达芬奇机器人直肠癌经括约肌间切除术超低位吻合相关并发症分析

刘洪昌; 王晓松; 高林丰; 张超; 罗华星; 余佩武; 唐波

doi:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201906022

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

达芬奇机器人直肠癌经括约肌间切除术超低位吻合相关并发症分析

临床医学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 达芬奇机器人直肠癌经括约肌间切除术超低位吻合相关并发症分析
- Complications associated with ultra-low anastomosis after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer
- 第三军医大学学报 2019年41卷第18期页码：1796-1801
- 作者机构：
  
  400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)附属第一医院普通外科
- 作者简介：
  
  [ 唐波，E-mail: 2211934029@qq.com TANG Bo, E-mail: 2211934029@qq.com
- 基金信息：
  
  西南医院军事医学临床创新重点课题(SWH2016ZDX2003);重庆市基础研究与前沿探索一般项目(CSTC2018jscx-mzdx0028)
- DOI：10.16016/j.1000-5404.201906022
  中图分类号： R615;R619;R735.37
- 收稿：2019-06-05，
  
  修回：2019-06-20，
  
  纸质出版：2019-09-30
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘洪昌, 王晓松, 高林丰, 等. 达芬奇机器人直肠癌经括约肌间切除术超低位吻合相关并发症分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2019,41(18):1796-1801.

Hongchang LIU, Xiaosong WANG, Linfeng GAO, et al. Complications associated with ultra-low anastomosis after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(18): 1796-1801.
刘洪昌, 王晓松, 高林丰, 等. 达芬奇机器人直肠癌经括约肌间切除术超低位吻合相关并发症分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2019,41(18):1796-1801. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201906022.

Hongchang LIU, Xiaosong WANG, Linfeng GAO, et al. Complications associated with ultra-low anastomosis after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(18): 1796-1801. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201906022.

摘要

目的

分析直肠癌患者采用达芬奇机器人经括约肌间切除术超低位吻合相关并发症情况，总结其临床特征，为其防治提供依据。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年3月本院收治的43例达芬奇机器人低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术患者的临床资料。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访。观察常见并发症，包括:①肛门狭窄，②炎性外痔，③不全肠梗阻，④直肠阴道瘘，⑤吻合口漏，⑥新发直肠脱垂。其他指标包括术中失血量、手术时间、排便时间、恢复正常饮食时间、术后住院时间、术后病理、淋巴结数目、远切缘。

结果

患者均行达芬奇机器人直肠癌经括约肌间切除术及预防性末端回肠造瘘。其中19例(44.2%

)患者术后出现肛门狭窄，以膜性狭窄为主，经定期扩肛后缓解。14例(32.6%)患者术后出现炎性外痔，中位缓解时间为术后33 (16~64) d。10例(23.3%)患者术后出现回肠造瘘口近端不全性肠梗阻，其中1例(2.3%)因保守治疗无效提前还瘘(术后35 d)，其余保守治疗恢复后择期还瘘。2例(4.7%)患者术后出现吻合口漏。1例(2.3%)患者术后出现直肠阴道瘘。无新发直肠脱垂。单因素Logistic回归分析显示:男性是肛门狭窄的独立危险因素(

=0.002)，炎性外痔的发生与手术时间有关(

=0.005)。

结论

达芬奇机器人直肠癌经括约肌间切除术超低位吻合相关并发症以肛门狭窄、炎性外痔和不全肠梗阻多见，加强早期预防、积极干预可取得较好的治疗效果。

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the complications associated with ultra-low anastomosis in robotic intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer and analyze their clinical characteristics for their prevention and treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 43 patients undergoing robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer in our hospital between January

2015 and March

2019. The patients were followed up after the surgeries

via

outpatient visit and by telephone to assess the occurrence of anal stenosis

edematous hemorrhoids

partial intestinal obstruction

rectovaginal fistula

anastomotic leakage

and rectal mucosal prolapse. The surgical and perioperative data including intraoperative blood loss

operative time

defecation time

time to normal diet

postoperative hospital stay

postoperative pathology

the number of lymph nodes involved

and distal resection margin were also analyzed for the patients.

Results

All the patients underwent robotic intersphincteric resection and prophylactic ileostomy. Postoperative anal stenosis (mainly membranous stenosis) was found in 19 patients (44.2%) after the surgery

and was relieved by regular anal expansion. Postoperative edematous hemorrhoids were found in 14 patients (32.6%) and remitted at a median of 33 d (range 16-64 d) after the operation. Among the 10 patients with partial intestinal obstruction

1 patient underwent closure of ileostomy 35 d after operation

which was before the scheduled time; and in the remaining patients

ileostomy was closed by elective surgery after conservative treatment. Two patients experienced anastomotic leakage and 1 patient had rectovaginal fistula after the surgery (delayed fistula). No rectal prolapse occurred in these patients. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the male gender was an independent risk factor for anal stenosis (

=0.002)

and the incidence of edematous hemorrhoids was correlated with the operation time (

=0.005).

Conclusion

Anal stenosis

edematous hemorrhoids

and partial intestinal obstruction are the most common complications associated with ultra-low anastomosis after robotic intersphincteric resection surgery for rectal cancer

and early preventive measures and active interventions can achieve favorable outcomes.

关键词

Keywords

references

AKAGI Y, SHIROUZU K, OGATA Y, et al . Oncologic outcome s of intersphincteric resection without preoperative chemoradiotherapy for very low rectal cancer[J ] . Surg Oncol, 2013, 22(2): 144-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2013.03.003.

吴宗辉, 甘露.低位直肠癌行保肛手术102例临床分析[J].第三军医大学学报, 2008, 30(4): 364-365. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.2008.04.029.

WU Z H, GAN L. Clinical analysis of 102 cases of anus-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer[J]. J Third Mil Med Univ, 2008, 30(4): 364-365. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.2008.04.029.

BRAUN J, TREUTNER K H, WINKELTAU G, et al . Results of intersphincteric resection of the rectum with direct coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma[J ] . Am J Surg, 1992, 163(4): 407-412. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90042-p.

SCHIESSEL R, KARNER-HANUSCH J, HERBST F, et al . Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours[J ] . Br J Surg, 1994, 81(9): 1376-1378. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800810944.

RULLIER E, ZERBIB F, LAURENT C, et al . Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer[J ] . Dis Colon Rectum, 1999, 42(9): 1168-1175. DOI: 10.1007/bf02238569.

SAITO N, MORIYA Y, SHIROUZU K, et al . Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience[J ] . Dis Colon Rectum, 2006, 49(10 Suppl): S13-S22. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0598-y.

LEE S H, KIM D H, LIM S W. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2018, 33(12): 1741-1753. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3145-0.

ANDOLFI C, UMANSKIY K. Current trends and perspectives in robotic surgery[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019, 29(2): 127-128. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.29027.ca.

唐波, 曾冬竹, 张超, 等.达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助直肠癌根治术456例报道[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2016, 23(12): 1419-1423.

TANG B, ZENG D Z, ZHANG C, et al . Application of Da Vinci robotic surgical system in radical resection of rectal cancer: A report of 456 cases[J ] . Chin J Bases Clin Gen Surg, 2016, 23(12): 1419-1423.

许平平, 许剑民.机器人手术系统在结直肠癌手术临床应用现状[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2016, 36(11): 1144- 1148.

XU P P, XU J M. Application status of robotic surgical system resection for colorectal cancer[J]. Chin J Pract Surg, 2016, 36(11): 1144-1148.

KIM J C, LEE J L, ALOTAIBI A M, et al . Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection facilitates an efficient sphincter-saving in patients with low rectal cancer[J ] . Int J Colorectal Dis, 2017, 32(8): 1137-1145. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2807-7.

YOO B E, CHO J S, SHIN J W, et al . Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes[J ] . Ann Surg Oncol, 2015, 22(4): 1219-1225. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4177-5.

KUO L J, NGU J C, HUANG Y J, et al . Anorectal complications after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer[J ] . Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(11): 4466-4471. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5499-8.

BANNURA G C, CUMSILLE M A, BARRERA A E, et al . Predictive factors of stenosis after stapled colorectal anastomosis: prospective analysis of 179 consecutive patients[J ] . World J Surg, 2004, 28(9): 921-925.

EBERHARDT J M, KIRAN R P, LAVERY I C. The impact of anastomotic leak and intra-abdominal abscess on cancer-related outcomes after resection for colorectal cancer: a case control study[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2009, 52(3): 380-386. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ad488.

GESSLER B, ERIKSSON O, ANGENETE E. Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2017, 32(4): 549-556. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2744-x.

苏亮, 贾小强, 赵卫兵, 等.直肠癌术后吻合口瘘的防治研究进展[J].结直肠肛门外科, 2018, 24(3): 317- 320. DOI: 10.19668/j.cnki.issn1674-0491.2018.03.029.

SU L, JIA X Q, ZHAO W B, et al . Advances in prevention and treatment of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery[J ] . J Color Anal Surg, 2018, 24(3): 317-320. DOI: 10.19668/j.cnki.issn1674-0491.2018.03.029.

管仲.直肠癌前切除术后吻合口瘘的危险因素分析及评分系统建立[D].苏州: 苏州大学, 2015. [http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10285-1015405834.htm .

GUAN Z. Risk factors of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer and establishment of A scoring system[D]. Suzhou: Soochow University, 2015.

LEONG Q M, SON D N, CHO J S, et al . Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients[J ] . Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(9): 2987-2992. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1657-6.

YAMADA K, OGATA S, SAIKI Y, et al . Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer[J ] . Dis Colon Rectum, 2009, 52(6): 1065-1071. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819f5fa2.

刘宝华.直肠癌根治术后吻合口狭窄原因与处理[J].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(2): 119-121.

LIU B H. Anastomotic stenosis after radical resection of rectal cancer: Causes and treatment[J]. Chin J Oper Proced Gen Surg (Electron Ed), 2014, 8(2): 119-121.

LIPSKA M A, BISSETT I P, PARRY B R, et al . Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk[J ] . ANZ J Surg, 2006, 76(7): 579-585. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03780.x.

戴志慧, 杜金林, 王建平, 等.保护性横结肠襻式造口对腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后吻合口漏及狭窄的影响[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2014, 13(7): 535-538. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2014.07.009.

DAI Z H, DU J L, WANG J P, et al . Effects of protective transverse colostomy on the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage and stricture after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer[J ] . Chin J Digest Surg, 2014, 13(7): 535- 538. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2014.07.009.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

圈套器冷切除术与热切除术在治疗结直肠小息肉安全性与有效性的回顾性对比研究

经导管主动脉瓣置换术的临床研究和应用进展

腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术血管入路并发症的处理

两种术式治疗女性压力性尿失禁效果和安全性的随机对照研究

先天性肛门直肠畸形术后直肠黏膜脱垂的病因分析