
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.400014 重庆,重庆医科大学附属儿童医院:放射科
2.400014 重庆,重庆医科大学附属儿童医院:肾脏内科与免疫学
3.400014 重庆,重庆医科大学附属儿童医院:国家儿童健康与疾病临床医学研究中心,儿童发育疾病研究教育部重点实验室,儿科学重庆市重点实验室
[徐晔,E-mail:xuyemail@163.com XU Ye, E-mail: xuye@163.com
收稿:2020-09-28,
修回:2020-10-23,
纸质出版:2021-02-15
移动端阅览
罗佳鑫, 张高福, 李伟, 等. 磁共振成像信号强度对胡桃夹综合征患儿左肾淤血的诊断价值[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021,43(3):249-254.
Jiaxin LUO, Gaofu ZHANG, Wei LI, et al. Diagnostic value of signal intensity of MR imaging for renal congestion in nutcracker syndrome: report of 39 children[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(3): 249-254.
罗佳鑫, 张高福, 李伟, 等. 磁共振成像信号强度对胡桃夹综合征患儿左肾淤血的诊断价值[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021,43(3):249-254. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202009235.
Jiaxin LUO, Gaofu ZHANG, Wei LI, et al. Diagnostic value of signal intensity of MR imaging for renal congestion in nutcracker syndrome: report of 39 children[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(3): 249-254. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202009235.
目的
2
探讨胡桃夹综合征(nutcracker syndrome
NCS)左肾淤血的磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging
MRI)影像识别及临床价值。
方法
2
纳入本院2018年6月至2019年3月确诊的NCS 39例患儿,其中男性23例,女性16例;年龄(11±3)岁。采用MRI平扫T
2
WI序列观测双肾皮髓质信号,测量两肾髓质与皮质MRI信号强度的差值(即MC值),计算两肾MC值的差的绝对值(即BR值)。根据双肾皮髓质信号是否有差异将患儿分为淤血组(
n
=25)及非淤血组(
n
=14),收集相关临床生化资料,分析识别肾淤血的MRI特征及与生化检查指标的相关性。
结果
2
左肾淤血时T
2
WI序列上显示髓质信号降低、双肾实质信号出现差异。淤血组的BR值显著高于非淤血组(
P
<
0.001),双肾皮髓质信号差异明显;而两组患儿的血尿发生率(
P
=0.614)、24 h尿蛋白定量(
P
=0.429)、尿素氮(
P
=0.420)、尿肌酐(
P
=0.781)差异均无统计学意义。ROC曲线分析显示,当BR值>2.4时,可判定为左肾淤血,诊断价值较高(AUC=0.894);24 h尿蛋白定量(AUC=0.579)、尿素氮(AUC=0.579)和尿肌酐(AUC=0.527)判定肾淤血诊断价值较低。
结论
2
两肾MRI信号强度差可判断NCS患儿左肾有无淤血,诊断价值较常用临床生化指标高。
Objective
2
To investigate the findings of MR imaging and their clinical value in diagnosis of left renal congestion in children with nutcracker syndrome (NCS).
Methods
2
All the 39 children (23 boys and 16 girls
mean age of 11±3 years) with NCS diagnosed at our hospital from Jun 2018 to Mar 2019 were enrolled in this study. Plain scanning sequence of T
2
WI was performed to measure the difference in signal intensity between the renal medulla and cortex (MC value) and calculate the absolute value of the difference between the MC values of both kidneys (BR value). Then
the children were divided into congestion group (
n
=25) and non-congestion group (
n
=14) according to whether
a different renal signal existed between the 2 kidneys. The correlation of MRI findings and clinical biochemical data were analyzed with aid of statistics software SPSS 21.0.
Results
2
In the patients with congested left kidney
the medullary signals were reduced at T2WI
which rendered a distinct signal difference between the 2 kidneys. The patients from the congestion group had significantly higher BR value (
P
<
0.001) and obvious differences in MC value than those from the non-congestion group. There were no statistical differences in the incidence rates of hematuria (
P
=0.614)
24-hour urine protein quantification (
P
=0.429)
and serum levels of urea nitrogen (
P
=0.420) and urinary creatinine (
P
=0.781) between the 2 groups. ROC curve analysis showed that when BR value
>
2.4
left renal congestion was valid
with higher diagnostic value (AUC=0.894)
but 24-hour urine protein quantification (AUC=0.579) and serum levels of urea nitrogen (AUC=0.579) and urinary creatinine (AUC=0.527) had lower diagnostic values.
Conclusion
2
Inter-kidney MRI signal difference in children with NCS is a reliable sign to judge whether a congested left kidney exists; whereas clinical biochemical indices are not.
李宝钢, 张崔斌, 罗海林, 等. "胡桃夹"综合征的研究进展[J].医药前沿, 2018, 8(6):72-73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1752.2018.06.048.
LI B G, ZHANG C B, LUO H L, et al . Research progress of "Nutcracker" syndrome[J ] . Med Front, 2018, 8(6): 72-73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1752.2018.06.048.
WANG H, GUO Y T, JIAO Y, et al . A minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of nutcracker syndrome using individualized three-dimensional printed extravascular titanium stents[J ] . Chin Med J (Engl), 2019, 132(12): 1454-1460. DOI:10.1097/cm9.0000000000000255.
谢丹凤, 阳海平.儿童无症状性血尿的病理特征及肾活检指征的探讨[J].中国临床新医学, 2020, 13(5):487-491. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2020.05.14.
XIE D F, YANG H P. Pathological characteristics of asymptomatic hematuria and the indications of renal biopsy in children[J]. Chin J New Clin Med, 2020, 13(5):487-491. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2020.05.14.
ANANTHAN K, ONIDA S, DAVIES A H. Nutcracker syndrome: an update on current diagnostic criteria and management guidelines[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2017, 53(6): 886-894. DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.02.015.
赵永峰, 王丹, 田忠祥.浅析螺旋CT在诊断胡桃夹综合征中的应用[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2018, 24(1): 38-41. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5741.2018.01.008.
ZHAO Y F, WANG D, TIAN Z X. Application of spiral CT in the diagnosis of nutcracker syndrome[J]. Chin Comput Med Imaging, 2018, 24(1): 38-41. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5741.2018.01.008.
CARDARELLI-LEITE L, VELLONI F G, SALVADORI P S, et al . Abdominal vascular syndromes: characteristic imaging findings[J ] . Radiol Bras, 2016, 49(4): 257-263. DOI:10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0136.
朱赟, 林强, 周建敏, 等.儿童肾脏疾病合并胡桃夹现象及其诊治要点探讨[J].中国实用儿科杂志, 2015, 30(9): 710-711.
ZHU Y, LIN Q, ZHOU J M, et al . Discussion on the phenomenon of nutcracker in children with kidney disease and its diagnosis and treatment[J ] . Chin J Pract Pediatr, 2015, 30(9): 710-711.
彭悦.胡桃夹综合征合并肾脏疾病临床分析[D].重庆: 重庆医科大学, 2015.
PENG Y. Clinical analysis of nutcracker syndrome with renal disease[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Medical University, 2015.
黄锦炽, 刘东旭, 赵欣, 等.多层螺旋CT血管造影诊断胡桃夹综合征的影像评价[J].白求恩医学杂志, 2015, 13(2): 209-210. DOI:10.16485/j.issn.2095-7858.2015.02.067.
HUAN G J C, LIU D X, ZHAO X, et al . Image evaluation of MSCT angiography in the diagnosis of Nutcracker syndrome[J ] . J Bethune Mil Med Coll, 2015, 13(2): 209-210. DOI:10.16485/j.issn.2095-7858.2015.02.067.
王魏龙, 唐良友, 赵修民, 等.胡桃夹综合征临床指标与多排螺旋CT扫描结果的关系[J].山西医药杂志, 2015, 44(13):1499-1501.
WANG W L, TANG L Y, ZHAO X M, et al . Relationship between clinical indicators of nutcracker syndrome and results of multi-slice spiral CT scan[J ] .Shanxi Med J, 2015, 44(13):1499-1501.
WANG L, YI L, YANG L Y, et al . Diagnosis and surgical treatment of nutcracker syndrome: a single-center experience[J ] . Urology, 2009, 73(4): 871-876. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.043.
吴静, 张翥, 岳改燕, 等. "胡桃夹"综合征误诊原因分析[J].中国中西医结合肾病杂志, 2015, 16(4): 335-336.
WU J, ZHANG Z, YUE G Y, et al . Analysis of misdiagnosis causes of "Nutcracker" syndrome[J ] . Chin J Integr Tradit West Nephrol, 2015, 16(4): 335-336.
杨帅帅, 陈学勋, 武文斌.左肾静脉压迫综合征伴蛋白尿患者肾脏病理分析[J].临床肾脏病杂志, 2013, 13(2): 67-70. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2013.02.006.
YANG S S, CHEN X X, WU W B. Kidney pathological changes and urine-related variables of left renal vein entrapment syndrome with pro-teinuria[J]. J Clin Nephrol, 2013, 13(2): 67-70. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2013.02.006.
吕筱航, 李秋, 张高福.不同年龄段儿童胡桃夹综合征的临床特点[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2019, 34(8):599-603. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2019.08.010.
LV X H, LI Q, ZHANG G F. Clinical features of children with nutcracker syndrome in different age groups[J]. Chin J Appl Clin Pediatr, 2019, 34(8):599-603. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2019.08.010.
张凯, 邱玲, 李雪梅, 等.胡桃夹综合征患者不同体位尿蛋白定量检测的日内变异分析[J].临床检验杂志, 2019, 37(7): 525-527. DOI:10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2019.07.11.
ZHANG K, QIU L, LI X M, et al . Intraderday variation analysis of urine protein in different positions in nutcracker syndrome patients[J ] . Chin J Clin Lab Sci, 2019, 37(7): 525-527. DOI:10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2019.07.11.
施冬雪, 罗钢.儿童胡桃夹综合征50例临床分析[J].中国医科大学学报, 2016, 45(10): 939-941, 957. DOI:10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2016.10.018.
SHI D X, LUO G. Clinical analysis of 50 cases of children with nutcracker syndrome[J]. J China Med Univ, 2016, 45(10): 939-941, 957. DOI:10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2016.10.018.
蔡享兰.成人血尿与胡桃夹综合征的误诊、漏诊及诊断分析探讨[J].当代医学, 2015, 21(20): 20-21. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2015.20.010.
CAI X L. Misdiagnosis, missed diagnosis and analysis of adult hematuria and nutcracker syndrome[J]. Contemp Med, 2015, 21(20): 20-21. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2015.20.010.
徐海山, 曾俊婷, 李雅娴, 等.左肾静脉压迫综合征65例误诊分析[J].中国基层医药, 2016, 23(12): 1864-1866. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2016.12.029.
XU H S, ZENG J T, LI Y X, et al . Analysis of misdiagnosis of 65 cases of left renal vein entrapment syndrome[J ] . Chin J Prim Med Pharm, 2016, 23(12): 1864-1866. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2016.12.029.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621