前置胎盘患者深层植入的临床特征分析

罗莉; 孙秋蕾; 应德美; 吴晓华; 谢荣凯; 陈正琼

doi:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201803102

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

前置胎盘患者深层植入的临床特征分析

临床医学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 前置胎盘患者深层植入的临床特征分析
- Clinical characteristics of placenta increta and percreta in patients with placenta previa
- 第三军医大学学报 2018年40卷第18期页码：1688-1692
- 作者机构：
  
  400037 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第二附属医院妇产科
- 作者简介：
  
  [ 陈正琼，E-mail:chenzhengqiong75@163.com CHEN Zhengqiong, E-mail:chenzhengqiong75@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第二附属医院院管课题研究基金(2016YLC28)
- DOI：10.16016/j.1000-5404.201803102
  中图分类号： R181.32;R714.462;R714.56
- 收稿：2018-03-14，
  
  修回：2018-05-15，
  
  纸质出版：2018-09-30
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
罗莉, 孙秋蕾, 应德美, 等. 前置胎盘患者深层植入的临床特征分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018,40(18):1688-1692.

Li LUO, Qiulei SUN, Demei YING, et al. Clinical characteristics of placenta increta and percreta in patients with placenta previa[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(18): 1688-1692.
罗莉, 孙秋蕾, 应德美, 等. 前置胎盘患者深层植入的临床特征分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018,40(18):1688-1692. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201803102.

Li LUO, Qiulei SUN, Demei YING, et al. Clinical characteristics of placenta increta and percreta in patients with placenta previa[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(18): 1688-1692. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201803102.

摘要

目的

探索前置胎盘患者深层植入(肌层植入及穿透性植入)的临床特征从而指导临床治疗并改善临床结局。

方法

回顾性分析我院4年间诊断为前置胎盘的患者571例。采用单因素及Logistic回归分析临床特征与深层植入间的关系，采用受试者工作(ROC)曲线评估各临床特征对深层植入的诊断敏感度及特异度。

结果

剖宫产次数每增加1次，胎盘深层植入的风险就增加3.433倍，

=3.433，

0.01。超声发现胎盘陷窝者、胎盘低回声带模糊或消失者、膀胱-子宫间隙血供增加者胎盘深层植入的风险的

值及

值分别为:

=5.047

0.01;

=2.913

=0.008;

=2.838

0.05。

结论

前置胎盘患者有2次以上剖宫产史，超声发现胎盘陷窝、胎盘后低回声模糊或消失、膀胱子宫间隙血供增多者发生深层植入的风险增加，应有针对性地设计围术期多学科团队协作方案以改善临床结局。

Abstract

Objective

To explore the clinical characteristics of placenta increta and percreta in patients with placenta previa to improve the clinical treatment and the patients' outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 571 patients with an ultrasound diagnosis of placenta previa at our center over a 4-year period. Univariate and logistic regression were used to explore the correlations between the clinical features of the patients and placental invasion

and the receiver operating (ROC) curve was used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of each clinical feature for the diagnosis of placenta increta and percreta.

Results

For each increase in the number of cesarean sections

the risk of placenta increta and percreta increased by 3.433 times (

=3.433

=0.000). The risk of placenta increta and percreta was increased significantly in patients with placenta lacunae (

=5.047

=0.000)

obscuration or disappearance of the retroplacental hypoechoic zone (

=2.913

=0.008)

and hypervascular bladder-uterine interface (

=2.838

=0.005).

Conclusion

The patients with placenta previa who have a history of 2 or more cesarean sections and ultrasound findings of placental lacunae

obscuration or disappearance of the retroplacental hypoechoic zone

and hypervascular bladder-uterine interface are at increased risks of placenta increta and percreta

and individualized perioperative care management involving multidisciplinary teams should be implemented for these patients to improve their outcomes.

关键词

Keywords

references

WOLDU S L, ORDONEZ M A, DEVINE P C, et al . Urologic considerations of placenta accreta: a contemporary tertiary care institutional experience[J ] . Urol Int, 2014, 93(1): 74- 79. DOI: 10.1159/000356064.

PATHER S, STROCKYJ S, RICHARDS A, et al . Maternal outcome after conservative management of placenta percreta at caesarean section: a report of three cases and a review of the literature[J ] . Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2014, 54(1): 84-87. DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12149.

WU S, KOCHERGINSKY M, HIBBARD J U. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 192(5): 1458-1461. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.074.

BALAYLA J, BONDARENKO H D. Placenta accreta and the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes[J]. J Perinat Med, 2013, 41(2): 141-149. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0219.

DE LA CRUZ C Z, THOMPSON E L, O'ROURKE K, et al . Cesarean section and the risk of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in high-income countries: a systematic review[J ] . Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015, 292(6): 1201-1215. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3790-2.

SILVER R M, LANDON M B, ROUSE D J, et al .Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries[J ] . Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 107(6): 1226-1232. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84.

GULERIA K, GUPTA B, AGARWAL S, et al . Abnormally invasive placenta: changing trends in diagnosis and management[J ] . Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2013, 92(4): 461-464. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12083.

BOWMAN Z S, ELLER A G, KENNEDY A M, et al . Accuracy of ultrasound for the prediction of placenta accreta[J ] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 211(2): 177-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.029.

TAM TAM K B, DOZIER J, MARTIN J N Jr. Approaches to reduce urinary tract injury during management of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta: a systematic review[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2012, 25(4): 329-334. DOI: 10. 3109/14767058.2011.576720.

WEI Q, ZHANG W, CHEN M, et al . Peripartum hyste-rectomy in 38 hospitals in China: a population-based study[J ] . Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2014, 289(3): 549-553. DOI: 10.1007/s00404- 013-3002-x.

COLMORN L B, PETERSEN K B, JAKOBSSON M, et al . The nordic obstetric surveillance study: a study of complete uterine rupture, abnormally invasive placenta, peripartum hysterectomy, and severe blood loss at delivery[J ] . Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2015, 94(7): 734-744. DOI: 10. 1111/aogs.12639.

WEINIGER C F, KABIRI D, GINOSAR Y, et al . Suspect-ed placenta accreta and cesarean hysterectomy: observational cohort utilizing an intraoperative decision strategy[J ] . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2016, 198: 56-61. DOI: 10. 1016/j.ejogrb.2015.12.020.

CLAUSEN C, LÖNN L, LANGHOFF-ROOS J. Management of placenta percreta: a review of published cases[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2014, 93(2): 138-143. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12295.

DANISMAN N, BASER E, TOGRUL C, et al . Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: experience of a major referral hospital in Ankara, Turkey[J ] . J Obstet Gynaecol, 2015, 35(1): 19-21. DOI: 10. 3109/01443615.2014.935712.

O'BRIEN J M, BARTON J R, DONALDSON E S. The management of placenta percreta: conservative and operative strategies[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 175(6): 1632-1638. DOI: 10.1016/s0002- 9378(96)70117-5.

MILLER D A, CHOLLET J A, GOODWIN T M. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 177(1): 210-214. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70463-0.

DEMIRCI O, TUGǦRUL A S, YILMAZ E, et al . Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary obstetric center: nine years evaluation[J ] . J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2011, 37(8): 1054-1060. DOI: 10. 1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01484.x.

ALFIREVIC Z, TANG A W, COLLINS S L, et al . Pro forma for ultrasound reporting in suspected abnormally invasive placenta (AIP): an international consensus[J ] . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 47(3): 276-278. DOI: 10.1002/uog.15810.

RITEAU A S, TASSIN M, CHAMBON G, et al . Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta[J ] . PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(4): e94866. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094866.

BLANCHETTE H. The rising cesarean delivery rate in America: what are the consequences[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 118(3): 687-690. DOI: 10. 1097/AOG.0b013e318227b8d9.

FITZPATRICK K E, SELLERS S, SPARK P, et al . The management and outcomes of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta in the UK: a population-based descriptive study[J ] . BJOG, 2014, 121(1): 62-70; discussion 70-1. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12405.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

胚胎着床位置对前置胎盘的预测价值及相关影响因素分析