
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
400014 重庆,重庆医科大学附属儿童医院胃肠新生儿外科, 儿童发育疾病研究教育部重点实验室,儿童发育重大疾病国家国际科技合作基地,儿科学重庆市重点实验室
[王佚,E-mail:wy757311@hotmail.com WANG Yi, E-mail: wy757311@hotmail.com
收稿:2018-12-12,
修回:2019-02-13,
纸质出版:2019-06-30
移动端阅览
赵焓滨, 侯金平, 侯金凤, 等. 先天性复杂肛门直肠畸形合并脊髓发育异常患儿排便功能的临床研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2019,41(12):1167-1173.
Hanbin ZHAO, Jinping HOU, Jinfeng HOU, et al. Defecatory function in children with congenital complex anorectal malformations complicated by spinal cord dysplasia[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(12): 1167-1173.
赵焓滨, 侯金平, 侯金凤, 等. 先天性复杂肛门直肠畸形合并脊髓发育异常患儿排便功能的临床研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2019,41(12):1167-1173. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201812104.
Hanbin ZHAO, Jinping HOU, Jinfeng HOU, et al. Defecatory function in children with congenital complex anorectal malformations complicated by spinal cord dysplasia[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(12): 1167-1173. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201812104.
目的
2
探讨脊髓发育异常与先天性复杂肛门直肠畸形(anorectal malformations
ARMs)的关系及其对排便功能的影响。
方法
2
回顾性分析2012年10月至2017年2月我科148例经分期手术治疗的ARMs患儿的临床资料,按腰骶部MRI检查结果分为脊髓发育正常组和脊髓发育异常组,分析脊髓发育异常在各类型ARMs中分布的差异及对肛门直肠周围肌肉发育情况、肛门直肠测压和术后排便功能的影响。
结果
2
① 本组148例ARMs患儿中34例(23.0%)检查结果提示脊髓发育异常,包括终丝脂肪变21例(61.8%)、椎管内脂肪瘤7例(20.6%)、脊髓空洞1例(2.9%)、椎管内囊性占位3例(8.8%)、混合型2例(5.9%);②按照Krickenbeck国际分类法对患儿的肛门直肠畸形进行分型,合并有脊髓发育异常的病例包括肛管直肠狭窄1例(占20.0%)、ARMs不伴瘘管5例(25.0%)、ARMs伴复杂直肠会阴瘘1例(20.0%)、ARMs伴直肠尿道球部瘘8例(22.2%)、ARMs伴直肠尿道前列腺部瘘6例(18.2%)、ARMs伴直肠膀胱颈部瘘1例(25.0%)、ARMs伴直肠舟状窝瘘8例(24.2%)、ARMs伴直肠阴道瘘2例(66.7%)、一穴肛2例(22.2%),各病理类型组间脊髓发育异常比例差异无统计学意义(
P
=0.874);③145例患儿在术中进行了肛门直肠周围肌肉发育情况评估,其中有26例肛门直肠周围肌肉发育好、105例发育良、14例发育差,脊髓正常组和异常组间肛门直肠周围肌肉发育差异有统计学意义(
P
=0.005);④44例患儿关瘘术6个月后行肛门直肠测压,脊髓发育正常组和异常组肛管静息压分别为(35.0±14.8)、(27.9±14.3)mmHg(
P
=0.268),脊髓发育正常组直肠肛管抑制反射(rectoanal inhibitory reflex
RAIR)引出率低于脊髓发育异常组(45.9%
vs
71.4%),但差异无统计学意义(
P
=0.412);⑤按修正的Rintal评分量表随访患儿的排便功能,脊髓发育正常组和异常组间排便功能构成比差异无统计学意义(
P
=0.416)。
结论
2
脊髓发育异常与ARMs肛周肌肉发育情况有关,提示ARMs患儿均应常规行腰骶部MRI检查以明确是否合并先天性脊髓发育异常。
Objective
2
To explore the relationship between spinal cord dysplasia and congenital complex anorectal malformations (ARMs) and how they affect the defecatory function in children.
Methods
2
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 148 children undergoing staged surgeries for complex ARMs between October
2012 and February
2017. According to the findings by lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
the children were divided into normal spinal cord group and abnormal spinal cord development group to analyze the distribution of spinal cord dysplasia in different types of ARMs and the impact of anomalies in spinal cord development on the development of the perianal muscles
anorectal manometry
and the defecatory function.
Results
2
Of the 148 children
34 (23.0%)
showed anomalies in spinal cord development
including steatosis of the terminal filament in 21 (61.8%) cases
intraspinal lipoma in 7 (20.6%) cases
syringomyelia in 1 (2.9%) case
intraspinal cystic lesion in 3 (8.8%) cases
and mixed spinal cord anomaly in 2 (5.9%) cases. We classified AMRs into different types according to Krickenbeck international classification
and abnormal spinal cord development was found in 20.0% (1/5) of the patients with rectal stenosis
25.0% (5/20) of the patients with rectal atresia
20.0% (1/5) of the patients with perineal fistula
22.2% (8/36) of the patients with rectobulbar fistula
18.2% (6/33) of the patients with rectoprostatic fistula
25.0% (1/4) of the patients with rectovesical fistula
24.2% (8/33) of the patients with vestibular fistula
66.7%(2/3) of the patients with rectovaginal fistula
and 22.2% (2/9) of the patients with cloaca; No significant difference was found in the incidences of abnormal spinal cord development among the 9 groups (
P
=0.874). A total of 145 patients were evaluated for perianal muscle development during the surgery
and 26 patients had excellent
105 had good
and 14 had poor development; the development of perianal muscles differed significantly between the children with normal and those with abnormal spinal cord development (
P
=0.005). Forty-four patients received anorectal manometry
which Showing no significant difference in resting anal pressure between the children with normal and abnormal spinal cord development (35.0±14.8
vs
27.9±14.3 mmHg
P
=0.268); the positivity rate of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) was lower in normal spinal cord group than in spinal cord dysplasia group (45.9%
vs
71.4%)
but the difference was not statistically significant (
P
=0.412). Follow-up of the patients for defecatory function assessment using the modified Rintal scale showed no significant difference in the constituent ratios of defecatory function bet
ween the 2 groups (
P
=0.416).
Conclusion
2
Spinal cord dysplasia is associated with perianal muscle development in children with complex ARMs
for whom routine lumbosacral MRI should be performed to detect the presence of spinal cord dysplasia.
DEVRIES P A, PEÑA A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 1982, 17(5): 638-643.
HEDLUND H, PEÑA A, RODRIGUEZ G, et al. Long-term anorectal function in imperforate anus treated by a posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: manometric investigation[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 1992, 27(7): 906-909.
RINTALA R, LINDAHL H, MARTTINEN E, et al. Constipation is a major functional complication after internal sphincter-saving posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for high and intermediate anorectal malformations[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 1993, 28(8): 1054-1058.
HOLSCHNEIDER A M, URE B M, PFROMMER W, et al. Innervation patterns of the rectal pouch and fistula in anorectal malformations: A preliminary report[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 1996, 31(3): 357-362.
LEVITT M A, PEÑA A. Outcomes from the correction of anorectal malformations[J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2005, 17(3): 394-401.
NIEVELSTEIN R A, VOS A, VALK J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in children with anorectal malformations: embryologic implications[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2002, 37(8): 1138-1145.
GOLONKA N R, HAGA L J, KEATING R P, et al. Routine MRI evaluation of low imperforate anus reveals unexpected high incidence of tethered spinal cord[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2002, 37(7): 966-969.
BADEMCI G, SAYGUN M, BATAY F, et al. Prevalence of primary tethered cord syndrome associated with occult spinal dysraphism in primary school children in Turkey[J]. Pediatr Neurosurg, 2006, 42(1): 4-13. DOI: 10.1159/000089503.
MCGIRT M J, MEHTA V, GARCES-AMBROSSI G, et al. Pediatric tethered cord syndrome: response of scoliosis to untethering procedures. Clinical article[J]. J Neurosurg Pediatr, 2009, 4(3): 270-274. DOI: 10.3171/2009.4.PEDS08463.
吉士俊.先天性脊髓发育异常的临床表现与治疗原则[J].中国实用儿科杂志, 2006, 21(8): 567-568. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2224.2006.08.004.
JI S J. Clinical manifestation and principles of treatment of congenital spinal cord development abnormalities[J]. Chin J Pract Pediatr, 2006, 21(8): 567-568. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2224.2006.08.004.
HOLSCHNEIDER A, HUTSON J, PEÑA A, et al. Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2005, 40(10): 1521-1526. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.08.002.
RINTALA R J, LINDAHL H. Is normal bowel function possible after repair of intermediate and high anorectal malformations?[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 1995, 30(3): 491-494.
SUPPIEJ A, DAL ZOTTO L, CAPPELLARI A, et al. Tethered cord in patients with anorectal malformation: preliminary results[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2009, 25(10): 851-855. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-009-2435-6.
LI L, LI Z, WANG L Y, et al. Anorectal anomaly: neuropathological changes in the sacral spinal cord[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 1993, 28(7): 880-885.
HERTZLER D A nd, DEPOWELL J J, STEVENSON C B, et al. Tethered cord syndrome: a review of the literature from embryology to adult presentation[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2010, 29(1): E1. DOI: 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1079.
PINTO F C, FONTES R B, LEONHARDT M D E C, et al. Anatomic study of the filum terminale and its correlations with the tethered cord syndrome[J]. Neurosurgery, 2002, 51(3): 725-729; discussion 729-730.
SAFAVI-ABBASI S, MAPSTONE T B, ARCHER J B, et al. History of the current understanding and management of tethered spinal cord[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2016, 25(1): 78-87. DOI: 10.3171/2015.11.SPINE15406.
TEO A T, GAN B K, TUNG J S, et al. Low-lying spinal cord and tethered cord syndrome in children with anorectal malformations[J]. Singapore Med J, 2012, 53(9): 570-576.
KIM S M, CHANG H K, LEE M J, et al. Spinal dysraphism with anorectal malformation: lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of 120 patients[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2010, 45(4): 769-776. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.094.
AOI S, SHIMOTAKE T, TSUDA T, et al. Impaired expression of myogenic regulatory molecules in the pelvic floor muscles of murine embryos with anorectal malformations[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2005, 40(5): 805-809. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.01.047.
BITOH Y, SHIMOTAKE T, SASAKI Y, et al. Development of the pelvic floor muscles of murine embryos with anorectal malformations[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2002, 37(2): 224-227.
蔡威, 孙宁, 魏光辉.小儿外科学[M]. 5版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014: 194-195.
CAI W, SUN N, WEI G H. Pediatric surgery[M]. 5th ed. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2014: 194-195.
MILLER R, BARTOLO D C, ROE A, et al. Anal sensation and the continence mechanism[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1988, 31(6): 433-438.
RAO S S C. Pathophysiology of adult fecal incontinence[J]. Gastroenterology, 2004, 126: S14-S22. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.013.
TSUDA T, IWAI N, KIMURA O, et al. Bowel function after surgery for anorectal malformations in patients with tethered spinal cord[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2007, 23(12): 1171-1174. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-007-2025-4.
KYRKLUND K, PAKARINEN M P, TASKINEN S, et al. Spinal cord anomalies in patients with anorectal malformations without severe sacral abnormalities or meningomyelocele: outcomes after expectant, conservative management[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2016, 25(6): 782-789. DOI: 10.3171/2016.4.SPINE1641.
TOTONELLI G, MORINI F, CATANIA V D, et al. Anorectal malformations associated spinal cord anomalies[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2016, 32(8): 729-735. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-016-3914-1.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621