臀上动脉螺旋桨皮瓣联合术后封闭负压治疗臀部压力性损伤效果分析

刘衍松; 伊力扎提·伊力哈木; 曹天勇; 张文汉; 冯光

doi:10.16016/j.1000-5404.202101047

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

臀上动脉螺旋桨皮瓣联合术后封闭负压治疗臀部压力性损伤效果分析

专题报道：皮肤创面与瘢痕修复研究 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 臀上动脉螺旋桨皮瓣联合术后封闭负压治疗臀部压力性损伤效果分析
- Clinical efficacy of superior gluteal artery propeller flap combined with postoperative vacuum sealing drainage in treatment of hip pressure injury
- 第三军医大学学报 2021年43卷第11期页码：1057-1062
- 作者机构：
  
  1.221004 江苏徐州，徐州仁慈医院创面修复科
  2.100080 北京，解放军第四临床医学中心烧伤整形科
- 作者简介：
  
  [冯光，E-mail：fengguang_304@aliyun.com FENG Guang, E-mail: fengguang_304@aliyun.com
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16016/j.1000-5404.202101047
  中图分类号： R619;R622.1;R632.1
- 收稿：2021-01-06，
  
  修回：2021-01-29，
  
  纸质出版：2021-06-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘衍松, 伊力扎提·伊力哈木, 曹天勇, 等. 臀上动脉螺旋桨皮瓣联合术后封闭负压治疗臀部压力性损伤效果分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021,43(11):1057-1062.

Yansong LIU, Yilihamu YILIZATI, Tianyong CAO, et al. Clinical efficacy of superior gluteal artery propeller flap combined with postoperative vacuum sealing drainage in treatment of hip pressure injury[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(11): 1057-1062.
刘衍松, 伊力扎提·伊力哈木, 曹天勇, 等. 臀上动脉螺旋桨皮瓣联合术后封闭负压治疗臀部压力性损伤效果分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021,43(11):1057-1062. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202101047.

Yansong LIU, Yilihamu YILIZATI, Tianyong CAO, et al. Clinical efficacy of superior gluteal artery propeller flap combined with postoperative vacuum sealing drainage in treatment of hip pressure injury[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(11): 1057-1062. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202101047.

摘要

目的

探讨应用臀上动脉穿支螺旋桨肌皮瓣联合术后负压吸引装置治疗臀部压力性损伤的临床效果。

方法

收集徐州仁慈医院2016年9月至2020年8月采用臀上动脉螺旋桨皮瓣联合术后负压治疗的压力性损伤患者32例。其中男性21例，女性11例；年龄14~79岁

平均56.87岁；压力性损伤分期：Ⅲ期12例，Ⅳ期20例；创面缺损面积30~56 cm

；术前评估患者各主要脏器功能均能耐受麻醉和手术操作，调整血红蛋白≥110 g/L，白蛋白≥30 g/L，观察皮瓣存活情况及治疗效果。

结果

患者均接受臀上动脉穿支螺旋桨皮瓣，术后予以封闭负压引流装置固定术野，术后31例皮瓣全部存活，其中1例患者术后因粪便污染出现皮瓣内侧边缘部分坏死，行乙状结肠造口后经换药处理后愈合，1例患者术后皮瓣供区缝合处因张力较大裂开继发感染，后期植皮修复。平均随访18个月，压力性损伤无复发。

结论

臀上动脉螺旋桨皮瓣血运可靠，操作简单，结合术后封闭负压吸引可降低术后并发症，治疗臀部压力性损伤效果较好。

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the clinical effectiveness of superior gluteal artery propeller flap combined with postoperative vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of hip pressure injury.

Methods

From September 2016 to August 2020

32 patients with hip pressure injury were treated with superior gluteal artery propeller flap combined with postoperative vacuum sealing drainage. They were 21 males and 11 females

at an average age of 56.87 (14~79) years. There were 12 patients with type Ⅲ

and 30 with type Ⅳ. The defect ranged from 30 to 56 cm

. The patients' ability to tolerate anesthesia and surgical operation for each major organ function was preoperatively evaluated. Their hemoglobin level was adjusted to ≥110 g/L and that of albumin to ≥30 g/L. The survival and therapeutic effect of the flap were observed.

Results

All patients were treated with superior gluteal artery propeller flap

followed by vacuum sealing drainage to maintain the operating field. All 31 flaps survived postoperatively. One patient suffered from necrosis of the medial edge of the flap due to fecal contamination

which was healed after sigmoid colostomy and redressing. Another patient suffered from secondary infection at the suture site of the flap due to high tension

and underwent skin graft later. The average follow-up period was 18 months

and there was no recurrence of pressure injury.

Conclusions

The superior gluteal artery propeller flap is reliable in blood supply and easy to operate. It is a reasonable option to combine with vacuum sealing drainage to reduce the complications after operation.

关键词

Keywords

references

NOLA G T, VISTNES L M. Differential response of skin and muscle in the experimental production of pressure sores[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1980, 66(5): 728-733.

KOSHIMA I, SOEDA S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle[J]. Br J Plast Surg, 1989, 42(6): 645-648.

KOSHIMA I, MORIGUCHI T, SOEDA S, et al . The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores[J ] . Plast Reconstr Surg, 1993, 91(4): 678-683.

朱婷婷, 方小魁, 李光早, 等. 臀上动脉穿支皮瓣在修复骶尾部压疮的应用[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(3): 332-334.

ZHU T T, FANG X K, LI G Z, et al . Application of superior gluteal artery perforator flap in repairing sacrococcygealpressure sores[J ] . J Bengbu Med Coll, 2019, 44(3): 332-334.

张晓杰, 宣昭鹏, 路来金. 骶尾部褥疮的手术治疗体会[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2014, 37(1): 25.

ZHANG X J, XUAN Z P, LU L J. Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal bedsore[J]. Chin J Microsurg, 2014, 37(1): 25.

孙佳琳, 郭鹏飞, 崔正军, 等. 臀上动脉穿支接力皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的临床效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2020, 36(8): 726-729.

SUN J L, GUO P F, CUI Z J, et al . Clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator "buddy flap" in repairing pressure ulcer in sacrococcygeal region[J ] . Chin J Burns, 2020, 36(8): 726-729.

邹杰, 肖夏娟, 肖昌明, 等. 应用双侧臀上下动脉穿支皮瓣修复骶尾部巨大压疮[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2019, 30(7): 430-432.

ZOU J, XIAO X J, XIAO C M, et al . Clinical application of bilateral superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps in the repair of large sacrococcygeal pressure ulcers[J ] . Chin J Aesthetic Plastic Surg, 2019, 30(7): 430-432.

AHMADZADEH R, BERGERON L, TANG M, et al . The superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps[J ] . Plast Reconstr Surg, 2007, 120(6): 1551-1556.

FAVUZZA N, D'ARPA S, CAJOZZO M, et al . Porcine model for gluteal artery perforator flap: anatomy and technique[J ] . Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2018, 6(2): e1661.

WANG C Y, WU C J, CHU T S, et al . Reconstruction of a sacral pressure ulcer with an inferior gluteal artery perforator flap after failed reconstruction using bilateral V-Y advancement flaps[J ] . Ostomy Wound Manage, 2018, 64(2): 45-48.

DJEDOVIC G, METZLER J, MORANDI E M, et al . Comparison of fasciocutaneous V-Y and rotational flaps for defect coverage of sacral pressure sores: a critical single-centre appraisal[J ] . Int Wound J, 2017, 14(6): 945-949.

KEMP T L, MATHES D. The Pedicled superior gluteal artery perforator flap for coverage of sacral pressure ulcers-clinical review and technical considerations[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2017, 5: 39.

钱坤, 熊竹友, 李光早. 封闭式负压吸引结合臀上动脉穿支皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的临床应用[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2018, 39(19): 2302-2304.

QIAN K, XIONG Z Y, LI G Z. Clinical effects of vacuum sealing drainage combined with superior gluteal artery perforator flap transplantation in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pressure sores[J]. J Qiqihar Med Coll, 2018, 39(19): 2302-2304.

刘江月, 李智. 负压创面治疗技术在难愈性创面治疗中的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(5): 366-369.

LIU J Y, LI Z. Clinical observation of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of refractory wound[J]. Chin J Inj Repair Wound Heal Electron Ed, 2017, 12(5): 366-369.

陈雷, 丁伟, 徐姝娟, 等. 负压创面治疗技术在Ⅲ~Ⅳ度褥疮治疗中的临床效果评价[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(5): 363-365.

CHEN L, DING W, XU S J, et al . Negative pressure wound therapy techniques in Ⅲ ~ Ⅳ degree bedsore treatment of clinical effect assessment[J ] . Chin J Inj Repair Wound Heal Electron Ed, 2017, 12(5): 363-365.

白晓龙, 赵震, 关铁军, 等. 封闭负压引流技术对大面积创面愈合的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(16): 4023-4024.

BAI X L, ZHAO Z, GUAN T J, et al . Effect of closed negative pressure drainage technique on large area wound healing[J ] . Chin J Gerontol, 2019, 39(16): 4023-4024.

尹朝奇, 康智星, 罗成群, 等. 皮瓣修复褥疮术前术后应用封闭负压引流技术的比较研究[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2017, 19 (5): 644-646, 649.

YIN C Q, KANG Z X, LUO C Q, et al . Comparative study of VAC in the preoperative and postoperative treatment of bedsore united with skin flap[J ] . J Chin Physician, 2017, 19 (5): 644-646, 649.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据