浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
后腹腔镜联合经肾盂输尿管软镜治疗巨大多发性鹿角形肾结石的临床研究
Clinical study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with transpyevic flexible ureteroscopy in treatment of multiple large staghorn calculi
- 第三军医大学学报 2018年40卷第15期 页码：1419-1423
- 作者机构：
1.400037 重庆, 陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第二附属医院泌尿外科
2.614000 四川 乐山, 武警四川省总队医院泌尿外科
- 作者简介：
[ 刘京, E-mail:lj717@aliyun.com LIU Jing, E-mail:lj717@aliyun.com
- 基金信息：
DOI：10.16016/j.1000-5404.201801081
中图分类号： R454;R692;R699.2收稿：2018-01-10，
修回：2018-05-02，
纸质出版：2018-08-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘京, 肖亚. 后腹腔镜联合经肾盂输尿管软镜治疗巨大多发性鹿角形肾结石的临床研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018,40(15):1419-1423.
Jing LIU, Ya XIAO. Clinical study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with transpyevic flexible ureteroscopy in treatment of multiple large staghorn calculi[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(15): 1419-1423.
刘京, 肖亚. 后腹腔镜联合经肾盂输尿管软镜治疗巨大多发性鹿角形肾结石的临床研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018,40(15):1419-1423. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201801081.
Jing LIU, Ya XIAO. Clinical study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with transpyevic flexible ureteroscopy in treatment of multiple large staghorn calculi[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(15): 1419-1423. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201801081.
摘要
目的
2
探讨后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术联合经肾盂输尿管软镜治疗巨大多发性鹿角形肾结石的临床应用效果。
方法
2
回顾性分析2014年9月至2017年9月在陆军军医大学（第三军医大学）第二附属医院接受后腹腔镜联合经肾盂输尿管软镜治疗巨大多发性鹿角形肾结石的47例患者临床资料，其中男性29例，女性18例，年龄28～67岁，平均45岁。左肾结石27例，右肾结石20例；肾外型肾盂20例，肾内型肾盂27例；肾盂结石合并2个肾盏结石23例，肾盂结石合并3个及以上肾盏结石24例；每例病例患者结石数量均≥3枚；每例病例单枚肾盂结石最大直径1.9～4.3 cm，平均2.9 cm。术中所有患者先行后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术取出鹿角形结石肾盂内部分，残余结石由输尿管软镜经肾盂切口置入集合系统内取出或粉碎。统计手术并发症、手术时间、出血量及一期结石清除率，术后常规随访3个月了解结石复发情况。
结果
2
47例手术均顺利完成，无死亡或严重并发症。手术时间为（123±12）min，其中输尿管软镜操作时间为（34±9）min，手术出血量（76±18）mL。44例（93.62%）患者一期取净结石；2例（4.26%）患者术后残余结石最大直径≤3 mm，保守治疗（大量饮水联合口服盐酸坦索罗辛）2周后排尽结石；1例（2.13%）术后残余结石最大直径5 mm，保守治疗2周无效，体外冲击波碎石联合保守治疗2周后排尽结石。随访3个月结石无复发。
结论
2
后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石联合经肾盂输尿管软镜治疗巨大、多发性鹿角形肾结石安全高效，结石一期清除率高。
Abstract
Objective
2
To explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with transpyevic flexible ureteroscopy in treatment of multiple large staghorn calculi.
Methods
2
Clinical data of 47 patients with multiple large staghorn calculi
who underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with flexible ureteroscopy from September 2014 to September 2017 in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University) were collected and retrospective analyzed. They were 29 males and 18 females
and at an average age of 45 (28 to 67) years. There were 27 cases of left kidney stones and 20 cases of right kidney stones
20 cases of intrarenal pelvis kidney and 27 cases of extrarenal pelvis kidney
and 23 cases of pelvic calculi with 2 calyceal calculi
and 24 cases of pelvic calculi with 3 or more calyceal calculi. In these patients
the average number of stones was more than 3
and the calculi had a maximal diameter of 1.9 to 4.3 cm
averagely 2.9 cm. All patients received retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy to remove pelvic calculi
followed by transpyevic flexible ureteroscopy for removal of residual calculi fragments. Complications
operation time
bleeding volume and stone-free rate after single surgery were counted and analyzed. All these cases were followed up to observe recurrence after 3 months.
Results
2
The surgery was completed successfully in all the 47 cases
with no death or serious complications observed. The operation time was 123±12 min while the time of ureteroscopic application was 34±9 min
and the blood loss was 76±18 mL. Calculi were removed completely in 44 cases (93.62%). Two patients (4.26%) had residual stones (≤ 3 mm) and got stone free in 2 weeks later after conventional therapy (large amount of drinking water and oral administration of tanzosoria hydrochloride)
and 1 patient (2.13%) who had residual stones in maximal size of 5 mm had to underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy after 2 weeks of conventional therapy
and then got stone-free in another 2 weeks later. No recurrence was seen during the 3 months' follow-up.
Conclusion
2
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with transpyelvic flexible ureteroscopy is safe and efficient
and with high stone-free rate after single surgery in treatment of multiple large staghorn calculi.
关键词
Keywords
references
王磊, 徐学军, 尹海军, 等.微创经皮肾镜钬激光碎石术与开放性肾切开取石术治疗复杂性肾结石临床疗效比较[J].中国内镜杂志, 2014, 20(1):72-75.
WANG L, XU X J, YIN H J, et al . Comparative study on clinical effect of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with holmiu m laser lithotripsy and open renal lithotomy treatment for complex renal calculi[J ] . China J Endoscopy, 2014, 20(1):72-75.
LU P, WANG Z, SONG R, et al . The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J ] . Urolithiasis, 2015, 43(3):199-206. DOI:10.1007/s00240-015-0757-5.
AMINSHARIFI A, IRANI D, MASOUMI M, et al . The management of large staghorn renal stones by percutaneous versus laparoscopic versus open nephrolithotomy:a comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and functional outcome[J ] . Urolithiasis, 2016, 44(6):551-557. DOI:10.1007/s00240-016-0877-6.
DE FATA-CHILLON F R, GIMBERNAT-DIAZ H, REDONDO-REDONDO C, et al . Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi:feasibility study[J ] . Arch Esp Urol, 2017, 70(5):542-549.
KIM B S. Recent advancement or less invasive treatment of percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Korean J Urol, 2015, 56(9):614-623. DOI:10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.614.
YANG Z, SONG L, XIE D, et al . The new generation mini-PCNL system-monitoring and controlling of renal pelvic pressure by suctioning device for efficient and safe PCNL in managing renal staghorn calculi[J ] . Urol Int, 2016, 97(1):61-66. DOI:10.1159/000442002.
NG F C, YAM W L, LIM T Y B, et al . Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy:Advantages and limitations[J ] .Investig Clin Urol, 2017, 58(5):346-352. DOI:10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.346.
刘嘉, 薛东炜, 刘屹立, 等.经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂肾结石的疗效观察[J].中国医科大学学报, 2013, 42(7):662-663.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0258-4646.2013.07.023.LIUJ,
XUE D W, LIU Y L, et al . Clinical efficacy of percutaneous nephroscopy combined with flexible ureteroscope in treatment of complex kidney stones[J ] . J Chin Med Univ, 2013, 42(7):662-663. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0258-4646.2013.07.023.
QUARESIMA L, CONTI A, VICI A, et al . Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the Galdakao-Modified Supine Valdivia position:A prospective analysis[J ] .Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2016, 88(2):93-96.DOI:10.4081/aiua.2016.2.93.
SANGUEDOLCE F, BOZZINI G, CHEW B, et al . The evolving role of retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of urolithiasis[J ] .Eur Urol Focus, 2017, 3(1):46-55.DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.007.
李毅, 陈刚, 文爽, 等.输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗长径≥ 2 cm的肾结石68例临床分析[J].第三军医大学学报, 2016, 38(13):1547-1551.DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201512188.LIY,
CHEN G, WEN S, et al . Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater:report of 68 cases[J ] .J Third Mil Med Univ, 2016, 38(13):1547-1551.DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201512188.
KANG S K, CHO K S, KANG D H, et al .Systematic review and meta-analysis to compare success rates of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones > 2 cm:An update[J ] .Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(49):e9119. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000009119.
PALMERO-MARTI J L, PANACH-NAVARRETE J, VALLS-GONZALEZ L, et al . Renal lithiasis, can we predict the need for retreatment in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)?[J ] .Arch Esp Urol, 2017, 70(5):534-541.
AMINSHARIFI A, IRANI D, MASOUMI M, et al . The management of large staghorn renal stones by percutaneous versus laparoscopic versus open nephrolithotomy:a comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and functional outcome[J ] .Urolithiasis, 2016, 44(6):551-557.DOI:10.1007/s00240-016-0877-6.
GLYBOCHKO P V, ALYAEV Y G, RAPOPORT L M, et al . Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and its role in modern surgery of nephrolithiasis[J ] . Urologiia, 2017(4):12-17.
PASTORE A L, PALLESCHI G, SILVESTRI L, et al . Combined laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and endoscopic pyelolithotripsy for staghorn calculi:long-term follow-up results from a case series[J ] . Ther Adv Urol, 2016, 8(1):3-8. DOI:10.1177/1756287215607417.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies
