
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
400038 重庆,陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第一附属医院关节外科中心
[ 杨柳,E-mail:jointsurgery@163.comYANG Liu, E-mail: jointsurgery@163.com
收稿:2018-12-15,
修回:2019-01-19,
纸质出版:2019-03-30
移动端阅览
苏眺, 陈光兴, 李静, 等. 关节镜下髋臼盂唇清理及髋臼缘微骨折治疗不可修复性盂唇损伤的临床疗效观察[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2019,41(6):600-607.
Tiao SU, Guangxing CHEN, Jing LI, et al. Therapeutic effect of arthroscopic segmental labral resection combined with microfracture at the rim of the acetabulum for irreparable labral lesions[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(6): 600-607.
苏眺, 陈光兴, 李静, 等. 关节镜下髋臼盂唇清理及髋臼缘微骨折治疗不可修复性盂唇损伤的临床疗效观察[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2019,41(6):600-607. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201812129.
Tiao SU, Guangxing CHEN, Jing LI, et al. Therapeutic effect of arthroscopic segmental labral resection combined with microfracture at the rim of the acetabulum for irreparable labral lesions[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(6): 600-607. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201812129.
目的
2
探讨盂唇清理及髋臼缘微骨折治疗不可修复盂唇损伤的盂唇再生可能性及临床疗效。
方法
2
回顾性分析2014年2月至2016年8月,因不可修复性盂唇损伤于本院关节外科中心行关节镜下盂唇清理伴或不伴髋臼缘微骨折的17例(22髋)患者。男性9例(14髋),女性8例(8髋);年龄23~61(45.6±10.6)岁。术中不可修复盂唇撕裂部分仅行盂唇清理者,为单纯盂唇清理组;除盂唇清理外,在清理后盂唇缺损区域行髋臼缘微骨折者为微骨折组。术后半年以上进行单髋髋臼盂唇放射状MRI检查及仰卧位牵引单髋X线透视检查,判断盂唇缺损区域形态及生理功能的恢复,同时对比术前及术后的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Harris髋关节评分(HHS评分)及HOS-ADL评分评估患者术后的疼痛缓解及髋关节功能恢复情况。
结果
2
17例患者随访时间26~56(35.5±10.6)个月。末次随访,盂唇清理及髋臼缘微骨折患者微骨折区域在术后MRI上均可见低信号组织充填覆盖,牵引透视下患髋可观察到关节负压透亮带的形成;行单纯盂唇清理(节段性切除)的患者术后MRI在相应盂唇缺损区域未观察到低信号组织覆盖,同时牵引透视未观察到患髋中央间室负压透亮带形成。两组术后VAS评分、HHS评分及HOS-ADL评分与术前比较,均有统计学差异(
P
<
0.05),而两组间术前及末次随访的VAS评分、HHS评分及HOS-ADL评分比较,均没有统计学差异。
结论
2
单纯盂唇清理或合并微骨折均可获得盂唇撕裂良好的近中期疗效,但微骨折可恢复盂唇清理后缺损区域的形态及维持负压的生理功能,有利于髋关节远期良好功能的维持,为不可修复性盂唇损伤治疗提供了新的方式。
Objective
2
To explore the clinical outcomes and the possibility of labrum regrowth in patients undergoing arthroscopic segmental labral resection combined with microfracture at the rim of the acetabulum for irreparable labral lesions.
Methods
2
From February
2014 to August
2016
17 patients (including 9 male and 8 female patients with a mean age of 45.6 years
range 23-61 years) with irreparable labral injury involving 22 hips underwent arthroscopic labral resection with or without microfracture at the rim of the acetabulum at our center (microfracture group and resection group
respectively). Single radial hip magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at least 6 months postoperatively was performed to observe the homogeneous low signal in the involved area
and fluoroscopic image of the involved hip under distraction were obtained to evaluate the recovery. Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Hip Outcome Score-Activity of Daily Life (HOS-ADL) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score were assessed both preoperatively and postoperatively to evaluate the functional outcome of the patients.
Results
2
The patients were followed up for 35.5±10.6 months (range
26-56 months) after the surgeries. At the last follow up
single radial hip MRI revealed homogeneous low signal intensity in the area where the labrum was deemed irreparable and resected followed by microf
racture of the remaining acetabular rim in all the patients in the microfracture group; in the resection group
no homogeneous low signal intensity were detected in the defects of the acetabular rim. Obvious vacuum effect was observed in all the fluoroscopic views in patients in the microfracture group
but not in the resection group. Functional assessment of the hip joint showed significant improvement of postoperative HHS
HOS-ADL and VAS scored in both groups (
P
<
0.05) without significant differences between the 2 group.
Conclusion
2
Arthroscopic segmental labral resection with or without microfracture at the rim of acetabulum achieves similar short-term functional outcomes. Marrow stimulation by microfracture recreates a fibrocartilage-like tissue at the labrum defects of the acetabular rim and restores the hydraulic seal effect of the labrum
which helps to preserve the long-term hip function. This surgical approach provides a new treatment option for irreparable labral lesions.
WENGER D E, KENDELL K R, MINER M R, et al . Acetabular labral tears rarely occur in the absence of bony abnormalities[J ] . Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004(426): 145-150.
KIM K C, HWANG D S, LEE C H, et al . Influence of femoroacetabular impingement on results of hip arthroscopy in patients with early osteoarthritis[J ] . Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007, 456: 128-132. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000246542.49574.2c.
BYRD J W, JONES K S. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up[J]. Arthroscopy, 2000, 16(6): 578-587. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2000.7683.
LARSON C M, GIVEANS M R, STONE R M. Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement: mean 3.5-year follow-up[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2012, 40(5): 1015-1021. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511434578.
SCANALIATO J P, CHRISTENSEN D L, SALFITI C, et al . Primary circumferential acetabular labral reconstruction: achieving outcomes similar to primary labral repair des pite more challenging patient characteristics[J ] . Am J Sports Med, 2018, 46(9): 2079-2088. DOI: 10.1177/0363546 518775425.
AAE T F, RANDSBORG P H, LUR S H, et al . Microfracture is more cost-effective than autologous chondrocyte implantation: A review of level 1 and level 2 studies with 5 year follow-up[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(4): 1044-1052. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4802-5.
MANKIN H J. The response of articular cartilage to mechanical injury[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1982, 64(3): 460-466.
FRISBIE D D, OXFORD J T, SOUTHWOOD L, et al . Early events in cartilage repair after subchondral bone microfracture[J ] . Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003(407): 215-227.
GUDAS R, KALESINSKAS R J, KIMTYS V, et al . A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes[J ] . Arthroscopy, 2005, 21(9): 1066-1075. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.06.018.
HOEMANN C D, HURTIG M, ROSSOMACHA E, et al . Chitosan-glycerol phosphate/blood impl ants improve hyaline cartilage repair in ovine microfracture defects[J ] . J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005, 87(12): 2671-2686. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02536.
MITCHELL N, SHEPARD N. The resurfacing of adult rabbit articular cartilage by multiple perforations through the subchondral bone[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1976, 58(2): 230-233.
BUCKWALTER J A. Evaluating methods of restoring cartilaginous articular surfaces[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1999(367 Suppl): S224-S238.
SELDES R M, TAN V, HUNT J, et al . Anatomy, histologic features, and vascularity of the adult acetabular labrum[J ] . Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001(382): 232-240.
PHILIPPON M J, NEPPLE J J, CAMPBELL K J, et al . The hip fluid seal: Part I: the effect of an acetabular labral tear, repair, resection, andreconstruction on hip fluid pressurization[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2014, 22(4): 722-729. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2874-z.
NEPPLE J J, PHILIPPON M J, CAMPBELL K J, et al . The hip fluid seal: Part Ⅱ: The effect of an acetabular labral tear, repair, resection, and reconstruction on hip stability to distractio n[J ] . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2014, 22(4): 730-736. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2875-y.
LARSON C M, GIVEANS M R, STONE R M. Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement: mean 3.5-year follow-up[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2012, 40(5): 1015-1021. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511434578.
MENGE T J, BRIGGS K K, DORNAN G J, et al . Survivorship and outcomes 10 years following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: labral debridement compared with labral repair[J ] . J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2017, 99(12): 997-1004. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01060.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621