
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
400016 重庆,重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经外科
[但炜,E-mail: 1187403442@qq.com DAN Wei, E-mail: 1187403442@qq.com
收稿:2021-02-05,
修回:2021-04-30,
纸质出版:2021-08-15
移动端阅览
练欢, 但炜, 魏钰, 等. 皮层高
Huan LIAN, Wei DAN, Yu WEI, et al. Value of cortical high-frequency gamma oscillations with electrocorticography in location of epileptogenic zone[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(15): 1465-1470.
练欢, 但炜, 魏钰, 等. 皮层高
Huan LIAN, Wei DAN, Yu WEI, et al. Value of cortical high-frequency gamma oscillations with electrocorticography in location of epileptogenic zone[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(15): 1465-1470. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202102036.
目的
2
通过比较难治性颞叶癫痫患者术中皮层脑电图(electrocorticography
ECoG)中高
γ
振荡(65~100 Hz)振荡活动与棘尖波在激惹区内外及病灶区、病周区及远离病灶区的出现率及分布特点,探讨皮层高频振荡对致痫灶的定位价值。
方法
2
回顾性分析本院2013年1月至2019年1月21例难治性颞叶癫痫患者的术中皮层脑电图,将发作间期癫痫样放电(interictal epileptiform discharges,IEDs)出现的导联定义为激惹区,无IEDs出现的导联定为非激惹区,结合术前影像学检查、术中导航及神经外科医师判断将监测皮层区
域分为病灶区、病周区及远离病灶区。比较IEDs(滤波范围: 1~30 Hz)和高
γ
振荡(滤波范围: 65~100 Hz)的出现率及分布特点,激惹区内、外高
γ
振荡的分布及病灶周围高
γ
振荡的发生率。
结果
2
① 21例患者IEDs和高
γ
振荡的总出现率均为100.0%(21/21),IEDs、高
γ
振荡、Gamma+IEDs的导联数分别为(9.50±2.80)、(8.14±2.93)、(6.60±2.40),经RM单向方差分析,IEDs的导联数显著高于高
γ
振荡和Gamma+IEDs。②激惹区和非激惹区中高
γ
振荡的导联数分别为(6.60±2.40)、(1.50±1.30),事件率分别为(0.42±0.30)、(0.20±0.20),经配对
t
检验,激惹区大于非激惹区。③病灶区、病周区及远离病灶区中高
γ
振荡事件数分别为(46.00±42.00)、(33.40±32.90)、(8.40±9.40),事件率分别为(0.40±0.30)、(0.37±0.38)、(0.10±0.10)。经两两配对
t
检验,病灶区及病周区中高
γ
振荡事件数及事件率差异无统计学意义,病灶区及病周区中高
γ
振荡30 s事件数及事件率分别显著高于远离病灶区。
结论
2
术中ECoG中传统IEDs目前仍是指导癫痫手术切除范围的重要标识,而高
γ
振荡与棘尖波及病灶具有高度一致性,且对于致痫灶识别比棘尖波更精确。IEDs结合高
γ
振荡可能具有更高的定位致痫灶价值。
Objective
2
To investigate the value of high-gamma oscillations (65~100 Hz) in epileptogenic foci localization by analyzing the intraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG) in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy
along with comparing the occurrence rate and distribution characteristics of high-gamma activity as well as spike wave inside and outside the irritative zone and around the foci.
Methods
2
A retrospective analysis was carried out on the intraoperative ECoG data of 21 patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2019. The channels with interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) were defined as irritated area
and those without IEDs as non-irritated area. Based on the preoperative imaging data
intraoperative navigation combined with neurosurgeon's judgment
the monitoring cortical area was divided into focal area
perifocal area and the area away from the focus. Then the occurrence rate and distribution characteristics of IEDs (filter range: 1~30 Hz) and high-gamma were compared
and the distribution of high-gamma activity inside and outside the irritated area
and the incidence of high-gamma around the foci were analyzed.
Results
2
① The overall incidence of IEDs and of high-gamma in the 21 patients were both 100.0% (21/21)
and the average number of channels for IEDs
high-gamma and gamma+IEDs was 9.50±2.80
8.14±2.93 and 6.60±2.40
respectively
indicating notably more IEDs channels than the other 2
by RM one-way ANOVA (
P
<
0.05). ②The channel numbers of high-gamma were 6.60±2.40 and 1.50±1.30 in the irritated and non-irritated areas respectively
and the event rates were 0.42±0.30 and 0.20±0.20 respectively
showing significant difference between the 2 areas (
P
<
0.01). ③The event numbers of high-gamma activity were 46.00±42.00
33.40±32.90 and 8.40±9.40 in the focal area
the perifocal area and the area away from the focus
respectively
with the corresponding event rate of 0.40±0.30
0.37±0.38 and 0.10±0.10
respectively. There were no significant differences in the event numbers and rates between the focal and perifocal area
though they were both significantly higher than that of the area away from the focus
by paired
t
-test (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Traditional IEDs of ECoG are still an important marker to guide the range of resection intra-operatively in epilepsy surgery
while high-gamma presents great consistency with both IEDs and foci
with more accurate identification of epileptogenic zone than IEDs. Therefore
IEDs combined with high-gamma may have greater value in the localization of epileptogenic zone.
王玮, 梁树立, 杨小枫. 头皮脑电信号中的高频振荡在癫痫诊疗中的应用研究进展[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2019;18(7): 740-744. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-8925.2019.07.018.
WANG W, LIANG S L, YANG X F. Recent advance in high frequency oscillation in scalp EEG signals in diagnoses and treatments of epilepsy[J]. Chin J Neuromed, 2019;18(7): 740-744. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-8925.2019.07.018.
THIJS R D, SURGES R, O'BRIEN T J, et al . Epilepsy in adults[J ] . Lancet, 2019, 393(10172): 689-701. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32596-0.
陈龙, 冯兆海, 姜磊, 等. MRI阴性药物难治性颞叶癫痫的外科治疗[J]. 新疆医学, 2020, 50(6): 552-555.
CHEN L, FENG Z H, JIANG L, et al . Surgical treatment of intractable temporal lobe epilepsy with non-lesional MRI[J ] . Xinjiang Med, 2020, 50(6): 552-555.
叶林妹, 陈聪, 丁芳, 等. 磁共振成像阴性颞叶癫痫的临床特点分析[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2020, 53(2): 103-109. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2020.02.005.
YE L M, CHEN C, DING F, et al . Clinical characteristics of nonlesional temporal lobe epilepsy[J ] . Chin J Neuromed, 2020, 53(2): 103-109. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2020.02.005.
张豪正, 李堃, 于华凤, 等. 24例难治性颞叶癫痫手术患者病例分析[J]. 癫痫杂志, 2021, 7(1): 34-38. DOI:10.7507/2096-0247.20210005.
ZHANG H Z, LI K, YU H F, et al . Analysis of 24 cases of intractable temporal lobe epilepsy surgery[J ] . J Epilepsy, 2021, 7(1): 34-38. DOI:10.7507/2096-0247.20210005.
ZIJLMANS M, ZWEIPHENNING W, VAN KLINK N. Changing concepts in presurgical assessment for epilepsy surgery[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2019, 15(10): 594-606. DOI:10.1038/s41582-019-0224-y.
FRAUSCHER B, BAR TOLOMEI F, KOBAYASHI K, et al . High-frequency oscillations: The state of clinical research[J ] . Epilepsia, 2017, 58(8): 1316-1329. DOI:10.1111/epi.13829.
CIMBALNIK J, BRINKMANN B, KREMEN V, et al . Physiological and pathological high frequency oscillations in focal epilepsy[J ] . Ann Clin Transl Neurol, 2018, 5(9): 1062-1076. DOI:10.1002/acn3.618.
KURUVILLA A, FLINK R. Intraoperative electrocorticography in epilepsy surgery: useful or not?[J]. Seizure, 2003, 12(8): 577-584. DOI: 10.1016/s1059-1311(03)00095-5.
周超, 但炜, 王刚, 等. 术中皮层脑电残余痫样放电与术后癫痫发作关系[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2016, 38(20): 2274-2278. DOI: 10.16016 /j.1000-5404.2016 03145.
ZHOU C, DAN W, WANG G, et al . Relationship of residual epileptiform discharges in intraoperative electrocorti- cography with seizure recurrence in patients after epilepsy surgery[J ] . Third Mil Med Uniiv, 2016, 38(20): 2274-2278. DOI: 10.16016 /j.1000-5404.201603145.
JOBST B C, BARTOLOMEI F, DIEHL B, et al . Intracranial EEG in the 21st century[J ] . Epilepsy Curr, 2020, 20(4): 180-188. DOI:10.1177/1535759720 934852.
王刚, 但炜, 熊伟茗, 等. 头皮脑电高频振荡波对继发性癫痫致痫灶的定位价值[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2014, 36(22): 2317-2320. DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.2014.22.018.
WANG G, DAN W, XIONG W M, et al . Scalp high frequency oscillations helps identify epileptogenic zone in secondary epilepsy[J ] . Third Mil Med Uniiv, , 2014, 36(22): 2317-2320. DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.2014.22.018.
BÉNAR C G, CHAUVIÈRE L, BARTOLOMEI F, et al . Pitfalls of high-pass filtering for detecting epileptic oscillations: a technical note on "false" ripples[J ] . Clin Neurophysiol, 2010, 121(3): 301-310. DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.019.
WORRELL G A, JERBI K, KOBAYASHI K, et al . Recording and analysis techniques for high-frequency oscillations[J ] . Prog Neurobiol, 2012, 98(3): 265-278. DOI:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.02.006.
RASMUSSEN T. Characteristics of a pure culture of frontal lobe epilepsy[J]. Epilepsia, 1983, 24(4): 482-493. DOI:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1983.tb04919.x.
QUILICHINI P P, LE VAN QUYEN M, IVANOV A, et al . Hub GABA neurons mediate gamma-frequency oscillations at ictal-like event onset in the immature hippocampus[J ] . Neuron, 2012, 74(1): 57-64. DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.026.
ALVARADO-ROJAS C, LEHONGRE K, BAGDASARYAN J, et al . Single-unit activities during epileptic discharges in the human hippocampal formation[J ] . Front Comput Neurosci, 2013, 7: 140. DOI:10.3389/fncom.2013.00140.
ANDRADE-VALENCA L P, DUBEAU F, MARI F, et al . Interictal scalp fast oscillations as a marker of the seizure onset zone[J ] . Neurology, 2011, 77(6): 524-531. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318228bee2.
URRESTARAZU E, CHANDER R, DUBEAU F, et al . Interictal high-frequency oscillations (100-500 Hz) in the intracerebral EEG of epileptic patients[J ] . Brain, 2007, 130(Pt 9): 2354-2366. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awm149.
JIRUSKA P, ALVARADO-ROJAS C, SCHEVON C A, et al . Update on the mechanisms and roles of high-frequency oscillations in seizures and epileptic disorders[J ] . Epilepsia, 2017, 58(8): 1330-1339. DOI:10.1111/epi.13830.
WANG S, WANG I Z, BULACIO J C, et al . Ripple classification helps to localize the seizure-onset zone in neocortical epilepsy[J ] . Epilepsia, 2013, 54(2): 370-376. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03721.x.
REN L, KUCEWICZ M T, CIMBALNIK J, et al . Gamma oscillations precede interictal epileptiform spikes in the seizure onset zone[J ] . Neurology, 2015, 84(6): 602-608. DOI:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001234.
ROEHRI N, PIZZO F, LAGARDE S, et al . High-frequency oscillations are not better biomarkers of epileptogenic tissues than spikes[J ] . Ann Neurol, 2018, 83(1): 84-97. DOI:10.1002/ana.25124.
ROEHRI N, BARTOLOMEI F. Are high-frequency oscillations better biomarkers of the epileptogenic zone than spikes?[J]. Curr Opin Neurol, 2019, 32(2): 213-219. DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000663.
ROSENOW F, LUDERS H. Presurgical evaluation of epilepsy[J]. Brain, 2001, 124(Pt 9): 1683-1700. DOI: 10.1093/brain/124.9.1683.
HE H Y, SHEN W, ZHENG L, et al . Excitatory synaptic dysfunction cell-autonomously decreases inhibitory inputs and disrupts structural and functional plasticity[J ] . Nat Commun, 2018, 9(1): 2893. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-05125-4.
ENGLOT D J, HAN S J, BERGER M S, et al . Extent of surgical resection predicts seizure freedom in low-grade temporal lobe brain tumors[J ] . Neurosurgery, 2012, 70(4): 921-928;discussion928. DOI:10.1227/neu.0b013e31823c3a30.
PAIL M, CIMBÁLNÍK J, ROMAN R, et al . High frequency oscillations in epileptic and non-epileptic human Hippocampus during a cognitive task[J ] . Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 18147. DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-74306-3.
孙永锋, 遇涛, 张国君, 等. 通过调整阅读参数找寻 γ 振荡协助定位致痫灶[J ] . 实用医学杂志, 2015, 31(21): 3556-3559. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2015.21.031.
SUN Y F, YU T, ZHANG G J, et al . Finding γ oscillations to assist in locating epileptogenic zone by adjusting reading parameters[J ] . J Pract Med, 2015, 31(21): 3556-3559. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2015.21.031..
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621