarction[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2018, 34(7): 640-642. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2018.07.003
陈小丽, 李建国, 任艳琴. 老年STEMI患者PCI术前PDW、NLR对院内MACE的预测价值[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2020, 49(6): 96-99. DOI: 10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2020.06.021.
CHEN X L, LI J G, REN Y Y. Relationship between PDW, NLR and mace in elderly STEMI patients before PCI[J]. J Med Res, 2020, 49(6): 96-99. DOI: 10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2020.06.021.
HUANG Z, DONG W. Adversarial MACE prediction after acute coronary syndrome using electronic health records[J]. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 2019, 23(5): 2117-2126. DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2018.2882518.
周茜洋, 唐春香, 张龙江, 等. 残余炎性心血管风险的研究进展[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2020, 33(7): 760-764. DOI: 10.16571/j.cnki.1008-8199.2020.07.017.
ZHOU X Y, TANG C X, ZHANG L J, et al . Progress of residual inflammatory cardiovascular risk[J ] . J Med Postgraduates, 2020, 33(7): 760-764. DOI: 10.16571/j.cnki.1008-8199.2020.07.017.
LE JEMTEL T H, SAMSON R, MILLIGAN G, et al . Visceral adipose tissue accumulation and residual cardiovascular risk[J ] . Curr Hypertens Rep, 2018, 20(9): 77. D OI: 10.1007/s11906-018-0880-0.
高雅楠, 席子惟, 娄亚柯, 等. 残余炎症风险在冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病中的研究进展[J]. 中国医药, 2020, 15(6): 957-959. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777.2020.06.037.
GAO Y N, XI Z W, LOU Y K, et al . Research progress of residual inflammation risk in coronary atherosclerotic heart disease[J ] . China Med, 2020, 15(6): 957-959. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777.2020.06.037.
中华医学会心血管病学分会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征诊断和治疗指南(2016)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2017, 45(5): 359-376. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.05.003.
Cardiovascular Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (2016)[J]. Chin J Cardiol, 2017, 45(5): 359-376. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.05.003.
PEREIRA-BARRETTO A C, BACAL F, DE ALBUQUERQUE D C. Most heart failure patients Die from pump failure: implications for therapy[J]. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs, 2015, 15(6): 387-393. DOI: 10.1007/s40256-015-0135-2.
ZAMANIPOOR NAJAFABADI A H, RAMSPEK C L, DEKKER F W, et al . TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models[J ] . BMJ Open, 2020, 10(9): e041537. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041537.
李佳欣. 经PCI术的AMI患者院内MACE发生风险的列线图建立[D]. 衡阳: 南华大学, 2019.
LI J X. Establishment of nomogram of MACE risk in AMI patients undergoing PCI[D]. Hengyang: University of South China, 2019.
伍佳茹. NLR与急性心肌梗死患者急诊PCI术后住院期间MACE的相关性研究[D]. 衡阳: 南华大学, 2018.
WU J R. Correlation between NLR and mace during emergency PCI hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction[D]. Hengyang: University of South China, 2018.
唐荣辉. PLR对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者急诊PCI术后院内MACE的预测研究[D]. 衡阳: 南华大学, 2020.
TANG R H. Prediction of MACE in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction after PCI with PLR[D]. Hengyang: University of South China, 2020.
陈倩. STEMI患者NLR与冠脉病变相关性及其急诊PCI术后变化对院内MACE的预测价值[D]. 衡阳: 南华大学, 2020.
CHEN Q. The correlation between NLR and coronary artery lesions in STEMI patients and the predictive value for in-hospital MACE after emergency PCI[D]. Hengyang: University of South China, 2020.
蔡婷. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者急诊PCI术后发生院内不良心血管事件的临床特点及影响因素分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2018.
CAI T. Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of nosocomial adverse cardiovascular events after emergency PCI in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2018.
GUEDENEY P, CLAESSEN B E, KALKMAN D N, et al . Residual inflammatory risk in patients with low LDL cholesterol levels undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J ] . J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 73(19): 2401-2409. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.077.
KALKMAN D N, AQUINO M, CLAESSEN B E, et al . Residual inflammatoryrisk and the impact on clinical outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary interventions[J ] . Eur Heart J, 2018, 39(46): 4101-4108. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy633.
TAGLIERI N, BACCHI REGGIANI M L, PALMERINI T, et al . Baseline white blood cell count is an independent predictor of long-term cardiovascular mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, but it does not improve the risk classification of the GRACE score[J ] . Cardiology, 2013, 124(2): 97-104. DOI: 10.1159/000346377.
李末寒, 陆士奇, 肖卓韬, 等. 白细胞/血小板平均体积联合Gensini积分评估急性心肌梗死患者住院期间预后的研究[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2020, 21(4): 282-286. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2020.04.005.
LI M H, LU S Q, XIAO Z T, et al . White blood cell/mean platelet volume combined with Gensini score for in-hospital prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J ] . J Clin Emerg, 2020, 21(4): 282-286. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2020.04.005.
UEDA H, MITSUSADA N, HARIMOTO K, et al . Glycosylated hemoglobin is a predictor of major adverse cardiac events after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus[J ] . Cardiology, 2010, 116(1): 51-57. DOI: 10.1159/000314331.
武金娥, 高凡, 吕军, 等. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者外周血白细胞、血小板和血红蛋白含量与预后的关系[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2020, 12(5): 620-622, 626.
WU J E, GAO F, LYU J, et al . Relationship between content of white blood count, platelet and hemoglobin and prognosis in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J ] . Chin J Evid-Based Cardiovasc Med, 2020, 12(5): 620-622, 626.
殷菲. 影响重症肺炎患者预后的相关因素分析及构建nomogram预测模型的价值研究[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2020, 21(10): 819-825. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2020.10.011.
YIN F. Analysis of relevant factors affecting the prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia and research on the value of establishing nomogram prediction model[J]. J Clin Emerg, 2020, 21(10): 819-825. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2020.10.011.
张学武, 魏向龙, 傅强, 等. 个体化预测急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者发生自发再灌注的列线图模型的建立[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2020, 36(7): 608-612. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2020.07.006.
ZHANG X W, WEI X L, FU Q, et al . Establishment of individualized nomogram model for predicting spontaneous reperfusion in patients with acute ST-segment myocardial infarction[J ] . J Clin Cardiol, 2020, 36(7): 608-612. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2020.07.006.
李沅洋, 张宇凡, 徐月, 等. 急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后心力衰竭风险预测模型建立与评估[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2019, 35(10): 916-922. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2019.10.012.
LI Y Y, ZHANG Y F, XU Y, et al . Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram for predicting heart failure in patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI[J ] . J Clin Cardiol, 2019, 35(10): 916-922. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2019.10.012.
叶青, 马礼坤, 张杰. 急性心肌梗死患者冠脉介入术后1年死亡风险列线图预测模型的构建[J]. 安徽医科大学学报, 2020, 55(12): 1959-1963. DOI:10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2020.12.028.
YE Q, MA L K, ZHANG J. Establishment of a nomogram for predicting the risk of 1-year death after coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Acta Univ Med Anhui, 2020, 55(12): 1959-1963. DOI: 10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2020.12.028.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621