
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
400016 重庆,重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科
[ 吕富荣,E-mail: lfr918@sina.com LYU Furong, E-mail: lfr918@sina.com
收稿:2021-02-08,
修回:2021-04-28,
纸质出版:2021-07-30
移动端阅览
石敏, 邱蓝玉, 李佳, 等. 基于CT分析膝关节前外侧韧带损伤的股骨后髁形态特征[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021,43(14):1384-1388.
Min SHI, Lanyu QIU, Jia LI, et al. Morphological characteristics of posterior femoral condyle of knee anterolateral ligament injury based on CT findings[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(14): 1384-1388.
石敏, 邱蓝玉, 李佳, 等. 基于CT分析膝关节前外侧韧带损伤的股骨后髁形态特征[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021,43(14):1384-1388. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202102053.
Min SHI, Lanyu QIU, Jia LI, et al. Morphological characteristics of posterior femoral condyle of knee anterolateral ligament injury based on CT findings[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(14): 1384-1388. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202102053.
目的
2
基于CT图像定量测量并分析膝关节前外侧韧带(anterolateral ligament
ALL)损伤的股骨后髁形态特征。
方法
2
回顾性筛选2014年1月至2019年4月本院41例急性ALL损伤的膝关节作为损伤组,并匹配41例膝关节作为对照组。受试者均有膝关节完整的影像资料,利用其CT图像定量测量两组的膝关节形态学参数,包括髁总宽度(medial-lateral width of epicondyle
MLW)、内侧后髁宽度(medial posterior condyle width
MPCW)、外侧后髁宽度(lateral posterior condyle width
LPCW)、外侧髁长度(lateral condyle length
LCL)、内侧髁长度(medial condyle length
MCL)、外侧后髁长度(lateral posterior condyle length
LPCL)、内侧后髁长度(medial posterior condyle length
MPCL)、内侧后髁高度(medial posterior condyle height
MPCH)、外侧后髁高度(lateral posterior condyle heigh
LPCH)。另计算后髁宽度(LPCW/MLW、MPCW/MLW)和长度(LPCL/LCL、MPCL/MCL)比值使得个体差异最小化。统计分析两组各参数之间的差异。
结果
2
两组间后髁形态差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。①宽度: ALL损伤组MLW大于对照组(
P
=0.042),LPCW/MLW和MPCW/MLW低于对照组(
P
<
0.05);②长度: ALL损伤组MCL、MPCL和LCL大于对照组(
P
<
0.05),LPCL/LCL低于对照组(
P
<
0.01);③高度: 两组间内、外侧后髁高度的差异均无统计学意义。
结论
2
ALL损伤组的内侧股骨后髁更窄,外侧股骨后髁更窄更短,可能通过改变膝关节的内部运动而增加ALL损伤的风险。
Objective
2
To quantitatively measure and analyze the morphological features of posterior femoral condyle of anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury based on CT images.
Methods
2
A total of 41 knees with acute ALL injuries admitted in our hospital from January 2014 to April 2019 were retrospectively selected as the injury group
and the other 41 matched knee joints served as the control group. Their complete imaging data of the knee joints were collected
and the CT images were used to quantitatively measure the morphological parameters of knee joints in the 2 groups
including medial-lateral width of epicondyle (MLW)
medial posterior condyle width (MPCW)
and lateral posterior condyle width (LPCW)
lateral condyle length (LCL)
medial condyle length (MCL)
lateral posterior condyle length (LPCL)
medial posterior condyle length (MPCL)
medial posterior condyle height (MPCH)
and lateral posterior condyle height (LPCH). In addition
the ratios of posterior condyle widths (LPCW/MLW
MPCW/MLW) and those of lengths (LPCL/LCL
MPCL/MCL) was calculated to minimize individual differences. Statistical analysis was carried out for the differences of parameters between the 2 groups.
Results
2
The differences in width and length of posterior condyle between the 2 groups were statistically significant (
P
<
0.05). ① Width: MLW was greater (
P
=0.042)
and the ratios of LPCW/MLW and MPCW/MLW were significantly lower in the ALL injury group than the control group (
P
<
0.05); ② Length: MCL
MPCL and LCL were larger (
P
<
0.05) and the ratio of LPCL/LCL was lower in ALL injury group than the control group (
P
<
0.01); ③ Height: There was no statistical difference in the height of medial and lateral posterior condyles between the 2 groups (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion
2
The medial posterior femoral condyle is narrower
and the lateral posterior femoral condyle is narrower and shorter. And shorter lateral posterior condyle increases the risk of ALL injury by changing the internal movement of knee joints.
SEGOND P. Recherches cliniques et expérimentales sur lesépanchements sanguins du genou par entorse[M]. Paris: Aux Bureaux du Progrès Médical, 1879: 297-299, 319-321, 340-341.
GETGOOD A, BROWN C, LORDING T, et al . The anterolateral complex of the knee: results from the International ALC Consensus Group Meeting[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(1): 166-176. DOI:10.1007/s00167-018-5072-6.
CLAES S, VEREECKE E, MAES M, et al . Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee[J ] . J Anat, 2013, 223(4): 321-328. DOI:10.1111/joa.12087.
DELALOYE J R, HARTOG C, BLATTER S, et al . Anterolateral ligament reconstruction and modified lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis similarly improve knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study[J ] . Arthroscopy, 2020, 36(7): 1942-1950. DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.027.
THEIN R, BOORMAN-PADGETT J, STONE K, et al . Biomechanical assessment of the anterolateral ligament of the knee[J ] . Bone Joint Surg, 2016, 98(11): 937-943. DOI:10.2106/jbjs.15.00344.
PARK Y B, LEE H J, RO D H, et al . Anterolateral ligament injury has a synergic impact on the anterolateral rotatory laxity in acute anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(10): 3334-3344. DOI:10.1007/s00167-019-05347-z.
YASUMA S, NOZAKI M, MURASE A, et al . Anterolateral ligament reconstruction as an augmentedprocedure for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores rotational stability: Quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift test using an inertial sensor[J ] . Knee, 2020, 27(2): 397-405. DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2020.02.015.
PFEIFFER T R, BURNHAM J M, KANAKAMEDALA A C, et al . Distal femur morphology affects rotatory knee instability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(5): 1514-1519. DOI:10.1007/s00167-018-5269-8.
GRASSI A, SIGNORELLI C, URRIZOLA F, et al . Anatomical features of Tibia and femur: Influence on laxity in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee[J ] . Knee, 2018, 25(4): 577-587. DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2018.03.017.
LANSDOWN D, MA C B. The influence of tibial and femoral bone morphology on knee kinematics in the anterior cruciate ligament injured knee[J]. Clin Sports Med, 2018, 37(1): 127-136. DOI:10.1016/j.csm.2017.07.012.
THAUNAT M, INGALE P S, DE GUISE J, et al . The effect of anterolateral ligament reconstruction on knee constraint: a computer model-based simulation study[J ] . Knee, 2020, 27(4): 1228-1237. DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2020.05.006.
HELITO C P, HELITO P V P, COSTA H P, et al . Assessment of the anterolateral ligament of the knee by magnetic resonance imaging in acute injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament[J ] . Arthroscopy, 2017, 33(1): 140-146. DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.009.
VAN HAVER A, DE ROO K, DE BEULE M, et al . Semi-automated landmark-based 3D analysis reveals new morphometric characteristics in the trochlear dysplastic femur[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2014, 22(11): 2698-2708. DOI:10.1007/s00167-013-2573-1.
SONNERY-COTTET B, VIEIRA T D, OUANEZAR H. Anterolateral ligament of the knee: diagnosis, indications, technique, outcomes[J]. Arthroscopy, 2019, 35(2): 302-303. DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.019.
ARIEL DE LIMA D, HELITO C P, LIMA F R A, et al . Surgical indications for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with extra-articular lateral tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction[J ] . Rev Bras Ortop, 2018, 53(6): 661-667. DOI:10.1016/j.rboe.2018.09.007.
GILLESPIE D, MANDZIAK D, HOWIE C. Influence of posterior lateralfemoral condyle geometry on patellar dislocation[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2015, 135(11): 1503-1509. DOI:10.1007/s00402-015-2310-y.
ROGER J, LUSTIG S, CERCIELLO S, et al . Short lateral posterior condyle is associated with trochlea dysplasia and patellar dislocation[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(3): 731-739. DOI:10.1007/s00167-018-502 3-2.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621