全膝关节置换术中3种股骨旋转截骨参考轴线的准确度对比

雷凯; 刘力铭; 范华全; 陈欣; 杨柳; 郭林

doi:10.16016/j.1000-5404.202008174

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

全膝关节置换术中3种股骨旋转截骨参考轴线的准确度对比

临床医学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 全膝关节置换术中3种股骨旋转截骨参考轴线的准确度对比
- Accuracy of 3 reference axes for femoral rotation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study of 124 cases
- 第三军医大学学报 2021年43卷第3期页码：261-266
- 作者机构：
  
  400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第一附属医院关节外科中心
- 作者简介：
  
  [郭林，E-mail: guolin6212@163.com GUO Lin, E-mail: guolin6212@163.com
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16016/j.1000-5404.202008174
  中图分类号： R322.71;R684.3;R687.4
- 收稿：2020-08-22，
  
  修回：2020-10-15，
  
  纸质出版：2021-02-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
雷凯, 刘力铭, 范华全, 等. 全膝关节置换术中3种股骨旋转截骨参考轴线的准确度对比[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021,43(3):261-266.

Kai LEI, Liming LIU, Huaquan FAN, et al. Accuracy of 3 reference axes for femoral rotation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study of 124 cases[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(3): 261-266.
雷凯, 刘力铭, 范华全, 等. 全膝关节置换术中3种股骨旋转截骨参考轴线的准确度对比[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021,43(3):261-266. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202008174.

Kai LEI, Liming LIU, Huaquan FAN, et al. Accuracy of 3 reference axes for femoral rotation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study of 124 cases[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(3): 261-266. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202008174.

摘要

目的

比较全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty，TKA)中，Whiteside线、外科通髁轴及滑车沟线这3种参考轴线行股骨旋转截骨的准确度。

方法

回顾性分析本中心2016年8月至2018年6月符合纳入标准的膝关节骨关节炎或类风湿性关节炎患者124例(男性25例，女性99例，中位年龄66.0岁)，共133例膝(左膝70例，右膝63例)。基于膝关节CT扫描数据建立其三维模型，分别参照Whiteside线、外科通髁轴及滑车沟线模拟股骨旋转截骨，比较模拟股骨旋转截骨角与其术中实际股骨旋转截骨角的差异，并计算其偏差值及离群度。

结果

参照Whiteside线、外科通髁轴及滑车沟线所得模拟股骨旋转截骨角与其术中实际股骨旋转截骨角的偏差值分别为(-2.61±2.76)°、(0.79±2.09)°、(-0.65±1.64)°，且三者之间差异具有统计学意义(

0.001)；其偏差

3°的离群度分别为48.12%、11.28%、8.27%。

结论

与Whiteside线及外科通髁轴相比，全膝关节置换术中参考滑车沟线行股骨旋转截骨的准确度更高。

Abstract

Objective

To compare the accuracy of rotation of the femoral component using 3 reference axes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

namely

the Whiteside line

surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA)

and sulcus line of the trochlear groove.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 124 patients (25 males and 99 females

at a median age of 66.0 years; including 133 knees

70 left and 63 right knees) with knee osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis who met the inclusion criteria in our center from August 2016 to June 2018. Based on the three-dimensional model established by knees CT scan data

the rotational alignment of femoral component was simulated with reference to the Whiteside line

sTEA and sulcus line

respectively. The difference was compared between the simulated rotation angle of femoral component and the actual angle of femoral rotation. The deviation and its outlier were calculated.

Results

The deviation between the actual angle of femoral rotation and the simulated rotation angle of femoral component obtained by referring to the Whiteside line

sTEA and sulcus line was (-2.61±2.76)°

(0.79±2.09)°

and (-0.65±1.64)°

respectively

and the differences between each pair were statistically significant (

0.001). The percentage of outliers with deviation

3° was 48.12%

11.28% and 8.27%

respectively.

Conclusion

Compared with the Whiteside line and sTEA

the femoral rotation with the sulcus line as the reference axis is more accurate during TKA.

关键词

Keywords

references

BOLDT J G, STIEHL J B, HODLER J, et al . Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty[J ] . Int Orthop, 2006, 30(5): 420-425. DOI:10.1007/s00264-006-0085-z.

ROMERO J, STÄHELIN, T, WYSST. et al . Die bedeutung der axialen rotationsausrichtung der knieprothesenkom-ponenten[J ] . Orthopäde, 2003, 32(6): 461-468.DOI:10.1007/s00132-003-0475-5.

WHITESIDE L A, ARIMA J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in Valgus total knee arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995 (321):168-172.

BERGER R A, RUBASH H E, SEEL M J, et al . Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis[J ] . Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1993 (286):40-47. DOI:10.1097/00003086-199301000-00008.

JENNY J Y, BOERI C. Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 2004, 75(1): 74-77. DOI:10.1080/00016470410001708150.

PARRATTE S, BLANC G, BOUSSEMART T, et al . Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(10): 2213-2219. DOI:10.1007/s00167-013-2623-8.

VICTOR J, VAN DONINCK D,LABEY L, et al . A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur[J ] . J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2009, 91-B(5): 683-690. DOI:10.1302/ 0301-620x.91b5.21827.

FEHRING T K. Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000(380):72-79.DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200011000-00010.

王体惠, 王旭, 王晓露, 等.术前MRI测量对提高全膝关节置换股骨假体外旋角度准确性的意义[J].骨科临床与研究杂志, 2019, 4(6): 365-369.DOI:10.19548/j.2096-269x.2019.06.010.

WANG T H, WANG X, WANG X L, et al . Clinical research of preoperative MRI measurement to improve the accuracy of external rotation angle of femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty[J ] . J Clin Orthop Res, 2019, 4(6): 365-369.DOI:10.19548/j.2096-269x.2019.06.010

TALBOT S, DIMITRIOU P, MULLEN M, et al . Referencing the sulcus line of the trochlear groove and removing intraoperative parallax errors improve femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(9): 2743-2750. DOI:10.1007/s00167-015-3668-7.

TALBOT S, DIMITRIOU P, RADIC R, et al . The sulcus line of the trochle ar groove is more accurate than Whiteside's line in determining femoral component rotation[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015, 23(11): 3306-3316. DOI:10.1007/s00167-014-3137-8.

GRIFFIN F M, INSALL J N, SCUDERI G R. The posterior condylar angle in osteoarthritic knees[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1998, 13(7): 812-815. DOI:10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90036-5.

IRANPOUR F, MERICAN A M, DANDACHLI W, et al . The geometry of the trochlear groove[J ] . Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(3): 782-788. DOI:10.1007/s11999-009-1156-4.

LOHMAN M, TALLROTH K, KETTUNEN J A, et al . Changing from analog to digital images: Does it affect the accuracy of alignment measurements of the lower extremity?[J ] . Acta Orthop, 2011, 82(3): 351-355. DOI:10.3109/17453674.2011.570670.

HUNGERFORD D S, KRACKOW K A. Total joint arthroplasty of the knee[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1985(192): 23-33.

SISTON R A. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005, 87(10): 2276. DOI:10.2106/jbjs.d.02945.

VICTOR J, VAN DONINCK D, LABEY L, et al . How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?[J ] . Knee, 2009, 16(5): 358-365. DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2009.01.001.

CERVERI P, MARCHENTE M, MANZOTTI A, et al . Determination of the Whiteside line on femur surface models by fitting high-order polynomial functions to cross-section profiles of the intercondylar Fossa[J ] . Comput Aided Surg, 2011, 16(2): 71-85. DOI:10.3109/10929088.2011.555106.

BOISGARD S, MOREAU P E, DESCAMPS S, et al . Computed tomographic study of the posterior condylar angle in arthritic knees: its use in the rotational positioning of the femoral implant of total knee prostheses[J ] . Surg Radiol Anat, 2003, 25(3/4): 330-334. DOI:10.1007/ s00276-003-0144-8.

ANOUCHI Y S, WHITESIDE L A, KAISER A D, et al . The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens[J ] . Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1993, 287(287):170. DOI:10.1097/00003086-199302000-00027.

VICTOR J. Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2009, 95(5): 365-372. DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.011.

TALBOT S, BARTLETT J. The anterior surface of the femur as a new landmark for femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2008, 16(3): 258-262. DOI:10.1007/s00167- 007-0421-x.

INSALL J N, BINAZZI R, SOUDRY M, et al . Total knee arthroplasty[J ] . Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1985(192): 13-22.

LEE D H, PARK J H, SONG D I, et al . Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: comparison between navigation-assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18(3): 381-387. DOI:10.1007/s00167-009-0983-x.

PANG H N, YEO S J, CHONG H C, et al . Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2011, 19(9): 1496-1503. DOI:10.1007/s00167-011-1483-3.

STEPHENS B F, HAKKI S, SALEH K J, et al . Clinical alignment variations in total knee arthroplasty with different navigation methods[J ] . Knee, 2014, 21(5): 971-974. DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2014.03.001.

TIGANI D, SABBIONI G, BEN AYAD R, et al . Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: gap-balancing versus measured resection technique[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18(10): 1304-1310. DOI:10.1007/s00167-010-1124-2.

LI S X, LUO X M, WANG P, et al . Clinical outcomes of gap balancing vs measured resection in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis involving 2259 subjects[J ] . J Arthroplast, 2018, 33(8): 2684-2693. DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.015.

SHARATH K R.正常及置换后膝关节生物力学[M]//ASHOK R, 膝关节外科学.辽宁: 辽宁科学技术出版社, 2017: 13-18.

SHARATH K R. Biomechanics of normal and replaced knee[M]//Ashok R. Knee surgery. Liaoning: Liaoning Science and Technology Publishing House, 2017: 13-18.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

两种镇痛方式对全膝关节置换术后患者凝血功能的影响