硕通镜与输尿管软镜治疗单侧上尿路结石的效果分析

罗生军; 袁野; 胡豪; 唐伟; 廖肇洲

doi:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201906145

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

硕通镜与输尿管软镜治疗单侧上尿路结石的效果分析

临床医学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 硕通镜与输尿管软镜治疗单侧上尿路结石的效果分析
- Clinical efficacy of negative pressure combined with ureteroscopy and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of unilateral upper urinary calculi
- 第三军医大学学报 2019年41卷第21期页码：2101-2106
- 作者机构：
  
  1.400016 重庆，重庆医科大学附属第一医院泌尿外科
  2.400053 重庆，重庆市第十三人民医院泌尿外科
- 作者简介：
  
  [廖肇洲，E-mail:cqssylzz@sina.comLIAO Zhaozhou, E-mail: cqssylzz@sina.com
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16016/j.1000-5404.201906145
  中图分类号： R692.4;R693.4;R699
- 收稿：2019-06-19，
  
  修回：2019-08-20，
  
  纸质出版：2019-11-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
罗生军, 袁野, 胡豪, 等. 硕通镜与输尿管软镜治疗单侧上尿路结石的效果分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2019,41(21):2101-2106.

Shengjun LUO, Ye YUAN, Hao HU, et al. Clinical efficacy of negative pressure combined with ureteroscopy and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of unilateral upper urinary calculi[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(21): 2101-2106.
罗生军, 袁野, 胡豪, 等. 硕通镜与输尿管软镜治疗单侧上尿路结石的效果分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2019,41(21):2101-2106. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201906145.

Shengjun LUO, Ye YUAN, Hao HU, et al. Clinical efficacy of negative pressure combined with ureteroscopy and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of unilateral upper urinary calculi[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(21): 2101-2106. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201906145.

摘要

目的

对比研究负压组合式输尿管镜(硕通镜)与输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术两种手术方式治疗单侧上尿路结石的有效性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析重庆医科大学附属第一医院和重庆市第十三人民医院2017年12月至2018年12月符合纳入排除标准的211例肾及输尿管上段结石行硕通镜和输尿管软镜碎石术患者的临床资料，其中硕通镜组106例，输尿管软镜组105例。比较两组手术时间、通道鞘置入成功率、术后住院时间、术后感染率、术后1 d结石清除率、术后1个月结石清除率。并按结石最大直径＞2 cm和≤2 cm进行亚组分析。

结果

两组在通道鞘置入成功率、手术时间、术后1 d结石清除率方面差异有统计学意义(

0.05)；两组术后住院时间、术后感染率、术后1个月结石清除率比较差异无统计学意义(

0.05)。结石直径＞2 cm时，硕通镜组术后1 d、1个月清石率为81.82%，均显著高于软镜组(

0.05)，两组手术时间差异无统计学意义；结石直径≤2 cm时，硕通镜组在术后1 d、1个月清石率优于软镜组，但手术时间长于软镜组，差异均有统计学意义(

0.05)。

结论

硕通镜和输尿管软镜治疗单侧上尿路结石均安全有效，硕通镜在治疗直径＞2 cm的结石时更具优势，但一期手术成功率较输尿管软镜低。

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of negative pressure combined with ureteroscopy (NPUR) with holmium laser in the treatment of unilateral upper urinary tract calculi in comparison with flexible ureteroscopy (FURS).

Methods

The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed for 211 patients of unilateral renal and proximal urinary calculi who received NPUR or FURS in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and the Thirteenth People's Hospital of Chongqing between December 2017 and December 2018. Of these patients

106 received NPUR and the other 105 underwent FURS. Operation time

successful rate of ureteral access sheath placement

postoperative length of hospital stay

postoperative infection rate

stone free rate (SFR) at 1 d and 1 month after operation were compared between the 2 groups. According to the size of calculi

the 2 groups were divided 2 subgroups (> 2 cm and ≤2 cm) in order to make further analysis.

Results

There were significant differences in successful rate of ureteral access sheath placement

operation time and SFR at 1 d after operation (

0.05); No significant differences were found in postoperative length of hospital stay

postoperative infection rate

and SFR at 1 month after operation (

0.05). When the size of calculi was

2 cm

the SFR was better in the NPUR group than the FURS group. But no difference was seen in the operation time.

Conclusion

NPUR and FURS are safe and effective in treatment for unilateral upper urinary tract calculi. NPUR is superior in treating larger (> 2 cm) stones

but the successful rate of same-session is lower than FURS.

关键词

Keywords

references

RICE P, PRATTLEY S, SOMANI B K. 'Negative ureteroscopy' for stone disease: evidence from a systematic review[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2019, 20(3): 13. DOI:10.1007/s11934-019-0878-4.

曾国华, 麦赞林, 夏术阶, 等.中国成年人群尿石症患病率横断面调查[J].中华泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 36(7):528-532. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2015.07.014.

ZENG G H, MAI Z L, XIA S J, et al . A cross-sectional survey of urolithiasis prevalence in China[J ] . Chin J Urol, 2015, 36(7):528-532. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2015.07.014.

中华医学会泌尿外科分会, 中国泌尿系结石联盟.软性输尿管镜术中国专家共识[J].中华泌尿外科杂志, 2016, 37(8):561-565. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1600-6702.2016.08.001.

Urology Branch of Chinese Medical Association, China Urinary Stone Association. Soft ureteroscopy Chinese expert consensus[J]. Chin J Urology, 2016, 37(8):561-565. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1600-6702.2016.08.001.

那彦群, 叶章群, 孙颖浩.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南手册: 2014版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014: 129-165.

NA Y Q, YE Z Q, SUN Y H. Chinese urology diagnosis and treatmentguidebook: 2014 Edition[M]. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House, 2014:129-165.

ASSIMOS D, KRAMBECK A, MILLER N L, et al . Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society guideline, PART I[J ] . J Urol, 2016, 196(4): 1153-1160. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090.

FAN S, GONG B, HAO Z, et al . Risk factors of infectious complications following flexible ureteroscope with a holmium laser: a retrospective study[J ] . Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(7): 11252-11259.

胡豪, 陈欣, 蒋立, 等.一期输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗≤2 cm单侧上尿路结石的临床研究[J].第三军医大学学报, 2018, 40(12): 1148-1154. DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201712221.

HU H, CHEN X, JIANG L, et al . Efficacy and safety of same-session flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for unilateral upper urinary tract calculi 2cm or smaller[J ] . J Third Mil Med Univ, 2018, 40(12): 1148-1154. DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201712221.

DAVIS N F, QUINLAN M R, POYET C, et al . Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety profile[J ] . World J Urol, 2018, 36(7): 1127-1138. DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2230-x.

陈宏宇, 韩毅, 胡国栋, 等.肾镜联合输尿管软镜通过经皮肾单通道取石治疗肾鹿角形结石[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 28-31.

CHEN H Y, HAN Y, HU G D, et al . Percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with flexible ureteroscope via single renal channel for the treatment of renal staghorn calculi[J ] . Chin J Endourol Electron Ed, 2019, 13(1): 28-31.

HU H, LU Y, HE D, et al . Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly[J ] . Urolithiasis, 2016, 44(5): 427-434.

DÍAZ PÉREZ D, LASO GARCÍA I, SÁNCHEZ GUERRERO C, et al . Urinary sepsis after endourological ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lithiasis[J ] . Actas Urol Esp, 2019, 43(6): 293-299. DOI:10.1016/j.acuro.2019.02.001.

GIUSTI G, PROIETTI S, VILLA L, et al . Current standard technique for modern flexible ureteroscopy: tips and tricks[J ] . Eur Urol, 2016, 70(1): 188-194. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.035.

王树声, 翁湘涛, 周均洪, 等.硕通镜治疗上尿路结石的有效性与安全性[J].中华泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 38(9): 671-674. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2017.09.008.

WANG S S, WENG X T, ZHOU J H, et al . Efficacy and safety on upper ureteric lithotripsy by Shuo Tong ureteroscopy[J ] . Chin J Urol, 2017, 38(9):671-674. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2017.09.008.

ERGIN G, KIRAC M, KOPRU B, et al . Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stones[J ] . Urol J, 2018, 15(6): 313-317. DOI:10.22037/uj.v0i0.4208.

杨嗣星.输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术肾盂内压检测方法及意义[J].临床外科杂志, 2014, 22(11):799-801. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2014.11.002.

YANG S X. Detection method and significance of renal pelvis internal pressure in ureteroscope holmium laser lithotripsy[J]. J Clin Surg, 2014, 22(11): 799-801. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2014.11.002.

OSTHER P J S. Risks of flexible ureterorenoscopy: pathophysiology and prevention[J]. Urolithiasis, 2018, 46(1): 59-67. DOI:10.1007/s00240-017-1018-6.

OZGOR F, SAHAN M, CUBUK A, et al . Factors affecting infectious complications following flexible ureterorenoscopy[J ] . Urolithiasis, 2019, 47(5):481-486. DOI:10.1007/s00240-018-1098-y.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

一期输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗≤2 cm单侧上尿路结石的临床研究

输尿管软镜治疗＞2 cm肾和输尿管上段结石的疗效和安全性评价

后腹腔镜联合经肾盂输尿管软镜治疗巨大多发性鹿角形肾结石的临床研究

CRP、PCT、NLR联合检测预警输尿管结石发生尿源性脓毒血症的临床研究

输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗长径≥2 cm的肾结石68例临床分析