浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
负性认知加工偏向问卷在军人群体中的信效度评价
Assessment of reliability and validity of Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire in military personnel
- 第三军医大学学报 2018年40卷第18期 页码：1619-1623
- 作者机构：
400038重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系行为医学教研室
- 作者简介：
[ 冯正直，E-mail:fzz@tmmu.edu.cn FENG Zhengzhi, E-mail: fzz@tmmu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：国家自然科学基金面上项目(31640036);；陆军军医大学医学心理系军事心理青年创新项目(XY2017203)
DOI：10.16016/j.1000-5404.201805075
中图分类号： R395.1;R821.2收稿：2018-05-10，
修回：2018-06-30，
纸质出版：2018-09-30
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
闫晓钒, 冯正直. 负性认知加工偏向问卷在军人群体中的信效度评价[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018,40(18):1619-1623.
Xiaofan YAN, Zhengzhi FENG. Assessment of reliability and validity of Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire in military personnel[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(18): 1619-1623.
闫晓钒, 冯正直. 负性认知加工偏向问卷在军人群体中的信效度评价[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018,40(18):1619-1623. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201805075.
Xiaofan YAN, Zhengzhi FENG. Assessment of reliability and validity of Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire in military personnel[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(18): 1619-1623. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201805075.
摘要
目的
2
将自编负性认知加工偏向问卷施测于军人群体，以进一步探索问卷的结构及信度。
方法
2
通过问卷调查法，对某部4 631名军人进行测查。并对所收集数据进行统计分析，以检测负性认知加工偏向问卷的结构以及信度指标。
结果
2
最终保留问卷的13个题项，删除负性解释偏向这一维度的题项，保留负性注意偏向、负性记忆偏向、负性沉思偏向3个维度，3个维度共可解释总问卷60.78%的变异；模型拟合指标都在标准范围之内(RMSEA=0.05，GFI=0.974，NFI=0.967，CFI=0.970，IFI=0.970)。问卷及各维度的内部一致性信度在0.79～0.89之间，各维度之间及其与总分之间呈正相关(
r
为0.57～0.89，
P
<
0.01)，各维度及总分与流调中心用抑郁量表总分呈正相关(
r
为0.41～0.53，
P
<
0.01)。
结论
2
经过删减后的负性认知加工偏向问卷在军人群体中的测量具有良好的信效度。
Abstract
Objective
2
To examine the reliability and validity of the Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire (NCPBQ) in military personnel.
Methods
2
A total of 4 631 military personnel were tested using the NCPBQ
Center for Epidemiological Survey-Depression Scale (CES-D)
and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The collected data were statistically analyzed to assess the structure and reliability of the NCPBQ.
Results
2
The final version of NCPBQ included 13 items in 3 dimensions covering negative attention bias
negative memory bias and negative rumination bias. These 3 dimensions accounted for 60.78% of the total variance of the questionnaire. The 3-dimension model fitting indexes of NCPBQ were within the standard range (RMSEA=0.05
GFI=0.974
NFI=0.967
CFI=0.970
and IFI=0.970). The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total questionnaire score and the scores of the 3 dimensions ranged from 0.79 to 0.89. The scores for negative attention bias
negative memory bias
and negative rumination bias all showed significant positive correlations with the total score of the questionnaire (
r
=0.57～0.89
P
<
0.01). The CES-D score was positively correlated with the total NCPBQ score and the scores for negative attention bias
negative memory bias and negative rumination bias (
r
=0.41～0.53
P
<
0.01).
Conclusion
2
The NCPBQ is of high reliability and validity for measurement among military personnel after appropriate modification.
关键词
Keywords
references
闫晓钒, 张睿, 冯正直.负性认知加工偏向问卷的研制[J].第三军医大学学报, 2017, 39(23): 2329-2334. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201707160.
YAN X F, ZHANG R, FENG Z Z. Development of negative cognitive processing bias questionnaire[J]. J Third Mil Med Univ, 2017, 39(23): 2329-2334. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201707160.
KOSTER E H, HOORELBEKE K. Cognitive bias modification for depression[J]. Curr Opin Psychol, 2015, 4: 119-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc. 2014.11.012.
WATKINS E. Psychological treatment of depressive rumination[J]. Curr Opin Psychol, 2015, 4: 32-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.020.
LEMOGNE C, MAYBERG H, BERGOUIGNAN L, et al . Self-referential processing and the prefrontal cortex over the course of depression: a pilot study[J ] . J Affect Disord, 2010, 124(1/2): 196-201. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.003.
周敏, 胡治国.抑郁症患者自我相关加工的fMRI研究现状[J].中国医学影像技术, 2014, 30(1): 149-152. DOI: 10.13929/j.1003-3289.2014.01.033.
ZHOU M, HU Z G. Status of fMRI studies on abnormalities of self-related processing in depression[J]. Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2014, 30(1): 149-152. DOI: 10.13929/j.1003-3289.2014.01.033.
FOSSATI P. Is major depression a cognitive disorder?[J]. Rev Neurol-France, 2018, 174(4): 212-215. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.01.365.
EVERAERT J, PODINA I R, KOSTER E H W. A comprehensive meta-analysis of interpretation biases in depression[J]. Clin Psychol Rev, 2017, 58: 33-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.005.
CHEN S, YAO N, QIAN M, et al . Attentional biases in high social anxiety using a flanker task[J ] . J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 2016, 51: 27-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep. 2015.12.002.
ROZENMAN M, AMIR N, WEERSING V R. Performance-based interpretation bias in clinically anxious youths: relationships with attention, anxiety, and negative cognition[J]. Behav Ther, 2014, 45(5): 594-605. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.03.009.
魏威, 谢庆斌, 朱晶晶, 等.儿童执行功能量表在中国学前儿童中的信效度分析[J].中国临床心理学杂质, 2018, 26(1): 26-29. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.01.006.
WEI W, XIE Q B, ZHU J J, et al . The psychometric characteristics of childhood executive functioning inventory among Chinese preschoolers[J ] . Chin J Clin Psy, 2018, 26(1): 26-29. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.01.006.
RADLOFF L S. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population[J]. App Psychol Measure, 1977, 3(1): 385-401.
郑晓华, 李延知.状态-特质焦虑问卷[J].中国心理卫生杂志, 1997, 11(4): 219-220.
ZHENG X H, LI Y Z. State trait anxiety inventory[J]. Chin J Ment Heal, 1997, 11(4): 219-220.
徐媛媛, 谢守蓉, 李丽, 等.情绪调节方式在军人幸福感促进心理健康中的作用[J].第三军医大学学报, 2017, 39(15): 1520-1524. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201704040.
XU Y Y, XIE S R, LI L, et al . Happiness promotes mental health among military personnel:mediation effect of emotion regulation types[J ] . J Third Mil Med Univ, 2017, 39(15): 1520-1524. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201704040.
吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2013: 483-493.
WU M L. Practice of statistical analysis of questionnaire: SPSS operation and application[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2013: 483-493.
温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报, 2004, 36(2): 186-194.
WEN Z L, HAU K T, MARSH H W, Structural equation model testing:cutoff criteria for goodness of fit indices and chi-square test[J]. J Acta Psychol Sinica, 2004, 36(2): 186-194.
NAIM R, KIVITY Y, BAR-HAIM Y, et al . Attention and interpretation bias modification treatment for social anxiety disorder: A randomized clinical trial of efficacy and synergy[J ] . J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 2018, 59: 19-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.10.006.
LICHTENSTEIN-VIDNE L, OKON-SINGER H, COHEN N, et al . Attentional bias in clinical depression and anxiety: The impact of emotionaland non-emotional distracting information[J ] . Biol Psychol, 2017, 122: 4-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho. 2016.07.012.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies
