罗哌卡因浸润麻醉对椎管内分娩镇痛下自然分娩后会阴疼痛镇痛效果的随机对照研究

朱圆; 熊亚; 李红雨; 王丹; 陈妍; 鲁开智; 甯交琳

doi:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201812166

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

罗哌卡因浸润麻醉对椎管内分娩镇痛下自然分娩后会阴疼痛镇痛效果的随机对照研究

临床医学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 罗哌卡因浸润麻醉对椎管内分娩镇痛下自然分娩后会阴疼痛镇痛效果的随机对照研究
- Pain relief effects of ropivacaine for perineal pain during vaginal delivery under epidural labor analgesia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
- 第三军医大学学报 2019年41卷第7期页码：691-695
- 作者机构：
  
  1.400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第一附属医院：麻醉科
  2.400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第一附属医院：妇产科
- 作者简介：
  
  [ 甯交琳, E-mail:460439856@qq.com NING Jiaolin, E-mail:460439856@qq.com
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16016/j.1000-5404.201812166
  中图分类号： R614.32;R714.3;R971.2
- 收稿：2018-12-15，
  
  修回：2019-01-19，
  
  纸质出版：2019-04-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
朱圆, 熊亚, 李红雨, 等. 罗哌卡因浸润麻醉对椎管内分娩镇痛下自然分娩后会阴疼痛镇痛效果的随机对照研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2019,41(7):691-695.

Yuan ZHU, Ya XIONG, Hongyu LI, et al. Pain relief effects of ropivacaine for perineal pain during vaginal delivery under epidural labor analgesia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(7): 691-695.
朱圆, 熊亚, 李红雨, 等. 罗哌卡因浸润麻醉对椎管内分娩镇痛下自然分娩后会阴疼痛镇痛效果的随机对照研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2019,41(7):691-695. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201812166.

Yuan ZHU, Ya XIONG, Hongyu LI, et al. Pain relief effects of ropivacaine for perineal pain during vaginal delivery under epidural labor analgesia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(7): 691-695. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201812166.

摘要

目的

比较罗哌卡因和利多卡因对椎管内分娩镇痛下自然分娩后会阴疼痛的镇痛效果。

方法

纳入2016年2月至2017年4月我院产科74名经阴道分娩并接受椎管内分娩镇痛的足月单胎产妇，其中初产妇60例，经产妇14例。采用随机数字表法分为罗哌卡因组和利多卡因组(

=37)。在会阴切开术或会阴修补术前进行0.75%罗哌卡因或1%利多卡因会阴局部浸润。用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue score，VAS)对分娩过程中及分娩后会阴疼痛进行评价分级，并对产妇满意度进行评价。

结果

在注药后1 min (33

26例，

=0.043)，产后3 h (31

20例，

=0.006)、4 h (27

11例，

0.001)、6 h (20

0例，

=0.030)，罗哌卡因组VAS为0的产妇多于利多卡因组，差异具有统计学意义(

0.05)。分娩后坐立(11

0例，

0.001)、排尿(22

3例，

0.001)和睡觉(32

24例，

=0.030)时，罗哌卡因组VAS评分为0的产妇人数均多于利多卡因组。罗哌卡因组对分娩镇痛满意的产妇(评价为非常满意和满意)多于利多卡因组(36

29例，

=0.013)。罗哌卡因组和利多卡因组新生儿Apgar评分、脐动静脉pH值、碱剩余、乳酸含量、二氧化碳分压和血红蛋白含量组间比较差异均无统计学意义。

结论

罗哌卡因会阴浸润麻醉较之于利多卡因能提供更快和更长时间的镇痛，可显著提高椎管内分娩镇痛下自然分娩产妇的满意度。

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the effects of ropivacaine versus lidocaine infiltration on the pain relief for perineal pain of puerpera undergoing vaginal delivery.

Methods

This is a prospective

randomized

double-blind study. Seventy-four puerperae with term singleton fetus undergoing vaginal delivery under epidural labor analgesia were enrolled into this study in the maternity center of our hospital from February 2016 to April 2017. Among them

60 were primipara and 14 were transpartum women. They were randomly allocated into ropivacaine group and lidocaine group (

=37). Before planned episiotomy or perineal repair

0.75 % ropivacaine or 1 % lidocaine infiltration was injected to them. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used

to rank the perineal pain grade. Moreoven

the puerpera's satisfaction was evaluated.

Results

There were more puerpera with VAS score equal to 0 in the ropicavaine group than the lidocaine group at 1 min (33

=0.043) after injection

and 3 (31

=0.006)

4 (27

0.001) and 6 h (20

=0.030) after delivery. The proportion of puerpera with VAS score of 0 in ropivacaine group was larger than that in the lidocaine group when they were sitting up (11

0.001)

urinating (22

0.001) and sleeping (32

=0.030) after delivery. Maternal satisfaction (very satisfied or satisfied) with labor analgesia in the ropivacaine group was better than that in the lidocaine group (36

=0.013). There were no significant differences in Apgar score

umbilical artery and venous pH value

lactic acid content

partial pressure of carbon dioxide and hemoglobin content between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

Ropivacaine perineal infiltration can provide faster and longer analgesia than lidocaine. It can significantly improve the satisfaction of vaginal delivery women with epidural labor analgesia.

关键词

Keywords

references

MACARTHUR A J, MACARTHUR C. Incidence, severity, and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 191(4): 1199-1204. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.064.

GOULD D. Perineal tears and episiotomy[J]. Nurs Stand, 2007, 21(52):41-46. DOI:10.7748/ns2007.09.21.52.41.c6596.

DANNECKER C, HILLEMANNS P, STRAUSS A, et al. Episiotomy and perinealtears presumed to be imminent: the influence on the urethral pressure profile, analmanometric and other pelvic floor findings—follow-up study of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2005, 84(1): 65-71. DOI:10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00585.x.

READING E, SLEDMERE M, COX N, et al. How women view postepisiotomy pain.[J]. BMJ, 1982, 284(6311): 243-246. DOI:10.1136/bmj.284.6311.243.

ZUOKUMOR P, COLUMB M. Epidural anaesthesia for pain relief in labour[J]. Euro J Anaesth, 2003, 20(8): 674-675. DOI:10.1097/00003643-200308000-00015.

GERSHENFELD D B, SAVEL L E. Postepisiotomy pain control with efocaine[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1953, 66(4): 860-865.

LAFOY J, GEDEN E A. Postepisiotomy pain: warm versus cold sitz bath[J]. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 1989, 18(5): 399-403. DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6909.1989.tb00493.x.

NIV D, WOLMAN I, YASHAR T, et al. Epidural morphine pretreatment for postepisiotomy pain[J]. Clin J Pain, 1994, 10(4): 319-323.

KARGAR R, AGHAZADEH-NAINIE A, KHODDAMI-VISHTEH H R. Comparison of the effects of lidocaine prilocaine cream (EMLA) and lidocaine injection on reduction of perineal pain during perineum repair in normal vaginal delivery[J]. J Family Reprod Health, 2016, 10(1): 21-26.

EKSTRÖM G, GUNNARSSON U B. Ropivacaine, a new amide-type local anesthetic agent, is metabolized by cytochromes P450 1A and 3A in human liver microsomes[J]. Drug Metab Dispos, 1996, 24(9): 955-961.

KUMAR S, PALANIAPPAN J M, KISHAN A. Preemptive caudal ropivacaine: an effective analgesic during degenerative lumbar spine surgery[J]. Asian Spine J, 2017, 11(1): 113-119. DOI:10.4184/asj.2017.11.1.113.

PEDUTO V A, BARONCINI S, MONTANINI S, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of epidural levobupivacaine 0.5% with epidural ropivacaine 0.75% for lower limb procedures[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2003, 20(12): 979-983.

MAGESWARAN R, CHOY Y C. Comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine for infraclavicular brachial plexus block[J]. Med J Malaysia, 2010, 65(4): 300-303.

ALZEFTAWY A E, ELSHEIKH N A. The effect of preemptive ankle block using ropivacaine and dexamethasone on postoperative analgesia in foot surgery[J]. Anesth Essays Res, 2017, 11(2): 372-375. DOI:10.4103/0259-1162.206275.

SAEED M, ANDRABI W I, RABBANI S, et al. The impact of preemptive ropivacaine in inguinal hernioplasty: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 13: 76-79. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.037.

SCHINKEL N, COLBUS L, SOLTNER C, et al. Perineal infiltration with lidocaine 1%, ropivacaine 0.75%, or placebo for episiotomy repair in parturients who received epidural labor analgesia: a double-blind randomized study[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2010, 19(3): 293-297. DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.11.005.

DESHPANDE J P, SAUNDATTIKAR G Y. Lignocaine versus ropivacaine infiltration for postpartum perineal pain[J]. Anesth Essays Res, 2017, 11(2): 300-303. DOI:10.4103/0259-1162.177191.

GUTTON C, BELLEFLEUR J P, PUPPO S, et al. Lidocaine versus ropivacaine for perineal infiltration post-episiotomy[J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2013, 122(1): 33-36. DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.01.028.

BIÇER C, YONTAR Y, GÖKAHMETOǦLU G, et al. Comparison of effects of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine infiltration on cutaneous wound healing in a rat model[J]. J Invest Surg, 2017: 1-6. DOI:10.1080/08941939.2017.1363325.

KOPACZ D J, CARPENTER R L, MACKEY D C. Effect of ropivacaine on cutaneous capillary blood flow in pigs[J]. Anesthesiology, 1989, 71(1): 69-74.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

6~10岁儿童肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞中罗哌卡因的安全有效浓度探索：一项基于序贯法的浓度测定研究

均匀试验设计在利多卡因缓释纳米微球制备中的应用

乳酸-羟基乙酸共聚物缓释纳米微球的制备及体外释药评价

提高大鼠心肌梗死模型成功率及存活率的研究

利多卡因在肝血管瘤介入治疗中的价值