
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
400014 重庆,重庆医科大学附属儿童医院烧伤整形科,儿童发育疾病研究教育部重点实验室,儿童发育重大疾病国家国际科技合作基地,儿科学重庆市重点实验室
[ 邱林, E-mail:dcliuyan@163.comQIU Lin, E-mail: dcliuyan@163.com
收稿:2018-08-19,
修回:2018-10-22,
纸质出版:2019-03-30
移动端阅览
刘燕, 邱林, 傅跃先, 等. 计算机辅助+3D打印技术在婴儿严重Pierre-Robin综合征下颌骨牵引成骨术中的应用[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2019,41(6):613-617.
Yan LIU, Lin QIU, Yuexian FU, et al. Application of computer aided simulation and three-dimensional printing in mandibular distraction osteogenesis for serious Pierre-Robin syndrome in infants[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(6): 613-617.
刘燕, 邱林, 傅跃先, 等. 计算机辅助+3D打印技术在婴儿严重Pierre-Robin综合征下颌骨牵引成骨术中的应用[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2019,41(6):613-617. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201808130.
Yan LIU, Lin QIU, Yuexian FU, et al. Application of computer aided simulation and three-dimensional printing in mandibular distraction osteogenesis for serious Pierre-Robin syndrome in infants[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(6): 613-617. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201808130.
目的
2
探索婴儿严重Pierre-Robin综合征(Pierre-Robin syndrome
PRS)下颌骨牵引成骨术(mandibular distraction osteogenesis
MDO)的精准操作方法。
方法
2
选取本院2016-2017年收治的严重PRS婴儿10例,男女各5例,术前计算机软件模拟截骨及延长,并3D打印头模验证计算机模拟结果,3D打印个体化截骨模块,预弯延长器,术中指导截骨及安放延长器。术后5 d,以每日1.2 mm的速度进行骨延长治疗,延长至轻度反颌。记录手术时间及出血量、延长长度、术后拔气管插管时间、进食改善情况,延长结束后复查CT,明确舌根至咽后壁距离,并做多导睡眠图(polysomnogram
PSG)测量呼吸暂停低通气指数(apnea hyponea index
AHI)。3个月后,再次手术取出延长器。
结果
2
10例患儿均顺利完成治疗。第1次手术时间为(1.72±0.15)h;出血量(16±3)mL;20侧下颌骨延长长度为(11.11±1.18)mm;术后拔出气管插管时间为(6.10±0.74)d;拔管后开始经口喂养,7 d后8例患儿每日进奶量为(374.0±65.2)mL,2例仍需鼻饲喂养;延长结束后舌根至咽后壁距离为(7.17±0.70)mm;PSG示AHI(1.5±0.6)次。所有患儿牵引区成骨良好;无口角偏斜等面神经损伤症状。面下部后缩显著改善。
结论
2
术前计算机辅助+3D打印技术指导截骨、牵引,能提高严重PRS婴儿MDO中操作的精准性,缩短手术时间,减少出血,并能避免损伤重要解剖结构,是严重PRS婴儿MDO的精准操作方法。
Objective
2
To establish a high-precision surgical approach for mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) for treatment of serious Pierre-Robin syndrome (PRS) in infants.
Methods
2
Ten infants with serious PRS were enrolled in this study. Before the operation
osteotomy and distraction were simulated using computer software
followed by three-dimensional (3D) printing of the head model for verifying the simulation results. After the verification
the individualized osteotomy template and bended distractor were constructed using a 3D printer to assist in subsequent osteotomy and fixation of the distractor. Five days after the operation
the distraction started at a daily rate of 1.2 mm until mild anterior crossbite occurred. The operative time
blood loss
distracted length
postoperative tracheal intubation time
and improvement of eating behavior after the operation were recorded. After the distraction
all the infants underwent CT examination for measurement of the distance from the tongue root to the posterior pharyngeal wall; they also received polysomnogram (PSG) examination to determine the apnea hyponea index (AHI). The distractors were removed surgically at 3 months after the operation.
Results
2
The operations were completed successfully in all the 10 infants. The mean operative time of the first operation was 1.72±0.15 h with a mean blood loss of 16±3 mL; the mandibular distraction distance on 20 sides averaged 11.11±1.18 mm. The postoperative endotracheal intubation time was 6.10±0.74 d. After the extubation
8 infants started oral feeding
and their daily milk intake reached 374.0±65.2 mL 7 d later while the other 2 infants still required nasal feeding. After the distraction
the mean distance from the tongue root to the posterior pharyngeal wall was 7.17±0.70 mm. PSG showed AHI of 1.5±0.6 in these infants. All the infants had good osteogenesis in the distraction area without symptoms of facial nerve injury and showed significant improvement in the lower part of the face.
Conclusion
2
For infants with serious PRS
computer aided simulation combined with 3D printing for guiding osteotomy and distraction not only improves the surgical precision of MDO and shortens the operative time
but also avoids damages to important anatomical structures during the surgery.
GANGOPADHYAY N, MENDONCA D A, WOOA S. Pierre robin sequence[J]. Semin Plast Surg, 2012, 26(2): 76-82. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1320065.
BREUGEM C C, MINK VAN DER MOLEN A B. What is 'Pierre Robin sequence'[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2009, 62(12): 1555-1558. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.050.
JAKOBSEN L P, KNUDSEN M A, LESPINASSE J, et al .The genetic basis of the Pierre Robin Sequence[J ] . Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2006, 43(2): 155-159. DOI: 10.1597/05-008.1.
CÔTÉ A, FANOUS A, ALMAJED A, et al .Pierre Robin sequence: review of diagnostic and treatment challenges[J ] . Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2015, 79(4): 451-464. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.01.035.
GÖZV A, GENÜ B, PALABIYIK M, et al . Airway management in neonates with Pierre Robin sequence[J ] . Turk J Pediatr, 2010, 52(2): 167-172.
VENDITTELLI B L, DEC W, WARREN S M, et al .The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of bilateral mandibular distraction[J ] . Plast Reconstr Surg, 2008, 122(4): 1144-1153. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181 85d596.
GATENO J, ALLEN M E, TEICHGRAEBER J F, et al .An in vitro study of the accuracy of a new protocol for planning distraction osteogenesis of the mandible[J ] . J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2000, 58(9): 985-990. DOI: 10.1053/joms.2000.8740..
COLE A, LYNCH P, SLATOR R. A new grading of Pierre Robin sequence[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2008, 45(6): 603-606. DOI: 10.1597/07-129.1.
赵竟伊, 靳小雷.下颌骨牵引成骨技术在婴幼儿Pierre Robin序列征治疗中的应用进展[J].中华整形外科杂志, 2014, 30(2): 157-160. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-4598.2013.02.25.
ZHAO J Y, JIN X L. Application progress of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of infants with Pierre Robin syndrome[J]. Chin J Plastic Surg, 2014, 30(2): 157- 160. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-4598.2013.02.25.
CHING J A, DAGGETT J D, ALVAREZ S A, et al . A simple mandibular distraction protocol to avoid tracheostomy in patients with Pierre Robin sequence[J ] . Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2017, 54(2): 210-215. DOI: 10.1597/14-211.
RACHMIEL A, EMODI O, RACHMIEL D, et al . Internal mandibular distraction to relieve airway obstruction in children with severe micrognathia[J ] . Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 43(10): 1176-1181. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.06.013.
SAHOO N K, ROY I D, DALAL S, et al .Distraction osteogenesis for management of severe OSA in Pierre Robin sequence: an approach to elude tracheostomy in infants[J ] . J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2016, 15(4): 501-505. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-016-0888-4.
MACKAY D R. Controversies in the diagnosis and management of the Robin sequence[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2011, 22(2): 415-420. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182074799.
COLLARES M V, DUARTE D W, SOBRAL D S, et al . Neonatal mandibular distraction osteogenesis reduces cleft palate widthand lengthens soft palate, influencing palatoplasty in patients with Pierre Robin sequence[J ] . J Craniofac Surg, 2016, 27(5): 1267-1272. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.00000000 00002752.
李阳, 伊彪, 王兴, 等.三维头模设计及个体化模板引导技术在OSAHS患者下颌骨牵引成骨术中的应用[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志, 2014, 21(2): 95-99. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5760.2014.02.009.
LI Y, YI B, WANG X, et al . Application of 3D head mold planning and individualized templates in mandibular distraction[J ] . Chin J Orthodont, 2014, 21(2): 95-99. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5760.2014.02.009.
SŁOWIŃSKI J J, CZARNECKA A. Numerical modeling of the traction process in the treatment for Pierre-Robin sequence[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2016, 89: 86-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.07.030.
METZGER M C, HOHLWEG-MAJERT B, SCHWARZ U, et al . Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer[J ] . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 105(2): e1-e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.040.
COHEN A, LAVIV A, BERMAN P, et al . Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology[J ] . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009, 108(5): 661-666. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.023.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621